Jump to content

June 8-12, 2009


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator

If you're going to copy/paste, please link. Thank you.

Numbers are based on Live+Same Day ratings

Ratings for the week June 8-12, 2009

(Compared to Last Week/Compared to Last Year)

Total Viewers

1. Y&R 4,774,000 (-71,000/-10,000)

2. B&B 3,026,000 (-175,000/-568,000) <----- new low (Previous low: 3,201,000 for June 1-5, 2009)

3. DAYS 2,816,000 (+154,000/+263,000)

4. GH 2,634,000 (+131,000/-157,000)

5. OLTL 2,595,000 (+40,000/-58,000)

6. AMC 2,519,000 (+33,000/-17,000)

7. ATWT 2,209,000 (-42,000/-380,000) <----- new low (Previous low: 2,251,000 for June 1-5, 2009)

8. GL 1,810,000 (-43,000/-465,000) <------- new low (Previous low: 1,853,000 for June 1-5, 2009)

HH

1. Y&R 3.4/11 (-.1/-.1) <---- ties low (Last time: November 10-14, 2008)

2. B&B 2.2/7 (-.2/-.4) <----- new low (Previous low: 2.4/8 for June 1-5, 2009)

3. DAYS 2.1/7 (+.1/+.2)

4. GH 1.9/6 (same/-.3)

5. AMC 1.8/6 (same/-.2) <---- ties low (Last time: June 1-5, 2009)

5. OLTL 1.8/6 (-.1/-.3) <---- ties low (Last time: May 25-29, 2009)

7. ATWT 1.6/5 (-.1/-.3) <---- new low (Previous low: 1.7/6 for June 1-5, 2009)

8. GL 1.3/4 (-.1/-.3) <------ new low (Previous low: 1.4/4 for June 1-5, 2009)

Women 18-49 Viewers

1. Y&R 1,086,000 (+3,000/+25,000)

2. GH 881,000 (+57,000/-92,000)

3. DAYS 849,000 (-1,000/+17,000)

4. OLTL 808,000 (-3,000/-72,000)

5. AMC 702,000 (-59,000/-139,000)

6. B&B 664,000 (-40,000/-111,000)

7. ATWT 495,000 (-53,000/-165,000)

8. GL 410,000 (-31,000/-190,000)

Women 18-49 Rating

1. Y&R 1.6/11 (same/same)

2. DAYS 1.3/8 (same/same)

2. GH 1.3/8 (+.1/-.2)

4. OLTL 1.2/8 (same/-.1)

5. AMC 1.1/7 (same/-.2)

6. B&B 1.0/7 (-.1/-.2) <------- ties low (Last time: May 18-22, 2009)

7. ATWT 0.7/5 (-.1/-.3) <------ new low (Previous low: 0.8/5 for June 1-5, 2009)

8. GL 0.6/4 (-.1/-.3) <-------- new low (Previous low: 0.7/4 for June 1-5, 2009)

Girls 12-17 Viewers

1. GH 67,000 (+23,000/+47,000)

2. OLTL 57,000 (+18,000/-1,000)

3. Y&R 50,000 (same/+14,000)

4. AMC 38,000 (+19,000/+13,000)

4. B&B 38,000 (-4,000/+14,000)

4. DAYS 38,000 (-9,000/-41,000)

7. ATWT 31,000 (-4,000/same)

8. GL 24,000 (-4,000/+8,000)

Women 18-34 Rating

1. Y&R 1.1/7 (same/+.1)

1. DAYS 1.1/7 (+.1/same)

3. GH 0.9/6 (same/-.1)

4. OLTL 0.8/5 (-.2/same)

5. AMC 0.7/5 (-.2/same)

6. B&B 0.6/4 (same/-.1)

7. ATWT 0.4/3 (-.2/-.1) <------- ties low

7. GL 0.4/2 (-.1/same)

Men 18+ Viewers

1. Y&R 1,131,000 (-28,000/-9,000)

2. B&B 632,000 (-44,000/-127,000)

3. DAYS 515,000 (-24,000/+40,000)

4. AMC 469,000 (-1,000/+76,000)

5. GH 436,000 (+30,000/-22,000)

5. OLTL 436,000 (-15,000/+21,000)

7. ATWT 399,000 (-36,000/-111,000)

8. GL 372,000 (-8,000/-101,000)

-------------------------------------

Day-To-Day Ratings - HH/Total Viewers

AMC

Monday: 1.8/2,434,000

Tuesday: 1.9/2,624,000

Wednesday: 1.9/2,574,000

Thursday: 1.9/2,481,000

Friday: 1.8/2,480,000

ATWT

Monday: 1.7/2,377,000

Tuesday: 1.6/2,031,000

Wednesday: 1.5/2,094,000

Thursday: 1.6/2,242,000

Friday: 1.7/2,302,000

B&B

Monday: 2.3/3,259,000

Tuesday: 2.1/2,849,000

Wednesday: 2.2/2,878,000

Thursday: 2.1/2,913,000

Friday: 2.3/3,228,000

DAYS

Monday: 2.0/2,786,000

Tuesday: 2.1/2,861,000

Wednesday: 2.3/2,994,000

Thursday: 2.1/2,713,000

Friday: 2.0/2,727,000

GH

Monday: 1.9/2,586,000

Tuesday: 2.0/2,687,000

Wednesday: 1.9/2,614,000

Thursday: 2.0/2,788,000

Friday: 1.9/2,494,000

GL

Monday: 1.2/1,803,000

Tuesday: 1.3/1,739,000

Wednesday: 1.3/1,767,000

Thursday: 1.3/1,834,000

Friday: 1.4/1,906,000

OLTL

Monday: 1.8/2,518,000

Tuesday: 1.9/2,827,000

Wednesday: 1.8/2,557,000

Thursday: 1.9/2,630,000

Friday: 1.8/2,445,000

Y&R

Monday: 3.6/5,166,000

Tuesday: 3.3/4,634,000

Wednesday: 3.4/4,703,000

Thursday: 3.4/4,730,000

Friday: 3.4/4,636,000

----------------------

For the SEASON September 22, 2008 through June 14, 2009

HH

1. Y&R 3.8

2. B&B 2.6

3. DAYS 2.2

3. GH 2.2

5. AMC 2.0

5. ATWT 2.0

5. OLTL 2.0

8. GL 1.6

Women 18-49 Rating

1. Y&R 1.8

2. DAYS 1.5

2. GH 1.5

4. OLTL 1.3

5. B&B 1.2

5. AMC 1.2

7. ATWT 1.0

8. GL 0.8

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 114
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Here is a god explanation to your question, from TV BY THE NUMBERS

Nielsen Says 2.5 Million Households Without TV, I Say Don’t Jump To Conclusions About Ratings Effects

Posted on 17 June 2009 by Bill Gorman

In its latest study out today, Nielsen estimates that 2.5 million US households cannot receive digital television signals and so are without TV entirely.

You can debate the validity of that number, it does fly in the face of the relatively few calls to FCC call centers set up to receive calls about the analog shut off, but correct or not, I don’t think there’s any other numbers out there to compare it with.

What I find interesting are the stories that are beginning to pop up about how ratings have or have not been effected by the analog shut off.

I’m not sure you can draw any conclusions about ratings effects at this point because of the way Nielsen measures ratings.

Nielsen gathers its national ratings data from approximately 20,000 households equipped with people meters. While Nielsen does its best to mirror the US population demographically, it seems to me that simply being a Nielsen “family” implies a certain level of self selection.

If you have enough of a clue to manage being a Nielsen family, that implies to me that you’re less likely to have been been caught by surprise by the analog shut off, and are more likely than average to be prepared.

The folks who got caught by the cut off are the least aware or the most procrastinating or disadvantaged in some other way that would likely keep them off people meters as well. So, I won’t be drawing any conclusions about how the ratings have or haven’t been effected by the shut off for awhile (maybe a long while), until there’s a lot more information

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

All this Neilsen talk and recount talk...

I love ratings and quantification, obviously. But what a dreadful business, to be in Neilsen's shoes. It is very, very easy to make errors here...and it is very easy to fix them. But the ratings have become so politicized (because of the revenue implications) that their poor statisticians must require diapers before releasing every little number.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The switch from analog to digital is a one time thing and ABC caught the error. Every time Nielsen has the occasional screw up, it is made into a big deal. Anyone who does statistics knows that errors can occur, but the fact is that they rarely do occur, especially when a company like Nielsen has teams of statisticians working on the numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

GH has really turned it around and I think when GH does well ABC Daytime does well, the same can be said for AMC as its the lead-in show and its ironic that ever since AMC struggled around 2006 that's when the rest of the lineup suffered so I think AMC has to get back on board here for the lineup.

I can't believe DAYS is losing Chelsea as that might be a small blow for them.

As for GL it seems like their waiting on ATWT to end its run over on CBS so they could get their package deal in place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

Can't do the ratings now but.....

- ATWT hit new lows in HH, Total Viewers, 18-49 Rating

- B&B hit new lows in HH, Total Viewers

- GL hit new lows in HH, Total Viewers, 18-49 Rating

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • That's a good point: if a show's state is not mentioned for many years, it's easier for the revolving door of never-ending newbies in charge to miss out on or get confused about previously-established facts.
    • IMO I get a brotherly/sisterly vibe from Kat/Jacob
    • Yes, the locale officially switched to Illinois in the early-1980s.  But I was watching daily during the entire Lemay era, and I'm fairly confident Bay City was never referenced as being in Michigan in any of Lemay's scripts. Agreed, Lemay did care about AW's past -- and used the past as subtext for many characters.  But it is unfortunate he chose never to mention (or perhaps was unaware of) the Michigan connection.  So by not mentioning it, this may be when that connection was lost for TPTB.   
    • Marquita Goings' wig was going to same a week or two ago.
    • Forgot to post something here

      Please register in order to view this content

        King of the Hill Voice Actor Johnathan Joss was gunned down and shot dead this past Sunday at 59 years old in Texas.  Here's the video of someone recording Joss' last moments before he was murdered.  This Monday past, the suspect turned himself to the police station and currently placed on house arrest until his Trial on August. 
    • I was hoping the Articulettes  would be more like Klymaxx then the Supremes.  Talk about inspiration for a soapy type of stories  (one of the bandmates tried to use the name in order to perform, internal fighting over who was the lead, and the same bandmate that tried to use the name of the group tried to include their name as a song writer... and almost got an award for songwriting). I could see Sharon/Tracy/Anita fighting over all that... and Sharon trying to use the name Articulettes in order to perform and big bad bully Anita and Vernon block it from happening. Shanice is like Amy Vining... but BTG... Amy Vining had a life beyond the nurses station.
    • I don't believe Lemay was the one who negated the fact that the show was originally set in Michigan. Aside from a few curious character mutations, he did seem to care about the past. I think AW switched the local to Illinois in the 1980s or later. I don't think TPTB always knew or remembered the past well enough to give new headwriters full accurate information, anyway. Lemay wrote a story about Pat Randolph killing a predator named Greg Bernard who was targeting her daughter. The writer referred to a teenaged Pat killing her boyfriend (Tom Baxter) by stabbing him, as she later killed Greg. But in reality, Pat had shot Tom with a gun, so TPTB were lax in knowing or correctly relating established facts to the current scribe. Is the specific murder weapon of a long-gone character a vital component 15 years after the fact? Probably not to most viewers, but for those who had been watching way back when, little mistakes like this can be grating. I'm not devastated that AW changed Bay City's home state along the way, but I see this as another grating point that a little research could have prevented. Soap viewers have loooooong memories, LOL!
    • Ooopphh , I just watched my recording and thought, what's going on there. 
    • Yes I was watching AW during that time, but I was very young.  So might have missed the references you mentioned. The late 1960s and early 1970s would have been during the Nixon and Cenedella head-writing eras.  Assuming you are correct, I'm quite surprised (and disappointed) Harding Lemay did not continue the Michigan references.  Especially since he was raised in a far northern region of a northern state, very very near the Canadian border. And I know he loved writing (either directly or indirectly) about his upbringing in that region. Perhaps no one in the studio ever told Lemay about the Michigan connection.  Who knows??  But I'm sure Lemay would have had a field-day playing all those Michigan references, which would have made his AW even more believable and relevant than it already was.  Such a missed opportunity!!
    • To me, there were some weaker writers on ATWT in the 1980s pre-Marland, but starting in 2000, the advent of the show's associated with Hogan Sheffer and Jean Passanante, the quality plummeted and remained in the toilet for the show's remaining years. It's amazing that so many actors were still able to make a silk purse out of a sow's ear. I just don't think KMS was one of them.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy