Jump to content

Examples of SORASing messing up timelines


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Yeah, but they've cooled that down a bit. He was born on Christmas Day 1979, and was in his late teens by 1989-1990 and married to Emily Ann. He was in his mid/late 20s by the time Michael Lowry started to play him in the mid 90s, so I'd say they've kinda aged him at halftime pace since the late 90s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

GH Birth years:

1977- Steven Lars Webber

1979- AJ Quartermaine

1981- Jason Quartermaine

1986- BJ Jones

1989- Lucas Jones

1989- Tommy Hardy Jr.

1990- Maxie Jones

1992- Dillon Quartermaine Hornsby

1993- Serena Baldwin

1994- Lulu Spencer

1995- Georgie Jones

1996- Brooke Lynn Ashton

1997- Michael Corinthos III

2001- Kristina Davis Corinthos

2003- Morgan Corinthos

2004- Cameron Webber Spencer

2006- Molly Lansing

2007- Jake Spencer

Lucas/Maxie were quickly lumped into the same age category, but things got messy when Georgie jumped up about a year behind Maxie, and Dillon somehow jumped up about 3 years to be in line with Lucas. Lulu was worse because she ended up stuck at adolescence until around 2006, while Georgie, who was born after Lulu, was aged much earlier in 2002. Brooke Lynn became part of that same bracket despite 6 years between the Maxie/Brooke Lynn births. It seems now that Michael and Lulu are proportionate ages, but Kristina's just outrageous because she's at LEAST 16 when she was only born 8 years ago. So she's aged twice as fast, while pictures I've seen of the upcoming Molly Lansing place her at what, 10, when she was born three years ago.

Tommy Hardy was born the same year as Lucas in 89, but he's been off the canvas since about 1997, so who knows how old he'd be if they brought that character back.

Sarah and Liz Webber had to have been born sometime between 1981 and 1986 for their ages to line up with characters like Jason and Lucky, but does anyone know what the age difference was supposed to be between BJ and Lucky? BJ died in 1994, but Lucky was already on canvas in 1993, though I feel Lucky was portrayed as older.

Liz's kids are due for aging as well, since they're mixed in there with Morgan and Molly, who have just been aged... but I somehow doubt they'll age Liz's children for a while.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

BJ would be however old Maxie is, within a year. So now Lucky would be a good few years older than her, and at the time of her death i think he was a few years older than her too.

I dont see Liz's kids getting aged anytime soon either.

Also, for the record, how old is Kristina? Do we know? I am thinking they are going for 15.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah Lucky was born in 1985 offscreen (Laura announced her pregnancy in late 84) but was 11 in 1993 when they returned (i'm guessing they did this to make Lucky a little more independent than an 8 year old would be and to make him a peer for Sly Eckert who was about to be orphaned).

BJ on the other hand remained at her natural age (so Lucky was supposed to have been four years older than her) and was 7 when she died (they always referred to what would have been her real age for several years after she died). Maxie actually caught up with BJ when Robyn Richards was cast in the role of Maxie, while I think Lucas stayed at his natural age and then actually got De-sorased for a time (An actor two and a half years years younger than Lucas' real age was playing him between 1998 and 2002) before catching up to Maxie in 2002.

I believe Kristina is 15.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

GH has always maintained that Luke and Laura married in 1981 which really doesn't add up to how old Lucky and Nikolas are supposed to be now.

Y&R's recent aging of Summer kind of throws off everything surrounding Nicholas and Sharon's break-up. They recently marked on screen that it had been 4 years since Cassie's death and Summer was born after that. I am no good trying to figure out ages but Summer appears to be at least 5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think out of all rapid-agings out there on soaps, the one that really spoke volumes about the powers-that-be just not giving a damn about history, timeline, or reasoning was the random rapid-aging of Rick & Mel's daughter, Leah Bauer, on GL a few years back. It throws the timeline off so much in regards to Rick, Harley, etc. and even worse yet was the fact that her rapid-aging brought absolutely nothing to the storyline. There was no point to it AT ALL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Since I am behind on Y&R, the other day I just saw the episodes surrounding Cassie's death anniversary. And it was ridiculous as hell when Sharon/Nick/Noah were talking how Cassie died FOUR years ago, yet Noah aged 10 years during that period. LOL Hell, even Summer, who wasn't even born when Cassie died, is now what.. 6?

They need to stop SORAS-ing kids. It's ridiculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

B&B has also screwed up their timeline completely with SORASing and de-SORASing.

Take Marcus for instance. Donna is supposed to have had him in high school, which would make him older than Rick and Bridget. Donna was out of high school when the show started and both Rick and Bridget were born several years into the show's run. But now Marcus is portrayed as more close in age to Steffy, who was born when Rick was already old enough to be married and have a child of his own.

Katie and Bridget are portrayed as being relatively close in age, at least that's the impression I get, but in reality Katie would be at least 20 years older than Bridget.

Hope is another example. She was born before Taylor was shot and "killed" by Sheila, but while Taylor's own children aged from kids to teenagers during her absence, Hope barely aged at all.

They also mentioned repeatedly that Brooke had been a part of the Forrester's life for twenty years, even when she had children who were decidedly older than twenty. So, she gave birth to Rick and Bridget before she even met the Forresters! :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think Y&R makes a point of saying Nikki and Victor were still supposed to have met in the 80's, this would be true anytime a show ages a character but they normally don't mention the years then, but Y&R shouldn't of mentioned a year for Cassie's passing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Members

Hey Manny. The Young And The Restless is Pretty Bad. They have Cassie Died when she was 4. Nick couldn't Talk to Sharon so Phyllis Comforted Nick and She got Pregnant and that is how Summer was Born. Now, Summer looks at least 5. Then, Noah SORASED Around 10 Years. Even if he could Add 2 Years to Each Year; Noah would only have SORASED 8 Years. Where are the Other 2 Years ? LOL ! However, It would be Even More Ridiculous if Spike became 8. Spike is Kendall's Little Boy on All My Children. There were Rumors that Charles Pratt was going to make Spike be 8. Charles Pratt is the Head Writer on All My Children. Miranda is 5 and Bianca Took Miranda to Paris. Then, Bianca and Miranda came back to Erica's Wedding. That was in May of 2005. Then, Bianca and Miranda came back to Pine Valley for Christmas. Then, Bianca and Miranda came to Pine Valley when Bianca's Sister Kendall was in A Coma and Spike was Born. Now, if They would make It be that Miranda was 8 and Spike was 5, then Ok. However, You Can't have It be that Spike is 8 and Miranda is 5. Another thing is that Emma is 6 and She is Spike's Big Sister. Another thing is that Spike is Either 2 or 3 and His Brother I think is 1. Spike can't be around 7 Years Older than Ian. Another thing is that Kendall was in the Hospital 3 Weeks because Ian had Surgery for A Bad Heart. Kendall can't have A 3 Year Old and 3 Weeks Later have A 8 Year Old. If A Week could be A Year, then 3+3=6. 6 is Not 8. Of Course, A Week is Not A Year. Kendall would go home and say Who is that 8 Year Old Boy. Spike would say Mommy and Kendall would say I'm Not Your Mommy. Thankfully, It Looks like They have Decided Not to SORAS Spike. Jody

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

    • As always, really interesting to get your impressions! I was only watching sporadically during this period (whereas I was transfixed during the Marian storyline), but if I remember correctly 1996 was a pretty rough transitional year. It came at a period where P&G was playing musical chairs with its executive producers--ATWT was hit especially hard by this. The current executive producer, Michael Laibson, is out in November 1996, replaced by Paul Rauch, who stays for nearly 6 years. While Rauch has a few really bad ideas that cause long-term damage to the show, those don't really kick in until 1999, and his first couple of years are very strong. So once you get to 1997, you should see the show rebound significantly. 
    • Haha love a little drunk posting

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I’m up to April 01, 1996. I think I’m starting to understand what many have said.. things are different. I miss the community vibe of Springfield, when you had people working at the hectic newspaper, the choatic diner, the rich were coming in for coffee, or the TV network was abuzz about the latest scandal. Things have become a little more tunneled into their own storylines. Right now, for me anyway, there isn’t a strong desire to see what happens next, ever since the Brent/Marian story ended. It was a darker, more suspenseful storyline that really got me intrigued and waiting to see what happens next, while everything else was just a nice view of midwestern families living their dramatic lives. And I love that too, when the characters and storytelling is strong, but right now, some things are a little stale. In these last 5 weeks, we had two bigger events: Nick and Susan’s wedding:  it was sweet, but I really found it weird they played music over their vows instead of being able to hear them. Then, they leave town immediately after and for good? We really didn’t get a ton of time with them - one minute Susan is in a hospital bed, post-coma, celebrating the new year, and now she’s married and gone. I’m having a hard time with the revolving door of characters since my early ’95 watch. This year we’ve lost so many characters, gained so many characters, and to what end? Henry’s funeral:  this was so sad, considering the real actor passed. I’m curious what other fans thought about the funeral. Granted, when an actor passes, you don’t have much time to plan ahead, so you need to insert it into whatever storylines are happening at the time.  But sadly, this funeral happened when everyone was hating each other. Vanessa was upset with Matt because the Amanda secret came out and he kept it from her. Quint showed up, with his very young affair no less, which made both Nola and J upset. Amanda was there which upset both Blake and Ross. Roger insisted he give a speech which upset everyone. Vanessa was mad at Quint for bringing his young girlfriend, and then Dinah was so upset about her grandfather, which was emotional, but everyone is currently at odds with Dinah. The flashbacks were effective, and the most emotional scene was Vanessa’s breakdown when reading Henry’s letter to her.  Otherwise, it was a pretty hateful funeral, which felt icky. Otherwise, my quick pros and cons currently happening… Pros: Alex and Hawk are great and funny. He gets under her skin and it’s hilarious to watch her react, but she needs him. They were in LA trying to get dirt on Amanda’s former life and Hawk was living it up with young gorgeous women and all the spending money at his disposal.  Generally, the Amanda and her secret storyline is interesting and I really like the actress. Alex vs. Amanda is entertaining. Tina came onto the scene around the time Nadine died, but she’s been given a backstory which is interesting to me now. She’s a prostitute, who means well, and is trying to take care of her daughter, Dahlia. She grew up with Frank, who has a soft spot for her. Marcus, in a new storyline he desperately needed away from Dinah and his dad, has taken a strong liking to Dahlia. She sings well and he plays saxophone well, so their music is endearing. Sadly, Tina got involved in a robbery gone-bad, where they held up a Spaulding board of directors meeting. She flees, but Frank catches her outside and is forced to arrest her, while Cleary (she’s back!) arrests the main bad guy involved and saves the Spaulding family. I’m curious to see where this one goes, but curious, was Tina actually on the show before this or is she a brand new character? Cons: The Dinah/Hart/Roger storyline is pretty stale now. I need something new. Lucy and Alan-Michael are barely on since Brent left, which is sad. You spend an entire year on a storyline that builds their relationship, brings strife and wedges, and now that they’re finally able to be together in love with no obstacles, you never show them? I want to see them happy! Oh and Lucy and Bridget/David haven't had a scene since Marian tried to get 'a room at the boarding house, which is weird because we haven't seen Bridget react to Lucy being alive. I don't even know if Lucy even lives at the boarding house or with AM, but it's sad pretending like Lucy/Bridget/David were never close friends. Reva/Josh, which is hogging airtime, is a serious whiplash. One week Josh loves her, she hates him; the next week, she loves him, he hates her. He’s always lying to Annie, but now he’s marrying her again, the second wedding in 4 months. I’m also very tired of Marah, her angst over everything, and their overwhelming concern over her. As much as I don’t like Buzz, it is funny watching Reva work at the diner, but I’ll never side with Alan so watching him have feelings about Reva/Buzz or Reva/Josh does nothing for me. Finally, the other small B storylines are only on like once a week which isn’t enough:  Gilly/Griffin/Viviane, Michelle/J, Blake/Ross/Rick, Rick/Abby, Holly/Fletcher and the baby. Something that just popped up out of the blue is David Grant leaving Springfield out of nowhere. He professed his love to Bridget, who turned him down, so he decides to leave when Griffin gives him a job opportunity. Sadly, another character written out for many new characters being introduced. Makes me wonder who is making these calls - the producers, the network, the writers, the fans?
    • OH. The AMC/OLTL Crossover with helicopter, down in the woods, 2 very pregnant, both give birth, only one baby lives. We are on the same page!!!
    • Backtracking because BTG has been distracting me from keeping up with GH. Why is Carly always involved with a paternity lie? Lulu is Dante's (wife? if Im correct) so she has the right to tell him about his son. If anything, she's in a better place to reveal paternity drama than Robin was. As for Robin...I'm conflicted about whether it was HER place to tell AJ he was Michael's dad. Being with a man who's pretending to be someone else's baby daddy is wild. Dante was snoring blaming everyone  but Rocco, however he was right about Jason. A convo isn't enough, neither is trying to be your son's friend. Adolescents need a disciplinarian. At least Lulu made Rocco and Danny scrub the house. 
    • May 2025: Stephanie Sloane interviews Kirsten Storms about all of Maxie's romances in the past 20 years: https://www.swooon.com/gallery/general-hospital-maxie-romances-spinelli-johnny-nathan-kirsten-storms/
    • I saw a new BTG promo during Watson tonight (Sunday May 11).   I don't remember what I saw (and I wouldn't say here on the nonspoiler thread anyhow). I know only that it was different from the "next on BTG" preview at the end of Friday's episode. If anyone catches the new promo, please post it on the spoiler thread.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy