Jump to content

Examples of SORASing messing up timelines


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Yeah, but they've cooled that down a bit. He was born on Christmas Day 1979, and was in his late teens by 1989-1990 and married to Emily Ann. He was in his mid/late 20s by the time Michael Lowry started to play him in the mid 90s, so I'd say they've kinda aged him at halftime pace since the late 90s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

GH Birth years:

1977- Steven Lars Webber

1979- AJ Quartermaine

1981- Jason Quartermaine

1986- BJ Jones

1989- Lucas Jones

1989- Tommy Hardy Jr.

1990- Maxie Jones

1992- Dillon Quartermaine Hornsby

1993- Serena Baldwin

1994- Lulu Spencer

1995- Georgie Jones

1996- Brooke Lynn Ashton

1997- Michael Corinthos III

2001- Kristina Davis Corinthos

2003- Morgan Corinthos

2004- Cameron Webber Spencer

2006- Molly Lansing

2007- Jake Spencer

Lucas/Maxie were quickly lumped into the same age category, but things got messy when Georgie jumped up about a year behind Maxie, and Dillon somehow jumped up about 3 years to be in line with Lucas. Lulu was worse because she ended up stuck at adolescence until around 2006, while Georgie, who was born after Lulu, was aged much earlier in 2002. Brooke Lynn became part of that same bracket despite 6 years between the Maxie/Brooke Lynn births. It seems now that Michael and Lulu are proportionate ages, but Kristina's just outrageous because she's at LEAST 16 when she was only born 8 years ago. So she's aged twice as fast, while pictures I've seen of the upcoming Molly Lansing place her at what, 10, when she was born three years ago.

Tommy Hardy was born the same year as Lucas in 89, but he's been off the canvas since about 1997, so who knows how old he'd be if they brought that character back.

Sarah and Liz Webber had to have been born sometime between 1981 and 1986 for their ages to line up with characters like Jason and Lucky, but does anyone know what the age difference was supposed to be between BJ and Lucky? BJ died in 1994, but Lucky was already on canvas in 1993, though I feel Lucky was portrayed as older.

Liz's kids are due for aging as well, since they're mixed in there with Morgan and Molly, who have just been aged... but I somehow doubt they'll age Liz's children for a while.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

BJ would be however old Maxie is, within a year. So now Lucky would be a good few years older than her, and at the time of her death i think he was a few years older than her too.

I dont see Liz's kids getting aged anytime soon either.

Also, for the record, how old is Kristina? Do we know? I am thinking they are going for 15.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah Lucky was born in 1985 offscreen (Laura announced her pregnancy in late 84) but was 11 in 1993 when they returned (i'm guessing they did this to make Lucky a little more independent than an 8 year old would be and to make him a peer for Sly Eckert who was about to be orphaned).

BJ on the other hand remained at her natural age (so Lucky was supposed to have been four years older than her) and was 7 when she died (they always referred to what would have been her real age for several years after she died). Maxie actually caught up with BJ when Robyn Richards was cast in the role of Maxie, while I think Lucas stayed at his natural age and then actually got De-sorased for a time (An actor two and a half years years younger than Lucas' real age was playing him between 1998 and 2002) before catching up to Maxie in 2002.

I believe Kristina is 15.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

GH has always maintained that Luke and Laura married in 1981 which really doesn't add up to how old Lucky and Nikolas are supposed to be now.

Y&R's recent aging of Summer kind of throws off everything surrounding Nicholas and Sharon's break-up. They recently marked on screen that it had been 4 years since Cassie's death and Summer was born after that. I am no good trying to figure out ages but Summer appears to be at least 5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think out of all rapid-agings out there on soaps, the one that really spoke volumes about the powers-that-be just not giving a damn about history, timeline, or reasoning was the random rapid-aging of Rick & Mel's daughter, Leah Bauer, on GL a few years back. It throws the timeline off so much in regards to Rick, Harley, etc. and even worse yet was the fact that her rapid-aging brought absolutely nothing to the storyline. There was no point to it AT ALL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Since I am behind on Y&R, the other day I just saw the episodes surrounding Cassie's death anniversary. And it was ridiculous as hell when Sharon/Nick/Noah were talking how Cassie died FOUR years ago, yet Noah aged 10 years during that period. LOL Hell, even Summer, who wasn't even born when Cassie died, is now what.. 6?

They need to stop SORAS-ing kids. It's ridiculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

B&B has also screwed up their timeline completely with SORASing and de-SORASing.

Take Marcus for instance. Donna is supposed to have had him in high school, which would make him older than Rick and Bridget. Donna was out of high school when the show started and both Rick and Bridget were born several years into the show's run. But now Marcus is portrayed as more close in age to Steffy, who was born when Rick was already old enough to be married and have a child of his own.

Katie and Bridget are portrayed as being relatively close in age, at least that's the impression I get, but in reality Katie would be at least 20 years older than Bridget.

Hope is another example. She was born before Taylor was shot and "killed" by Sheila, but while Taylor's own children aged from kids to teenagers during her absence, Hope barely aged at all.

They also mentioned repeatedly that Brooke had been a part of the Forrester's life for twenty years, even when she had children who were decidedly older than twenty. So, she gave birth to Rick and Bridget before she even met the Forresters! :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think Y&R makes a point of saying Nikki and Victor were still supposed to have met in the 80's, this would be true anytime a show ages a character but they normally don't mention the years then, but Y&R shouldn't of mentioned a year for Cassie's passing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Members

Hey Manny. The Young And The Restless is Pretty Bad. They have Cassie Died when she was 4. Nick couldn't Talk to Sharon so Phyllis Comforted Nick and She got Pregnant and that is how Summer was Born. Now, Summer looks at least 5. Then, Noah SORASED Around 10 Years. Even if he could Add 2 Years to Each Year; Noah would only have SORASED 8 Years. Where are the Other 2 Years ? LOL ! However, It would be Even More Ridiculous if Spike became 8. Spike is Kendall's Little Boy on All My Children. There were Rumors that Charles Pratt was going to make Spike be 8. Charles Pratt is the Head Writer on All My Children. Miranda is 5 and Bianca Took Miranda to Paris. Then, Bianca and Miranda came back to Erica's Wedding. That was in May of 2005. Then, Bianca and Miranda came back to Pine Valley for Christmas. Then, Bianca and Miranda came to Pine Valley when Bianca's Sister Kendall was in A Coma and Spike was Born. Now, if They would make It be that Miranda was 8 and Spike was 5, then Ok. However, You Can't have It be that Spike is 8 and Miranda is 5. Another thing is that Emma is 6 and She is Spike's Big Sister. Another thing is that Spike is Either 2 or 3 and His Brother I think is 1. Spike can't be around 7 Years Older than Ian. Another thing is that Kendall was in the Hospital 3 Weeks because Ian had Surgery for A Bad Heart. Kendall can't have A 3 Year Old and 3 Weeks Later have A 8 Year Old. If A Week could be A Year, then 3+3=6. 6 is Not 8. Of Course, A Week is Not A Year. Kendall would go home and say Who is that 8 Year Old Boy. Spike would say Mommy and Kendall would say I'm Not Your Mommy. Thankfully, It Looks like They have Decided Not to SORAS Spike. Jody

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • The last five or so episodes of season 8 after the Jean Hackney story ended were pretty strong with the Laura/Val friendship breakdown, Ben's PTSD with Val trying to help him, and the start of Jill realizing that Val was as much of a threat to her happiness with Gary as Abby was. I always thought that the Jean Hackney story should have ended at mid season at the latest... and then deal with the fall-out because seeing Ben/Val switch roles with Ben in mental decline instead of Val would have been interesting to explore.  And seeing Val and Laura's friendship suffer also was interesting and should have been explored especially with Karen caught in the middle and Abby both intrigued and amused at the conflict that she didn't cause. However, season 8 was the only Latham run season where Val was well written.  
    • Well, she's not in there sweeping the floors at the end of the night, and you don't bring in an award-winning producer to just sit on their backsides (or hey, maybe you do!). Again, without knowing the specific capacity she's in there working as⏤and it seems as if we are not going to at the present time⏤it's hard to speculate/discuss. I would interpret she's in a role that either would not require being credited, or she's, as others have speculated, is back and not receiving credit for the work she's done. That'd be like saying, per the WGA, all writers must be credited, but as we've seen by those who've worked as fi-core, they don't always receive credit. 

      Please register in order to view this content

       And, if my research is correct, per the DGA, you can request not to be credited for work you do. I could only assume the same would be for the PGA, as well.
    • When Anita read Barbara's letter, it started out with the viewers hearing it in Barbara's voice as Anita read silently. And then Anita saying the next portion aloud while Barbara's voice continued simultaneously. And then ending with Anita alone saying the last part aloud. Excerpt from interview  (link to full interview) The rest may be spoilerish -- Only the nonspoiler part here: I love the idea of reading that letter,” shares Tunie. “And at one point in the script, I think it said that my voice joined her, and [Anita] started reciting the letter from memory because [she] memorized this letter. I suggested to Steve Williford, our director, ‘What if it’s like that moment in Hamilton when Hamilton is writing the resignation letter to George Washington, and then he starts saying it too, and then Hamilton’s voice fades away, and then it’s all George. What if we do something like that?’ And he was like, ‘Oh, my God! I just got chills. Let’s do it!’ So, we did it.” I understood that it worked really well, so I’m really happy about that.”  
    • I think MVJ and Guza made a good team in the launching of the soap, and I'm hoping that the rotation of all stories and characters is maintained once he officially departs from the credits. And so far, Ron C's breakdowns have been decent... but they pop only when he's paired with a good script writer like Jazmin.   I hope once Guza leaves officially... that MVJ is able to reign in Ron C and the dread Jamey G.
    • I read that, but my interpretation was that she is uncredited because it is in a non-production capacity.  In others words, she's not secretly producing, or writing, as some had speculated prior to the confirmation. Her likeliest position would be in a post-production consultant capacity. I assume we agree on this?
    • Errol already confirmed she is back at Y&R and in a non-producing role; this alludes to she is not credited for the role she has.
    • I don't think Lisa served a purpose after the serial killer storyline. The writers never gave her anything to do but be Vicky's nemesis. Joanna Going deserved better. Another example of a character taking over the show and then the writers not having a longterm plan for the character.  Exhibit B: Sally Spencer. Such a missed opportunity. It really angers me how they misused her. She could sing and act and they just threw her away in that sexist nonsense storyline. Once the story was over, they wrote her off. The McKinnons should have lasted for years. I will give the show credit for how they introduced Sandra Ferguson as Amanda. I thought it was expertly done. She comes in and she immediately connected to RKK's Sam. She has chemistry with Matthew and she has realistic conversations with MAc and Rachel. That's how it is done. 
    • Great points, and it has not completely vanished. Leslie on Beyond the Gates fits the trope (she's still not over that Ted lovin' two decades later), though I will say there does seem to be an effort to make her more complex.
    • I understand why people speculate, but I have to say it doesn’t sound very plausible that Jill Farren Phelps would be working at Y&R in any uncredited role. CBS daytime shows are tightly bound by union contracts and corporate oversight, and that kind of informal arrangement would be a major liability in 2025. Before the mergers of SAG-AFTRA and the two WGA branches, it may have been easier to hire someone quietly or off the books. But those days are behind us. With digital payroll, tighter pension tracking, and increased scrutiny from legal and compliance departments, it’s just not the kind of thing anyone can get away with anymore. Most union members, especially producers nearing retirement, would not risk their eligibility or benefits to take an uncredited role. The Producers Guild of America is also very clear about crediting. To even receive the PGA mark, a producer has to be verified through a formal review process. According to their credit certification guidelines (source), "only individuals who performed a majority of the producing functions on a motion picture or television production" are eligible for credit, and those credits must be official and recorded. If someone is functioning in that capacity, they are not supposed to be uncredited. Studios that are union signatories, like CBS and Sony, know better than to skirt those rules. If anyone has a legitimate, primary source confirming that CBS is hiring someone like Phelps in an uncredited production role, I’d honestly be curious to read it. But without that, this just feels like rumor—not reality.
    • I keep thinking about the persistent trend of eroticizing mental illness on Guiding Light. Sonni and Annie were never more compelling, or more attractive to the show, than when they were manic. It played into a recurring theme: strong women undone by their unhinged reaction to sex. The writers were likely inspired by Basic Instinct and the broader wave of neo-noir films in the late '80s and early '90s, where female sexuality was often equated with instability. The result was a crude portrayal, not just of mental illness, but of womanhood itself. Both Sonni and Annie were introduced as sharp, capable women, brought in specifically as formidable antagonists to Reva. They were logical and composed, standing in contrast to Reva’s emotional volatility. That difference made them threatening, but not especially “sexy”—until desire became their undoing. In a very male fantasy, their strength unraveled the moment they slept with Joshua. As soon as they got a taste of Lewis lovin’, they spiraled into scheming lunatics, willing to torch everything to hold on to him. It was part of a larger trend in the culture. Fatal Attraction, Single White Female, and The Hand That Rocks the Cradle all traded on the idea that female desire was dangerous, barely held in check, and always teetering on the edge of madness. Looking back, it's a pretty grim trope. And while it's not completely vanished, I'm grateful we don't see it quite as often today.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy