Jump to content

Examples of SORASing messing up timelines


Recommended Posts

  • Members

On AMC Jake Martin is talking about when he thought he was Colby's father when she was being born. In real life this was around ten years ago but since Colby was SORASed from like 6 to 15 in 2006 and is now around 19 how young was Jake when Colby was being born if Colby is now 19? What are some more examples of this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

According to the new timeline Jake would have been around 19 or 20 which is the age he was involved with Emily Ann and pining after Julie I think. LOL

*************************************

One of the biggest examples is Kendall herself which has thrown off the whole AMC timeline. Erica is no longer the counterpart of her rival Tara, but is the age of her adopted brother Tad. Also the new timeframe would have made Erica about 13 when AMC premiered.

Also Kendall is supposed to be older than Charlie who was born when several years after Kendall's supposed birth.

If Charlie ever returns to the show they will either totally ignore that or Charlie will have to be around JR and Jamie's age now which will make him even younger than his own sister Kelsey who was born about 9 years after him on the show.

Which is why I think we will never see Charlie Brent again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

On GL, Rick and Mel Bauer have a child who was born in 2003 (?) and who is now entering college or in college. Not only was this ridiculously pointless, as she has never had a storyline that I can recall, but she is now older than Daisy, who was originally born in 1986 and was about 11 or 12 when she came to town in 1998. Then when Daisy returned to town around 2006 or 2007, she was only around 16 years old. None of it makes any sense to me.

On ATWT, Ellen Stewart was a teenage girl in the late 50s. She had a son, Dan, she gave up for adoption. A few years later, she married the adoptive father, David. David had a son, Paul, with his late wife. By the late early 70s, both of these boys were in their early or mid 20s. Ellen became a matriarch, and Ellen's mother Claire should now close to being a great-grandmother, in spite of her not being that old. Claire was abruptly killed off and I assume as a gift to Barbara Berjer for this confusion, she was moved to GL as Barbara Norris. In the early 70s, Ellen and David had two daughters, Dee and Annie. By 1976 or 1977, both of these girls had been aged to around 18, which must have made Ellen seem geriatric, and I wonder if that's one of the reasons why Dan, who was now also pushed into an older age bracket, was killed off.

Tom Hughes, who was born in 1961 or so, returned to town in the early 70s as a drug-addicted Vietnam veteran.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Leah " I refuse to call her a Bauer Boudreaux" is the worst rapid aging in the history of daytime. The girl literally went from a 3 month old baby to a teenager over night. :angry:

Leah has now leaped ahead of her big brother Jude, cousin Robbie,Zach,Emma,Clarissa,Kevin and James marler,Maureen and Will. All of those kids were born before her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This is why ,overall I am against SORASing.

If a few years were added here and there ,and it was consistent,it would be OK.

Instead,we get these drastic changes,which suddenly make all the older characters way older than they should be.

It is just lazy storytelling.

Days was bad when Julie's son David was aged.He should have been about 7 and was aged to early 20's.It limited the stories for Julie,especially a few years later when she became a grandmother.It made Alice a great,great grandmother.

Days had Sandy Horton and Steve Olsen as core family members in the younger age group,but they were never used.It also meant that by the mid 80's,David was considered useless,when,instead he should have been emerging as a major character.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

EJ is the biggest example I can think of currently on the Days canvas. EJ was born in 1997, but yet he's the same age as Sami/Eric, Lucas, Carrie, Brady etc...

Phillip was born in what 1995 or 96? But is the same age as Belle and Shawn and that crowd...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I get most annoyed when characters are aged from adolescents to early 20s. Why skip all those rich years with them as teenagers causing hell for their parents? It seems so short sighted.

UNLESS it's to match them up to others on the canvas that they'd conceivably be peers with, like Chloe on Y&R. I don't mind that we missed most of her child and all of her formative years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think that one of the worst SORASing was done to Heather Stephens on Y&R.

I remember her as a baby while Paul and Nikki were still at high school.

Now Victoria was born a good 5 years after April left town with Heather to go to NY.

Fast forward a few year's April returns to Genoa City with a 12 year old Heather, but Victoria was a good 5 - 7 years older.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think that is when SORASing looks worse is when they allow some to grow up on screen and SORAS others around them.

OLTL did that with Jessica for the most part and now with Starr.

Secret Storm did it with Amy keeping Jada Rowland in the role for years.

It just makes things look worse when it is not applied equally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

    • As always, really interesting to get your impressions! I was only watching sporadically during this period (whereas I was transfixed during the Marian storyline), but if I remember correctly 1996 was a pretty rough transitional year. It came at a period where P&G was playing musical chairs with its executive producers--ATWT was hit especially hard by this. The current executive producer, Michael Laibson, is out in November 1996, replaced by Paul Rauch, who stays for nearly 6 years. While Rauch has a few really bad ideas that cause long-term damage to the show, those don't really kick in until 1999, and his first couple of years are very strong. So once you get to 1997, you should see the show rebound significantly. 
    • Haha love a little drunk posting

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I’m up to April 01, 1996. I think I’m starting to understand what many have said.. things are different. I miss the community vibe of Springfield, when you had people working at the hectic newspaper, the choatic diner, the rich were coming in for coffee, or the TV network was abuzz about the latest scandal. Things have become a little more tunneled into their own storylines. Right now, for me anyway, there isn’t a strong desire to see what happens next, ever since the Brent/Marian story ended. It was a darker, more suspenseful storyline that really got me intrigued and waiting to see what happens next, while everything else was just a nice view of midwestern families living their dramatic lives. And I love that too, when the characters and storytelling is strong, but right now, some things are a little stale. In these last 5 weeks, we had two bigger events: Nick and Susan’s wedding:  it was sweet, but I really found it weird they played music over their vows instead of being able to hear them. Then, they leave town immediately after and for good? We really didn’t get a ton of time with them - one minute Susan is in a hospital bed, post-coma, celebrating the new year, and now she’s married and gone. I’m having a hard time with the revolving door of characters since my early ’95 watch. This year we’ve lost so many characters, gained so many characters, and to what end? Henry’s funeral:  this was so sad, considering the real actor passed. I’m curious what other fans thought about the funeral. Granted, when an actor passes, you don’t have much time to plan ahead, so you need to insert it into whatever storylines are happening at the time.  But sadly, this funeral happened when everyone was hating each other. Vanessa was upset with Matt because the Amanda secret came out and he kept it from her. Quint showed up, with his very young affair no less, which made both Nola and J upset. Amanda was there which upset both Blake and Ross. Roger insisted he give a speech which upset everyone. Vanessa was mad at Quint for bringing his young girlfriend, and then Dinah was so upset about her grandfather, which was emotional, but everyone is currently at odds with Dinah. The flashbacks were effective, and the most emotional scene was Vanessa’s breakdown when reading Henry’s letter to her.  Otherwise, it was a pretty hateful funeral, which felt icky. Otherwise, my quick pros and cons currently happening… Pros: Alex and Hawk are great and funny. He gets under her skin and it’s hilarious to watch her react, but she needs him. They were in LA trying to get dirt on Amanda’s former life and Hawk was living it up with young gorgeous women and all the spending money at his disposal.  Generally, the Amanda and her secret storyline is interesting and I really like the actress. Alex vs. Amanda is entertaining. Tina came onto the scene around the time Nadine died, but she’s been given a backstory which is interesting to me now. She’s a prostitute, who means well, and is trying to take care of her daughter, Dahlia. She grew up with Frank, who has a soft spot for her. Marcus, in a new storyline he desperately needed away from Dinah and his dad, has taken a strong liking to Dahlia. She sings well and he plays saxophone well, so their music is endearing. Sadly, Tina got involved in a robbery gone-bad, where they held up a Spaulding board of directors meeting. She flees, but Frank catches her outside and is forced to arrest her, while Cleary (she’s back!) arrests the main bad guy involved and saves the Spaulding family. I’m curious to see where this one goes, but curious, was Tina actually on the show before this or is she a brand new character? Cons: The Dinah/Hart/Roger storyline is pretty stale now. I need something new. Lucy and Alan-Michael are barely on since Brent left, which is sad. You spend an entire year on a storyline that builds their relationship, brings strife and wedges, and now that they’re finally able to be together in love with no obstacles, you never show them? I want to see them happy! Oh and Lucy and Bridget/David haven't had a scene since Marian tried to get 'a room at the boarding house, which is weird because we haven't seen Bridget react to Lucy being alive. I don't even know if Lucy even lives at the boarding house or with AM, but it's sad pretending like Lucy/Bridget/David were never close friends. Reva/Josh, which is hogging airtime, is a serious whiplash. One week Josh loves her, she hates him; the next week, she loves him, he hates her. He’s always lying to Annie, but now he’s marrying her again, the second wedding in 4 months. I’m also very tired of Marah, her angst over everything, and their overwhelming concern over her. As much as I don’t like Buzz, it is funny watching Reva work at the diner, but I’ll never side with Alan so watching him have feelings about Reva/Buzz or Reva/Josh does nothing for me. Finally, the other small B storylines are only on like once a week which isn’t enough:  Gilly/Griffin/Viviane, Michelle/J, Blake/Ross/Rick, Rick/Abby, Holly/Fletcher and the baby. Something that just popped up out of the blue is David Grant leaving Springfield out of nowhere. He professed his love to Bridget, who turned him down, so he decides to leave when Griffin gives him a job opportunity. Sadly, another character written out for many new characters being introduced. Makes me wonder who is making these calls - the producers, the network, the writers, the fans?
    • OH. The AMC/OLTL Crossover with helicopter, down in the woods, 2 very pregnant, both give birth, only one baby lives. We are on the same page!!!
    • Backtracking because BTG has been distracting me from keeping up with GH. Why is Carly always involved with a paternity lie? Lulu is Dante's (wife? if Im correct) so she has the right to tell him about his son. If anything, she's in a better place to reveal paternity drama than Robin was. As for Robin...I'm conflicted about whether it was HER place to tell AJ he was Michael's dad. Being with a man who's pretending to be someone else's baby daddy is wild. Dante was snoring blaming everyone  but Rocco, however he was right about Jason. A convo isn't enough, neither is trying to be your son's friend. Adolescents need a disciplinarian. At least Lulu made Rocco and Danny scrub the house. 
    • May 2025: Stephanie Sloane interviews Kirsten Storms about all of Maxie's romances in the past 20 years: https://www.swooon.com/gallery/general-hospital-maxie-romances-spinelli-johnny-nathan-kirsten-storms/
    • I saw a new BTG promo during Watson tonight (Sunday May 11).   I don't remember what I saw (and I wouldn't say here on the nonspoiler thread anyhow). I know only that it was different from the "next on BTG" preview at the end of Friday's episode. If anyone catches the new promo, please post it on the spoiler thread.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy