Jump to content

B&B: Week of May 25, 2009


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

No, Bill Jr. isn't much younger than Nick.

Ridge, Thorne, Nick, Bill Jr.,

are all in the Brooke, Taylor, Felicia, Kristen age group. (Because Kristen still exists, and Tony's HIV might catch up with someday).

Bridget has no one in her age group but Rick. Yech. Amber, Deacon, CJ -- if they ever return -- all work in this agegroup. I guess Owen is in this agegroup.

Steffy and Marcus are alone in their age group. I guess Thomas fits there too, since Bridget babysat him as a baby.

Then we have Hope, RJ, Felicia's kid (Dino?), and Thorne's daughter. Am I missing anyone from that group?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's hard to remember that Thomas is supposed to be older than Steffy. The writers do such a great job of emasculating their male 'leads' and making them helpless mindless children. They did the same thing to Storm with William DeVry in the role.

It wouldn't be so offensive if it weren't for the fact that the female siblings become dumbed-down, and are as dumbed down as the brothers are emasculated. They take the lead and then make things worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sigh. Really? Eric has been doing this? Really?

So, the plot twist coming out of the blue is one thing. But the assassination of Eric's character (I haven't seen the episode yet to comment on context) is outrageous.

How can you take the patriarch of your family and have him do stuff like this?????

All of which affirms my basic point...they dynamic of B&B is that we hate the core family. Therefore, we enjoy all the outsiders who come in and knock them down a peg. The one saving grace of the show is that they seem to be casting a few interesting outsiders these days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's Thorne. He did this in order to bring Claudia Cortez back to the States. She was the love of his life. :P

I have never watched a soap as plot driven as B&B. None of the characters owns a personality, everything can happen to everybody, everybody can do everything. Vixen? Tortured heroine? Matriarch? Psycho? The same character does it all... :(

I agree with Toups. LAD gets younger and hotter all the time. It's a sin that she is playing "Nicky's" mother. They could bring a young daughter/niece for her (Macy 2: The Colbys) and have her fall in love with a Forrester boy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

today completely turned me off from him. He has absolutely no rooting value. At least when he was working with Stephanie, I could root for him via rooting for her and her pain, but Bill on his own is coming on way too strong with no motivation to back it up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Great points, and it has not completely vanished. Leslie on Beyond the Gates fits the trope (she's still not over that Ted lovin' two decades later), though I will say there does seem to be an effort to make her more complex.
    • I understand why people speculate, but I have to say it doesn’t sound very plausible that Jill Farren Phelps would be working at Y&R in any uncredited role. CBS daytime shows are tightly bound by union contracts and corporate oversight, and that kind of informal arrangement would be a major liability in 2025. Before the mergers of SAG-AFTRA and the two WGA branches, it may have been easier to hire someone quietly or off the books. But those days are behind us. With digital payroll, tighter pension tracking, and increased scrutiny from legal and compliance departments, it’s just not the kind of thing anyone can get away with anymore. Most union members, especially producers nearing retirement, would not risk their eligibility or benefits to take an uncredited role. The Producers Guild of America is also very clear about crediting. To even receive the PGA mark, a producer has to be verified through a formal review process. According to their credit certification guidelines (source), "only individuals who performed a majority of the producing functions on a motion picture or television production" are eligible for credit, and those credits must be official and recorded. If someone is functioning in that capacity, they are not supposed to be uncredited. Studios that are union signatories, like CBS and Sony, know better than to skirt those rules. If anyone has a legitimate, primary source confirming that CBS is hiring someone like Phelps in an uncredited production role, I’d honestly be curious to read it. But without that, this just feels like rumor—not reality.
    • I keep thinking about the persistent trend of eroticizing mental illness on Guiding Light. Sonni and Annie were never more compelling, or more attractive to the show, than when they were manic. It played into a recurring theme: strong women undone by their unhinged reaction to sex. The writers were likely inspired by Basic Instinct and the broader wave of neo-noir films in the late '80s and early '90s, where female sexuality was often equated with instability. The result was a crude portrayal, not just of mental illness, but of womanhood itself. Both Sonni and Annie were introduced as sharp, capable women, brought in specifically as formidable antagonists to Reva. They were logical and composed, standing in contrast to Reva’s emotional volatility. That difference made them threatening, but not especially “sexy”—until desire became their undoing. In a very male fantasy, their strength unraveled the moment they slept with Joshua. As soon as they got a taste of Lewis lovin’, they spiraled into scheming lunatics, willing to torch everything to hold on to him. It was part of a larger trend in the culture. Fatal Attraction, Single White Female, and The Hand That Rocks the Cradle all traded on the idea that female desire was dangerous, barely held in check, and always teetering on the edge of madness. Looking back, it's a pretty grim trope. And while it's not completely vanished, I'm grateful we don't see it quite as often today.
    • Elements of it were silly, but it was a small price to pay to get Zas back. I should say there's a difference between in town and out of town returns. It's understandable for Roger to skulk around town in a bad wig and clown suit when he's in Springfield and running the risk of bumping in to people he knows.  Taking us out of town to find someone always has a short shelf life. Then it usually becomes about another character knowing X is alive but determined to keep them out of Springfield. Like Alan discovering Amish Reva. I don't know how long it went on, but it was probably twice as long as necessary.
    • Elizabeth Dennehy complained on the Locher Room about how ridiculous so much of the writing was for Roger's return. She laughed at so much of Roger's antics and how it was hard for her to take them seriously. Probably another reason she was fired as she didn't play the game.  
    • Only thing I enjoyed was Abby / Olivia, etc., and the addiction storyline. Otherwise, I could do without the season.
    • Right? Vanessa had a ball gown for every occasion.
    • Roger's return storyline may have been silly but Roger's return was what lead to GL's last golden era.  It was the combination of Roger's return and Robert Calhoun becoming EP that got GL to finally hit it's stride after some really bad years. It will always disappoint me that the ratings during Robert Calhoun's run didn't reflect the quality of the show.
    • He also gave some of the best episodes, like the episodes surrounding Doug's death. The problem with Days was that Ron had a horrible vision from he top. I don't feel the same for MVJ and nothing that has happened in all these months suggests she doesn't have a handle on the show. Now if it becomes an issue I'll acknowledge it, but I'm not seeing it so far.
    • Jean Hackney was awful and that lead to Ben's exit story which sucked. I liked Ben/Val together. Val's love for Ben was that of a grown woman moving on with her life and Ben's love for Val made him willingly decide to raise another man's children as his own.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy