Jump to content

Y&R: Week of May 18, 2009


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

We don't even know if it's really happening. I think Mary Jane will have murderous intentions, regardless of Victor's influence. I think she'll go against him and up the ante in a way Victor doesn't agree with. In other words, it's going to get out of hand for Victor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

:lol: That's the same as

?

That actually sounds great. But, comparing something character-building like the Michael/Julia thing with something character-destroying like Victor having Jack killed is funny. ^_^

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Victor CLEARLY doesn't know how disturbed Mary Jane is. He probably thinks he has her under control, he probably has no idea what vendetta she has against Jack. If she tries to kill Jack, Victor will be indirectly responsible for it, since he brought her to town.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And that is wonderful soap irony--he's responsible, but OTOH, not really. (Although he is dealing with a woman who was willing to change her face to get revenge, that isn't clue enough?). But if he directs MJ to "get rid of Jack," or something more direct than that, then.... :o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Going waaay back, because I guess staying away from SON a few hours means your are pages behind....

I'd like that...but I think some people would feel that twists Adam's established heterosexuality too far...and it pushes some kind of agenda.

Definitely classic soap with a unique twist.

I totally agree that having Victor INTENTIONALLY try to

is...shark-jumping. I am staying calm, though, cause EB won't allow it.

LOL

Totally. That's what I'm 90% sure is the real story. Hoping, anyway. Otherwise I joining the chorus of complainers, for real.

LOL. Yes, even if Mary Jane jumps the rails and leaves TGVN's control, Nikki may well get the joy of uttering those words (and maybe, in the process, Victor will soften toward her...yeah right!). [if MTS/Character stays on the show].

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sorry, cara mia, but this is total bullsh!t! :lol: Awfully, crappy, hastily written story. Adam never ever showed any signs of homosexuality and further more always looked like a person who is totally disgusted by it and would puke if someone suggested that scheme to him.

Unique twist? Serisouly, Mark... :mellow:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • My hunch is what you've described. JFP is likely back working on transitioning the show to a new studio and embracing new technology for its production model.
    • The woman who was the co-chair of Latinas for Trump is now complaining about his targeting immigrants that she thought were "safe." I also read a puff piece from yet another "insider" journalist who lives to normalize fascists - this one with a tech bro who was venting off the record because he thought voting for Trump was cool and would show up the Democrats and maybe we'd get Greenland, but now he's getting upset.  These people still support Trump, and Republicans, they just want to make sure they get credit for being respectable. And they will get it.
    • I really do wish someone could. Just a few characters in very simple backdrops, with very real problems that are just a little larger than life, like the '50s and '60s. All the characters having a level of dignity or respect. And their inner lives are what dominate the story, even if there are outside forces at play.
    • It's a lesson to never be loyal because once your use is up, you're shown the door. MSW was the only bright spot for CBS for awhile, and once they were back on top... they promptly sabotaged the show as a repayment for all that the show had done for the network.  
    • The show made a mistake in not bringing in more McKinnon kids, specifically bringing back Ben. Kathleen was leaving, and while I like you am very fond of Sally Spencer as MJ, that didn't seem to be a common view. They also decimated the character in a truly sick storyline. So that just left Cheryl. 
    • Between Gwen and Cat, the show often seems to side with those who cause lots of cruelty to Jack and Jennifer. I am half-surprised that the show hasn't brought Peter Blake back for more of the same.  I don't really know if there is a purpose for them in Salem now, but I do feel a sense of stability and rightness when Melissa Reeves is back in the role of Jennifer and back in the Horton house, in spite of...well, a lot of offcamera stuff we all know perfectly well. 
    • I like to call her an FC-reject character

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I’m sensing you’re not really a John Black fan from your posts. This has been some of the best soap Days has done in many years but you seem completely opposed to it lol.
    • The John Black character has been a part of my life for decades. I like heroes being honored, however imperfect they may be.  I'm glad they are giving him a long farewell and tribute.
    • Annie Dutton was anything, but sane when she was introduced.  She was very tortured and looked like she was on the verge of tears when she was first introduced.   While people, and writers, made it seem as though Annie lost her mind because of Josh.. I truly think that Annie had a lot of untreated mental issues that didn't manifest until her marriage to Josh. Sonni was also anything, but strong when she was first introduced either.   Claire in 1983 was a complete 180 from the Claire that we got in 1986... and I do agree that her character was degraded.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy