Jump to content

Confessions of an ex-soap writer


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 37
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

You need to research it a bit.

Anyway... Primetime shows — perhaps the majority, not all — have a nice practice. In the writers’ room everyone plots. All the writers contribute to all episodes. So once the whole team outlines the episode, the show runner picks a writer who gets the notes and the basic plot and goes to type out his script.

:)

Kubla, do you know how did that whole pitching process when Lorraine was there worked? I'm referring to that story Johnson & Beldner and another writer, I'm forgetting which one, proposed to her? Did they just make a suggestion or did they also write the synopsis for the story or something?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sorry to butt in, but did you both mean to be this dismissive?

When I look at the title of this board it is "Soap Opera Network" not "Soap Opera Aspiring Writers Network". So OF COURSE there are many of us who haven't got a CLUE about the process.

Rather than peer over top the spectacles and send folks to the library, what about educatin' the dumb folk?

Back to lurkdom on this issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No, I honestly didn't mean it like that.

If I was mean, alphanguy, I apologize. :)

The problem, Mark, is that so little info gets out of this offices and soaps, it's more guarded than Fort Knox, and every head writer has his/her own way of doing things so it is difficult to generalise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Which was not a smart decision, if you ask me. Especially when, in the long run, it made not a difference in Iris' attitude toward Mac.

Meanwhile, I'm surprised no one has nominated Mr. Hiltbrand as soaps' potential new messiah. I thought by now we'd see "David Hiltbrand should HW [enter show name here]!" posts all over the place. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think it was meant to make a change in Iris' attitude but to make her more of a fighter and to explore more of her character. It also strengthened her feeling of being unloved by all the men in her life. And it made her long even more for Mac's love in the light of she was the only daughter in his life and now she was competing for him with Amanda. Add to that now Amanda was his blood and she was not. It made her fight even harder to make Mac love her and notice her.

It was an excellent set up.

Beverlee McKinsey was really great all throughout her tenure on AW but from 1978 to 1980 she was remarkable. Lemay gave her some of the greatest material to work with those years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I totally meant to be dismissive. It wasn't a dismissal due to someone's lack of knowledge regarding the process -- it was a dismissal to someone's lack of knowledge about the process AND dogging a show that I enjoy while citing their favorite show as being so wonderful for using a process they don't even use. If the poster knew about the process and actually researched it (listening to their favorite show's former HW Kay Alden's lecture two years ago, for example), then they would know that Y&R's writing process works virtually identical to the way AMC's does. Head writer writes the long term, breakdown writers write the outlines and script writers write the dialogue. As far as "educatin' the dumb folk" rather than sending them to the library, I'd be more than happy to if I was asked to do so. Otherwise, I'm not responsible for educating someone who dives into a conversation with misinformation and a jab at a show they don't watch. They weren't asking for education at all. It was just yet another attempt at being divisive.

But thanks for asking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I know one actor who said that he thought it would be better if the writers could be physically closer to where the show gets done. He acknowledged that it isn't necessarily feasible but that level of collaboration would probably result in a better product or at least a better creative process. IMO, there's something good that happens when everyone is in the same place that you can't duplicate using other forms of communication. But this is the 21st century, so break out the Blackberrys and hope for the best.

And please don't smack me around for not knowing how the whole BTS thing works. I don't claim to. I just thought I'd throw that out there. Just consider me the little girl rocking and weeping in the corner while Uncle Sylph, Mark and R Sinclair fight with each other at the family barbecue.

*sings to herself* Yes Jesus loves me...Yes Jesus loves me...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I just saw this now!

There totally is. But in certain ways, it might be cheaper for them not to have the room. Not to say anything about the fact that you can sit in your cottage somewhere in the Godforsaken hills, type your script and after you finish, just hit: Send! (For me, that's exactly the problem.)

:lol:

Don't worry, marceline, very few people can claim that they know exactly how things work, and in detail, at any givetime. Head writers change, bring with them tiny adjustments so it's all in a state of flux. But the basics, I think, remain constant.

I would, however, like to know whether any of today's HWs writes story projections...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Actually, All My Children does use a different process from other shows.

Not trying to cross R Sinclair's path or anything - but their process is different now. The script writer receives a summary of what's in their episode, and has a day or two to make their own outline, breaking down all the scenes, and then only four or five days to write a script (as opposed to the seven other soaps get). So there's definitely a time crunch AMC has, and a double-duty they're forced to do, that other shows aren't under.

I'm not saying it's better or worse - but I do think you need somebody experienced in both breakdowns and scripts, like a Michelle Patrick or an Addie Walsh. Whereas most shows give breakdown writers three or four days to write a breakdown, and script writers a week to write a show, AMC needs somebody to do the whole process in six or seven days. So there's definitely a lot less time for exploration and concentration. You have to just get it done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Cat herself will be a stumbling block all her own as she vowed to Chad to stay away from him, thus redeeming her of her crime morally. Classic DAYS would have them gazing longingly at each other at Doug's Place or Blondie's, while Liz is serenading the room with a song aptly chosen to represent their feelings of emotional turmoil.
    • From what I just recently watched, they were setting her up to go into future stories. She was Emmy nomination worthy in the material I saw. If some viewers did not like her, the character could have been rehabilitated after that sick storyline. It feels like they destroyed a character for fun and then tossed her to the curb. Spencer had chemistry with everyone. I'm just retroactively angry on Spencer's behalf.  You're right about how Cheryl was often forgotten and pushed aside and I would take Cheryl over Josie. I think soaps need characters like Cheryl. Characters like Josie are way too common. Josie always got on my nerves.
    • CBS was back in third place in 1994/95. That was the season CBS lost NFL broadcasting rights which also cost them several established affiliates in major media markets. 1995 CBS was sold to Westinghouse and Les Moonves arrived. 1995/96 CBS was trying to be young and cool to compete with NBC and Fox, but it was an epic failure and CBS was once again in third place.
    • I tend to think that Chad will actually listen to Jen (this time). And that will be the next stumbling block in their relationship, which will open the possibilities for Cat to seek another member of their love triangle... To iterate my earlier thought, I am also not a fan of the person Melissa Reeves, but the character of Jennifer looks so chic this week, especially in comparison to Hope (and Gabi).  That blunt haircut is a winner.   
    • I think Cheryl was essentially replaced by Josie, and it seems likely that Lemay wanted to bring the Frames back into the picture and for a variety of reasons that it would be McKinnons who would make way for them. Cheryl didn't really get many layers -- she was pretty and kind and sweet and faded into the background so that Scott could participate in the AIDS storyline with Dawn. Looking at the AWHP, other than (not very) shockingly being in love with her mother's adopted son Scott, Cheryl apparently went out with Sam and flirted with much-too-old-for-her John Hudson and MJ's ex-boyfriend/pimp Chad. I know MJ told Mary that she had been a prostitute, but did she tell Cheryl and did she tell anyone about Chad's pimping?   
    • I feel the same way about Melissa Reeves' Jennifer. She just makes the show feel like home by her presence alone. I am perfectly okay with them coming in every once and awhile, which probably fits Reeves' schedule better anyway. Their connections to Salem are still there: JJ, the grandkids, Jack still owning half of The Spectator ... they're perfect recurring characters. All this talk of Jennifer being in the wrong regarding Cat is absurd. Jennifer is not being villainized in any way, shape, or form, she's just being allowed to actually be human, which adds odds to the obstacle of Chad and Cat eventually getting together. All inner conflict. Keep it coming!
    • Hahaha. Jean Hackney, Angelica Nero, and the Falcon Crest henchwomen were all straight out of a James Bond movie.
    • My hunch is what you've described. JFP is likely back working on transitioning the show to a new studio and embracing new technology for its production model.
    • The woman who was the co-chair of Latinas for Trump is now complaining about his targeting immigrants that she thought were "safe." I also read a puff piece from yet another "insider" journalist who lives to normalize fascists - this one with a tech bro who was venting off the record because he thought voting for Trump was cool and would show up the Democrats and maybe we'd get Greenland, but now he's getting upset.  These people still support Trump, and Republicans, they just want to make sure they get credit for being respectable. And they will get it.
    • I really do wish someone could. Just a few characters in very simple backdrops, with very real problems that are just a little larger than life, like the '50s and '60s. All the characters having a level of dignity or respect. And their inner lives are what dominate the story, even if there are outside forces at play.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy