Jump to content

Another World Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted (edited)

Mona, I disagree. I see similarities in Rachel & Erica just as I do Ada & Mona. Agnes wrote the troublesome daughter & her put upon mother 4 times. To me, it is clearly a trope. Agnes even talked about similarities/differences in Rachel & Erica.

This is the editor of the AW trivia book talking about Rachel & Erica.

Hordes of soap opera vixens through the years have been based to some degree on Erica Kane, played so deftly on “All My Children” for almost thirty years by Susan Lucci. Rachel Cory n`ee Davis, who started off on “Another World” as a scheming gold-digger is one of them. What separates Rachel from daytime’s other Erica Klones is the fact that Rachel Davis was introduced to viewers three years before Erica. In 1965, writer Agnes Nixon had completed the bible for “All My Children.” After Procter & Gamble optioned the project but passed on it, the bible went into a drawer. Nixon was asked, however, to take on head-writing duties at “Another World.” One of the first characters she introduced was Rachel Davis, a scheming model whose destructive relationships with men and obsession with material gain could be traced back to being abandoned by her father.

Edited by Contessa Donatella
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 13.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

And, this is Agnes in her autobiography, I think in some appendix. 

“On ERICA versus RACHEL, Erica was a very unique character. Rachel on Another World was her precursor to the public, but in fact I created Erica first, since I had written the bible for All My Children before I started head writing Another World. Rachel was a lower-class Erica, her mother was a cleaning woman, and her goals were not nearly stratostrepheric as Erica’s. Rachel just wanted to marry Russ or somebody with money. What Erica and Rachel have in common is they thought if they could get their dream, they’d be satisfied. But that dream has been very elusive.”– Agnes Nixon, Creator, ONE LIFE TO LIVE, ALL MY CHILDREN, and LOVING

Oh, okay. I will re-read what you said then. Sorry. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Please don’t be so fast to correct everyone on the board. Check the credits of the June 23, 1999 episode.  The zookeeper played by Chet Carlin was indeed named Sam Ratcliffe

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

Ridiculous that they would choose to honor Sam Ratcliffe, when he was no more important than any of the directors during AW's golden age (1965 through 1979).  If they were going to honor directors (which is unusual to begin with), why choose him?   How about honoring some characters, or actors, or head-writers??  No, no, no!!  Goutman insisted, "There will be no returns and no reflection on the past."  But we did get a gorilla and a nod to Sam Ratcliffe.  Why must everything be a joke??   

I mean no disrespect to Mr Ratcliffe, but just because he was a favorite of Linda Dano and Stephen Schnetzer doesn't seem like a very good reason to honor him.  Just my opinion, of course.

Edited by Mona Kane Croft
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

How cool that they listed him in the credits!!! But, still, I do not believe they said it in the show. Do you? That is, of course, what I was speaking of.  And as far as the other goes, we tend to get on rather well here & sometimes one person has the best info, sometimes someone else, a third person, a new person, it all mostly comes out in the wash. Given how much bad info is out there, being a fan of good info just seems like a good thing to me. 

I got the biggest kick out of tweeting with Carolyn Culliton about her namesake & with Jean Passanante about Lumina. And, Patrick Mulcahey about early Texas/AW. Twi/X is so degraded now that it would never happen again. 

Mona, Sam was a writer not a director. I'm not sure if you were confused on that point or not. If I misunderstood, skip it. 

 

Edited by Contessa Donatella
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

I was just mistaken.  I thought he had been a director.  But I stand corrected (as my 10th grade history teacher used to say).   I've always loved that phrase.  It's a polite way to admit one was wrong.   

But writer or director, my point still stands. 

Edited by Mona Kane Croft
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

As to Goutman saying over & over we are not going to chase nostalgia. We have stories & we intend to tell them. Then what does he do, a gorilla harkening back to the zany comedy of the 80s. Which I hasten to say I loved but what is it if not nostalgic?

I get it that he tried to bring back Beverlee but when that fell through why not Carmen?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I love that you and I are coming from two different perspectives, yet we more or less agree. And I thank you for that.   

And of course -- why not Carmen?  For God's sake, Carmen was damned good as Iris.

And finally -- why go to the trouble of finding Sam Groom and flying him all the way from California, if he wasn't going to play Russ?? Especially since Russ's daughter (Josie) was still a major character.  Something has always been very fishy about all that.  I'll speculate that the intent was for Groom to return as Russ, but at the last minute someone at NBC or P&G said NO!  So Groom was given a day-player role.  Again, just speculation on my part.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, the gorilla keeper was referenced on air as Sam Ratcliffe. Cass mentions his name as he and Felicia are walking to the gorilla pit on the June 23rd episode. I watched the episode recently and remember the scene as they were talking about Wallingford. Richard and Carolyn are mentioned by name in the same scene.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The gorilla stuff was nonsense and a waste of time. It was an insult to waste the previous few minutes of a show on that idiocy. I hated it. I don't care if it was a tribute to a good writer or not. I appreciate the accurate information though, and it's nice when people confirm information so thank you Watson.

I'm also glad Beverlee McKinsey did not return as Iris because she was not my Iris. Carmen Duncan was. I understand this is not true for everyone, but McKinsey was Alexandra and Duncan was Iris because I was not old enough to see McKinsey on AW or Texas. While I had given up AW yrs before it's end, I would have been angered if Iris had returned with McKinsey playing her. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Wonder if Groom was supposed to return in the Summer of 99 as Russ as the show was cancelled?  Maybe the show gave him the part of the minister because of that?  Goutman kept saying that the show would not celebrate the 35th anniversary in May, but they had the summer to celebrate.

The gorilla stuff could have been skipped to give Rachel a few more minutes at the end of the show to reminisce and show some flashbacks as she swept through the Cory living room one last time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Anything to spare us the sight of the AW cast singing a James Brown song to soothe a savage gorilla, lol!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • @Maxim https://www.facebook.com/reel/4165068087116271  
    • I think Steve and Shawn track down Kevin and Jeffrey gives them one dose on the sly in exchange for keeping it quiet. John's organs will go to Bo. We know he's not really coming home. Xander won't make the board meeting so EJ will get the hospital by default. And Kate will tell Xander that Sarah lied to him precisely because she feared he would do something like this to Philip  Those are my Friday predictions! Was a good show. I felt Philip's fear in that last scene.
    • @MaximBoth of Diana Ross's daughter are so talented but also they are a hoot! Check Tracee out here. https://www.instagram.com/reel/DIgzye6xqYQ/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link  
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • And now all the episodes are gone. SMH. These jackasses never stop 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Not much happened today. But @brisbydog, all of our wish came true: no Leo this week

      Please register in order to view this content

      I guess Susan was necessary today, but I really wish she’d leave. Marlena putting EJ on blast about Belle was pretty good though, and I hope they continue to use Marlena in their storyline. I’m interested in seeing what happens to EJelle in the aftermath of the John storyline. And I really wish we were seeing Paul and Andrew moving in on John’s location. If they can’t get Christopher Sean on the show, they should at least try to get Colton Little.  I liked how smart Xander was today and that he immediately that Philip stole the drug. He did a pretty good job in his scenes where he confronted Philip as well. I also appreciate the way that Philip’s been written lately; more like a tragic hero than a bratty, goofy clown. Which is all the more reason that I hope the triangle with Stephanie and Alex is revived. But Xander did seem a little overly melodramatic in his last scene though And, I can’t help but think that Dr. Russell being so hesitant about involving the police in the drug theft could be a sign of something. 
    • I haven’t watched since Daisy’s last episode. Part of me feels like its a good place to end it because outside of The Platt’s, Tracy, Todd, and Carla and Swain I haven’t really enjoyed the show. Too many depressing stories and irksome characters, I especially hate what they’re doing to Debbie. I do think its funny they spent all this time investing into that awful new family and apparently they’ve already been canned, feedback must have been horrid.
    • I think the pre-Barnabas episodes are very underrated both for dialogue and character. They're slow but they really create a world and fill out the characters, imbuing them with heavy dimension that ultimately will have to sustain them for years as the show largely stops writing for character after it returns from 1795. What we know about them by then is what they have to power them. (I don't think the show was bad after, I actually love it in '68 and often in times after that, but it was very different.) I think the B&W episodes with Barnabas' early days are especially frightening - they terrified me as a kid - but the color stuff in '67 is also very strong, especially in the stretch where Julia is on the run, Carolyn is under Barnabas' control, and you get the sense that events have gone off the rails for the regular characters and anything goes. As a child viewer seeing it in syndication on the Sci-Fi Channel, who had no idea who lived or who died, it was a lot. Mitch Ryan is especially powerful in the early pre-Barnabas era as the sort of Byronic Burke Devlin character. You knew they had to kill him once Barnabas comes in, despite Ryan's alcohol problem making it impossible to keep him at the show - Burke dominates the first year or so as the fulcrum character, he's incredibly magnetic and charismatic. You couldn't see him becoming a dupe for Barnabas and Julia, as Anthony George's more benign, mild version briefly does before getting unceremoniously killed off. I always found Burke's offscreen plane crash death very eerie and suspicious, and I think the show does toy with the question if Barnabas' powers somehow got him on that plane and if he took it down. I had always wanted Burke to return one day, in any revival project, as a kind of vengeful power broker and puppet master, driven by Vicki's inevitable demise to get revenge on Barnabas and co. I still have Art Wallace's "Shadows on the Wall" DS bible somewhere. IIRC in the earliest versions of the plot Vicki was going to somehow be tied to the butler or his daughter - Betty Hanscomb or something. I don't remember the exact details. I do know there's all sorts of raised and dropped plotlines and characters offscreen in '66, like Ned Calder, the man they clearly intended to pair with Liz and so on. I've always found '66 very rich, but I don't begrudge the show after for it because it's still awfully well-written, specifically the early Barnabas stuff.
    • I totally agree with this, as most of you seem to. Mary Carney was at least competent and reasonably likable; I just feel like she barely had anything of substance to do before she was abruptly given the hook. And I get the backstory of Kathleen Tolan having done a play with Helen Gallagher, but...at any point did they ever actually READ her before they greenlit her? Because...OOF. First time I saw her on SoapNet was right when this GODAWFUL actress named Charity Rahmer played Belle on Days of Our Lives for all of three weeks before she was mercifully recast; her line readings were straight out of a Charlie Brown special. I remember thinking Kathleen Tolan could have played her mother! In the Frank/Jill/Delia triangle, Delia WAS the one who was cheated on, so I got why she was upset and thought it was perfectly valid in theory at least, but of course it was blown up to Wagnerian proportions including falls involving staircases and tricycles. But with Pat/Faith/Delia I had no sympathy for her...especially because it was mainly with Catherine Hicks's Faith and I really liked her.
    • I was going through those episodes from 1984 and early 1985 before they were taken down. Some of the older characters, like Don and even Tom, looked a little out of place, like they were on the wrong show. But the newer characters were fun. It's too bad they lost the character of Melissa. I guess Jennifer took her long-term place on the canvas. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy