Jump to content

Another World Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

David Bailey was the only actor that I remember as Russ. I was too young to remember Sam Groom or Robert Hover. When David Bailey returned in 1989, I thought the powers that be should have recast the part. However, I went back to watch some episodes with Bailey. Actually, Bailey was good. The show missed a great opportunity to keep Bailey on longer than six months. Bailey always great chemistry with Vickie Wyndham, Irene Dailey and Connie Ford. And he was good in scenes with Carmen Duncan. Russ could have been involved with Iris again and possibly Rachel with the return of Carl Hutchins. Charles Keating's reappearance in 1989 with Carl being involved with the Red Swan story.  Beverly Penberthy's return in 1989 would have been a treat. Pat could have played the aunt for Josie to lean on, and good romantic pairing later for Spencer Harrison. Even though Paul Stevens had passed away in 1986. I would have brought back the character Brian Bancroft; this time being played by Donald May or John Gabriel.

Was the intention for David Bailey to return for only short-term purposes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 13.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members
Posted (edited)

It would have been interesting to see Sam Groom back in the role of Russ, when the character returned in 1989 (or even in a later return).  David Bailey was acceptable as Russ, but he didn't have much acting range.  And if Russ and Rachel ever reunited, I don't think Bailey would have been the best choice, because Rachel's husband sort of becomes AW's leading man. I don't think Bailey would have risen to that challenge. But Groom could have done that wonderfully.  I would have also been okay with a complete recast -- hopefully with an actor with a good deal of soap opera experience and someone happy with the role long-term.  

And to answer a question: I do not believe Russ's return in 1989 was originally meant to be short-term.  With the reveal that Josie was his daughter, and with Olivia on the canvas, there was lots for Russ to do.  I think Lemay's plan was that Russ return permanently, but Donna Swajeski probably didn't think he was exciting enough and lost interest in Russ.  

Edited by Tisy-Lish
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oakland Tribune,  23 December 1984

Osburn faces up to lookalike role by Connie Passalacqua

With all due respect to Kim Canes, Julie Osborn of Another World" has Nancy Frangione eyes.  Osburn was cast as Bay City secretary Kathleen McKlnnon, a character with a striking resemblance to the mysteriously vanished Cecile de Poullgnac, in a part especially written for her. Oaburn does look very much like Frangione, and the writers used that similarity in a plot twist which had Kathleen (in a blond wig) impersonate Cecile in a successful attempt to smoke out and capture Cecile's captors.

Do you really think I look like Nancy? Osburn still asks incredulously. I think I look a lot more like Kathleen Layman (the actress who plays Kathleens sister, policewoman MJ.). It''s dear that Osburn is a seriously determined young actress who'd rather be known because of her own talents, rather than any coincidence.

I've been acting since I was 12," said Osburn, who grew up in Arlington, Texas, and took her first acting class there at a children's theater workshop. After leads in high-school plays she studied drama at Trinity University in San Antonio and came to New York City when die was 20, to study with acting coach Uta Hagen. By her own description, the last place she ever thought she'd work was on a soap opera. I was a theater snob," she said. I didn't want to be a soap actress, because it used to have the connotation in show business that you were bad. But that's changed. I see a lot of soap  actors on Broadway now. ' Osburn was set in her place when she went out to Hollywood last year during the pilot season. I worked off-Broadway and on tour and I studied with wonderful people, she recalls. But the casting people out there didn't know who they were and didn't care. I wouldn't be out there if I wasn't good, would I? All they wanted to know was If I had done any TV. Well, I decided to break In somewhere

She had rejected two previous soap offers but became more receptive to the role offered by Another. World. As wltchy Kathleen, Osburn has deliciously taken up the fallen banner of the shows villianess, now that Frangione has left the show. She even likes her Job. The role is well-written and fun to play, she said. '

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

She never was a villainess. At most she clashed a little bit with Cass and Felicia when she first came on only because she didn't just do whatever Cass wanted in his scheme to find Cecile.

I agree she didn't resemble Nancy Frangione and they only got away with the body double storyline because Nancy was nowhere nearby while Kathleen was making decoy appearances in a blonde wig. And I am more grateful than not that they cast Julie Osburn because she was a great sister for Kathleen Layman's MJ and also fit in with Cass and Felicia without being like Cecile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Was Kathleen meant to be a villain and this quickly changed?  I remember finding an article from the early eighties that talked about Iris and Rachel as sisters. If these things were written now, you would accuse the writers of using AI. I imagine some of them were storyline projections the soap columnists got that changed before the stories went to press [obviously not the Iris/Rachel error), but who knows?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I can see why the Sam/Amanda story went downhill so fast. Thomas Gibson was a terrible replacement. I don't remember the circumstances of RKK quitting  (if his contract was over or if the departure was more acrimonious), but Gibson just sucks the energy out of every scene. He has no chemistry with anyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Kathleen was not a villainess when she first appeared but she was also not a typical heroine. She was keeping secrets from MJ and Ben about her last job, was ambitious and definitely had an edge.  That’s why she fit so well with Felicia and Cass.  They still had some shades of grey at that point 

Edited by Efulton
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sounds similar to where she was when she returned in 1991, just older and more hardened by life. I do appreciate some aspects of that return, but it's tough to get past all the slanted writing for Frankie/Cass as I have no great interest in that pairing (of course you are going to write for the couple who are actually staying on the show, but I feel how I feel).

That's a good spot. I don't think it's him but there is some resemblance so I may be wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Kathleen & Carl’s returns were one the best stories Swajeski told. Yes the writing was slanted in Frankie’s favour but Julie Osburn originally only signed a short contract.  She did extend her stay and was well integrated into the show.  They wanted her to resign again and it looked like they were going to pair Kathleen with Grant but she wanted to return to California. 

Edited by Efulton
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I know Curlee/Demorest tried to give Roger a conscience in regard to raping Holly, and Zas is magnificent in those scenes with Alex. But he kinda ends up blaming Adam and the fact he (well, really the writers) ignores raping Rita and being responsible for her and Ed's child's death make it less than convincing.  I do think during 89-93 they were careful to not whitewash his past with Holly, but his occasional bouts of conscience always seemed to be overridden by his obsession/lust for her. The only purely good thing I can ever recall him doing is helping Maureen during the blackout, and even then, had she lived, he would've found a way to call that favor in. I've kinda resisted saying it, but it's kind of clear to me Long was determined to have her own version of Erica Kane, and God help us all, it ended up as Reva Shayne. Although at least Kim could act. (Sorry LaLucci fans) Honestly, I'm not even sure CBS soaps ever a character as larger than life as Reva. 
    • Regardless, I'd still like to see more episodes from the 80s...there is very little of Charlotte Greer, Kirklands and Greenberg's out there sadly.
    • A black family having a white maid would be a good subversion of stereotypes. Also want to say that while the overall show has many flaws, the biggest one that's legitimately stifling is the lack of a rival family.
    • I also do not like the bits I've seen with Delia during Labine's 83 return. I am glad when she came back for the last time in 1986, she allowed Delia to move on from Frank. 
    • Thanks for the well-detailed reply. I'm fairly early in my viewing, so I have some time before it goes nuts. Thanks a lot! @kalbir and @DRW50 thank you so much. I am just approaching 100 episodes, so I'm good for now. 
    • The Duprees as the main family isn't the problem, but the fact is that over 3/4 of the cast are Duprees.. so it limits coupling potential and also keeps the canvas too closed in. Too many female Duprees and no hetero, nor gay, male Duprees is also a problem.   I also agree with @DemetriKanethat the male characters are one note, and not very layered/interesting... outside of Bill, that is. To me, I would have focused on either Nicole's family and dynamics or Dani's family and dynamics instead of trying to introduce/develop both families at the same time.  Nicole's family is more developed and interesting with loads of storyline possiblities then Dani's family right now. And because MVJ and co decided to feature so many Duprees... we're less likely to be free of any outside characters like Ashley/Derek since they're the non-Dupree part of the canvas.
    • BTG: A B&B: B DAYS: B+ GH: A- Y&R: C-
    • I can not see Kat as a police officer and do not want that for her. Thats not her passion nor does she care about that stuff. The stuff with Eva and Leslie is specific to her life and wanting to protect her family. Her "detective" skills have more to do with her business background, which makes her very analytical and pay close attention to details. If this show had a corporation, she'd make a shrewed businesswoman and CEO I definitely dont want to see her sleep with her cousin's husband. That would be too much of a Hayley redux which ironically you dont want with the Sharon/Hayley theory
    • I would make Jan, Ashley's mom, Anita and Vernon's maid. It would lock in to why Leslie would choose to befriend both her and Mona. It also gives Ashley a connection to the Duprees and explains how she befriended Naomi. I would have had Derek start the show as a cop to explain his connection to Jacob. Kat needs to realize that she is MADE to be a detective. Have her go through police training, making the appropriate comments about the uniform along the way. Have her prove she is so much more than a rich princess, even to herself. Then, when Jacob's partner is proven to be dirty, Kat is assigned as Jacob's rookie trainee. At the same time, Naomi does finally get a case she can follow through on. Her client is a person that Jacob arrested. This puts them at odds because Jacob knows this person did it, as does Kat, but Naomi only sees the extenuating circumstances and believes he deserves a lighter sentence and a second chance. THAT is when Jacob will turn to Kat in frustration and she will lose her virginity to him. 
    • This opened my eyes and appeals to my logic. But, don't you also think that the fact that they are so ill-suited means that, by soap-opera-laws, they aren't a long term item?  I like how Belle is written now, so I appreciate the fact that she is in this story.  But, I don't believe anything will become of it, and I think EJ is going to mess it up very soon.  Which explains why I don't get too worked up over it. I'm also suspending my outrage until I see how EJ treats Belle during her mourning.  If he cheats with Cat, then we'll know that he was never meant to be happy.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy