Jump to content

Mala Bhattacharjee on diversity


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 21
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I think the bigger question is why was the story terribly written, with inconsistent, confused characterization, hackneyed stereotypes, and bad casting. Another question is if anyone at Y&R even cares about the Winters family at this point in time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't except these writers to do black on black love they can't even write for a indivsional black character.

Blacks are always in a bubble then they'll disappear.

I'm not going to go into why they rehire CK so Lily can venture out & date how many white guys she wants & reassure people that she is part of a black family. By keeping saying that she just like her mother. When the viewers don't see it on the screen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Again, Nancy Curlee got it. Gilly, David, Kat, and Hamp were all rooted in black families and black culture and yet their stories affected everyone in town. I loved the antagonism and blackmail between Roger and Gilly at WSPR.

And, of course, their stories all went to hell after regimes changed at GL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

but she is like her mother- she's black!

AS for OLTL- they aren't re-issuing the Gannons, they're re-issuing Rachel. They'll cast as many counselors, teachers, and security that they can just so people will shut up about diversity. "Hell, if Y&R can do it, so can we."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's just it, they're not even stereotypical! They aren't anybody. It's the elephant in the room whereby we're waiting for someone to acknowledge that they're black.

Stereotypical would imply the Winters are eating chicken while Neil plays the sax and slaps Karen on the ass while Devon talks "jive".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah, thinking about it closely, it's almost like they're too afraid to admit these people are Black - which is nonsense really.

But I guess with the lack of Black writers and producers in daytime, and existing writers not really trying, it's the final product we get.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah, thank you for posting, Rakesh. No matter what the New York Times said this week, race will always be a hot-button issue in America. And it's a shame it's not being portrayed in any entertainment medium as well as it once was.

To me, it's not that they're being stereotypical at all. In the soaps where I've seen Black families the most, they're just boring. They're not even caricatures anymore.

But again, I don't want to see Lily finding her roots by sporting a fro, reading Angela Davis, and becoming an activist for the AIDS orphans in Sierra Leone (actually, the last idea would kinda be nice; I mean, if Mac can go to Darfur...). I just want to see reality.

For instance, I loved when Devon shared his grandma's recipe with the Winters of those brownies or whatever. That's not a "Black" thing but it's REAL. It's human. And none of the damn characters are human anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think giving the Black characters these token social issues like adoption drama, illness, crack-addicted mothers, and absent parent comes off as deeply stereotypical to me. It seems like for years the Winter's family, in particular, has been used as the token social issue storyline family.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The adoption story wasn't played with enough integrity to be a stereotypical "Black," thing, though.

I don't know. Maybe because it was developed so poorly, because the Winters are now so non-Black without Dru, I just didn't see the stereotype.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Is Mala's blog comment making it into the SOD mag? The soap mags rarely publish anything controversial. I have to admit that I am tired of arguing about the importance of diversity on the soaps. It has been years of this [!@#$%^&*]. Daytime is determined to write itself into cancellation. There is nothing I can do about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • DePriest left in January 1988. According to the AWHP, Rose last appeared nearly a year before in February 1987 while both Sara and Peggy appeared as late as October 1987.
    • Annie was not brought in as an antagonist for Reva. Reva wasn’t even on the canvas when Annie first appeared in late 1994. 
    • The speculation……….very entertaining. 
    • I had forgotten that several Days stars came out strong against Melissa. Good for them!
    • That would have made sense. Did all these characters get dropped when DePriest left or had they already been dropped?
    • The other issue with Missy: in June 2020, she "liked" some social media posts by Candace Owens -- things Candace said that were against Black Lives Matter.  That is described here https://tvline.com/news/melissa-reeves-racism-days-of-our-lives-instagram-controversy-2894568/ I don't know if that was ever resolved.
    • She appeared onscreen not long after Rose Livingston and Sara Montaigne, and we found out that Sara was Rose's estranged daughter. I wonder whether Peggy might have been part of that family group -- or else they were just juggling a few different potential mysteries so that they could develop whatever seemed to be getting the best response from the audience. They didn't do anything much with Rose and Sara really either. Maybe Rose would have become more prominent if Rachel and Mac had split up over Mitch, or if Sara had really flourished. In some ways I can picture Cheryl being affected by MJ's prostitution similarly to how Josie was distressed by finding out about Sharlene. But I can also see that Josie as a Frame being involved with Matthew would have different stakes for Rachel and Sharlene than Cheryl being involved with Scott. I do think the solution for Cheryl would have had to be a badder boy than Scott -- either a real bad boy who would do her wrong, or the kind of bad boy (not Chad!!!) who is essentially misunderstood and other people just don't understand. Cheryl would also have been better off with some friends her own age. Matthew and Josie benefited a bit from having other teenagers to interact with.
    • Sally Spencer was a decent actress, but the writing destroyed the "M.J." that Kathleen Layman had built. Layman had a quiet strength about her, and she and Osburn really felt like sisters. Spencer's character should have been either an unmentioned sister, or maybe Jake's that grew up close to Kathleen, M.J. and the rest, but was away for a few years before joining the force. Kristen Marie was o.k., but I always got a mousier vibe from her. Being pigeon-holed with Scott for most of the run hurt things for her, as well.  The Loves were also underserved between Rhonda Lewin and Philece Sampler. Philece would have been better as Nicole. Thank goodness Anne Heche  showed up for the next round of auditions. Christopher Holder was mediocre as Peter, but given a shot, I think Marcus Smythe could have stuck around for a while.  I would have had Peggy Lazarus be a Frame -- possibly an ex-wife for Vince with an agenda. Smythe and Hollen had  a fun chemistry that could have kept the two around.. Bringing recasts for  Cheryl and Ben back mixing it up with other Frames. Corys, Lawrences at the time might have kept all the families stronger. 
    • shoot...he said in that Locher room with Krista. I think he met her before that---she was doing Broadway and they had mutual friends or an agent maybe?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy