Jump to content

Y&R: Week of April 27, 2009


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 717
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Copying this over from the older thread, since this is really about this week.

Why does Gloria NEED to sincerely atone? Why can't she be the reckless bad girl who consistently makes wrong choices?

For me, part of Gloria's charm has been her inability to acknowledge her wrongness. Most of the time, she feels justified. That capacity for self-delusion is fascinating.

Indeed, that is why I am concerned if she starts confessing. Because then she loses the protective envelope of "I felt justified".

Oh well, it doesn't matter. Gloria could turn into the GC serial killer and, if JC plays her, I'd likely give her a pass.

Actually, that last sentence is a trigger for me: I see why the Baldwin boys give her a pass, because I am similarly enchanted by her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The fact is that we don't want to see either of the four trying to fix their crimes again. But we all know it's going to happen in the near future. As soon as they all becoming normal, people start rambling that they've lost their charm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Glo never seriously atones for anything and she is the only person deluded into thinking that she has. She is the ultimate grifter and her sense of justification fits right into that profile. Her sons forgive her because of some perceived past injustice that has been heaped upon her by River, Tom or who ever.

I can see TIIC changing her back story to "having been abandoned and given away by her mother upteen years ago", instead of letting her be. This of course would be a shame because every good series needs a villian who creates mayhem--just because.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think that's the problem too. That they never own up to it. And it would be so much more of a pleasure to watch if they never owned up to it in a sinister way, as if they were doing evil and saying, "Yeah, I'm a bada** mofo. I got my lawyer and no one can touch me," instead of, "Woe is me. I can't help but be greedy. It's an addiction, like alcohol. But it's a good thing I got my son to intervene whenever I fall off the 'Gecco' wagon."

I don't want to feel sorry for villains; especially ones who never learn. And if they never learn, have them commit crimes over something they really can't help (like avenging a rape or a murder) or commit crimes that aren't felonies for once?

Darn it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

At the end of the day, Gloria and her "little helpers" are way better than various characters on that show, IMO, which I won't name just because today I'm tired of writing their name down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I don't, since they've clearly incorporated them into Tomas' storyline, and I happen to like his tattoos, but his jackets not fitting doesn't mean they're trying to cover his tattoos. The clothing overall isn't the issue; it's the fit. And I expect(ed) more from Jeresa Featherstone and her team. Very disappointed. He's the only male, overall, whose costume irritates me.
    • "And OMG, watching the scenes of Roger's return in comparison...the quality in the writing really nosedived. The stupid mask." Very much agreed.  Having Roger hide behind a mask for weeks/months, with it culminating with him swinging in on a vine at Blake/Phillip's wedding....geez.  So juvenile. IMO, Guiding Light never did a good job reintroducing major characters, either from the dead or elsewhere.  Masked balls = awful.  Amish = awful. When Reva was brought back from the dead, she should've just showed up in Springfield as Reva, and informed everyone that she had been gone for years because she felt like it.  She had a four-year fling with some dude who ended up dumping her due to disloyalty. Josh would be pissed and declare that their love is not *always* but *sometimes* and he'd act accordingly.  Her kids would hate her.   
    • Agreed. The Emmys next year are gonna be a pretty tough competition and I hope we get a Days sweep lol  Not only does Deidre deserve a nomination for these last few weeks, but I also think Paul Telfer, Raven Bowens, Carson Boatman, Dan Feuerriegel and Alison Sweeney have good chances as well.
    • It’s not about a lack of faith and trust in MVJ, it’s about a a lack of faith and trust in Ron Carlivati, who I think can be very sneaky and manipulative when he wants to be.  And, all that “He’s just a breakdown writer” talk never changed my mind about anything, because at Days, it was “just a breakdown writer” that gave us some of the worst episodes I’ve ever seen. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • @TaoboiI ran into Dani’s favorite party planner again tonight

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy