Colleen fierce?? Her storyline is laughable. I can't take her seriously. What a shame we are stuck with a sucky actress in this story.

Here! Here! You're preaching to the choir!

I love it bc people dont expect to take her seriously in the storyline and then get frustrated bc she isnt coming across as dumb as they think she will. She's proving them all wrong and not backing down. Best thing is that there is absolutely nothing any of them can do about it

Colleen has never been stupid until this last recast and this storyline isn't helping matters.

At least to me it was more appealing than boring/stupid Colleen. I just cant stand the actress in the role. She is totally ruining this story for me.

Me as well, she doesn't have the charisma that this role needs and deserves.

Phyllis getting arrested, while predictable, was pure soap. I continue to be fascinated by Stacy Haiduck/Mary Jane. I mean I think its becoming clear its Patty, the fact we don't know for sure and are kept guessing really speaks to the tight, consistent writing this show has been giving us.

I agree, I'm still intrigued by the MJ character and can't wait for the big reveal... I just hope all the buildup doesn't disappoint.

I thought Eden was a goth girl when I first started watching again. The dark hair, the dark clothing she wore, gloomy personality and the fact that she doesnt smile much unless she's with Noah. To someone who doesnt know her, its easy to see why she'd be called that

Nope, nothing Goth about Eden at all but perhaps they will go there?

Doug Davidson said the actress that played Mary is retired from acting and I think is too sick to act again.

Such a damn shame, she owned that role and I said several weeks ago that she should come back and wreak some havoc on Paul and Heather.

Considering how many crimes Lauren has helped that criminal family of her's cover up, she looks stupid passing moral judgement on other people.

I cracked up reading this and looking at BA in your avatar with that look on her face, which was perfect for what you wrote.

Paul/Nikki need to be broken up ASAP.

Or write for them and actually show them on screen. Ridiculous!

Joshua Morrow and Michelle Stafford had both said they wanted to work together. She probably thought she was doing them a favor. I am not sure how much of an influence she had on the decision since the writers had been thinking about it since their summer road trip to California. I would bet this was said in passing and not so much a "What do you think we should do" sort of conversation.

It doesn't matter if it was to me, it was a cool idea and neither of us seem to be sure of the circumstances surrounding how the actors felt at that time. She mentioned she was asked and she told them she felt Phyllis was a good character am sure she's not the only one on set to think of it but that was cool I pretty mmuch liked what she said about the Phyllis character overall, I really don't need any hypotheticals or possible scenarios in how it was done I liked the interview the way it is. Whether or not it was done in passing is not very important the actress did not indicate that was or was not the case, and I did not perceive her response as such. Thanks.

Edited April 30, 200916 yr by classicmoment

Can Y&R stop teasing and just end Nick/Phyllis already? They reunite now, but we'll be back in the same situation when he cheats on her with Sharon again by summer

They are good at teasing all of the fan bases.

That Sharon Case interview was I love it when actors/actresses exhibit cleverness and a good handling on who their characters are. Oddly enough, it is the good actors who only do that....

It doesn't matter if it was to me, it was a cool idea and neither of us seem to be sure of the circumstances surrounding how the actors felt at that time. She mentioned she was asked and she told them she felt Phyllis was a good character am sure she's not the only one on set to think of it but that was cool I pretty mmuch liked what she said about the Phyllis character overall, I really don't need any hypotheticals or possible scenarios in how it was done I liked the interview the way it is. Whether or not it was done in passing is not very important the actress did not indicate that was or was not the case, and I did not perceive her response as such. Thanks.

It does mean a little something to me which is why I replied. Since many people read the boards, I can see a scenario where suddenly it's online community lore that Sharon Case came up with the idea for the Phyllis and Nick pairing, which, she did not. The response was as much for others as for you. It is good that you don't need hypotheticals as you will take little from my response. Frankly, that's just fine. We take what we need and keep moving around here.

It does mean a little something to me which is why I replied. Since many people read the boards, I can see a scenario where suddenly it's online community lore that Sharon Case came up with the idea for the Phyllis and Nick pairing, which, she did not. The response was as much for others as for you. It is good that you don't need hypotheticals as you will take little from my response. Frankly, that's just fine. We take what we need and keep moving around here.

Let's be clear your reply to a quote of my post came off as if you were correcting me on something, if you needed to make it clear you didn't have to quote me cause frankly my post was in reference to the actress' quote from the article. So if one of those people you felt you needed to clearify your knowledge on who came up with what idea about a storyline was me, next time don't feel the "need" please. Thank you!

Edited April 30, 200916 yr by classicmoment

ENOUGH! THE BOTH OF YOU! I WILL CRUSH YOU!

Sharon Case came up with the idea for the Phyllis and Nick pairing, which, she did not.

How do you know that?

ENOUGH! THE BOTH OF YOU! I WILL CRUSH YOU!

LMAO :lol:

ENOUGH! THE BOTH OF YOU! I WILL CRUSH YOU!

what ? Just a lil friendly sparring

I thought Lauren was very reasonable in her reasons for wanting Sharon to pay for her crime. What kind of example does it set for both Noah and Eden that Sharon should get away scott free because she's the town "Darling"? Its like this character should somehow be protected from any fall out from her affairs, and now her crimes, why? No other character, besides Victor, never has to pay the piper, and it is the reason most people now hate his character. Will she at least be shown seeing a therapist or will she be instantly cured by Nick's love?

I also don't see how it is an accident that Sharon let Eden take the fall. She must have been in serious denial not to be able to put two and two together when her mother caught her stealing and called her on it. She was aware of what she was doing and should have remembered handing Eden the bag that day. Are we ever going to see Sharon at least apologize to the girl that she has judged as much as Nikki judged her when she was dating a teenage Nick?

I thought Lauren was very reasonable in her reasons for wanting Sharon to pay for her crime. What kind of example does it set for both Noah and Eden that Sharon should get away scott free because she's the town "Darling"? Its like this character should somehow be protected from any fall out from her affairs, and now her crimes, why? No other character, besides Victor, never has to pay the piper, and it is the reason most people now hate his character. Will she at least be shown seeing a therapist or will she be instantly cured by Nick's love?

I also don't see how it is an accident that Sharon let Eden take the fall. She must have been in serious denial not to be able to put two and two together when her mother caught her stealing and called her on it. She was aware of what she was doing and should have remembered handing Eden the bag that day. Are we ever going to see Sharon at least apologize to the girl that she has judged as much as Nikki judged her when she was dating a teenage Nick?

I don't think Lauren was very reasonable at all and Sharon being the town "darling" has nothing to do with it. My biggest problem is people's complete, I guess or the lack of questions about WHY Sharon would do this. Does Lauren actually believe that a very normal and mentally healthy Sharon would steal those books or those clothes? No, I don't think so at all. I think they all know better. In fact, if I lived in Genoa City and someone said "Did you know Sharon has been stealing things all over town", the first thing I'd ask is "What is wrong with her" or "That doesn't sound like Sharon". Really, why would Sharon need to steal books or clothes? She doesn't appear to be hurting for money at all. Lauren was pressing charges for revenge really. She was mad at Sharon and I get that, but I don't really believe that her reasons were noble or that she was trying to set some grand example for Noah and Eden.

I do agree however, that Sharon needs some therapy.

Also, while Sharon has made mistakes and absolutely owes Eden an apology for the books, lets not act as though Eden is innocent or that Sharon wasn't somewhat justified in not particularly wanting Noah to hang out with her considering - I believe the first time Sharon and Nick met Eden she was drunk, dancing badly at an unsupervised party sticking Noah's phone down her shirt while he was trying to answer his parents' call.

Edited April 30, 200916 yr by AllAboutAngst

IMHO, 99.9% of store owners would not care at all why someone ripped them off and stole things from them./

IMHO, 99.9% of store owners would not care at all why someone ripped them off and stole things from them./

I can agree with that, but we're not talking about some random woman that she has never met, she knows Sharon.

I can agree with that, but we're not talking about some random woman that she has never met, she knows Sharon.

I will give you that....

but, Sharon also let Laurens step daughter take the fall for her crimes.

Furthermore, Lauren & Sharon are not BFF's.