Jump to content

Y&R: Week of April 20, 2009


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 319
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

It was a great episode :).

But, one wonders why Branco is being so effusive. What is the agenda?

I'm probably being naive, but I think Branco is just doing his schtick to promote what he thinks is the last remaining exemplar of consistently good soap.

From the blog days, I think Branco thinks that Casiello "gets it". It's not just that Casiello has a blog--it is what he said in that blog, and how he responded to the customer.

(As a contrast, look at Dena Higley's blog).

Still, since Casiello himself has been pretty humble on his own blog, it would be nice if Branco didn't give him more spotlight than he seems to want.

I personally liked all the things that Toups mentioned. I really liked the clever staging and pacing of the myriad Ana-story elements. It flowed like good theater.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That seems like a perfectly fine justification to me :).

But, actually, this is where I got into trouble with Mr. Branco over on Usenet.

Because someone made a comment like yours above, I think about Mr. Branco and Kyle Lowder.

I "laughed" and played along.

Mr. Branco came into Usenet, called us all inappropriate and homophobic, and that we represented what was wrong with internet fans today.

The thread continued, with other Usenet posters claiming that Branco's occasional public drooling made him fair game for these kinds of comments

---

But here's the thing. I think Branco is God's gift to soap "journalism" or "press".

No, really!

Nothing else out there generates the same kind of interest (love or hate) as Branco's column. People flock to it, discuss it, critique it.

He's generating buzz...something that is so desperately needed for this threatened genre.

Through all of his (self-admitted) hyperbole and emotional-lability-for-public-consumption, he conveys a real love for the genre AND a demand that it be excellent.

How are these bad things? (For the record, I also think Carolyn Hinsey is often good for the genre, with her brand of criticism. Although, unlike Branco, her love for the genre doesn't shine through as much).

I don't want to make this a thread about Branco, but I do feel, sometimes, that "the evil that men do lives after them, the good is oft interred with their bones"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Translation: "How dare Kyle blab all over the Internet about what we did last night at the club? The big butt!"

What's the worst thing Branco could do to me? Label me a homophobe? Number one, that'd be ironic. Number two, I've been called much worse by much classier people. And number three, so what?

And for the record? There's journalism, there's "journalism", and then there's what he does, which is the cyberspace equivalent of scribbling "Mrs. Tom Casiello" over and over again in his notebook during fourth-period biology. If what he does attracts buzz to these shows, then these shows are better off remaining well-kept secrets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Now, here's a question. Ana today.... could this child's acting have BEEN more wooden? The scene where they walked in on Neil and Karen's hysteria, and this girl just deadpans... "It's all my fault", she didn't show any remorse in her eyes, face, in her voice.... she probabaly convey's more emotion when she goes the the Burger King and orders a whopper! And Bryton wasn't much better.... all the courtrrom scenes just going through the motions like a zombie. Wer'e lucky that those two are so inconsequential to the story, or they might have brought an otherwise fabulous episode down. But luckily Peeples and St. John saved the scenes and directed all attention to THEM... heck even Marcille was good today!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have to be honest - both Ana and Cane needed acting coaches today. If the thought of what happened to Ana today made Lily or Cane wonder if that would be Delia in ten years, then GREAT! Because Ana looked positively fine and bored with everything that was going on, and Delia would be too!

I understand Cane agreed to drop the suit, but the way he treated Chloe like some life-long friend was infuriating. There wasn't a trace of nuance at all in those Cane/Chloe scenes. It should have been really sad and touching to watch Cane drop the suit and say good-bye to Delia, and instead I was screaming at my television that after stomping around town for months, now he's just all sorts of peachy to walk away with no problem! I would have been fine if it built to that, but Cane had that drugged-out goofy smile on his face from the second he pulled Chloe aside to tell her. There was zero arc from Goddard.

Definitely the two weak points for me as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Whenever I see this girl I see Cassie who even as a child would convey the deepest sorrow. It's as if every Black person in the

cast has been robbed of their souls. They're all shells of themselves. So hollow. Maybe they all need to get pushed off a cliff and come back to life recast. Even Neil.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Not sure if anyone else noticed this, but at the end of Y&R today, the song accompanying the montage consisted of the words “bless the beasts and the children.

Y&R’s opening theme originated as a music cue from the 1971 movie titled Bless the Beasts and the Children. Not sure if this was just a coincidence or what, but thought it was interesting. Just a little Y&R history fact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No, it wasn't a cooincidence, it's another nod to HISTORY. The instrumental version of that song from the "Bless The Beasts And The Children" soundtrack was used as background music often in the 70's, and was used last in 2003 when Snapper, Greg, and Jill were leaving the mansion to take Liz for her brain tumor operation (the Foster family reunion they did for the 30th anniversary). The original version with lyrics that was recorded by the Carpenters was also used in 1982 when Snapper said a final goodbye to his son, Chuckie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Bloodshed is inevitable now. It’s another reason I’m glad Black people aren’t getting involved in these protests. As awful as this is, I keep reminding myself that 54 percent of Latino men voted for Trump. These people were put in harm’s way by members of their own communities and sometimes even members of their own families. Too many people decided to touch the stove.
    • Maybe I'm still in denial, but nothing about Neighbours' ongoing social media output gives the vibe of a show that's ending. In today's 'Roundup' video, Alan Fletcher referenced that production finishes in five weeks, but in all the show's posts the cast are as jovial and lighthearted as ever. Remarkably so for people who are about to lose their jobs.    Perhaps they're just putting a brave face on things, and I know they approached the previous axing with a positive attitude. Maybe putting an upbeat face on things is a collective way of showing potential backers that there's still life in the show? Or is it possible that they already know the show has been saved, and we'll get an announcement next month when filming wraps and the show 'rests'?   Does any of that make sense?!
    • A very good week for male eye candy on GH. New Michael is beautiful, Curtis's arms looked great in that polo shirt, Cody looks even more handsome with his new haircut AND we got Marco in swim shorts rocking his lovely bod and chest fur. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Yeah when Jamey Giddens did breakdowns for DAYS, he would sometimes state in tweets that specific things were his idea that he had pitched to Ron.
    • I don't, since they've clearly incorporated them into Tomas' storyline, and I happen to like his tattoos, but his jackets not fitting doesn't mean they're trying to cover his tattoos. The clothing overall isn't the issue; it's the fit. And I expect(ed) more from Jeresa Featherstone and her team. Very disappointed. He's the only male, overall, whose costume irritates me.
    • "And OMG, watching the scenes of Roger's return in comparison...the quality in the writing really nosedived. The stupid mask." Very much agreed.  Having Roger hide behind a mask for weeks/months, with it culminating with him swinging in on a vine at Blake/Phillip's wedding....geez.  So juvenile. IMO, Guiding Light never did a good job reintroducing major characters, either from the dead or elsewhere.  Masked balls = awful.  Amish = awful. When Reva was brought back from the dead, she should've just showed up in Springfield as Reva, and informed everyone that she had been gone for years because she felt like it.  She had a four-year fling with some dude who ended up dumping her due to disloyalty. Josh would be pissed and declare that their love is not *always* but *sometimes* and he'd act accordingly.  Her kids would hate her.   
    • Agreed. The Emmys next year are gonna be a pretty tough competition and I hope we get a Days sweep lol  Not only does Deidre deserve a nomination for these last few weeks, but I also think Paul Telfer, Raven Bowens, Carson Boatman, Dan Feuerriegel and Alison Sweeney have good chances as well.
    • It’s not about a lack of faith and trust in MVJ, it’s about a a lack of faith and trust in Ron Carlivati, who I think can be very sneaky and manipulative when he wants to be.  And, all that “He’s just a breakdown writer” talk never changed my mind about anything, because at Days, it was “just a breakdown writer” that gave us some of the worst episodes I’ve ever seen. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy