Members y&r_fan Posted April 11, 2009 Members Share Posted April 11, 2009 B&B should strike while the iron is hot and bring back Rick Hearst as Whip Jones. Jackie could hire him at Jackie M or he could work for . Or if they don't want to bring Whip back they could always hire him as Taylor's brother Zach. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members juniorz1 Posted April 11, 2009 Members Share Posted April 11, 2009 Ewww, no. I couldn't stand Whip. Of all of Rick Hearst's daytime roles, Whip is easily my least favorite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Taiah Posted April 11, 2009 Members Share Posted April 11, 2009 Noooo, I wouldn't want RH back on B&B at all. But back on Y&R (new character obviously), I'll take that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members MarkH Posted April 11, 2009 Members Share Posted April 11, 2009 The Y&R canvas is full. The B&B canvas is decrepit and incestuous. Thus, I support bringing on Rick to fix things up over there. I want Sean Kanan back at the same time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Y&RWorldTurner Posted April 11, 2009 Members Share Posted April 11, 2009 Whatever, like you guys atually expect Bradley to write for him. Some of you will never learn when it comes to Brad Bell... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members MarkH Posted April 11, 2009 Members Share Posted April 11, 2009 We're addicts. We keep hoping this time will be different. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Cat Posted April 11, 2009 Members Share Posted April 11, 2009 Unless Bill Bell rose from his grave to take over the reins of B&B, I honestly would not wish the show on as talented an actor as Rick Hearst. Bradley Bell needs to show that he can value the host of great characters who already willfully ignores on his canvas first. Co-sign on the Sean Kanan wish, though. He invigorated the show. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Sylph Posted April 11, 2009 Members Share Posted April 11, 2009 Hm... Is this a contradiction: you don't want talented actors on a show, but you'd like Sean Kanan? I hate Sean Kanan, I wish you thought his character was awful, you obviously don't. One rule for Hearst, the other for Kanan? Kanan sucks. His character, too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members juniorz1 Posted April 11, 2009 Members Share Posted April 11, 2009 Deacon was fantastic for his first year or so on the show but the writing weakened for his character. I thought Sean Kanan was fantastic, if bloated in the role. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members MarkH Posted April 11, 2009 Members Share Posted April 11, 2009 What I don't think you get is that there is a substantial contingent of us that hates Forresters. Loathes them. Finds them entitled and irresponsible and perverse. For us, the pleasure has always come from watching the malevolent outsiders knock them down a peg. Sally Spectra, who got in a few good blows. Massimo, the only man who ever talked to Eric like the lecherous slime he is Deacon, who did to the Forresters what Rick is doing to Ridge now...but who had incendiary chemistry with Stephanie. As she does with so many, Flannery appealed to Deacon's desperate need for a mother Amber Moore, who beat Brooke at her own slutty game Angela, who exposed the hypocrisy of "close family" among the Forresters -- when she showed that an "imperfect" Forrester was not worthy of being acknowledged Sheila, the ultimate outsider, who only wanted love and acceptance. When it was denied to her, her schemes were delicious Each of these outsiders received more audience love than disdain, at least during their initial runs. And that is because the audience hates the Forresters. HATES 'em (except for Stephanie). So, yes, we need Deacon and Whip and Amber and Sheila ... or suitable replacements. The Forresters need so badly to be taught some lessons right now. To a one, every single one is acting like an irredeemable ass right now. My hope is that is the next in a line of people who can teach Eric and his spoiled brats some lessons. Stephanie, telling "grandpa" that she was gonna "show him" was a delight. Stephanie is the ULTIMATE Forrester adversary (if they let her be). She will do this with strength, and I hope she brings that lecherous Viagra popper down to his knees BEGGING for mercy. Even a few weeks ago, when someone was stealing Forrester designs and giving them to the Marones. The chat on here and elsewhere was "I wonder who" and "this is fun"...NOT "oh those poor Forresters". A few of us would like to see those folks humbled. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Cat Posted April 11, 2009 Members Share Posted April 11, 2009 I don't see how my statement is contradictory. Whip was a character with a lot of potential, yes -- humor, not afraid to pull on women's lingerie, chemistry with everyone, and a secret past involving a rather intense mother and a fixation with Forrester Creations. Alas, Bradley Bell dispensed with his services a few months' later and buried the SL. That speaks volumes. If the EP/HW is not willing to put in the groundwork in a new character played by (IMO) one of Daytime's most accomplished actors, what can I do about it? Again and again, interesting characters and the actors who play them are thrown to the wayside in favor of blowhards like Jack Wagner, talentless hair models like Ronn Moss and the underrated but sleepwalking Katherine Kelly Lang who has been on Blow-Up Doll Mode. I like Rick Hearst too much as an actor to see him subjected to that indignity (I felt the same way with how Eileen Davidson was treated). He's already been through all that with GH. I honestly think that RH should be playing characters who become leads -- he has the stature and talent of a lead actor. As for Sean Kanan, I actually think he's somewhat talented, too. More than that, though, the character of Deacon is (or was) embedded in the canvas of the show. He is "Little Eric's" dad -- you know, the kid the Forresters swore they would treat as if he were their own flesh and blood before he was shipped back to Furnace Creek? He is Hope's father. He was in love with Amber. Married to Bridget. Shtupped her mom. Headed marketing at FC. Shtupped Jackie. He is the troublemaker of the show. Bradley has been trying to write characters like him ever since he left -- Shane, Owen, now Rick. This sort of anatgonist is needed because he pisses everybody off and because the Brooke/Stephanie rivalry is played out. JMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Cat Posted April 11, 2009 Members Share Posted April 11, 2009 Yes! ABSOLUTELY. I'm just going to stop posting and let Mark speak for me now because he explains it brilliantly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members MarkH Posted April 11, 2009 Members Share Posted April 11, 2009 Oh, how I love this post. Love it! Yes, every word is true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members BadZoe Posted April 11, 2009 Members Share Posted April 11, 2009 I want Phyllis to find the Matt Clarke look alike to bring to town as her new boyfriend, thus aggravating Nick and driving Sharon into the nuthouse. He's too good for B&B, they'd just waste him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members All My Shadows Posted April 11, 2009 Members Share Posted April 11, 2009 Whipple? Ew, no. GL should be moving heaven and earth to get him back as A-M. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.