Jump to content

B&B: Bring back Rick Hearst!


Recommended Posts

  • Members

B&B should strike while the iron is hot and bring back Rick Hearst as Whip Jones. Jackie could hire him at Jackie M or he could work for

.

Or if they don't want to bring Whip back they could always hire him as Taylor's brother Zach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 30
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Unless Bill Bell rose from his grave to take over the reins of B&B, I honestly would not wish the show on as talented an actor as Rick Hearst. Bradley Bell needs to show that he can value the host of great characters who already willfully ignores on his canvas first.

Co-sign on the Sean Kanan wish, though. He invigorated the show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Hm... Is this a contradiction: you don't want talented actors on a show, but you'd like Sean Kanan? I hate Sean Kanan, I wish you thought his character was awful, you obviously don't. One rule for Hearst, the other for Kanan?

Kanan sucks. His character, too. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What I don't think you get is that there is a substantial contingent of us that hates Forresters. Loathes them. Finds them entitled and irresponsible and perverse.

For us, the pleasure has always come from watching the malevolent outsiders knock them down a peg.

  • Sally Spectra, who got in a few good blows.
  • Massimo, the only man who ever talked to Eric like the lecherous slime he is
  • Deacon, who did to the Forresters what Rick is doing to Ridge now...but who had incendiary chemistry with Stephanie. As she does with so many, Flannery appealed to Deacon's desperate need for a mother
  • Amber Moore, who beat Brooke at her own slutty game
  • Angela, who exposed the hypocrisy of "close family" among the Forresters -- when she showed that an "imperfect" Forrester was not worthy of being acknowledged
  • Sheila, the ultimate outsider, who only wanted love and acceptance. When it was denied to her, her schemes were delicious

Each of these outsiders received more audience love than disdain, at least during their initial runs. And that is because the audience hates the Forresters. HATES 'em (except for Stephanie).

So, yes, we need Deacon and Whip and Amber and Sheila ... or suitable replacements. The Forresters need so badly to be taught some lessons right now. To a one, every single one is acting like an irredeemable ass right now.

My hope is that

is the next in a line of people who can teach Eric and his spoiled brats some lessons.

Stephanie, telling "grandpa" that she was gonna "show him" was a delight. Stephanie is the ULTIMATE Forrester adversary (if they let her be). She will do this with strength, and I hope she brings that lecherous Viagra popper down to his knees BEGGING for mercy.

Even a few weeks ago, when someone was stealing Forrester designs and giving them to the Marones. The chat on here and elsewhere was "I wonder who" and "this is fun"...NOT "oh those poor Forresters". A few of us would like to see those folks humbled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't see how my statement is contradictory. :huh: Whip was a character with a lot of potential, yes -- humor, not afraid to pull on women's lingerie, chemistry with everyone, and a secret past involving a rather intense mother and a fixation with Forrester Creations. Alas, Bradley Bell dispensed with his services a few months' later and buried the SL. That speaks volumes. If the EP/HW is not willing to put in the groundwork in a new character played by (IMO) one of Daytime's most accomplished actors, what can I do about it?

Again and again, interesting characters and the actors who play them are thrown to the wayside in favor of blowhards like Jack Wagner, talentless hair models like Ronn Moss and the underrated but sleepwalking Katherine Kelly Lang who has been on Blow-Up Doll Mode.

I like Rick Hearst too much as an actor to see him subjected to that indignity (I felt the same way with how Eileen Davidson was treated). He's already been through all that with GH. I honestly think that RH should be playing characters who become leads -- he has the stature and talent of a lead actor.

As for Sean Kanan, I actually think he's somewhat talented, too. More than that, though, the character of Deacon is (or was) embedded in the canvas of the show. He is "Little Eric's" dad -- you know, the kid the Forresters swore they would treat as if he were their own flesh and blood before he was shipped back to Furnace Creek? He is Hope's father. He was in love with Amber. Married to Bridget. Shtupped her mom. Headed marketing at FC. Shtupped Jackie. He is the troublemaker of the show. Bradley has been trying to write characters like him ever since he left -- Shane, Owen, now Rick. This sort of anatgonist is needed because he pisses everybody off and because the Brooke/Stephanie rivalry is played out. JMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Marland was long gone by this point.  He quit in either August/September 1982. I think it was due to letting the actress play out her contract and use her for party scenes and/or scenes with Phillip/Justin.   I was surprised she was still on in June 1983 myself, because I figured she had been written out before Pam Long joined the writing staff. Thankfully, having episodes uploaded during this period on Spauldingfield YT site has helped to connect some of the dots.  It looks as though Pam Long starts the first week or so of May 1983.. and in those first few weeks: Morgan and Evie were both written off and Lillian/Mindy/Billy/Beth/Annabelle all come onto the show.    
    • @MaximThis really  old song popped into my head this morning .... 

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • For any military veterans and family: Military discount for *NEW* subscribers for any type of ParamountPlus subscription, "for the life of the subscription" (whatever that means). Includes: active duty, retirees, reservists and National Guard, veterans, dependents and spouses. Military veterans will receive 50% off new subscriptions (They have a verification process) https://help.paramountplus.com/s/article/Does-Paramount-offer-Military-discounts For existing subscribers, who would be eligible but haven't used the discount: (from the same paramount help link) Question: I’m an existing ParamountPlus subscriber in the military. How do I get the discount? Answer: To take advantage of the military discount offer*, you’ll first need to cancel your existing subscription, then re-subscribe to Paramount+ [at the verification link] on your desktop or mobile browser. During the signup process, your credentials will be verified to confirm your current status. Once you've been verified, your discount will be applied in the next billing cycle.
    • What a lovely gif!!!!!! @Maxim

      Please register in order to view this content

        @Maxim  
    • I didn’t find it that interesting

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I can't watch until later (Canada issues). What is Philip's motivation for stealing the drug? Only plot I cared about today and you did not mention it 
    • Doug III’s first day of work. Hope he does a good job… or that Tate tries to sabotage him somehow

      Please register in order to view this content

      His scenes with Holly were nice though. They’re sweet together and I understand why some people think that they have more chemistry than Tate/Holly do. And I liked that Doug III opened up to her about his past. Maybe that could lead to something good happening in the future.  I also enjoyed Roman and Kate, and how they’re both being tied into EJ’s shooting. The mystery of it all is really compelling. I don’t think Roman is the shooter though either.  I didn’t have much sympathy for Kristen though. She has no one to blame for Rachel’s problems than herself. But at the same time, I’m really surprised that Days actually remembered the Alex/Kristen fling. I thought Ron had erased that from existence. I’m not shipping them at all, but I’m definitely shipping a permanent end to Brady/Kristen but after today, I’m not so sure about that either.  And, Johnny and Chanel were still great together
    • https://parade.com/news/beyond-the-gates-actor-flexes-like-a-wrestler-in-viral-shirtless-photo
    • Some country club revelation thoughts from a casual watcher no one asked for. The Great: Daphnee Duplaix gave the best performance we've seen yet. Nicole's dialogue was also well thought out and felt character specific. TJ Maxx Ted was also pretty good. Trisha Mann-Grant steals every scene she's in. Often without even trying. Carrying multiple episodes worth of exposition heavy soap dialogue with starts and stops and recapping and drama and humor is no small feat and she nailed. Vernon telling Lesliana to STFU.  The Bad: So much of the dialogue for the rest of the cast was overly written. Martin said "You are a vile human being with a hole in your heart!". Marty, what are we doing? It's SO dramatic and sounds so silly coming from this grown man. Do Bill and Hayley do anything but talk about the Duprees? And the nerve of her to get so excited to find out Ted is a cheater when she and her husband are too. There should be a hint of shame mixed in with your glee, ma'am. The Questionable: Coffee and a rendition of Amazing Grace after finding out Nicole was betrayed by her husband. The Duprees are an odd bunch. The stinger of one segment had Anita prepared to lambast Lesliana, when we came back someone else was talking. When Anita eventually said something to Wig, it was a lukewarm at best. And then of course she thought singing a song about something that should absolutely not be extended to her son-in-law. The entire family allowing this deranged woman to speech at them in their own was...nuts. I know she said something about what would the neighbors say but my GOD. Is she just going to be allowed to trespass whenever she feels like it now? The focus on Leslie and her wig usage as an oddity is...odd. I think Chelsea said something like "and she wears wigs!" (while wearing a buss down middle part). Okay? It's just not that odd for a black woman to change up her hair. It's the different names that's the problem. I know it's meant to be humorous, in a throwback soap kind of way, but it fell flat for me.  I'm sorry I find the whole family to be WEIRD. It's like they want us to see them as ruthless yet benevolent, open yet furtive, snobbish yet tooth achingly sweet all at the same time. I cannot get a lock on the family dynamics. Everyone is just there.  I'm gonna cry if this show doesn't start giving us ages (or close to it!) for these characters. Because if Eva is 21-22 then Martin was being given crayons, a soda pop and blinders when he was 15-17 years old. Martin had to have been under 8 for me to buy this story, which would make Eva and Kat late 20s (Martin is at least 35 since he wants to run for president), which I don't think they're meant to be. It's honestly minor but it bothers me. I've mentioned this to @Vee but I think the optics on opening the show with both sisters discovering their husbands of over 30 years are cheaters should've been considered. I doubt there was any intention behind it, no one's rubbing their hands together as they scheme to say the married black men can't stay loyal but how does it look? Maybe it's just me. Honestly it's probably just me!
    • Thank you very much!!!! I really appreciate it!!! I also have read the GH coffee table book from the 90s!!!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy