Jump to content

B&B: Could Stephanie and Taylor work as a couple?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 25
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

You ain't gotta worry about me casting a vote. I vote neither. "Bridge" is played out and so is "Tridge." I know Ridge can be a chauvinist pig at times, but over the last couple of years, I've really started to like and enjoy the character, because I feel he still has potential. I know people hated Ashley's crossover to B&B, but I feel like she was one of the best things to happen to Ridge in awhile.

IMO, Ridge deserves better than the both of them. Should that be posted in the unpopular opinion section?

Think about that SNL Skit. Colonel Engus. Ringing a bell?

By "what she was," I certainly hope you don't mean that busybody morality bus that she was before. I can handle a moral Taylor who preaches from experiences that she owns up to. But please, God, no more whitewashing, no more forgetting, and no more "Taylor Good, Brooke Bad!"

LOL!

And NorrthCafe, great analysis of the whole Stephanie/Taylor dynamic.

It's refreshing to engage in a B&B discussion that doesn't involve talking about how cheap and easy the show is, how much it generally sucks, when Brad will get fired, or what guest stars can jazz up the show and make it better. Thank you, thank you, thank you! :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thanks for the comment, Bellcurve! I think the show is missing out on something huge with these two. We've seen friendships on this show before, but the relationship between these two defies description.

Stephanie loved Caroline as a daughter, but when she thought Caroline was going to tear her family apart, she defended her family against Caroline and even threatened to throw Caroline out of the family home. She protected her boys against Caroline's whims. I believed that Steph shared just a friendship with Caroline because there were limits and real disagreements, and an attempt to find balance. Stephanie doesn't have that with Taylor. She's worshipful of Taylor:

  • Stephanie sold Thorne out without batting an eyelash, because she cared more about what TAYLOR wanted. Giving a child she thought was Thorne's to Ridge? Geez, don't worry about Thorne flipping his lid, he only shot his brother once before and was nearly primed to do it a second time.
  • She nearly sank FC by hiring Taylor as the 'Face of Forrester' because in her mind, Taylor was the IDEAL woman. Makes you wonder how Steph can 'save' Jackie M's.
  • She sold out Allie and Pheebs' mental stability to protect Taylor. It just goes on and on.

That doesn't sound like just friendship, in my book.

Taylor's frozen face and Steph's winter dungeon? LOL, that sounds about right to me! :P:P:P Sorry for the imagery, Vee.

BTW, did anyone else giggle about morally suspect Taylor whining about Brooke sleeping her way 'through the family'? Why won't the writers ever put someone in scene with Taylor who can remind her that not only was she once with Storm (the writers upgraded him to a 'former lover' when he returned), she slept with Storm and Brooke's father, Stephen. She slept with Ridge and all THREE of his brothers in a far shorter period of time than Brooke with the Forresters. Brooke is a rank novice compared to Taylor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I hope Brooke drags out that chestnut some day....

But it shows how Brad has ruined Taylor in short order, since most of what you mention (including the Storm retcon) happened since she returned from the dead.

Even with Thorne, I do not believe it was sexual back in the day (i.e., when Thorne divorced Macy via fax to be with Taylor).

The only time Taylor had sex out of wedlock was when she de-virginized James in the moments before they were going to "die" in the avalanche/snowstorm or whatever.

Taylor lost the moral high ground that she desperately needed to be a true adversary for Brooke. Now she's just another slut, if not from the Valley.

I'd like to have Taylor get a scene where she looks in the mirror and says "Damn it, I'm sick of being this person. I WILL be Taylor! I WILL act with integrity and authenticity!" And from that moment, instantly and magically, she is a sober and sensitive woman.

That's what I want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

same here. Ive hated what they've done with Taylor. She used to be the heart of the show; its moral center but now its kind of hypocritical to consider her that. I loved her new assertive and strong personality but not the self destructive behavior that came along with it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've never understood the idea of Taylor as 'moral'. I know she speaks in moral tones, but her actions have always said otherwise, which is why I think she and Steph are so PERFECTLY matched, they are the same on that score.

Taylor's actions, even before her latest back-from-the-dead stunt, were not too much different from those around them - namely RIDGE. Taylor was always better able to hide her behavior and present a 'moral' face to those who didn't know any better.

She lied to Brooke about sleeping with Ridge when they were together.

She lied to Ridge about Brooke sleeping with Grant when she knew the truth.

She lied to the Forresters about having known Grant (when the implication was that she was sleeping with Grant while married to Blake Hayes).

She used crazy-as-a-fox Blake Hayes to make Ridge jealous when Ridge was focused on Brooke, sleeping with Blake, tossing him aside and then sleeping with Ridge immediately after.

She lied to Stephanie (and everyone else) about having actually slept with James.

She convinced Brooke to stay with Eric to give Rick time to 'adjust' to their divorce and then went after Ridge.

She tried to use Brooke's children to get close to them so that Ridge leave Brooke when she came back the first time she came back from the dead.

She and Stephanie were wickedly ugly about Brooke behind her back, snooping through her office, Taylor crackling while Steph referred to Brooke as a 'hooker making money for it's john'.

Add her role in the Venice scheme, the fact that she diagnosed Thorne and Brooke as mentally ill only AFTER Ridge told her to stop supporting them, and that she had young Rick lie about her relationship with Eric (something she's still keeping from Stephanie).

That's my short list, LOL!

I've always found Taylor to be a very ugly soul and the more she cackled about her 'moral' behavior. the more of a hypocrite she's become.

Stpehanie and Taylor are kindred. They feel beaten up by the world despite the fact that they've created their own misery. They have such a hatred for the world around them and it would be GREAT if they got together and actually found happiness.

For me, Steph is love-to-hate. Taylor is just there, BLAH. Together? They could actually be interesting. I think a relationship with these two would be amazingly transformational for the characters and allow the writers to open them up in a way they never have.

We've never come close to that with Taylor. she's always been the anti-Brooke plot device. They started to open Stephanie with the abuse storyline, and then shut it down almost as quickly as they started it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Marland was long gone by this point.  He quit in either August/September 1982. I think it was due to letting the actress play out her contract and use her for party scenes and/or scenes with Phillip/Justin.   I was surprised she was still on in June 1983 myself, because I figured she had been written out before Pam Long joined the writing staff. Thankfully, having episodes uploaded during this period on Spauldingfield YT site has helped to connect some of the dots.  It looks as though Pam Long starts the first week or so of May 1983.. and in those first few weeks: Morgan and Evie were both written off and Lillian/Mindy/Billy/Beth/Annabelle all come onto the show.    
    • @MaximThis really  old song popped into my head this morning .... 

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • For any military veterans and family: Military discount for *NEW* subscribers for any type of ParamountPlus subscription, "for the life of the subscription" (whatever that means). Includes: active duty, retirees, reservists and National Guard, veterans, dependents and spouses. Military veterans will receive 50% off new subscriptions (They have a verification process) https://help.paramountplus.com/s/article/Does-Paramount-offer-Military-discounts For existing subscribers, who would be eligible but haven't used the discount: (from the same paramount help link) Question: I’m an existing ParamountPlus subscriber in the military. How do I get the discount? Answer: To take advantage of the military discount offer*, you’ll first need to cancel your existing subscription, then re-subscribe to Paramount+ [at the verification link] on your desktop or mobile browser. During the signup process, your credentials will be verified to confirm your current status. Once you've been verified, your discount will be applied in the next billing cycle.
    • What a lovely gif!!!!!! @Maxim

      Please register in order to view this content

        @Maxim  
    • I didn’t find it that interesting

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I can't watch until later (Canada issues). What is Philip's motivation for stealing the drug? Only plot I cared about today and you did not mention it 
    • Doug III’s first day of work. Hope he does a good job… or that Tate tries to sabotage him somehow

      Please register in order to view this content

      His scenes with Holly were nice though. They’re sweet together and I understand why some people think that they have more chemistry than Tate/Holly do. And I liked that Doug III opened up to her about his past. Maybe that could lead to something good happening in the future.  I also enjoyed Roman and Kate, and how they’re both being tied into EJ’s shooting. The mystery of it all is really compelling. I don’t think Roman is the shooter though either.  I didn’t have much sympathy for Kristen though. She has no one to blame for Rachel’s problems than herself. But at the same time, I’m really surprised that Days actually remembered the Alex/Kristen fling. I thought Ron had erased that from existence. I’m not shipping them at all, but I’m definitely shipping a permanent end to Brady/Kristen but after today, I’m not so sure about that either.  And, Johnny and Chanel were still great together
    • https://parade.com/news/beyond-the-gates-actor-flexes-like-a-wrestler-in-viral-shirtless-photo
    • Some country club revelation thoughts from a casual watcher no one asked for. The Great: Daphnee Duplaix gave the best performance we've seen yet. Nicole's dialogue was also well thought out and felt character specific. TJ Maxx Ted was also pretty good. Trisha Mann-Grant steals every scene she's in. Often without even trying. Carrying multiple episodes worth of exposition heavy soap dialogue with starts and stops and recapping and drama and humor is no small feat and she nailed. Vernon telling Lesliana to STFU.  The Bad: So much of the dialogue for the rest of the cast was overly written. Martin said "You are a vile human being with a hole in your heart!". Marty, what are we doing? It's SO dramatic and sounds so silly coming from this grown man. Do Bill and Hayley do anything but talk about the Duprees? And the nerve of her to get so excited to find out Ted is a cheater when she and her husband are too. There should be a hint of shame mixed in with your glee, ma'am. The Questionable: Coffee and a rendition of Amazing Grace after finding out Nicole was betrayed by her husband. The Duprees are an odd bunch. The stinger of one segment had Anita prepared to lambast Lesliana, when we came back someone else was talking. When Anita eventually said something to Wig, it was a lukewarm at best. And then of course she thought singing a song about something that should absolutely not be extended to her son-in-law. The entire family allowing this deranged woman to speech at them in their own was...nuts. I know she said something about what would the neighbors say but my GOD. Is she just going to be allowed to trespass whenever she feels like it now? The focus on Leslie and her wig usage as an oddity is...odd. I think Chelsea said something like "and she wears wigs!" (while wearing a buss down middle part). Okay? It's just not that odd for a black woman to change up her hair. It's the different names that's the problem. I know it's meant to be humorous, in a throwback soap kind of way, but it fell flat for me.  I'm sorry I find the whole family to be WEIRD. It's like they want us to see them as ruthless yet benevolent, open yet furtive, snobbish yet tooth achingly sweet all at the same time. I cannot get a lock on the family dynamics. Everyone is just there.  I'm gonna cry if this show doesn't start giving us ages (or close to it!) for these characters. Because if Eva is 21-22 then Martin was being given crayons, a soda pop and blinders when he was 15-17 years old. Martin had to have been under 8 for me to buy this story, which would make Eva and Kat late 20s (Martin is at least 35 since he wants to run for president), which I don't think they're meant to be. It's honestly minor but it bothers me. I've mentioned this to @Vee but I think the optics on opening the show with both sisters discovering their husbands of over 30 years are cheaters should've been considered. I doubt there was any intention behind it, no one's rubbing their hands together as they scheme to say the married black men can't stay loyal but how does it look? Maybe it's just me. Honestly it's probably just me!
    • Thank you very much!!!! I really appreciate it!!! I also have read the GH coffee table book from the 90s!!!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy