Jump to content

B&B: Could Stephanie and Taylor work as a couple?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Does anyone else wonder if that's the direction the BnB writers are headed in? Steph could have gotten fancy new digs, like Jackie did. The writers had her moving in with Taylor. Why?

Stephanie has supported Taylor and protected her, even when it meant she had to betray her own children:

  • She protected Taylor's adultery with James.
  • She forgave Taylor's bigamy with Omar.
  • She hid Taylor's 'confession' letter from Ridge.
  • She forgave Taylor for lying about killing Thorne's wife, Darla, and getting close to him and his daughter Allie as a way of 'helping' them. She knew they were tormented about not knowing who killed Darla. She became engaged to Thorne and nearly became Allie's stepmom.
  • Believing that Taylor was pregnant with Thorne's child, Steph tried to get pregnant Taylor to leave Thorne and go back to Ridge (knowing the pain it would cause Thorne).
  • She forgave Taylor for leaving her granddaughter Phoebe's catatonic and hospitalized in keeping the secret.

It would be interesting, to me at least, if Steph and Taylor finally realized that they've protected one another over all others, including their family members (Taylor betraying her brother Zach and easily forgiving Steph for throwing her father aside). Their friendship never made sense because it was so extreme and seemed only to be based on hatred for Brooke. How could Steph forgive all of that in Taylor, but hate Brooke who was so faithful to her son?

The irony? Eric would finally realize what it was like to be shoved aside for a younger woman! He's done it to Steph for so long, if Steph fell for Taylor, it would blow him away (and so many others).

In true soap fashion, imagine teen Allie coming back angry at her grandmother, not because she's in love with a woman, but that she's in love with THAT woman, the woman who took her mother's life and then deceived her!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 25
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I actually think their friendship makes perfect sense; they seem to have this wonderful mother-daughter like relationship. Often, I think Stephanie views Taylor as the daughter she never really had; Felicia was always a pain in the ass for her, and she harbored extreme resentment for Kristen at times... But Stephanie and Taylor respected one another and I'm not sure I'd like all that to be thrown away just for a possibly successful lesbian relationship.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I use to think that Taylor was just a weapon for Steph to use against Brooke, not that she cared for Taylor.

That she would betray her own children for Taylor? Even if she couldn't stand the girls, she LOVES Ridge (more than any man - she once told him). There has to be some reason she would betray even Ridge to keep Taylor in their lives.

That she so quickly forgave Taylor for the Darla thing made me wonder what the writers were up to even then. She sent Taylor back to Thorne and told her to stop feeling guilty. WHAT THA'???? This was after telling Darla she was the finest Forrester wife there ever was!

I'm starting to wonder if the writers were giving us romantic relationship overtones the entire time!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I am advocating for gay stories everywhere...but this is one I hope they leave as what it USED to be...a dear friendship and almost maternal bond. With Stephanie being Taylor's cheerleader and impetus to defend herself in the Brooke war.

Taylor, in this scenario, is romantically challenged but sane and likeable.

Could we get back to that? Please? I don't need Taylor driving front burner crisis stories ever again. I like her as the stable one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Glad you brought that point up, MarkH. I haven't seen a 'war' with Brooke. Brooke isn't at war with them. She never has been. She's done everything in her power to make peace with the two of them and they continued to keep coming after her. Is it a war they created to use as a way to keep themselves together, witout ever admitting that there's been no war with Brooke? The writers could really use that history to frame their relationship.

Taylor has never been the stable one, in my book. She's created on crisis after another to use as an excuse to run to Stephanie. They've used Ridge and Brooke, in my opinion, to form their bond, but I wouldn't call it friendship. I just don't know what to call it. It's certainly symbiotic/parasitic at times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Maybe B&B will have Stephanie constantly catch Taylor in her bra and panties or naked in the steam room too? I mean, that seems to be so commonplace at B&B for Stephanie these days.

Anyway, I like Stephanie and Taylor's mother/daughter bond. But I loved Taylor when she was the Forrester outsider for that split second. It was so great to see Taylor bitch out "the queen." It was a glorious, beautiful moment on B&B. Alot of people view Taylor's downward spiral as her "jump the shark" moment. I view it as part of her evolution. I hated how goody-goody Taylor was and always preferred Brooke over her. But this new Taylor, that emerged post-Hector and post-James isn't the same sanctimonious hypocrite shrew that she was before Sheila shot her. This Taylor makes mistakes, but learns from them, and fully acknowledges her slutty behavior instead of being sneaky about it. Yes, Taylor played the "wounded hoe" card with Rick and spun it in a different direction when it came to telling Steffy why she shouldn't date Rick and why she went after her daughter's ex-boyfriend. But I still forgive Taylor for that because at least she a)owns up to it instead of using words like "fate" and "destiny" to excuse it and b)she's not throwing her "moral" values and her holy water at everyone. It's great to see these two back to where they were before, but I think it's great that Taylor told Stephanie about herself at least once before they went back to the way things were.

But with that said, I lobsterlove seeing her get worked up. The chicken dance is an artform. LOL. Thanks, BadZoe!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh PLEASE. Brooke flipped her f%ck!ng sh!t when Taylor started dating Rick. Yeah, Rick is her son, but that doesn't have a damn thing to do with her. Also, Brooke promised repeatedly that she would stay away from Nick and Taylor and baby Jack. But the second Taylor's marriage to Nick crumbled, what did the Valley girl do? She ran in and accused Taylor of not bonding with the baby, instead of doing what she was supposed to do, which is LET GO! Not to mention leading Nick on AGAIN! EGADS!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh damn...I fear we're gonna get into some Tridge vs. Bridge stuff. Yuck :)

I was always "team Brooke" ... no matter how awful she was. But I still want/love stable, sensible Taylor. On the other hand, where Brooke is concerned, I cannot respect her if she ever looks at another man again. And she will...you just know it. They ruined by beloved Brooke, IMO, when she veered -- even for a second -- from her "destiny" with Ridge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Two things I think need to be done, in order for Taylor to stay:

1) She must be written, as Mark said, like she was. She can, and should, become the moral center of the show. That doesn't mean they have to wipe out her complexities, or forget the mistakes that she has made, but she still can be the flawed center.

2) Tylor has to seriously stop portraying the role the way she has been. Arms a flyin', bossom a rockin', no, enough. I remember emotional scenes were Tylo really got to me (no matter how unpopular that may be) and she was awesome, but now... I don't know.

I want my Taylor back. Why is Bell letting her get away with this? Then again, he does have Moss and others to care about...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Taylor written out? I could live with that... EASILY! :P

For years I'd thought of Ridge as someone else's son because it was the ONLY thing that made sense of Steph's preoccupation with him at the expense of her other children. I thought the writers did a good job of figuring out that they had to make sense of it all. The others were Eric's, Ridge was the child of a man who loved her and respected her.

Steph having feelings for Taylor is the ONLY thing that makes sense of her preoccupation with her at the expense of her children, including Ridge. The accident with Darla, the cover up, and Pheeb's and Allie's breakdowns should have been the last straw for Steph, but she always protected Taylor. The writers have to make sense of it somehow. Steph is like the bad mom who chooses the significant other over her children. There's nothing Taylor could do to her children that she wouldn't forgive.

Even Sally wanted to rip Darla's head off for hurting Macy. It took her a while to forgive Darla and she loved her like a daughter.

I never saw Steph and Taylor as mother and daughter, more like partners in deception.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Marland was long gone by this point.  He quit in either August/September 1982. I think it was due to letting the actress play out her contract and use her for party scenes and/or scenes with Phillip/Justin.   I was surprised she was still on in June 1983 myself, because I figured she had been written out before Pam Long joined the writing staff. Thankfully, having episodes uploaded during this period on Spauldingfield YT site has helped to connect some of the dots.  It looks as though Pam Long starts the first week or so of May 1983.. and in those first few weeks: Morgan and Evie were both written off and Lillian/Mindy/Billy/Beth/Annabelle all come onto the show.    
    • @MaximThis really  old song popped into my head this morning .... 

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • For any military veterans and family: Military discount for *NEW* subscribers for any type of ParamountPlus subscription, "for the life of the subscription" (whatever that means). Includes: active duty, retirees, reservists and National Guard, veterans, dependents and spouses. Military veterans will receive 50% off new subscriptions (They have a verification process) https://help.paramountplus.com/s/article/Does-Paramount-offer-Military-discounts For existing subscribers, who would be eligible but haven't used the discount: (from the same paramount help link) Question: I’m an existing ParamountPlus subscriber in the military. How do I get the discount? Answer: To take advantage of the military discount offer*, you’ll first need to cancel your existing subscription, then re-subscribe to Paramount+ [at the verification link] on your desktop or mobile browser. During the signup process, your credentials will be verified to confirm your current status. Once you've been verified, your discount will be applied in the next billing cycle.
    • What a lovely gif!!!!!! @Maxim

      Please register in order to view this content

        @Maxim  
    • I didn’t find it that interesting

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I can't watch until later (Canada issues). What is Philip's motivation for stealing the drug? Only plot I cared about today and you did not mention it 
    • Doug III’s first day of work. Hope he does a good job… or that Tate tries to sabotage him somehow

      Please register in order to view this content

      His scenes with Holly were nice though. They’re sweet together and I understand why some people think that they have more chemistry than Tate/Holly do. And I liked that Doug III opened up to her about his past. Maybe that could lead to something good happening in the future.  I also enjoyed Roman and Kate, and how they’re both being tied into EJ’s shooting. The mystery of it all is really compelling. I don’t think Roman is the shooter though either.  I didn’t have much sympathy for Kristen though. She has no one to blame for Rachel’s problems than herself. But at the same time, I’m really surprised that Days actually remembered the Alex/Kristen fling. I thought Ron had erased that from existence. I’m not shipping them at all, but I’m definitely shipping a permanent end to Brady/Kristen but after today, I’m not so sure about that either.  And, Johnny and Chanel were still great together
    • https://parade.com/news/beyond-the-gates-actor-flexes-like-a-wrestler-in-viral-shirtless-photo
    • Some country club revelation thoughts from a casual watcher no one asked for. The Great: Daphnee Duplaix gave the best performance we've seen yet. Nicole's dialogue was also well thought out and felt character specific. TJ Maxx Ted was also pretty good. Trisha Mann-Grant steals every scene she's in. Often without even trying. Carrying multiple episodes worth of exposition heavy soap dialogue with starts and stops and recapping and drama and humor is no small feat and she nailed. Vernon telling Lesliana to STFU.  The Bad: So much of the dialogue for the rest of the cast was overly written. Martin said "You are a vile human being with a hole in your heart!". Marty, what are we doing? It's SO dramatic and sounds so silly coming from this grown man. Do Bill and Hayley do anything but talk about the Duprees? And the nerve of her to get so excited to find out Ted is a cheater when she and her husband are too. There should be a hint of shame mixed in with your glee, ma'am. The Questionable: Coffee and a rendition of Amazing Grace after finding out Nicole was betrayed by her husband. The Duprees are an odd bunch. The stinger of one segment had Anita prepared to lambast Lesliana, when we came back someone else was talking. When Anita eventually said something to Wig, it was a lukewarm at best. And then of course she thought singing a song about something that should absolutely not be extended to her son-in-law. The entire family allowing this deranged woman to speech at them in their own was...nuts. I know she said something about what would the neighbors say but my GOD. Is she just going to be allowed to trespass whenever she feels like it now? The focus on Leslie and her wig usage as an oddity is...odd. I think Chelsea said something like "and she wears wigs!" (while wearing a buss down middle part). Okay? It's just not that odd for a black woman to change up her hair. It's the different names that's the problem. I know it's meant to be humorous, in a throwback soap kind of way, but it fell flat for me.  I'm sorry I find the whole family to be WEIRD. It's like they want us to see them as ruthless yet benevolent, open yet furtive, snobbish yet tooth achingly sweet all at the same time. I cannot get a lock on the family dynamics. Everyone is just there.  I'm gonna cry if this show doesn't start giving us ages (or close to it!) for these characters. Because if Eva is 21-22 then Martin was being given crayons, a soda pop and blinders when he was 15-17 years old. Martin had to have been under 8 for me to buy this story, which would make Eva and Kat late 20s (Martin is at least 35 since he wants to run for president), which I don't think they're meant to be. It's honestly minor but it bothers me. I've mentioned this to @Vee but I think the optics on opening the show with both sisters discovering their husbands of over 30 years are cheaters should've been considered. I doubt there was any intention behind it, no one's rubbing their hands together as they scheme to say the married black men can't stay loyal but how does it look? Maybe it's just me. Honestly it's probably just me!
    • Thank you very much!!!! I really appreciate it!!! I also have read the GH coffee table book from the 90s!!!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy