Jump to content

Interview with Tom Casiello


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I know you already interviewed him Toups. I hope you don't mind.

CZ: How did you come to soap writing? Were you a soap fan before? Which soap writer(s) do you admire?

TC: I always wanted to be a soap writer, going back to junior high. There were always soap on in my house growing up, in pretty much every room. I never wanted to write anything else. I grew up loving Michael Malone's first run on OLTL, Nancy Curlee on GL, Bill Bell on Y&R. I loved Donna Swajeski's years on Another World. Sally Sussman over at Generations. The Dobsons on Santa Barbara. Claire Labine on GH. The list goes on and on.

CZ: You've been writing for 4 current soaps (ATWT, OLTL, DAYS, YR). How would you characterize these different shows?

TC: Well, what I believe the shows are at their hearts is very different from what they were like when I was writing for them. ATWT always had this grand, sweeping kind of story-telling, with very large extended families. The Stewarts, the Hugheses, the Snyders, the Walshes... it always had this midwestern, multi-generational vibe to it growing up. I know when I was there, there was a really effort made to modernize it, make it feel not so old-fashioned. Whether or not that helped or hurt the show is another story. But that's what the goal was.

One Life to Live was a show I always struggled to find an identity for. When I was there, I always felt this "ripped from the headlines!" vibe, which wasn't what OLTL felt like to me growing up. When I was young, there was a Country-Western, rough-and-tumble approach to the show when I was younger. It had a wicked sense of humor, and loved taking very realistic characters and putting them in very over-the-top situations - but still managed to tell really powerful stories about the haves-and-have-nots. I've always felt OLTL is in a state of flux about its identity, and I feel like every head writer has brought something very different to the show.

DAYS is the super-couple show. It always has been. It's super-couples, longing, and big adventure stories. It's also one of the few shows I feel is capable of taking twelve characters and dumping them in another locale for a month or two without the fans freaking out. I've never been able to work on another show where the audience accepts "out-of-town" stories the way they do at Days.

Y&R is definitely the most challenging, and definitely the most rewarding. It's a very psychological way of looking at stories, much more subtle. At Days, heaping on the drama was a good thing - but at Y&R, the drama is a lot "quieter". Not that there isn't loads of drama. But it's about these character moments, these very soulful silences. I read a post recently on a message board that talked about the "symphony" of soap writing, and that's what it feels like at Y&R. This very classic way of looking at story structure, the build to crescendos, and then the quiet adagios. It's a show that focus on thematic elements within the episodes as much as plot points, and I really respect that.

CZ: Do you have any favorite storyline or moment you have written?

TC: I always get in trouble with this question, because the stories that are inspiring to write are not always the ones that are most successful. I know when Jen Landon gives interviews about her time at ATWT, she talks about what a joy it was to play the double role. The fans may not have enjoyed it as much, but I really appreciate how Landon enjoyed stepping out of the Gwen Munson angst and creating something new and different. As an actress, it had to be a joy for her, no matter what she or the fans thought of the story. And that's how I feel about my favorite storylines. Even if the stories themselves ended up being a bust, it's always fascinating to step out of the routine soap drama and trying your hand at something different. But if I had to list my Top Five episodes, they'd have to be (in no particular order)

1) Shelle's Wedding/Thanksgiving, DOOL

2) Viki's heart attack with Tess/Todd, OLTL

3) Bryant's death, ATWT

4) Nora, Lindsay and Mark confronting Colson, OLTL

5) An episode I just wrote at Y&R that I can't talk about. :-)

CZ: Would you like being head writer someday?

TC: I always thought I did, but in this environment, I don't think I would. I've watched so many head writers just get beaten down, attacked from all angles, from networks-to their writing team-to EP's-to the fans. So much so that their stories end up nothing like what they intended. Once upon a time, it was my dream, but that was before I saw what one goes through in that position. I'm really, really happy just being part of the collaboration of a breakdown team now, and wouldn't trade it for anything.

CZ: Now you're on Y&R, do you have favorite characters you like writing for?

TC: Ask me this question in another two months, and I can give you the answer. :-) There is one story I just love, with characters I always find something new in. It's awesome. But I can't talk about it yet. Other than that, I love anything with Katherine and Jill. Anything that puts the three Abbott siblings together - Peter, Eileen and Billy have amazing chemistry as a family. It's an awesome cast. I can honestly say there's something in every storyline that I can connect with and relate to, on a personal level. And I haven't always been able to say that at other shows.

CZ: With "'Guiding Light" just getting cancelled, can you see a future for daytime soaps?

TC: I will always believe in a future for daytime soaps, although I've conceded they may have to go away for awhile before they come back. But part of keeping the blog going last year was to let fans know that there are a LOT of people out there: producers, directors, writers, and actors, who are bound and determined to keep this going in some way, shape or form. The decision may eventually be made for us, but until then, I think it's so important that we not only believe in our shows, but we work harder than ever to elevate the quality. This really is the eleventh hour, so I don't know what any show stands to lose by giving fans the kind of intelligent, respectful, heartfelt, entertaining drama they deserve. If not now - then when?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 32
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

You know, I was just thinking this, while watching DAYS yesterday. There was a scene with Nicole and Tony in the hospital. Tony was unable to talk and Nicole was talking and talking, basically telling the whole story of what happened lately. The music was really dramatic, but over the top dramatic. Her dialogue was kinda like from a soap parody... seriously... I was thinking to myself how when someone does a soap opera parody, they do it exactly like that scene. And I thought to myself: you don't really get that at Y&R. Y&R does different kind of drama.

I don't want to make it sound like I was bashing DAYS. Cause I did once enjoy that kind of over-the-top drama. And I could probably get into to it again, because that campy way of prodcution can be entertaining.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You are absolutely correct. That is such a part of days identity tho, and the poler opposite is such a part of Y&R's identity. Days is very in your face drama dn Y&R is very reserved pulled back drama throughout with bursts of it, if anyone understands what im trying to say, lolz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

When was Casiello at ATWT? It doesn't sound like it was during Marland's tenure as head writer. Marland never tried to modernize ATWT as far as I could tell from watching. Okay, I re-read the the interview. He was there when Jennifer Landon was there. Ugh. The beginning of the end of ATWT.

I like his characterization of the different soaps. He is on target about their identities. He thinks that soaps will go away and then come back. He may be right.

"This really is the eleventh hour, so I don't know what any show stands to lose by giving fans the kind of intelligent, respectful, heartfelt, entertaining drama they deserve. If not now - then when?"

So true. If only the ABC soaps listened to this wise advice.

FrenchFan, excellent interview. Thanks for sharing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well he was at OLTL during Higley's tenure so as far as the "ripped from the headlines" vibe, he was right.

I feel bad that these other shows (well every show except the symphonic Y&R, minus Latham- and B&B) have had such inconsistent identities due to regime changes and network bulls-it. And bad headwriters they hire too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Hey! I resemble that remark! You and I are just disagreeing on everything today :)

Hold the fort! Stop the presses! Casiello reads SON???? I'll have to self-censor...don't want to interfere in anyone's creative process!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • The last five or so episodes of season 8 after the Jean Hackney story ended were pretty strong with the Laura/Val friendship breakdown, Ben's PTSD with Val trying to help him, and the start of Jill realizing that Val was as much of a threat to her happiness with Gary as Abby was. I always thought that the Jean Hackney story should have ended at mid season at the latest... and then deal with the fall-out because seeing Ben/Val switch roles with Ben in mental decline instead of Val would have been interesting to explore.  And seeing Val and Laura's friendship suffer also was interesting and should have been explored especially with Karen caught in the middle and Abby both intrigued and amused at the conflict that she didn't cause. However, season 8 was the only Latham run season where Val was well written.  
    • Well, she's not in there sweeping the floors at the end of the night, and you don't bring in an award-winning producer to just sit on their backsides (or hey, maybe you do!). Again, without knowing the specific capacity she's in there working as⏤and it seems as if we are not going to at the present time⏤it's hard to speculate/discuss. I would interpret she's in a role that either would not require being credited, or she's, as others have speculated, is back and not receiving credit for the work she's done. That'd be like saying, per the WGA, all writers must be credited, but as we've seen by those who've worked as fi-core, they don't always receive credit. 

      Please register in order to view this content

       And, if my research is correct, per the DGA, you can request not to be credited for work you do. I could only assume the same would be for the PGA, as well.
    • When Anita read Barbara's letter, it started out with the viewers hearing it in Barbara's voice as Anita read silently. And then Anita saying the next portion aloud while Barbara's voice continued simultaneously. And then ending with Anita alone saying the last part aloud. Excerpt from interview  (link to full interview) The rest may be spoilerish -- Only the nonspoiler part here: I love the idea of reading that letter,” shares Tunie. “And at one point in the script, I think it said that my voice joined her, and [Anita] started reciting the letter from memory because [she] memorized this letter. I suggested to Steve Williford, our director, ‘What if it’s like that moment in Hamilton when Hamilton is writing the resignation letter to George Washington, and then he starts saying it too, and then Hamilton’s voice fades away, and then it’s all George. What if we do something like that?’ And he was like, ‘Oh, my God! I just got chills. Let’s do it!’ So, we did it.” I understood that it worked really well, so I’m really happy about that.”  
    • I think MVJ and Guza made a good team in the launching of the soap, and I'm hoping that the rotation of all stories and characters is maintained once he officially departs from the credits. And so far, Ron C's breakdowns have been decent... but they pop only when he's paired with a good script writer like Jazmin.   I hope once Guza leaves officially... that MVJ is able to reign in Ron C and the dread Jamey G.
    • I read that, but my interpretation was that she is uncredited because it is in a non-production capacity.  In others words, she's not secretly producing, or writing, as some had speculated prior to the confirmation. Her likeliest position would be in a post-production consultant capacity. I assume we agree on this?
    • Errol already confirmed she is back at Y&R and in a non-producing role; this alludes to she is not credited for the role she has.
    • I don't think Lisa served a purpose after the serial killer storyline. The writers never gave her anything to do but be Vicky's nemesis. Joanna Going deserved better. Another example of a character taking over the show and then the writers not having a longterm plan for the character.  Exhibit B: Sally Spencer. Such a missed opportunity. It really angers me how they misused her. She could sing and act and they just threw her away in that sexist nonsense storyline. Once the story was over, they wrote her off. The McKinnons should have lasted for years. I will give the show credit for how they introduced Sandra Ferguson as Amanda. I thought it was expertly done. She comes in and she immediately connected to RKK's Sam. She has chemistry with Matthew and she has realistic conversations with MAc and Rachel. That's how it is done. 
    • Great points, and it has not completely vanished. Leslie on Beyond the Gates fits the trope (she's still not over that Ted lovin' two decades later), though I will say there does seem to be an effort to make her more complex.
    • I understand why people speculate, but I have to say it doesn’t sound very plausible that Jill Farren Phelps would be working at Y&R in any uncredited role. CBS daytime shows are tightly bound by union contracts and corporate oversight, and that kind of informal arrangement would be a major liability in 2025. Before the mergers of SAG-AFTRA and the two WGA branches, it may have been easier to hire someone quietly or off the books. But those days are behind us. With digital payroll, tighter pension tracking, and increased scrutiny from legal and compliance departments, it’s just not the kind of thing anyone can get away with anymore. Most union members, especially producers nearing retirement, would not risk their eligibility or benefits to take an uncredited role. The Producers Guild of America is also very clear about crediting. To even receive the PGA mark, a producer has to be verified through a formal review process. According to their credit certification guidelines (source), "only individuals who performed a majority of the producing functions on a motion picture or television production" are eligible for credit, and those credits must be official and recorded. If someone is functioning in that capacity, they are not supposed to be uncredited. Studios that are union signatories, like CBS and Sony, know better than to skirt those rules. If anyone has a legitimate, primary source confirming that CBS is hiring someone like Phelps in an uncredited production role, I’d honestly be curious to read it. But without that, this just feels like rumor—not reality.
    • I keep thinking about the persistent trend of eroticizing mental illness on Guiding Light. Sonni and Annie were never more compelling, or more attractive to the show, than when they were manic. It played into a recurring theme: strong women undone by their unhinged reaction to sex. The writers were likely inspired by Basic Instinct and the broader wave of neo-noir films in the late '80s and early '90s, where female sexuality was often equated with instability. The result was a crude portrayal, not just of mental illness, but of womanhood itself. Both Sonni and Annie were introduced as sharp, capable women, brought in specifically as formidable antagonists to Reva. They were logical and composed, standing in contrast to Reva’s emotional volatility. That difference made them threatening, but not especially “sexy”—until desire became their undoing. In a very male fantasy, their strength unraveled the moment they slept with Joshua. As soon as they got a taste of Lewis lovin’, they spiraled into scheming lunatics, willing to torch everything to hold on to him. It was part of a larger trend in the culture. Fatal Attraction, Single White Female, and The Hand That Rocks the Cradle all traded on the idea that female desire was dangerous, barely held in check, and always teetering on the edge of madness. Looking back, it's a pretty grim trope. And while it's not completely vanished, I'm grateful we don't see it quite as often today.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy