Jump to content

GL: Will The Light Burn Out Out Come Sept?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Not saying that they wouldn't try again, but they've tried that before. It was like the extra hour of Today they do with Hoda and Kathy-Lee but a panel of like four ladies and I'm pretty sure one of them was Les Moonves' wife who's on Big Brother etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 118
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

GL may be profitable, but by how MUCH?! The ratings have taken a nosedive since this new production model and a 1.8, although that may be an achievable ambition, is simply not enough to sustain a soap! And that was before the economy took a nose dive.

What if GL has to take yet another paycut? Will they do the whole show outdoors, with beds and couches in that little grass field? Or will they do a sponsorship with a Motel6 and do most of the shooting there?

Because GL looks like S-H-IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII-T! Period. That's why! And I know opinions are subjective and that we are all entitled to ours and all that jazz, and that you think I am wrong, but GL looks like crap. Period.

And how long will this "return to drama" stick around before Ellen Wheeler thinks of something more innovative or decides to return to the "Inside the Lights" that you we loved so much towards the end?

If CBS can find a cheaper and, again, more attractive alternative to GL, then why not go for it? I'd rather see a boring CBS version of The View or "The Julie Chen Show" anyday over GL. At least they'll have a shot at technical awards.

mmmmk.

And if the O&O's are sick of GL, then CBS will likely give their express approval. Maybe that is the case right now?

Who says it has to be a View clone? Why couldn't it be Bob Scheiffer(who saw ratings increase during his time at the Evening News) in a daily-stripped "Face the Nation" or Lara Logan interviewing politicians and talking about women's health issues and pimping out 60 Minutes and the CBS Evening News?

And I guess we soap fans can just watch SOAPnet, Hulu.com, and YouTube for our enjoyment. I don't get why there ISN'T a need for relevant programming about current events and/or women's health. Whether it's in the package of four women at a table talking or a single host?

And talkshows have proven to be viable, workable, and profitable alternatives. Just ask the late Roger King(Oprah, Dr. Phil) or Barbara Walters/Brian Frons. And so have gameshows.

Maybe GL's cancellation will force lower-rated soaps to get in gear and churn out good story before it's too late.

"Letting Go..."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think ION network should pick it up and air it in PRIME TIME and see what happens (CW is too youth oriented, and cable channels don't air everywhere). GL may be a failure according to the networks... but maybe they just need to move and become a big fish in a smaller pond?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Without a doubt that will be the case. Considering almost all the CBS O&O stations air Dr. Phil in GL's 3pm time period, CBS would put their own new creation, may it be a talk show, on a 10am, the time the O&O stations air GL. 3pm will become local station time. It would be like a switch. It also makes more sense that way because if CBS can come up with a new ratings grabbing show for the morning, it could help out TPIR and maybe the rest of their daytime line up as opposed to being their last show of the afternoon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think one could make a good argument that soaps have "looked like [!@#$%^&*]" for the great majority of their lifespans. Hell, GL was on the air when the only "production value" was a person's imagination. And through the early tv years when the soaps were shot in poorly designed and sparsely decorated sets that periodically fell during production. But the stories were so good that viewers never minded the production. Admittedly, storytelling is a big problem with GL even now, but as others have said, there HAS been marked improvement. There's plenty of areas that MUST improve in order for the show to be even close to as good as it was, but it should be given the chance. After all, I think most of us are talking only another year. I think that's enough to see if the show can improve. After all, I think we can all agree that longterm improvement is the only way a show can save itself.

I completely agree! I've seen some of the posts in this and the other thread about the future and I have to say: bullshit! We say that daytime needs to be overhauled and renovated. I'd argue that most of entertainment: from television to movies to books is in a huge rut. Partly because I think we've run out of original ideas in general. But that's not necessarily a bad thing. After all, MAB has proven that a show rooted in history and "baggage" can still be fresh and riveting. So unless future technology can make an actor pop off my tv screen like a Jetsons gadget, I don't see how some new lineup will be any more creative or innovative than the old.

Considering how much more overhead the other soaps have (more vets, more BTS talent, higher production costs in general) and considering how close even they are to GL, I'd argue that GL is probably more profitable than the other shows are.

I dunno. Maybe the fact that I'm trying to defend the show, when several months ago, I WANTED this show to be put out of its misery, says something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Considering that GH and AMC supposedly can't even stay in budget, if this is about profit, then they shouldn't even be on the air now. Yet the press and many in the industry still continue to peddle GH as a jewel in the crown.

I agree GL will probably be replaced with syndicated programming, and then time may be freed up to try to help Price is Right. Then if this is a success, the message will be, "Hey, we're better off cutting the soaps out," and we can say goodbye to a few more of them, or most of them, even sooner. That would be some type of amusingly dark coda, if this great wakeup call to daytime (canceling GL) soon turns into a wakeup call to the networks to get rid of most of their soaps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But how can this show be trusted? We've seen it time and time again, how things will make marked improvement only for TIIC to screw this show over again. How many times will the budget be slashed and the cast be forced to embarrass themselves for an easy paycheck? What happens if CBS renews the show AGAIN at a lower licensing fee? More big namkes fired? Will Grant Aleksander become Peapack's answer to Thaao Penglis? Will GL turn itself into an audio show with pictures of the actors? Again, will they do every show from that field they're so fond of in the rain, sleet, and snow all in the same episode? Will they be able to afford their production office space? Or will they do all their work from home to save on production costs?(I know that read like the intro to Soap, but whatever...)

No one is saying the new lineup(sans GL) would be innovative. No one is saying that at all. Certainly a talkshow wouldn't be the most creative or innovative thing ever. But alas, so typical of the nuGL fanbase to put words into people's mouths! :rolleyes:

Anyway, Barbara Bloom has to do something to preserve what's left of the CBS Daytime Lineup. No one is saying that daytime doesn't need a renaissance or creative overhaul. But certainly(as I believe marceline mentioned in another thread weeks ago), embracing mediocrity isn't going to help daytime die a death with dignity.

No one blames you for being nostalgic, Dan. I mean, it must be refreshing to see your show finally "back on track." However, there's something to be said about "letting go" when you've exhausted all efforts.

Possibly. But Bloom needs pet projects to keep her job. It's well known that Y&R, B&B, and (to a certain degree, because of FREEmantle Media's control over it) PRICE are all self governing bodies who have "respectful" relationships with the network. If GL gets canceled, that leaves ATWT, which is likely to be canceled right after it. If both of the PGP shows are canned without replacements, then they really don't need her position at CBS. They just need someone in charge of FCC Content and Censorship, which they have at each coast anyway.

Bloom would be an idiot to axe GL without a replacement, whether it be another soap, talk show, or game show. She needs properties on her lineup to keep her job. That's why I take stock in the TVWeek Article that claims she's looking for a cheaper replacement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sorry if I gave that hint that I was putting words into people's mouths, but I actually meant it on a larger scale, not just moaning that everyone is "picking on" little ol' GL, lol. I was thinking about everyone's posts from the future thread about how soaps in general should be allowed to die so that something fresh and innovative can take its place, which is easier said than done, I think, in a business that makes its money on sequels and remakes and series of all kinds.

Of course, after posting that, I thought that by the time soaps have all died, network television in general would be close to death as well. On one hand, I like this democratization of television. I like that I can watch what I want when I want to watch it. It just doesn't seem to be as sustainable financially as something more objective like a network's lineup. After all, democracy is hardly the most organized form of government possible. Who knows what the future holds of course.

Some of the news in the not-too-distant future do have me a little bit hopeful. But I do understand the risks. Personally, I think I just want one more year. Give the show a chance to keep the improvement going and if it can't muster up than pull the plug September 2010.

It's funny to read that because I've said it myself to a number of GL fans on this very board over the years. But I think I'm starting to understand why it really puts fans on the defensive. It's kind of like a sibling that's disconnected from the family coming back when a parent is on their deathbed and telling you that you need to let go. Sure that sibling is thinking more about logic and the probable chance of recovery, but they don't have the immediate emotional connection than you do. So instead of logic, you are simply holding on to hope and to hear them saying you need to let go, particularly when they have been gone for years is frustrating and infuriating.

Of course, that sibling also doesn't realize how much easier said than done "letting go" can be...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think the issue, on CBS's part here, would be that GL has been given "one more year" for the few years and P&G's misjudgements have seen the show go through some truly horrible times, trying to emulate other series instead of providing the community/character driven drama that made GL a success in the first place. Now it's just getting back to where it needed to be years ago, so it's understandable that they might want to cut the chord.

Still, I think that if it was renewed when it was in far worse shape (with a far higher budget), then they should give it a chance to see if this creative upswing can continue. My one gripe with GL right now is the opening, it's horrid. When your only issue with a series is those 30 seconds, you know it cant be that bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So, I agree with much of what you have written here.

Here is how I see it going. The "2010s" are going to be the decade during which not only daytime-soaps-on-US-networks are no longer economically viable, but possibly the decade in which broadcast networks are not viable.

So, all our "guiding lights" will blink out, one after another, in domino. Brad Bell's SOD interview points out that some might last longer than I think (I think they'll all be dead by 2016)...but the basic premise that soaps will go -- for both intrinsic and extrinsic reasons -- seems pretty inarguable.

Now the day will come when your "democratic" on-demand universe will be properly monitized. Indeed, I would argue this can't happen UNTIL we get rid of "free" TV. (Why pay for something you can get without payment).

At that point, when the conditions are right, new serials will begin to seed and grow. But, as I have written before, they will NOT again be "daytime", they will NOT necessarily by 5-days a week, and they will NOT last 70 years. They will, at best, capture small cable-like audience shares. Never again will these behemoth soaps capture big numbers. That's true for the whole TV landscape.

That is why shows, from the oldest (GL) to the youngest (B&B) need to be studied as the artifacts they are...products of a different era. We should enjoy them while they are creatively and financially viable, but we should also gird ourselves -- for 100% of the shows -- for the unavoidable day, coming fairly soon, when the financials just won't work out anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well... the problem is this. You cannot get rid of free TV, PERIOD. For one, the FCC won't allow it... and secondly, free TV is the basis on which the emergency broadcast system is laid upon. Public safety is much more important than anything else. I don't think soaps will be gone by 2016, I think they will dwindle to 2 or 3. Now, part of my problem is that local network affiliates are LOADED with cable company advertizements, trying to fool people and scare them that the digital transition means they HAVE to get cable service. These local affiliates are cutting their own throats, enabling MORE people to tune into cable channels and tune OUT the big 3. In this crappy economy, pushing the consumer to go back to getting their television Over the air, would mean more veiwers for the big 3. But since alot of the big 3 own cable channels as well.... there are only so many pieces in that pie, and they've made things so each network only gets a bite, instead of a whole piece.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Yeah, right, they've got Cam playing Love2Hate Drew in extremis & they're not gonna play that hand out?!!!  I figure they use the prison beat-down for a redemptive phase but only when they think they've wrung every possible drop out of this absolutely odious every day villain they've created!
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Respectfully agree to disagree. We had 4 episodes with original flashbacks integrated well into contemporary scenes that were sweet, romantic, that resonated, that hit all the possible nostalgic chords & that shows me the writing team not only cares for these 2 characters but that they were really excited about writing for them. And, we also have the quote from Korte/VanEtten beginning of the year-ish that they considered Lucky & Liz a foundational couple for the canvas.  I thought Lucky's saying he didn't think he'd stay once she turned down his marriage proposal to be good character motivation. I also thought the idea of some summer travels with Aiden supports character integrity.  Going by his exit interviews, what's left is people & logistics/scheduling, etc. & there's no way a writing team can anticipate an actor taking an out in their contract ahead of time. They have to deal with it, in the moment, when it comes up & likely it's going to make a bit of a mess to whatever they have sketched out in the long story thrust. 
    • I had a driver taking me to Infusion the other day & we were talking about soaps. She was out of touch but had been a CBS fan, from TPIR, all day till Oprah. Telling her about BTG. What network? CBS. When: 2pm. Is it between ATWT & GL? Oh, girl, you are so behind. So, she was appalled when I briefly brought her up to date BUT she remained interested in hearing more about BTG, so that was a plus.  Last weekend I got a haircut so it is the way I like it, short & spiky but of course it's purple. Recently, I was waiting for my ride outside the Infusion Center & a woman comes up to me, about my age, short spiky hair but all white. She raves about my purple hair & says she is a pancreatic cancer survivor & purple is that color (which I knew) and she is thinking going purple but doesn't know where to start. So I tell her about Splat, no bleach req'd, easy, etc. & she's getting excited & my driver pulled up, & stuck her head out & said, Donna? & she had purple hair, too! I felt like we were in a purple vortex. It was both lovely & surreal.      
    • We saw Hope, with Bo, where she revealed John's death to him & he immediately wanted to leave for Salem & we saw the two of them talk to a doc or an admin about whether he would be allowed to be discharged yet.  Someone, maybe Will, talked to Sami on the phone and at the airport Sydney had taken a fall, sounded like she was on a moving sidewalk, and had at least 2 breaks & was scheduled for some kind of orthopedic surgery.  Since it is clear that Sweeney cannot or will not be available, again I say  it is time to recast.  Wasn't Carrie lock-step with Belle the whole time? In general I thought all of the eulogies were both good & appropriate. Yes, Paul touched me like no other. Loved Abe. I still miss previous Little Rachel but for the first time new Little Rachel also moved me. And, amazingly, I am caught up again. Whoopeee!  
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • In true TV tradition Dani kept her bra on during sex. Couldn't we have been treated to Andre in his underwear , rather than trousers on already? I took Hayley's reaction as teasing. Surely she wouldn't think for a moment Bill was fooling around with Ashley? I agree that Dupree staircase looks a little basic.Wish for something grander. And in the living room there was a lamp in front of the door. Huh? Is that a closet? Would you have built in storage in a living room in a house of that size? Chelsea has millions of followers?
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/v/16N2KPYDxR/ During the livestream tribute to #DrakeHogestyn we discussed the taping of #JohnBlack funeral scenes on Days of our Lives beautifully stated by his TV children Eric Martsolf Martha Madison
    • 1976 Pt 2 A young woman named Tina calls Norman’s hospital room, claiming she’s in town and is broke and upset about his condition. He firmly tells her to stay away, but she sneaks into his room later, upsetting him. He tells her she’s ruining his plan, but she can’t see why— after all, he’s told her he loves her, and they will soon be married. Norman becomes irate and starts yelling, claiming all his problems are because of Sandy. Meanwhile, Bob, who had left the floor station for Norman’s room, discovered he’d forgotten his stethoscope and returned to his office for it. Nurses passing Norman’s room heard loud shouting from within but assumed everything was under control, as Dr. Hughes was in there. When Bob finally returns, he finds Norman alone. Tina has slipped out, and Norman has had another heart attack. All emergency methods fail, and Norman dies. Bob takes it hard; he was his doctor and couldn’t save him. John Dixon, long resentful and bitter at Bob’s successes in his career, subtly manages to force a hearing into Norman’s death. The floor nurses report that Bob went to Norman’s room and an argument followed; then Bob called for help when Norman went into heart failure. Bob’s report is contradictory that he went for his stethoscope and found Garrison already stricken. Bob, assuming that this is only a routine death, has already left on a short vacation, untroubled and unsuspecting, so his written report must stand. He returns to find that the situation has escalated into a full-fledged investigation. Learning that the argument is the bone. of contention, Sandy comes forward and claims that she was in Norman’s room, arguing with him. Bob refuses to let her perjure herself, which John manages to use as credence in Norman’s contention that Bob and Sandy were having an affair. ‘Bob is angry when, after a week, the hospital board hands him an official reprimand; thinking this is virtually an accusation of guilt, Bob refuses to accept it. His first reaction is his resignation, but upon thinking it through, he decides he’s going to fight this. He withdraws his hasty resignation and begins to work with Tom to reconstruct the events of the day Norman died. Nurse Connolly finally admits that someone could have entered Norman’s room unseen, but Floor Nurse Holland is firmly convinced no one did. Carol Stallings is upset to learn that the business tactics of her husband, Jay, while legal, are not as ethical and moral as she would have hoped. Chris Hughes has asked Tom to take over Jay’s legal affairs for the firm. Tom decides the opportunity is too good to refuse, even though he personally doesn’t like Jay - and knows Jay resents him, as he and Carol were at. one time married. Tom soon finds that some of Jay’s proposed new dealings are somewhat illegal, in the gray area, and tells him he advises against them. It is a  lawyer’s function to protect clients from making this kind of mistake, he explains. Kim Dixon has recovered physically from the injuries she sustained when she was hit on the head during a tornado, but her amnesia continues. She has been told that she was about to divorce John and marry Dan, but cannot seem to feel any emotions toward Dan now. In fact, she has noticed that most of the people around her seem to dislike John, and she is therefore feeling sympathetic toward him. John manages to usé Kim’s uncertainty to widen the gap between her and Dan, and finally convinces Kim to let him move back home. Dan is very badly hurt upon learning of this. Kim explains to Bob that she feels uncomfortable with Dan—she senses that he expects more of her than she can deal with now—while John has been thoughtful and understanding of her. Susan Stewart, Dan’s ex-wife, has stopped drinking, and tries to help Dan through this painful time by taking the holiday season responsibilities for Emily and Betsy upon herself to relieve Dan of the burden. (Emily is Dan and Susan’s daughter; Betsy believes she is Dan’s orphaned niece but is in reality his daughter by the late Elizabeth Stewart.) Dan’s misery at Kim’s apparent rejection has finally  convinced him to accept a medical-mission assignment in Bolivia. Kim, meanwhile, has been having momentary flashes of memory, but none are long enough so that she can understand what she’s remembering. On the night Dan is leaving for Bolivia, however, she has a coherent recollection and remembers the letter she wrote to Dan saying she wanted to be with him for the rest of their lives. Learning that he is leaving immediately, Kim leaves three messages on his answering machine. But Susan, who still wants Dan back, overhears Kim on the phone and goes to Dan’s office, where she removes the tape. Susan later tells Kim that Dan got the messages but they weren’t important enough to handle before leaving for South America. Susan then suggests to Kim that she gracefully end it by writing to Dan saying it’s all over, and to press Kim further shé suggests that Kim has been ungrateful to John for the constant care and concern he’s shows her during the past weeks. I believe the Dan going to Bolivia story was when John Reilly left. When Dan returned, it was again John Colenback. So the Kim/Dan story had been initiated with Reilly/Hays.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy