Jump to content

ATWT: March Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 142
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I thought it was Jack who brought up Hal (talking about how he and Carly raised Parker the way his dad would have wanted, not thinking that he could do anything just because he had money).

Then Janet responded, asking if Hal would have wanted Jack to send Parker to boarding school.

The week was okay -- no clunker stories, but still too much of Dusty/Meg.

I like Carly's developing alcoholism story because it is topical and related to her family history.

I liked Luke voicing many of the concerns some posters have had about his hypocrisy, and Noah agreeing, before his resolving to get back into the foundation work. I liked Lily calling Noah to go to the foundation meeting. I liked the hot Luke/Noah kiss. Seeing Brian again, geting an update on Lucinda's health, Brian and Lucinda being friends, Lily getting involved with the foundation, the confrontation about mission with the other foundation, all worked for me.

I liked Casey in the whole Casey/Jade/Allison/Emily messy reveal, as well as Emily and Jade's scene afterward. It's scary, but I'm starting to root for Emily in everything she does, not only here but with Paul/Meg and the Lucy situation. I agree, where is Susan? She hasn't been on in forever.

I liked how the show protrayed both Carly/Jack/Janet, and Parker/Liberty, as right in their own way. Parker/Liberty were shown to be immature with the way Parker was talking about how Liberty would be able to buy anything she wanted. Yet the two are still rootable for me and I don't want Parker sent off to boarding school.

I'm confused because I didn't think Parker/Liberty actually had sex the day of the kitchen fire. But the show is acting like they did so I guess they did.

Lucy is tolerable now -- I wonder which returning character she is working with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They didn't...but I think they would have if not for the kitchen fire. I don't blame Jack for thinking they had or not believing them when they said they didn't.

Today's show....not great, but it was just so frakin' nice to see unusual character interactions, it felt like old times.

Holden and Lily both need to STFU when it comes to relationship advice. Holden, because he was crawling into bed with two women last summer (so much for his advice for Meggie to "cool it" between relationships) and Lily....sigh....girl, Dusty made it CLEAR from the beginning of your boffscapade that it was just sex. Not to mention, you hit that tool-belt wearing Mike like five seconds after finding out about Carly and Holden.

Advice to Paul...perhaps if you wanted to convince your ex you'd changed, you'd resist the temptation to lick her face every time she's in the same room with you. Seriously, she's your ex...stop asking about her "social" life every five friggin' seconds. It feeds her ego and makes you look pathetic.

Nuke.....UGH. Just freakin' ONCE I'd love for those idiots to be wrong. Just to prove that they can be. Would it hurt to be turned down for an apartment because they're college students? Don't meet income requirements, or someone just got to the apartment first?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh dear gawd :lol::lol::lol:

I actually watched since I was home. I agree about character interactions. LOL....so tired of Luke feeling he is always being duped because he is gay. Gawd...Van's acting gets worse everyday. What's with all these faces he makes while acting? What's with all the extra gay acting in his performances?

That would have been priceless. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Was that judge for real? :rolleyes: Talk about not getting all the facts before deciding whether Limbo and Puker should be allowed to marry. I am so glad Jack kicked Parker to the curb. I am sorry but Carly should have slapped the s h i t out of Parker! The show wasnt have bad. Maybe Goutman needs to produce ATWT only 3 days a week and show classic ATWT eppys the rest of the week.

Parker needs to die a horrible death...LOL. I hate Parker with a passion. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

LOL....I can't hate Parker, but damn if that kid doesn't piss me the hell off. I hate how Pissy justifies these stupid kids, when no judge in their right mind would have acted that way. I'm only surprised Carly didn't deliberately get herself arrested to try and delay the wedding.

The way it developed, I got where Jack was coming from. I don't think he was right to throw him out of Carly's house, but I sure didn't want Parker to trample over Carly even more with his snotty attitude. Parker needs to get knocked around a little to understand what being an adult truly is.

What the hell is with Paul? I only wish he was done begging Meg because I'm sick of them. I'd much rather see Dusty and Meg.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

First, Happy Birthday PJ. Parker pissed me off too. The judge was so unbelievable. What is Pissy smoking? The judge was so over the top. He didnt even take the time to find out about Parker's father. The whole scenes were absurd and just plain laughable.

I think he did more because of his anger than Parker trampling on Carly. Although that was part of it. I was thinking the same thing about Parker knowing what the real world was like.

Paul just looks pathetic everytime he is on. Howarth needs a cut. He is hair is awful. I like Meg and Dusty. But you know Pissy and Goutman orgasm over Paul and Meg...LOL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thanks!

LOL...today and yesterday are why this show drives me nuts. Yes, the plotting is horrible. But damned if I haven't been riveted to the fallout like a crackwhore. :D

I didn't quite mean that Jack was upset about Carly being trampled on, exactly. He didn't actually hear what Parker said to the judge. But it's obvious Carly would have let them stay and let Parker rub her nose in his newfound "adult" status. Jack nailed it today when he told Carly that Parker was proud of what he'd done and one smug little SOB.

At least Austin Peck got his hair buzzed, thank God. He looks like such a dork when his hair gets long...like an eighties reject.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Maura West was simply astounding beginning to end; from her discovery of Parker's research online, to storming into the judge's office, to be ridiculed by her own son, airing her dirty laundry, to be threatened by the judge with assault charges; Maura was rocking on all cylinders and I wouldn't be surprised if she wins her second Emmy in 2010..

Michael Park was electrifying in his scenes with Mick Hazen. Chills went down my spine when Michael delived, "Get out of my way son"; the expression on Mick Hazen's Parker's face, priceless. This episode allowed him to be sweet and caring with Janet while sitting for baby Eliza, to truly mesmerizing and full of rage when having walked in on his 16 year old son just having been married. Great range and impact and I will be shocked if he isn't nominated for a Emmy next year..

Mick Hazen plays the rebellious teen perfectly. If we fans are irritated with his ways, it is a true testament to the actor who is coming into his own and now it looks like we have a frontrunner in the Younger Actor category for 2010.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I like the fallout too. Even though I missed the weeks leading up to it. I hate how Pissy is making Carly and Janet look so stupid in the process. So Carly had NO CLUE that her son was in the championship game? It just made Carly look like a bad mother. Is Carly that busy that she doesnt know what's happening in her son's life? Janet is dumb period...LOL. But Pissy dumbed her down even more during this week.

And Liberho is so content being married. She could have stopped all this mess. She sure doesnt look like she's in love with Puker.

Maura West and Michael Park have been outstanding this week. I think MP has been extra great. MP looks so good too. It looks like he has lost some weight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I watched a few bits and pieces of the past few shows. It's nice to see Noah and Luke are probably about as happy and affectionate as they're ever going to get. Jake Silbermann's come a long way, he's much more natural these days.

What can you say about Maura West? I can't count the number of actors who started phoning it in when they had half the crap Maura's been given over the years. She's one of a kind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Just when I'd almost given up on ATWT, it has come roaring back thanks to this brilliant story. I am glad Parker and Liberty successfully got married and it is the mark of how well-written this story is that every character -- Carly, Jack, Janet, Parker, Liberty, Craig, Brad, Katie -- has their own unique point of view on this, sometimes a surprising one (Craig calling Jack) and all those points of view are understandable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • When Anita read Barbara's letter, it started out with the viewers hearing it in Barbara's voice as Anita read silently. And then Anita saying the next portion aloud while Barbara's voice continued simultaneously. And then ending with Anita alone saying the last part aloud. Excerpt from interview  (link to full interview) The rest may be spoilerish -- Only the nonspoiler part here: I love the idea of reading that letter,” shares Tunie. “And at one point in the script, I think it said that my voice joined her, and [Anita] started reciting the letter from memory because [she] memorized this letter. I suggested to Steve Williford, our director, ‘What if it’s like that moment in Hamilton when Hamilton is writing the resignation letter to George Washington, and then he starts saying it too, and then Hamilton’s voice fades away, and then it’s all George. What if we do something like that?’ And he was like, ‘Oh, my God! I just got chills. Let’s do it!’ So, we did it.” I understood that it worked really well, so I’m really happy about that.”  
    • I think MVJ and Guza made a good team in the launching of the soap, and I'm hoping that the rotation of all stories and characters is maintained once he officially departs from the credits. And so far, Ron C's breakdowns have been decent... but they pop only when he's paired with a good script writer like Jazmin.   I hope once Guza leaves officially... that MVJ is able to reign in Ron C and the dread Jamey G.
    • I read that, but my interpretation was that she is uncredited because it is in a non-production capacity.  In others words, she's not secretly producing, or writing, as some had speculated prior to the confirmation. Her likeliest position would be in a post-production consultant capacity. I assume we agree on this?
    • Errol already confirmed she is back at Y&R and in a non-producing role; this alludes to she is not credited for the role she has.
    • I don't think Lisa served a purpose after the serial killer storyline. The writers never gave her anything to do but be Vicky's nemesis. Joanna Going deserved better. Another example of a character taking over the show and then the writers not having a longterm plan for the character.  Exhibit B: Sally Spencer. Such a missed opportunity. It really angers me how they misused her. She could sing and act and they just threw her away in that sexist nonsense storyline. Once the story was over, they wrote her off. The McKinnons should have lasted for years. I will give the show credit for how they introduced Sandra Ferguson as Amanda. I thought it was expertly done. She comes in and she immediately connected to RKK's Sam. She has chemistry with Matthew and she has realistic conversations with MAc and Rachel. That's how it is done. 
    • Great points, and it has not completely vanished. Leslie on Beyond the Gates fits the trope (she's still not over that Ted lovin' two decades later), though I will say there does seem to be an effort to make her more complex.
    • I understand why people speculate, but I have to say it doesn’t sound very plausible that Jill Farren Phelps would be working at Y&R in any uncredited role. CBS daytime shows are tightly bound by union contracts and corporate oversight, and that kind of informal arrangement would be a major liability in 2025. Before the mergers of SAG-AFTRA and the two WGA branches, it may have been easier to hire someone quietly or off the books. But those days are behind us. With digital payroll, tighter pension tracking, and increased scrutiny from legal and compliance departments, it’s just not the kind of thing anyone can get away with anymore. Most union members, especially producers nearing retirement, would not risk their eligibility or benefits to take an uncredited role. The Producers Guild of America is also very clear about crediting. To even receive the PGA mark, a producer has to be verified through a formal review process. According to their credit certification guidelines (source), "only individuals who performed a majority of the producing functions on a motion picture or television production" are eligible for credit, and those credits must be official and recorded. If someone is functioning in that capacity, they are not supposed to be uncredited. Studios that are union signatories, like CBS and Sony, know better than to skirt those rules. If anyone has a legitimate, primary source confirming that CBS is hiring someone like Phelps in an uncredited production role, I’d honestly be curious to read it. But without that, this just feels like rumor—not reality.
    • I keep thinking about the persistent trend of eroticizing mental illness on Guiding Light. Sonni and Annie were never more compelling, or more attractive to the show, than when they were manic. It played into a recurring theme: strong women undone by their unhinged reaction to sex. The writers were likely inspired by Basic Instinct and the broader wave of neo-noir films in the late '80s and early '90s, where female sexuality was often equated with instability. The result was a crude portrayal, not just of mental illness, but of womanhood itself. Both Sonni and Annie were introduced as sharp, capable women, brought in specifically as formidable antagonists to Reva. They were logical and composed, standing in contrast to Reva’s emotional volatility. That difference made them threatening, but not especially “sexy”—until desire became their undoing. In a very male fantasy, their strength unraveled the moment they slept with Joshua. As soon as they got a taste of Lewis lovin’, they spiraled into scheming lunatics, willing to torch everything to hold on to him. It was part of a larger trend in the culture. Fatal Attraction, Single White Female, and The Hand That Rocks the Cradle all traded on the idea that female desire was dangerous, barely held in check, and always teetering on the edge of madness. Looking back, it's a pretty grim trope. And while it's not completely vanished, I'm grateful we don't see it quite as often today.
    • Elements of it were silly, but it was a small price to pay to get Zas back. I should say there's a difference between in town and out of town returns. It's understandable for Roger to skulk around town in a bad wig and clown suit when he's in Springfield and running the risk of bumping in to people he knows.  Taking us out of town to find someone always has a short shelf life. Then it usually becomes about another character knowing X is alive but determined to keep them out of Springfield. Like Alan discovering Amish Reva. I don't know how long it went on, but it was probably twice as long as necessary.
    • Elizabeth Dennehy complained on the Locher Room about how ridiculous so much of the writing was for Roger's return. She laughed at so much of Roger's antics and how it was hard for her to take them seriously. Probably another reason she was fired as she didn't play the game.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy