Jump to content

ATWT: March Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 142
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

At least it was fun snark, built on and acknowledging history (even the fact that Meg is clueless about Em's brief foray into hookerdom...) unlike the stilted Carly/Craig crapfest, where she's just forgiven him for putting her sister in a coma. Y'know...'cause he "deserves" a second twentieth thousandth chance to raise his kid or ruin Carly's life, whichever comes first.

I'd be fine with Meg/Dusty. What needs to die is the Paul/Meg relationship from hell.

I wouldn't exactly call it "pure trash"...it was definitely more interesting than yesterday, dominated by whiny twenty-somethings. AKA "bad actor fest".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I am fine with Meg and Dusty too but you know Peg is the endgame. Although with you know who returning things could change. But I doubt it...LOL

Well...pure trash seems to sum up ATWT for me lately. All the backtracking with Lucy not being charged with kidnapping just got my blood boiling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

A big ol' friggin' SNAP to the new cracks developing in Jack and Janet's relationship. I'm sick of that silly twit defending her daughter and blaming Parker for "pushing" her into sex. Janet is clearly projecting her Brad-issues on Parker, and I'm glad Jack called her on foisting the blame on his son. As if Janet's ever punished her daughter?

The Carly/Craig sex scene was blissfully non-existant.

ICK to Brad/Katie/V/Henry. Tell me...where does ANYONE find a "happy mother's day balloon" in March???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Because they formed a fanbase so quickly after Meg and Dusty split and she set her eyes on Paul. They had potential. Had, being the key word. But the relentless pimping and character destruction has left the "Peg" pairing of old in pieces. And as always, with PissAnt and Goutman, if something's broke at ATWT, don't fix it. Just pretend it's not broken and feature it even more...maybe the viewers won't notice!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't have a friggin' clue what TIIC see in Meg/Paul that justifies this ENDLESS circle of hell. MWil/RH had a nice chemistry, but TIIC have milked it dry. TIIC don't understand that they wouldn't have to keep Paul this bat-[!@#$%^&*] crazy if he moved on to a new woman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oy vey...I couldn't be more underwhelmed by the wrap up to the murder if I tried. Today, for no reason, it's Noah's turn to suspect everyone, and Luke who gets to be reasonable and suddenly "trust" Kevin. WTH??? Any other day Luke acts like Kev deserves the electric chair for farting crossways...and today it's "blah blah Kev didn't really know how Mark was managing his campaign." REALLY??? Luke was on a friggin' crusade to tar and feather Kev before.

UGH...just lame-ass stupid. At least we're rid of Elwood. FOREVER.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

:lol: Sorry for the laughter PJ but your post is so right on. Today's show was just awful. Nuke...oh dear gawd...end them now and ship them far away and give me more Bob, Kim and Lisa instead. They need to be axed. The murder storyline was so bad...that it is not even funny. What a waste of time. No real writing was put forth in it. Anyone at SON could have written that atricious story. My Gawd was it awful!! The script writing by Gordon Rayfield was awful too. I would have rather seen Kevin f u c k Luke and Noah catch them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I piss and moan because I love the show. What's so freakin' frustrating is that a daily show can be good. It's the long-term story arcs that are unimaginative, hampering the momentum of the show. Days like today, centered on a bunch of damn boring twentysomethings in a simplistic no-one-gives-a-crap-about-those-who-died plot would kill anyone's enthusiasm for any show.

There are positives. The actors mostly. Even those boring twentysomethings can shine---when involved in story with veteran actors. I like the feel of the outdoor scenes, which are head and shoulders above either GL's or B&B's IMO.

I was thinking...I LIKE Kev more than I like either Luke or Noah (and I honestly liked Noah with originalMaddie). Nuke are boring, earnest and self-righteous to the nth degree. Kev is a guy who made ONE bad decision (after being blindsided by the news of Luke's sexuality) and seems genuinely trying to do "the right thing" when it counts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Seriously, aside from Paul and Emily (and I freely admit my bias in that regard lol), today's show was made of fail.

I did LMAO at Emily saying Paul was so positive, and asking if he was taking his meds, and then later Paul handing Emily his shrink's emergency contact number.

NuLucy seems even younger than Peyton to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You mean a flawed character, who struggles with his own defense mechanisms, does the wrong things for the right reasons, and actually acts like a human being instead of a walking PSA?

Yeah - who wants to watch THAT kind of character...?!

:rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • When Anita read Barbara's letter, it started out with the viewers hearing it in Barbara's voice as Anita read silently. And then Anita saying the next portion aloud while Barbara's voice continued simultaneously. And then ending with Anita alone saying the last part aloud. Excerpt from interview  (link to full interview) The rest may be spoilerish -- Only the nonspoiler part here: I love the idea of reading that letter,” shares Tunie. “And at one point in the script, I think it said that my voice joined her, and [Anita] started reciting the letter from memory because [she] memorized this letter. I suggested to Steve Williford, our director, ‘What if it’s like that moment in Hamilton when Hamilton is writing the resignation letter to George Washington, and then he starts saying it too, and then Hamilton’s voice fades away, and then it’s all George. What if we do something like that?’ And he was like, ‘Oh, my God! I just got chills. Let’s do it!’ So, we did it.” I understood that it worked really well, so I’m really happy about that.”  
    • I think MVJ and Guza made a good team in the launching of the soap, and I'm hoping that the rotation of all stories and characters is maintained once he officially departs from the credits. And so far, Ron C's breakdowns have been decent... but they pop only when he's paired with a good script writer like Jazmin.   I hope once Guza leaves officially... that MVJ is able to reign in Ron C and the dread Jamey G.
    • I read that, but my interpretation was that she is uncredited because it is in a non-production capacity.  In others words, she's not secretly producing, or writing, as some had speculated prior to the confirmation. Her likeliest position would be in a post-production consultant capacity. I assume we agree on this?
    • Errol already confirmed she is back at Y&R and in a non-producing role; this alludes to she is not credited for the role she has.
    • I don't think Lisa served a purpose after the serial killer storyline. The writers never gave her anything to do but be Vicky's nemesis. Joanna Going deserved better. Another example of a character taking over the show and then the writers not having a longterm plan for the character.  Exhibit B: Sally Spencer. Such a missed opportunity. It really angers me how they misused her. She could sing and act and they just threw her away in that sexist nonsense storyline. Once the story was over, they wrote her off. The McKinnons should have lasted for years. I will give the show credit for how they introduced Sandra Ferguson as Amanda. I thought it was expertly done. She comes in and she immediately connected to RKK's Sam. She has chemistry with Matthew and she has realistic conversations with MAc and Rachel. That's how it is done. 
    • Great points, and it has not completely vanished. Leslie on Beyond the Gates fits the trope (she's still not over that Ted lovin' two decades later), though I will say there does seem to be an effort to make her more complex.
    • I understand why people speculate, but I have to say it doesn’t sound very plausible that Jill Farren Phelps would be working at Y&R in any uncredited role. CBS daytime shows are tightly bound by union contracts and corporate oversight, and that kind of informal arrangement would be a major liability in 2025. Before the mergers of SAG-AFTRA and the two WGA branches, it may have been easier to hire someone quietly or off the books. But those days are behind us. With digital payroll, tighter pension tracking, and increased scrutiny from legal and compliance departments, it’s just not the kind of thing anyone can get away with anymore. Most union members, especially producers nearing retirement, would not risk their eligibility or benefits to take an uncredited role. The Producers Guild of America is also very clear about crediting. To even receive the PGA mark, a producer has to be verified through a formal review process. According to their credit certification guidelines (source), "only individuals who performed a majority of the producing functions on a motion picture or television production" are eligible for credit, and those credits must be official and recorded. If someone is functioning in that capacity, they are not supposed to be uncredited. Studios that are union signatories, like CBS and Sony, know better than to skirt those rules. If anyone has a legitimate, primary source confirming that CBS is hiring someone like Phelps in an uncredited production role, I’d honestly be curious to read it. But without that, this just feels like rumor—not reality.
    • I keep thinking about the persistent trend of eroticizing mental illness on Guiding Light. Sonni and Annie were never more compelling, or more attractive to the show, than when they were manic. It played into a recurring theme: strong women undone by their unhinged reaction to sex. The writers were likely inspired by Basic Instinct and the broader wave of neo-noir films in the late '80s and early '90s, where female sexuality was often equated with instability. The result was a crude portrayal, not just of mental illness, but of womanhood itself. Both Sonni and Annie were introduced as sharp, capable women, brought in specifically as formidable antagonists to Reva. They were logical and composed, standing in contrast to Reva’s emotional volatility. That difference made them threatening, but not especially “sexy”—until desire became their undoing. In a very male fantasy, their strength unraveled the moment they slept with Joshua. As soon as they got a taste of Lewis lovin’, they spiraled into scheming lunatics, willing to torch everything to hold on to him. It was part of a larger trend in the culture. Fatal Attraction, Single White Female, and The Hand That Rocks the Cradle all traded on the idea that female desire was dangerous, barely held in check, and always teetering on the edge of madness. Looking back, it's a pretty grim trope. And while it's not completely vanished, I'm grateful we don't see it quite as often today.
    • Elements of it were silly, but it was a small price to pay to get Zas back. I should say there's a difference between in town and out of town returns. It's understandable for Roger to skulk around town in a bad wig and clown suit when he's in Springfield and running the risk of bumping in to people he knows.  Taking us out of town to find someone always has a short shelf life. Then it usually becomes about another character knowing X is alive but determined to keep them out of Springfield. Like Alan discovering Amish Reva. I don't know how long it went on, but it was probably twice as long as necessary.
    • Elizabeth Dennehy complained on the Locher Room about how ridiculous so much of the writing was for Roger's return. She laughed at so much of Roger's antics and how it was hard for her to take them seriously. Probably another reason she was fired as she didn't play the game.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy