Jump to content

Handling the Frontburner


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Aaah yes, Victoria Rowell did great when she had the chance to be on the frontburner. It really isn't that surprising that the only time the Winters family is on frontburner in a way is when Rowell was around. With Y&R being so good right now, can you imagine how good it would be if Dru would resurface? :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I'm always amazed at those who extol the virtues of Susan Lucci. To me, she is the epitome of why soap stars are never taken seriously. Her over-the-top scenery chewing might pass muster in high school productions , but she is far from an actress.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There are lots of reason that soap actors aren't taken seriously. Bad acting is only part of it. Susan can't act for her life, but she has the presence that has made Erica work all these years. Sap fans aren't the most discriminatory when it comes acting anyway. They just want to be entertained and Susan Lucci as Erica has been entertaining.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's not about acting with Susan Lucci. It's about CHARISMA. There are many actresses who are much more skilled than La Lucci...but none of them (and I really mean that, none) have the presence she does. Susan Lucci is Erica Kane and Erica Kane is All My Children. It's really that simple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Erica Kane is an over-the-top scenery chewer! That's the whole idea. It's impossible to specify where Erica ends and Susan begins.

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Sometimes I say to HELL with being "subtle." If your character is a fabulous diva who struts her [!@#$%^&*] on a daily basis, there is no need to be "subtle!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I just think that if people are looking for good acting as the prime requisite, they are looking in the wrong place when looking at soap operas. Between the horrendous dialogue, moronic stories, and the total lack of time to rehearse and actually act, it just isn't about technical skill. Soaps aren't where you go to find Maggie Smith. Lucci outshines everyone else in the same exact way William Shatner made Patrick Stewart irrelevent despite his theatrical background in shakespeare and the classics in that one film they made together. Some people are good actors, and some people have *it*. Lucci has it, no one else in daytime does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I totally disagree with most of that.

Daytime through the years has been graced by some of the best performers as far as talent that there are. The last few years as they shifted more to using looks as a requirement when hiring it has been less so but throughout the history no.

I would say that if you are looking for the performers that have "IT" then yes daytime is not the place to look but daytime has had some of the best talents out there.

You look at James Mitchell, Ruth Warrick, Marie Masters, Suzanne Rogers, Mary Stuart, Constance Ford, Joan Copeland, Larry Bryggman, Elizabeth Hubbard, Susan Flannery, William Prince, Erika Slezak, Gillian Spencer, and many others but those are the first ones that come to mind. Most of those rose above it even when they were given bad material, but none of them really had "IT." Mary Stuart even tried to make it in the movies and got some roles but never made it big. She thrived in soaps on her talent alone.

I would put many soap stars right up there with the best of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Steve, you are correct. Watching someone like Maura West, who gives subtle, understated performances, as well as raw and emotional be compared to hystrionic ham Lucci drives me up a wall. Daytime does have some great performers, they just don't happen to be on AMC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You're just not getting it.

Those of us who extol the magnificence of Susan Lucci aren't talking about her acting, we're talking about HER, her charisma, her star quality, her IT factor that nobody in daytime can hope of radiating.

I agree with SteveFrame's list of fantastically talented performers...daytime is filled with talent...but NONE of them have the IT factor that Lucci has exploded with for nearly 4 decades.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Maura may be a better actor, but IMO Lucci is the better performer. There's a distinct quality about everything she does in her performances, and that's what makes her stand out. If she were like the rest, she'd be exactly that...like the rest. She'd be constantly lumped into the group with Flannery, Zimmer, Cooper, Slezak, etc. Which, it should go without saying, is a MARVELOUS category to be in. But Lucci is in a class of her own all the way. She'd probably fail big time in any other soap opera role, but no one on this entire Earth can ever possibly play Erica Kane better than she can. It's just impossible. It does not happen. Susan Lucci is Erica Kane, and anyone else who'd even try would just be making a damn fool out of themselves. That includes you, Meryl.

I respect your opinion, but I think that's an unfair assumption. I know that it's a tired argument, but you can't get around the difference between doing two or three movies a year and doing anywhere between 125-200 soap episodes a year. That doesn't even account for the fact that soaps are at least 95% dialogue and 5% action (except for GH!). There are different types of acting for different industries. Daytime is different from movies, which is different from musical theatre, which is different from sitcoms, which is different from porn, which is different from "Sesame Street," and so on. It's not to say that one group of actors is better than the others, but that there's a certain style/standard that is expected from each one. There are many Academy Award winners who would probably break their necks trying to keep up with the rigorous pace of daytime, but there shouldn't be competition between the industries, IMO. There should be nothing but respect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I disagree about some of them looking bad outside of daytime. Constance Ford stole many episodes of Perry Mason from more talented stars. Jeanne Cooper did the same. Constance Ford stole the movie A Summer Place from some very talented performers.

Robin Strasser gave a wonderful performance in the mini-series Baby M. And she was pretty good too in a supporting turn on Coach.

Leon Russom and Wings Hauser are 2 very talented long term soap actors from the 70's who have stolen many movies in the last few years.

Frances Reid has turned in some great performances on shows like Perry Mason in the past. And she did that movie with Robert Young about alzheimer's and she was wonderful.

Susan Flannery was one of the bright spots in the movie The Towering Inferno right up there in the midst of many great movie stars and she got some of the best reviews out of all of them and got a Globe nomination for it.

As far as Susan Lucci's IT fact. Yes she has it as Erica. But it never has helped her anywhere else. Her primetime motion pictures were never successful. She paled when thrown into Dallas. All the other actors ate her to death and made her look so amateur. She never got any good reviews at all in any of the made for TV movies she made. And that is the reason they quit asking her to do them because the ratings never were there.

I agree that Susan Lucci has IT but more of it is to do with the marriage of the right part. Her IT has never translated anywhere else onscreen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Actually, the majority of the TV movies La Lucci starred in during the 80s and 90s were done because Lucci negotiated them into her AMC contract. ABC had to do them and in actual fact, several of them were big successes. 1986's 'Mafia Princess' and 1991's 'The Bride in Black' were both very highly rated.

After Frons took over ABC Dayime Lucci's TV movie clause was removed. It's hard to say whose choice that was, it is FRONS we're talking about.

The writing during her run on 'Dallas' was bad for everyone, I don't think anyone was any good that season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Always, in every way, Cass/Wally/Felicia foundational to my viewing. And, I think if we look at the aftermath of the disastrous 90 minute show that we find too many pockets of some kind of lost time at the show plus way too much of change-ups in exec & writing leadership and of course we also reach the first time it becomes notable that NBC wants to get rid of the show so they can put a new soap they own in the timeslot.
    • If the MAGAts were easy prey enough to get manipulated into voting for the tangerine-tinted terror, they'll fall for anything.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • And this came out as the "feud" and the media pushing the protests in Los Angeles got all the media attention. They know the press and the public will not care or can be manipulated into approving.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Hope you will enjoy the 1976 storyline from the Daytime serial Newsletter. The show had just expanded to an hour so new characters and stories were required. The Soderbergs had been writing since late 73 and the show was still #1. Looking foward to comments and discusssion Pt.1  For over two decades As the World Turns has depicted the events in the lives of two Oakdale families: the wealthy and influential Lowells and the less affluent but equally respected Hughes family. Judge Lowell’s granddaughter Ellen is married now to Dr. David Stewart, whose adopted son, Dan, is actually her own illegitimate child. Dan was once married to Dr. Susan Stewart, by whom he has a daughter, Emily. Dan then married Liz, the ex-wife of his late brother Paul. Liz was the mother of Dan’s daughter Betsy, who believes to this day that Paul was her father. Liz died tragically the day after their wedding. Ellen and David have two daughters, Carolann (Annie) and Dawn (Dee), now of college age. Dan has recently fallen in love with Kim Dixon, who was about to divorce Dr. John Dixon until injuries suffered in a tornado caused amnesia and left her with no memory of her love for Dan. John is using this respite to solicitously convince Kim of his love for her. Nancy and Chris Hughes had three children: Bob, a doctor, Donald, an attorney, and Penny, who, after tragically losing two husbands due to automobile accidents, is now living in Europe, where she is married to a racing-car driver. Bob was married while very young to Lisa Miller, then a scheming and selfish young woman, whose machinations destroyed their marriage. She is the mother of Bob’s son, Tom, who is divorced from Carol, who is now married to Jay Stallings. Tom is currently married to Natalie Bannon. Bob later married model Sandy Wilson, a marriage which ended in divorce, and Sandy is now married to Norman Garrison, who is her partner in a beauty products concern. Norman blames Bob for Sandy’s  recent disillusionment with their marriage, and, ironically, Norman suffered a heart attack during his verbal assault on Bob at a Hughes family party; and while Bob rode with him in the ambulance to the hospital, Bob’s beloved wife, Jennifer, Kim’s sister, died in a car crash while driving home alone. Lisa, more mature and considerate of others now, is married to attorney Grant Colman, but her life has been complicated by the recent arrival in town of Grant’s ex-wife, Joyce, and the incredible news that she and Grant had a child after their separation, a child Joyce gave out for adoption but now wants to reclaim. Now the story continues... The picture has now come clear for attorney Grant Coiman. He has learned that his ex-wife Joyce neglected to tell him she had a child shortly after their divorce and had given the boy to Mary and Brian Ellison for adoption. Grant, after seeing the adoption papers and considering the boy’s interests, tells Mary he feels the child should remain with them; they are providing a fine, stable home for him. Grant’s wife, Lisa, is pleased with his decision, feeling he has thus closed the door to the past and they can now go on with their own lives. But Joyce has learned that attorney Dick Martin is now back in private practice, and she tells him she was confused when she gave Teddy up years ago and wants him to represent her in a custody action to get her son back. Dick tells Joyce she has a very weak case but he’ll do what he can. He goes out to Laramie to see the  Ellisons, upsetting them very much. Grant, meanwhile, has confided in Chris Hughes, his law partner, that while his name was on the consent form for the Ellisons’ adoption, he didn’t sign the papers; he had, in fact, never known that he had a son. But he’s afraid to open a new can of worms by signing a consent form now, as that would reveal that the adoption papers are not legally correct. Grant confides the situation to Lisa, explaining that if he wanted to,  he could probably get custody of Teddy himself, but that’s not what he feels would be best for the child. Mary Ellison finally breaks under the strain of Dick’s visit and tells Brian that Dr. Paulk, the doctor who arranged the adoption, told her he didn’t know where to find the baby’s father and so he signed the consent form himself. She painfully explains she kept this secret knowing that Brian wouldn’t go through with the adoption if he learned the papers weren’t legally sound. Brian quickly calls their family lawyer, Jerry Butler, who immediately phones Grant to be sure he backs the Ellisons’ claim. Dick realizes from Joyce’s story that Grant couldn’t have signed the papers and tells him he knows. The only person who has a right to file for Teddy’s custody now is Grant; he’s the only injured party. And the moment he files, Dick can sue for invalidation of the Ellisons’ adoption. Grant finally files, to settle the custody question once and for all, but technically he's filing for custody himself. Tom Hughes and Natalie Porter are married in a small, lovely ceremony at the home of his grandparents, Nancy and Chris Hughes. They honeymoon in the Southwest and return full of expectations of happiness. Natalie is disquieted, however, when flowers arrive which are not from her new husband. She covers by pretending to check with the florist and tells Tom it was a wrong delivery and they have told her she might as well keep them. But she knows who sent them. Natalie is upset when, shortly after, Luke Porter arrives in town and seeks her out. But Luke insists he is there only to assure her this is a final farewell and he has now decided to concentrate on. making his own marriage work. Sandy Garrison, Bob’s ex-wife, is working at the  bookstore to fill in for Natalie. Her estranged husband, Norman, recovering from a heart attack he suffered during a drunken confrontation with Bob at the Colonnade Room, is still telling anyone who will listen that Bob and Sandy are having an affair, but ironically will let only Bob care for him at the hospital. His recovery is hampered by his easily aroused temper. Norman anxiously tries to persuade Dr. John Dixon to convince Bob to swear he slipped at the restaurant, thus making them liable for a costly lawsuit, but John won’t do this. Chris discovers a large amount of money missing when checking the books on the Garrisons’ business, but doesn’t want to upset Sandy with this. More to come...
    • The cynical (i.e., the dominant) me has the very same thoughts.
    • Oh wow that’s pretty awesome! I wish I had  approached him but there was so many people 
    • In the current environment, while it's small, there is a crumb of good news: Apparently, San Antonio voted for a DEMOCRATIC mayor, Gina Ortiz, beating the "right-hand man" of Gov. Greg Abbott, former Texas Secretary of State Rolando Pablos. https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/5337199-gina-ortiz-jones-wins-san-antonio/
    • Love this! You are both adorable. Wow
    • I have not gone back to watch much of 1987, but from what I've seen lately, it doesn't feel like the writers or producers had any sort of plan. The show feels as if it's constantly in flux.  I will give it credit for this. It's watchable for the most part minus Lisa/Jamie which I find nearly unwatchable now.   I don't find Cheryl mousy. I think she has a lot of quiet strength, but she was saddled with the Scott romance which the writers did not invest in. She had a good friendship with Julie (also criminally underused), and her interactions with Ada were enjoyable as well. I also like Layman, but Spencer was extremely talented and when Cass returns, Schnetzer and Spencer have some wonderful scenes. Spencer also fits in with Alexander, Hogan, and Marie.  I'd forgotten just how much I missed seeing Wallingford. IT was so good to see him again. Even when they didn't have a major plot, Felicia/Cass/Wallingford/Mitch always brings a smile to my face.  
    •   Dani’s cute ass party planner. He gave me some tea but I was so drunk I don’t remember it.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy