Jump to content

OLTL: Erika Slezak


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I have to interrupt reading this entertaining thread by saying I love this post, especially the first sentence. I'm SO tired of the Marlena lovefest. The ratings on Days right now are indicating that life goes on. I really don't think, in these later years,Marlena was all that and a bag of chips anymore.

That being said, I hope this is a rumor, but I agree that no one is safe. But, I think OLTL is already having some difficulties WITH Vicki on, based on the ratings. It's rather disappointing. So, Vicki (like Marlena), isn't making or breaking the show. Something else is wrong. It's a sad soap that makes it or breaks it on one character only.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 103
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Erika Slezak has always been humble to a fault in her public comments. She is also a master at playing the daytime game. When she makes a cut (like she did to Dena Higley) she leaves no scar and comes off totally civil. She has to say she is dispensable, that is her personality. It doesn't happen to be true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think if we look at OLTL conceptually... the idea of "One Life" to Live... I think it's Viki's life. That's what the show has ideally been about, Viki. It started with her, she held it all together and if she's out, I think it will/should end with her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Normally I would agree, but considering as how Viki is barely on this show at the moment with minimal to no air time and instead the same few are on day in and day out over and over again, I can't agree. If Viki was shown more, had feature story and then the ratings were bad, I could agree. But since Viki is not on I can't blame her character for breaking the show when others who are overexposed I would assess stronger blame to. OLTL has lost a lot of sense of balance, and that is never a good thing for any show, but most especially this show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Not to sound unkind, and no one has mentioned this, but part of the problem with Slezak is that she is rather matronly. She doesn't have the seductive sexual viability of a Susan Lucci, or even the campy sexual viability of a Robin Strasser. I'm convinced that's the reason GH refuses to have Genie Francis back; she comes off as too matronly and patchwork quilty. Also, Slezak is not a man. Duh! Men on these shows can grow old and/or go out of shape (think Michael E Knight, Tony Geary, Bobby Woods, etc), of course within limits, but they don't suffer the same fate as aging actresses. It's a double standard. It's not fair, but it's true. I don't think that Slezak's multiple Emmys and adoration from fans/critics mean a hill of beans in this cost-saving environment. If you're not important to the bottom line, which to ABC translates into attracting 18- to 34-year-old women with enticing sexual situations, then you're not vital to the show. I watch the show occasionally and read the spoilers, and it does look as if Viki has been marginalized. I like Slezak and she definitely is the nostalgic heart and soul of the show. But to be honest, for the viewers they're desperately trying to attract, would Slezak's absence really make much of a difference? Think about that. When it comes down to it, this is probably a rumor without much merit and more than likely won't really happen. But just the fact that a substantial rumor such as this could have some basis in reality says a lot about the current state of soaps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Nothing will attract a new or young demo to this show or any others. No one single thing. The only thing that will potentially attract a few new viewers are well-written stories, families and couples. Even GH coasts on a handful of couples.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, and not to sound unkind either, then how do you explain Susan Flannery? I think it's a case by case basis rather than the general feeling that sex appeal and only sex appeal is what sells in soaps. Granted, things aren't as wonderful as they once were, but to be fair, I think soaps are one of the last mediums (English soaps like Eastenders in particular) where authentic looking older folks get a chance at representation. I think tptb/tiic will find any way to justify their already made up minds and there's really no across the board rhyme or reason why decisions concerning older vets get made. SF has already expressed an interest in retiring, and I believe that that saddens (even scares?) the Bell folks, where perhaps folks at ABC would be wetting themselves with excitement to be getting rid of someone of her payscale. I truly believe that the Bell people treasure Flannery and Cooper (the proof is in the pudding), and it saddens me that I don't feel the same rallying cry for the vets over at ABC. If Agnes Nixon still owned her shows for example, things would have been a LOT different over the years minus the ever-increasing network interference. I don't believe Agnes would have watched any of her beloved creations wither on the vine save for the actors' personal decisions/illnesses, and so on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Not to sound cliched, but comparing ABC soaps vs. the Bell soaps, and the CBS soaps in general, is like comparing apples and oranges. The CBS shows have always appealed to a more mature audience than the ABC soaps and CBS has always sought out this demo while actively pursuing the 18-34's and 18-49's. They've been able to find the right balance between the old guard and the new. CBS doesn't live and die by the demos like ABC does. ABC is ALL about sex and flash and quick fixes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There seems to be more on this because it made the new SOD cover this week.

OLTL's web rumor about Erika Slezak being cut: Slezak, "They're focusing on other stories right now. And that's all I can really say."

Online rumors saying a female vet may be dropped has some fans wondering about Erika Slezak.

I sure hope this is not going to happen. To me OLTL just would not be the same without Erika Slezak's Viki. Wouldn't OLTL have denied this if there was nothing to it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't believe that for one minute that Erika Sleazak is going anywhere! If Frons gives her the boot, there would be a major uproar beyond belief over this.

I wish Frons would be handed his walking papers like ASAP. With so many cutbacks, does Disney really need to pay someone to intervene so much in their daytime programming?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I didnt mean that I thought he would kill her; just that he gave off the impression that he had the capacity to do so. The original Ted portrayed him with more of a dark side when they were together. Its the switch up I see in True Crime stories when an upstanding pillar of the community ends up doing heinous things under people's noise whom would never beleive  he'd do when in actuality, he's a covert monster. Thats a dichotomy in the character as portrayed by Maurice that I dont see anymore
    • I think one mistake that later writers made with Gail was to make her either Lee's angelic wife or the therapist that was an easy dupe for evil characters that required treatment.  Under Marland, there was a series of scenes where Tracy goaded Lee to drink, Jessie witnessed it and spilled the beans about what she saw to Gail.  Gail, then, in turn, ripped Tracy a new one.  I wish that Gail and Tracy scene still existed on YouTube.  It was glorious not only to see evil Tracy be put in her place, but to see some real fire from Gail.
    • I won't be. We all know that the shelf life of a villainess isn't very long. Trisha Mann-Grant is the breakout star of BtG and she is destined for bigger and better things.
    • I feel CBS/P&G got really shaken by 1978-1982 ABC huge rise and domination, thus the changes to the shows. Considering Capitol showed no growth, I wonder if CBS ever regretting cancelling Search for Tomorrow. From the 1980s Ratings thread, Capitol pretty much inherited Search for Tomorrow audience but Capitol ratings were impacted when One Life to Live rebounded in 1985 with Andrea Evans return. Remember Capitol was head-to-head with the second half of One Life to Live. Even if CBS kept Search for Tomorrow, I think it would've ended as soon as Bill Bell had a second show ready. Funny thing is Search for Tomorrow NBC run was only three months shorter that Capitol run.
    • This was Bill's most complicated moment. The pecs stole the show and what was left from Brooke's dignity.

      Please register in order to view this content

         
    • You are going to be so proud of me because I agree.  I kept thinking why is Sonny/Mo getting all the dialogue and gate keeping everyone's feelings when there are 3 other capable actors in these scenes?  Ned should have told Sonny to shut up lol. I am fine with Sonny getting a reaction, but he got 90% of the airtime for his reaction.  I don't even think it's mental health that's keeping his job.  MB wouldn't get this much time on screen if it was a pity thing.  Frank is too afraid to cut Sonny because of fan reaction.  I know there aren't any Sonny fans here, but I do think there are Sonny fans out there (besides me) lol.
    • I've been looking at the ratings during and after each head writer switch.  The ratings during Marcus' tenure (Oct 74 to April 75) were very good but at first not quite as high a Upton's (who was there six months prior. Marcus left when Mary Hartman was picked up as she was a creator and head writer). I've watched Marcus' interviews on Youtube; she discusses most of the soaps she worked on. She liked the money; she's not all warm and fuzzy about writing for them. She loved nighttime genres that gave her writing more flexibility than soapy dramas. But she was good at writing soaps.  By April 75, SFT was no.2 in the ratings behind ATWT. O'Shea was next (lasted 18 months) and in May 75, SFT high No. 1. When O'Shea left the show as still in the top five. O'Shea moved to OLTL in 77? but not as head writer so not sure why she left SFT. The Corringtons were the safest bet to keep long term. They needed to change direction by 1980 as the ratings were  dropping but still very solid 6s/low 20s share). They should have expanded the show to an hour and given the Corringtons some direction and more budget. One has to wonder about two people who were with the show for a long time: Mary Ellis Bunim was promoted to EP when she was about 28, amazingly and a woman! She as talented but she went through at 11 head writer changes if she started in 1974.  Here's her list of writers: Theodore Apstein (January 1974 – May 1974) 5 mo Gabrielle Upton (May 1974 – November 1974) 6 mo Ann Marcus (October 1974 - April 1975) 6 mo Peggy O’Shea (April 1975 – November 1976) 18 mo Irving Elman (with James Lipton) (November 1976 – Summer 1977) 9 mo Robert J. Shaw with Charles/Patti Dizenzo (August 1977 - Spring 78) 6-9 mo? Henry Slesar (Spring 78 to August 78) 3-4 mo? Corringtons (August 1978 to May 1980) 1 yr/9mo Linda Grover/John Porterfield (May 1980 to mid July 1980) 3 mo. Gabrielle Upton (July 1980 to at least through March or April) Harding Lemay April to June 81 writers' strike Don Chastain (Summer 1981 writers' strike - replaced by Ellis/Hunt Dec 81 or Jan 82) Then Fred Bartholemew comes in when Bunim goes to ATWT (Oct 81?) and he brings in Ellis Hunt for the NBC switchover, they lasted 11 months. Mary Stuart is the other mystery to me: how was she to work with? Did she instigate many of the writer firings? Was she not involved at all. No other P&G show went through this kind of frenetic change. (The Doctors might be a close second but wasn't on as long and not P&G).
    • I'm getting the sense that something happened between Anita and Dante Green that wasn’t exactly copacetic, to say the least. I wonder — did he promise her fame and fortune as a solo artist, and then attack her when she rebuffed his advances? I hope it’s not a long-lost child plot lurking out there for her. Maybe she left behind an sibling in poverty or something instead, back in Cabrini-Green/Chicago. It does seem like neither Tracy nor Sharon’s solo careers turned out the way they dreamed — both ended up singing at City Wineries. I still think Leslie is connected to the Duprees — maybe her mother is Sharon, and she's going after the Duprees because she believes she could’ve had their lifestyle if things had gone differently for her mom. She does have ties to Chicago. That said, I hope this is the last disguise from her toolbox for a while — I’d hate for that to get played out. But I do wonder if she’s going to use Nicole 2.0 to frame Nicole for something down the line? I’m all for giving Shanice more time on canvas, and I wouldn’t hate it if she and Andre became an item — someone who doesn’t mind being public, unlike Dani. Or I can see Doug finally getting fed up with their arrangement and turning to the nurse for some “relief.” Vanessa was, in a way, telling herself off in those scenes with Ted about his cheating. And I have to say, Keith Robinson’s Ted brings a broader range of emotion than Maurice Johnson’s did — though I think Ted 2.0 is benefitting from better writing than OG Ted, whose arc relied more on MJ’s charisma and physical presence. That said, as someone else pointed out, Keith looks like he’s drowning in the clothes they’ve got him in. Hopefully, they’ve got some better-fitted attire lined up now.
    • They are just right there in your face.  It's hard to not see Ciara's boobs at all times.  And simmer down camera man, this is a family show!! The high school stuff makes it weird.  Physically the actors all look fine together.  It just makes me think Doug needs to find friends his own age.   With Ari at least Doug was under the impression she was over 21. I liked JJ and Eve too lol!
    • Specifically that's Kat & she is, there's no other way to say it except like pulling off a band-aid. She's Chad's "#1 fan" IOW, basically, kinda sorta she's an albatross around Chad's neck.  Kat can turn any conversation into a discussion of Chad & what he ate for breakfast or the most minute of minute things about Chad Duell's life & times.  We hope she's not dangerous. We hope she's just boring. That Chad is not back has lit a fire under her. She's upped her number of posts, which all relate in some way to Chad. Now you know what there is to know about as I said Chad Duell's #1 fan.     
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy