Jump to content

All: In 5 years how many soaps will still be on the air?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

In 5 years how many soaps will still be on the air?

My guess is CBS will still be airing Y&R and B&B and GH and maybe Days will be airing on Soapnet or the internet.

GL: will end this Fall

AMC:Will end in Early 2010 shorty after it's 40th b-day.

OLTL:Will last a year or 2 after AMC

ATWT: Will be gone by 2011

Days: If the ratings an ABC can get it cheap may stay around.

There may be a bunch of new internet soaps if a workable model can be created.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I hate threads like this. And there have been so many.

It's like "vote on which soaps should be canceled!"

It is almost as morbid as voting on which aunts and uncles will be dead in five years. Is it really necessary?

I feel like since we do gather here out of a common love for the genre, that we should spend our time celebrating what we love about it, hoping for its resurgence, and not watching and speculating on the when and how of its death.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have done these "dead pools" (Marceline's reference), and I have done linear projections to estimate dates-of-death from current trends.

But I am coming around to your opinion, DES!

Just remember, though, that this death-speculation is not always mean spirited. Sometimes it is anticipatory socialization...something like throwing your arms up to brace against being hit. We visualize and speculate about the death, because we fear it, and it helps us to expect it, so we will not be so shocked and hurt. It is actually a fairly natural human response.

That said, I agree. Maybe we are putting too much of the "death" out there (I have been a perpetrator!), and thereby contributing to the larger "soaps are doomed" narrative. Maybe if we hold on to the positivity you describe, in some small way it will help others to see that there is still life and love in the fandom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thanks for seeing my point. After my post, I was tempted to look back at how many of these kinds of threads I actively partcipated in, because I'm sure I have. But there's a thread on this board "the decline of soap operas" which I have yet to open because it's just becoming too much. I don't want to delude myself into thinking more soaps won't be canceled, it is what it is. But if that's ALL we talk about, if we want to put deadlines and death dates on soaps before the networks do, I feel we are encouraging them to do so. I personally can't do it anymore. I don't want to contribute to the death of the genre and create a self-fulfilling prophecy.

For all my complaints and disappointments (mostly about GH, LOL), they are because I DO love soaps and think they are a valuable and underappreciated medium, and hope they are around for a long time to come. I wish the executives would spend more time revitalizing the industry than suffocating it. So I wish we would stop doing our part to suffocate it as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Word. One can know and accept that ratings are down and that it's crunch time for TPTB at the shows, but when you're reduced to just shrugging whenever there's good news of any kind, and blowing it all off with a "Well, it doesn't matter anyway, in a couple of years it'll all be gone..," I think it's just sad.

And honestly, again, five years ago, the same question was asked. "In five years what soaps do you think we'll have left?" And then someone, thinking they're Miss Cleo, busts in with a "Well, they'll all be gone except for Y&R and B&B in primetime or cable or whatever." If anything changes within the next five years, the most it'll be is the ends of GL and DAYS, and maybe ATWT, but that depends on how much you believe ATWT and GL are a package deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

We all deal with these things differently. I respect that some people want to believe that soaps will go on forever. My fondest wish is that by some miracle someone will try a new soap. But I don't see anything wrong with acknowledging the facts in front of us like falling ratings, tanking economy and budget cuts and not just for soaps. People aren't pulling this negativity out of some paranoid dream. There's a reason people are asking these questions. I think those of us who can handle realistic discussions about cancellation should be allowed to have them and those who are upset by the topic need to find a way to deal with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There is a distinct difference between optimism and denial, and a distinct difference between acknowledging the reality of falling ratings and actively "dead pooling" every two weeks to guess which soaps will die first. I think people can tell the difference between the point of this thread and the point of other threads that want to talk seriously about business models, cost efficiency, and relevance to the viewership.

Failing to acknowledge those differences is what's delusional. The world is not black and white. But I do believe that optimism and pessimism have power unto themselves and that's my point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think all except GL and there's a good possibility that it will still be around. Daytime isn't going anywhere, as long as the networks can get some revenue, they will keep them on. If they axe them, that's around 1-4 hours of ad revenue the network itself loses, because the hours in daytime would surely go to syndication, plus the internet revenue from streaming the soaps would disappear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree. This drum banging about the death of soaps in premature. Having said that, I don't think GL will be around in five years. The numbers are just too low. If DAYS can't make it work financially, NBC may hang on to it; if not, it will be gone too. I think Y&R and B&B are safe, unless their number start to tumble, which seems unlikely, especially for Y&R which is on such an upswing creatively. The rest, who knows?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No, DES has a point.

Look, if you know when the contracts expire, and you do the linear projections on the current ratings trends, it really is simple math to see when they will go. There might be some variance around specific dates, but it's kind of straightforward to figure out the dates and the order of death.

The unknown here is that the whole financials of network television are changing, and so that might alter the viability of soaps if we move (soon) to a new cost model. That's basically what J. Bernard said at Daytime Confidential.

But let's combine DavidEvanSmith and Marceline's points. Marceline says she'd like to see a NEW soap. Indeed, that (more than anything) would argue that genre still has life...because people are still investing in it. A new soap, I think, can't plan to live 70 years. It would be better for it to plan on five years, and really tell a rip-roaring story with a defined conclusion. But that kind of talk is not about hopelessness and death. It is about the evolution and rebirth of the genre. Very different...

I wrote a positive blog piece about Nuke's sex (ATWT). I can't TELL you how many people have emailed me and commented to me and on boards with -- strangely -- an expression of GRATITUDE that finally someone said something positive :).

What I take from that is that we (as "internet fandom"), as a group, may have developed into too negative a culture. In general, all good things require moderation and balance...a blend of lightness and dark. So too it is with fandom.

If every thread about about the 'death of soaps' were matched with a thread about 'new hope', I don't think we'd feel so unbalanced.

This isn't just theoretical. If people KEEP trashing the genre, it becomes more and more and more uncool. How many people have tuned out in disgust, in part, because their anger and negativity was fueled by internet fan environments? I don't know...but you KNOW this "contagious negativity" problem exists! Look at Tom Cruise's career! Mel Gibson's!

Doesn't it seem odd to find so much of this negativity within fan environments that ostensibly exist to CELEBRATE the genre? It does to me. It suggests that, instead, we may often have formed communities of Schadenfreude. Why did that happen? Is it truly healthy for the genre?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I get where this is coming from, because I've seen the people who stick cotton in their ears and shout out "La! La! La! La! La! La!" to ignore what's really going on and to pretend like nothing is happening. And I can't speak for everyone, but for me, it's not necessarily about thinking that soaps will go on forever. I liken it to having a relative with terminal illness (which, I know, is a worn-out analogy, but I still think it has value). When you visit this relative, are you going to sit there and talk about how their body is shutting down, they're losing all of their strength, and it's only a matter of time before they pass away? And even further, are you going to sit there and talk about those things with everyone EXCEPT for the person who is dying? I know that soaps are not people, they don't have feelings, but still, the genre is something that most of us here and really passionate about. We all wish that someone would hop in with a miracle cure to make them vibrant again. People like me don't want to be bogged down, worried about what's going to canceled and who's going to be fired every time we turn on a soap. We just want to enjoy them while we can, before they're gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Arguably DAYS OF OUR LIVES has been brilliant lately & definitely was last week. But, here I am with nitpick & technicalities. This was the only misstep but it was just a stupid thing that should have been caught. Deidre Hall as Marlena has this one problematic line, "It didn't matter how many identities you had, I always knew exactly who you were, you were the man who saved my life." - Marlena, DAYS, 6-2-25 Unfortunately the flashback closest to it was when Marlena was on the phone, terrified because she thought he was Stefano. Yes, it's true that the line is not accurate. There were many times when she did not feel the way she is claiming because of whatever was going on in story with his 'retconned to hell & back' identity & origin story. Does it keep the whole week from being called excellent? Nope.  
    • The Vault has been down all night.
    • Notable: Glendale is not exactly a progressive enclave.

      Please register in order to view this content

      Newsom is a craven opportunist, but his comments today were exactly how better people need to handle Trump.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I decided this primetime soap deserved it's own thread as the Primetime soaps thread is very cluttered and why shouldn't NBC's Lorimar soap mot have a chance to shine? In doing a deeper dive into the second season ratings I was surprised to see that FR actually had an uptick in the ratings when NBC moved it to 9pm Tuesdays beginning March 82. I'd always assumed this move was a desperate one as NBC were running short of programming and had given up on the show,deciding to let the final episodes play out and be hammered by 3's Company  and CBS Movie. But the numbers paint a different story. In it's 10pm slot up against Hart to Hart, which regularly finished in the Top 20, FL premiered in 53rd place and placed in the 40's and 50's as the season continued. But come January 82 the numbers surged a little now moving into the 40's hitting #43 in Feb. Hart to Hart was #11 Then in March Bret Maverick was moved to 8pm with FR @9. First week 16th March FR #47 15.1/24 3's Company #3 Too Close for Comfort #5 CBS Movie #60 Not great but #2 in it's timeslot March 23 FR #44 15.6/25 3's Company #4 Too Close for Comfort #5 CBS Movie #33 So even with a stronger movie on CBS FR's numbers went up. March 30 FR #31 16.6/26 3's Company #9 Too Close for Comfort #5 CBS Movie #56 Best rating/position yet Tues April 6 pre empted Tues April 14 FR #36 16.0/26 3's Company #5 Too Close for Comfort #11 CBS Movie #59 Maintaining previous week's numbers Tues April 21 FR #33 15.6/24 3's Company #3 Too Close for Comfort #5 CBS Movie #60 Numbers down a little (reflecting general spring downturn) but best ranking of the season so far Tues April 28 FR #35 15.1/23 3's Company #9 Too Close for Comfort #6 CBS Movie #42 Tues May 4 FR #27 15.2/24 3's Company #5 Too Close for Comfort #4 CBS Movie #41 Season finale and highest position of the season. Looking at those numbers I wonder why NBC cancelled the show? They had very few hits and here was a show that was holding it's own and moving up in the rankings in a tougher timeslot. And being a serial, the storylines could continue to build the following season. And I'm sure the desirable W18-49 demo was good. Some might argue that CBS were shower weaker movies, but even so, soap viewers are pretty loyal. I guess Grant Tinker arrived at NBC and wanted a classier look but there was room for FR on the schedule. I mean, the following season Knight Rider,Powers of Matthew Star and the A Team arrived so there was still room for more populist fare. Flamingo could have stayed at 9pm-the replacement Gavilan bombed (surely FR would have done better} or moved back to 10pm. The following Jan NBC had a hit with A Team Tues 8pm. Had Flamingo followed it, it might have really taken off. As it was they tried Bare Essence, which flopped. Oh well,it was not to be...    
    • Always, in every way, Cass/Wally/Felicia foundational to my viewing. And, I think if we look at the aftermath of the disastrous 90 minute show that we find too many pockets of some kind of lost time at the show plus way too much of change-ups in exec & writing leadership and of course we also reach the first time it becomes notable that NBC wants to get rid of the show so they can put a new soap they own in the timeslot.
    • If the MAGAts were easy prey enough to get manipulated into voting for the tangerine-tinted terror, they'll fall for anything.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • And this came out as the "feud" and the media pushing the protests in Los Angeles got all the media attention. They know the press and the public will not care or can be manipulated into approving.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Hope you will enjoy the 1976 storyline from the Daytime serial Newsletter. The show had just expanded to an hour so new characters and stories were required. The Soderbergs had been writing since late 73 and the show was still #1. Looking foward to comments and discusssion Pt.1  For over two decades As the World Turns has depicted the events in the lives of two Oakdale families: the wealthy and influential Lowells and the less affluent but equally respected Hughes family. Judge Lowell’s granddaughter Ellen is married now to Dr. David Stewart, whose adopted son, Dan, is actually her own illegitimate child. Dan was once married to Dr. Susan Stewart, by whom he has a daughter, Emily. Dan then married Liz, the ex-wife of his late brother Paul. Liz was the mother of Dan’s daughter Betsy, who believes to this day that Paul was her father. Liz died tragically the day after their wedding. Ellen and David have two daughters, Carolann (Annie) and Dawn (Dee), now of college age. Dan has recently fallen in love with Kim Dixon, who was about to divorce Dr. John Dixon until injuries suffered in a tornado caused amnesia and left her with no memory of her love for Dan. John is using this respite to solicitously convince Kim of his love for her. Nancy and Chris Hughes had three children: Bob, a doctor, Donald, an attorney, and Penny, who, after tragically losing two husbands due to automobile accidents, is now living in Europe, where she is married to a racing-car driver. Bob was married while very young to Lisa Miller, then a scheming and selfish young woman, whose machinations destroyed their marriage. She is the mother of Bob’s son, Tom, who is divorced from Carol, who is now married to Jay Stallings. Tom is currently married to Natalie Bannon. Bob later married model Sandy Wilson, a marriage which ended in divorce, and Sandy is now married to Norman Garrison, who is her partner in a beauty products concern. Norman blames Bob for Sandy’s  recent disillusionment with their marriage, and, ironically, Norman suffered a heart attack during his verbal assault on Bob at a Hughes family party; and while Bob rode with him in the ambulance to the hospital, Bob’s beloved wife, Jennifer, Kim’s sister, died in a car crash while driving home alone. Lisa, more mature and considerate of others now, is married to attorney Grant Colman, but her life has been complicated by the recent arrival in town of Grant’s ex-wife, Joyce, and the incredible news that she and Grant had a child after their separation, a child Joyce gave out for adoption but now wants to reclaim. Now the story continues... The picture has now come clear for attorney Grant Coiman. He has learned that his ex-wife Joyce neglected to tell him she had a child shortly after their divorce and had given the boy to Mary and Brian Ellison for adoption. Grant, after seeing the adoption papers and considering the boy’s interests, tells Mary he feels the child should remain with them; they are providing a fine, stable home for him. Grant’s wife, Lisa, is pleased with his decision, feeling he has thus closed the door to the past and they can now go on with their own lives. But Joyce has learned that attorney Dick Martin is now back in private practice, and she tells him she was confused when she gave Teddy up years ago and wants him to represent her in a custody action to get her son back. Dick tells Joyce she has a very weak case but he’ll do what he can. He goes out to Laramie to see the  Ellisons, upsetting them very much. Grant, meanwhile, has confided in Chris Hughes, his law partner, that while his name was on the consent form for the Ellisons’ adoption, he didn’t sign the papers; he had, in fact, never known that he had a son. But he’s afraid to open a new can of worms by signing a consent form now, as that would reveal that the adoption papers are not legally correct. Grant confides the situation to Lisa, explaining that if he wanted to,  he could probably get custody of Teddy himself, but that’s not what he feels would be best for the child. Mary Ellison finally breaks under the strain of Dick’s visit and tells Brian that Dr. Paulk, the doctor who arranged the adoption, told her he didn’t know where to find the baby’s father and so he signed the consent form himself. She painfully explains she kept this secret knowing that Brian wouldn’t go through with the adoption if he learned the papers weren’t legally sound. Brian quickly calls their family lawyer, Jerry Butler, who immediately phones Grant to be sure he backs the Ellisons’ claim. Dick realizes from Joyce’s story that Grant couldn’t have signed the papers and tells him he knows. The only person who has a right to file for Teddy’s custody now is Grant; he’s the only injured party. And the moment he files, Dick can sue for invalidation of the Ellisons’ adoption. Grant finally files, to settle the custody question once and for all, but technically he's filing for custody himself. Tom Hughes and Natalie Porter are married in a small, lovely ceremony at the home of his grandparents, Nancy and Chris Hughes. They honeymoon in the Southwest and return full of expectations of happiness. Natalie is disquieted, however, when flowers arrive which are not from her new husband. She covers by pretending to check with the florist and tells Tom it was a wrong delivery and they have told her she might as well keep them. But she knows who sent them. Natalie is upset when, shortly after, Luke Porter arrives in town and seeks her out. But Luke insists he is there only to assure her this is a final farewell and he has now decided to concentrate on. making his own marriage work. Sandy Garrison, Bob’s ex-wife, is working at the  bookstore to fill in for Natalie. Her estranged husband, Norman, recovering from a heart attack he suffered during a drunken confrontation with Bob at the Colonnade Room, is still telling anyone who will listen that Bob and Sandy are having an affair, but ironically will let only Bob care for him at the hospital. His recovery is hampered by his easily aroused temper. Norman anxiously tries to persuade Dr. John Dixon to convince Bob to swear he slipped at the restaurant, thus making them liable for a costly lawsuit, but John won’t do this. Chris discovers a large amount of money missing when checking the books on the Garrisons’ business, but doesn’t want to upset Sandy with this. More to come...
    • The cynical (i.e., the dominant) me has the very same thoughts.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy