Jump to content

The Great Douglas Marland


Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

Oh, Doug... it's all of that AND a bag of chips at P & G now.

Great story - thanks for sharing this, Paul Raven. It's absolutely an industry run on panic. And the worst thing that can happen to a show is somebody's granddaughter or maid saying that morning "I don't like this..." Network execs take that as gospel.

  • Replies 105
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members
Posted

Much isn't written about Marland the mentor. We know he was mentored early on by the great Harding Lemay, and prior to joining ATWT, I believe he was a uncredited consultant for CBS Daytime in some capacity. I've also heard from a number of people that Marland served as something of a mentor to Curlee and Demorest early into their GL tenure, probably at the suggestion of the great Robert Calhoun, who IMO never gets much credit for some really sensational years at both ATWT and GL. He's one of the last soap EP's that totally "got" the genre. While Marland praises him for being something of a "writer's EP," I think Calhoun's experience at GL with Pamela K. Long was quite the opposite, I've heard those two couldn't stand one another.

I'd really like to know how Marland managed his writing team. From what Patrick Mulcahey has said from working with Marland on GL in the early 80's, Marland was very detailed and wrote so much of the actual scenes and dialogue himself that it didn't give others the room to make their mark. Harding Lemay was very much the same way at AW. Mulcahey went on to say that Marland was a genius writer, but horrible teacher, but he picked up quite a lot nonetheless.

  • Members
Posted

The Walsh siblings vs. Lucinda...just giving my opinion,(as usual) that time frame of ATWT had great ratings, didn't meant the Connor/Evan thing did it. I just thought the Connor actress was the usual unsexy Marland creation and I coudln't believe that Evan actually liked girls. True, it was more of the performers then the writing but I wanted to see a full blooded battle, Marland didn't do full blooded or passion well, as I said, everyone was too damn polite all the time.

I thought that a great combination of writers would have been Marland and Pam Long, he would provide the structure, the discipline, the respect for the core, and Long would have brought the sexiness, passion and family warmth.

  • Members
Posted

I feel like I've read somewhere that he was...but I can't remember where and I can't imagine any reliable source that could have printed such a thing at the time he was alive. But I definitely got that vibe from most everything I've seen of his work, for some of the same reasons you mentioned as well as the Donna Summers disco montage at the climax of the Roger/Rita GL suspense story that someone else mentioned earlier. Plus weren't there all those new wave stars (the B-52s!) making guest appearances at Tony Reardon's nightclub? I do know he was not married. If he was gay, he definitely was not out...I can't imagine he could have been. In any event, Robert Calhoun was said to have been the life partner of that former movie star he brought on as one of Lisa's husbands in the obit recently. (I'm trying to imagine if a producer brought on his lover as a love interest for a veteran character today...it would be all over the internet and I am sure he would be ripped to shreds.) So I'm sure Calhoun accounted for some of the gay sensibility on ATWT at that time, but I like to think Marland was on the team as well. They did work well together, whereas I am not surprised to hear how Calhoun (did not) get along with Pam Long...he must have thought Reva and Bud and their assorted relations were complete trailer trash and been all too eager to send Reva off that bridge and make worldly divas like Holly and Alexandra and Vanessa front and center.

I can kind of see what you mean, although it feels blasphemous to say that and I have a slightly different take on it myself. I was too young to have been watching at the time, but I get the sense watching just about any episode of a P&G soap from the late '70s (at least) until the mid '80s or maybe even the early 90s that the just-barely-disguised latent homoeroticism was practically jumping off the screen. I mean, really, how many people involved in all aspects of these shows were creative gay men who came to NY sometime after Stonewall to come out, and somehow found themselves working in a weird little niche of one of the most conservative industries in the country that did not involve manufacturing weapons or something (selling detergent to housewives)? Unfortunately we lost a lot of those guys on-screen and off, and I think somewhere around that time a lot of the barely-closeted gay folks in power who were still with us started using their influence less for in-jokes and fantasy fulfillment and more to lobby for serious coming out stories meant to challenge viewers' homophobia. Too bad most of those stories have been extremely tepid and were killed by the networks before they even began, and that earlier era seems more interesting to me in a lot of ways. (Not that I would have wanted to have had to live through that.) But while it lasted, from what I've seen of Marland's shows, he definitely seemed to be the king of that era, and I can definitely see where the straight couples were not nearly as steamy as the male bonding. As much as people revere the ATWT 30th anniversary episode, and I have seen it and I too think it was first-rate, but I have to say the speech of Penny's at Chris and Nancy's party where she said Chris was the perfect father, the perfect husband, etc... and that was it(!!!) just made me think that Marland must have thought these characters were from another planet. But I don't hold that against Marland - nothing I've seen of the Irna era seemed like her characters were more realistic or passionate, and even the Dobsons who later wrote such far-out stuff later on Santa Barbara seemed to be stuck in the '50s in the way they wrote couples on GL. Marland just seemed to continue writing in that vein, while (no question) pushing the genre forward in so many other ways, but the unspoken vibes sometimes overshadowed the Ozzie and Harriet aspects.

I actually think James Reilly's writing was kind of a throwback to that era, and I was bizarrely entertained by his early DOOL stories as a closeted young teenager. Although once I was older than 15 or so it turned me off because the religious overtones were so extreme and the interactions between the hetero couples were so stylized that even I knew at that point they were completely absurd. Whereas from what I've seen of Marland's writing I got the sense that he was perfectly comfortable in his own skin and had a keen sense of all kinds of human emotion, but with standards and practice still thinking hetero sex was taboo at the time, I bet he just wasn't overly motivated to break new ground in that regard the way female writers like Agnes Nixon and Claire Labine seemed to be doing on ABC at that time in their writing for straight couples.

I feel like I'm going to regret writing all of this, because I so don't mean to speak ill of Doug Marland - or even James Reilly, as much as his writing was not my cup of tea as an adult. I do believe he loved the genre and was a success at giving a lot of viewers what they wanted to see, and indeed he brought me some much needed escapism as an adolescent, and I truly hope that he had a very rich, full, and happy personal life. I just frankly never saw it reflected in his writing. Whereas I clearly get the sense watching any episode of GL or ATWT that Marland was having a good time writing this stuff and he understood people and the world...I just suspect his world was a little different than Oakdale or Springfield.

  • Members
Posted

I don't know about Marland's women being unsexy. I guess in looks maybe they weren't but I always found Marland's female character more sexy because they were strong characters and well defined. It made them more beautiful and sexy to me.

I think Meg and Emily were definitely sexier under Marland.

  • 3 months later...
  • Members
Posted

What was your favorite story from Douglas Marland? One of my favorites was the Ruxton Hills murder. Yeah, I spelled it wrong. An observant SON member noticed it. :P So this is what my username refers to........This story was truly one of the great classics of the Douglas Marland years. James Stenbeck is in hiding at Steve Andropolis' development house in Ruxton Hills. He has taken Paul and Emily there with him, along with his employee, and crooked cop Nick Costello. In Part 1 you'll see Tonio, Meg, Lucinda, Barbara and others trying to decide what to do about Stenbeck...as well as James discovering that Emily is carrying his child

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GTmgN38Pvp4&hl=en&fs=1 type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344">

Things go from bad to worse when James gives Monica Lawerence the directions to Ruxton Hills and her mother overhears. Duncan finds out that his former associate is working for Stenbeck, and Lucinda receives a disturbing call.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ziw1dk_9P50&hl=en&fs=1 type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344">

The moments that shake all of Oakdale to its core. Nick is locked in the basement...James Stenbeck, Emily, and...Paul are upstairs, and half of Oakdale is headed to the Ruxton Hills house. An explosive conclusion!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uWhtSYPOH6U&hl=en&fs=1 type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344">

I highly doubt Jean Passanante or Chris Goutman could come up with something like it.

  • Members
Posted

I don't know if this counts (since it wasn't on ATWT), but I'll be eternally grateful to Doug Marland for GL's Quint and Nola. Those two, and their romance, meant everything to me, and still do.

Oh, and the Douglas Cummings story wasn't too bad either. ;-)

  • Members
Posted

And why shouldn't they (take it as gospel)? Number one, it sure beats the responses you get from focus groups, since these people are ones who actually watch the show(s) everyday. And number two, I've always said I learned more about how you tell a story from my mother and grandmother, who would get on the horn with each other during commercial breaks and discuss what had just happened on GL, than from any professor or workshop.

  • Members
Posted

Yeah, but everybody's moms and grandmothers (and maids and beauticians) are just like mine: average, everyday people who earn a living and who want to be entertained without having their intelligence insulted at every turn.

  • Members
Posted

Which I'm not arguing with. Had I not known about fired popular actors because someone in a network's exec house says "he looks like he'd have smelly feet and stinky armpits"

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • One more thing on Tuesday's episode, did anyone else notice the weird blocking? Belle and Eric were thanking Sarah, and worrying about Lyme Disease (which must be a red herring, I can't believe we're watching a PSA about inspecting for tics).  Then, Belle turned to EJ and threatened him with a lawsuit.  EJ acted as if he hadn't heard the entire conversation that was happening two inches away from him.   I like EJ, but a little of silly/mean EJ goes a long way.  His sarcasm during that scene felt out of place, regardless of Eric's presence.  When he bugs his eyes, and feigns innocence, it is a little too OTT for my taste.  I understand that he was the punching bag for most scenes, but EJ feels more mature than resorting to funny faces.  And, isn't rather quick to worry about Stephanie's sales, she just debuted the book yesterday in their timeline?
    • I dont think he knew Leslie was staying there. I know this is all for the drama and mess which Im here for, but Vernon really could have easily rented a small studio space where he and Sharon could practice lol.
    • I understand that no one could ever replace Bernau, but Ron Raines is somewhat of a different beast. Still great (to me) though. He spent his entire TV run in one role, that was impossible to do justice correctly. 
    • Again, Bernau's illness impacted that. It's pretty obvious Pilon was always meant to be temporary. I read an article from that period that said he was working on both Ryan's Hope and GL at the same time. So he wasn't on contract for either show. (Maybe that explains somewhat why his performance was so low energy, because he was overworked doing two soaps). Later, they put him in the opening and in commercials for the show. That must have been because they were certain Bernau was not returning. Around that time, they approached Zaslow about being the permanent replacement for Bernau. He turned them down and suggested coming back as Roger. Pilon stayed so they could re-introduce Roger and write an exit for Alan. I'm guessing if MZ had not wanted to come back, they would have had no choice but to keep Pilon (which I don't think they wanted, or maybe Pilon wasn't interested) or send out a casting call for a new Alan. I think they wanted to avoid that because they were really determined not to let the nature of Bernau's illness to become public knowledge. At this point, they were still keepin up the fiction that he was going to return even while this stuff was happening BTS.   Yeah, it seems crazy now, but people forget how stigmatized AIDS was back then. I'm convinced the idea to ask Zaslow to take the role came about so they could replace Bernau as quietly as possible. Everyone would have been so surprised it would have taken the focus off Bernau not returning. It makes a kind of twisted sense. Still, thank goodness Zazlow said no and they said yes to his suggestion to return as Roger. The way everything worked out gave GL a few more strong years. I guess it's the nature of soaps, you never know what things in real life will end up strongly impacting the show, both negatively and positively. (Something just occurred to me. If Zazlow HAD said yes to playing Alan...he would have had to play being in love with Reva.

      Please register in order to view this content

      )
    • I truly do not understand why this has not happened. It's so un-Carly-like not have confronted Joss already. 
    • He definitely had it going on back in the day
    • I have long given up on logic and Mayor Laura Collins! It makes about as much sense as Luke being elected mayor over Lee Baldwin in the 80’s, maybe even less sense. She committed manslaughter as a teenager, was involved with a mobster (I guess credit for them taking Smith down), had a shoot out in her home and killed another mobster in self defense, thought she bludgeoned her stepfather to death, then was catatonic for years. Her current husband had a twin that was a serial killer, had his own breakdown that threatened lives, and most recently hid his brother for treatment and that allowed Ryan to escape and kill again. And had hook killer Esme as a houseguest and is raising her child. I don’t care for Sonny anymore but their relationship is just another thing that involves suspension of belief to watch the show. I wish someone on this show would remind these adults that they used to pull way worse stuff than this! I would love a scene where Laura is sitting with Lulu and tells her while she is not happy this is nothing compared to what she got up to when she was young, and maybe even some understanding that she would also do stupid stuff if she believed in the cause. Olivia reminding Dante that he was wild as a teen and this isn’t that. Felicia reminding Anna that they were being shot at when pretty close to Emma’s age. These characterizations are just so basic. Have some fun with the actual history of the show. That kind of wink would mean more to me than just name dropping some random fact.
    • There are no dumb questions here, we've all known each other long enough to fill in information without shaming each other.  We want you to be happy @carolineg.  Your POV as one of the few women here is vital. So, please, I hope you never feel as if any question, idea, or opinion is ever silly or stupid.  Your daily reminders about the realities of manicure and menstrual management has become a part of the personality of this thread. As for Hank, while I'm confident there's a plan in place.  It is frustrating that they announce these casting so far in advance that it is tough as an audience and wait it out until the thing happens.  I'm happy they didn't blow it the second Mike was in town, a week after meeting Liam. So, it is a slow burn. And, conveniently, he lets us know when his episodes air. 

      Please register in order to view this content

        Speaking of silly stuff, is anyone bothered by the placement of Tony's pocket on his shirt?  It is so odd that whatever bargain bin they found it, would choose to place a huge black pocket over the floral design?
    • I think his full name is Chadwick.  I remember, back when the previous actor was playing him, someone called him Chadwick a couple of times.  It may have been Stefano.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy