Jump to content

The Politics Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Thanks to that man winning the election and the far right parties all over the world getting their power and hopes up... I'll probably have to live my 30s in fear of maniacal homophobia. I can already feel the shift in Germany. It's not how it was couple of years ago... Or even... months ago. For the first time me and my husband actually feel looked at with contempt and the micro aggressions are hardcore. I don't even want to go into detail, but the last few weeks have been eye opening for us. I told him... The time for us to hold hands in public... Has ended. People are starting to get really aggressive and hateful and I'm scared. 

And reading this... Makes me even more scared. Apparently they can start calling us mentally ill again and I won't be able to report them.

https://people.com/meta-new-policy-lgbtq-people-mental-illness-8772793

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 45.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vee

    6816

  • DRW50

    5988

  • DramatistDreamer

    5521

  • Khan

    3459

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

The Meta changes are alarming. And, it's really a mess because the Facebook mechanical censors recently have been notorious for censoring things that were harmless. Also, Facebook at least in the recent past has made it impossible to see what post was being called as the rule breaking post. Unfortunately it sounds like their response is to make things worse, not better. 

As one simple example, yesterday I made a post congratulating Steve Burton on his engagement & Facebook declined it as some negative of one of their community standards, specifically which of course unknown. 

And, thinking about the issue of gays & accusations of "mental illness", it was in 1973 that the American Psychiatric Association changed it so that being gay was not considered a mental illness. Does that mean that Facebook is turning back the clock 52 years? What kind of reverse progress does that represent?!!!

 

Edited by Contessa Donatella
info
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's incredibly disturbing. And they are doing this piece by piece... Slowly trying to reverse what we have achieved as a group. Slowly and quietly trying to rob us of our rights and freedoms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I wonder how all the "lgb without the t" people who insist if they play into transphobia, they will be spared feel about this. It blatantly says that homosexuality is nothing more than part of "political and religious discourse."

They hate us and they don't even need to pretend otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yep. And they are starting to be more and more direct about it. I remember years ago when we would go outside and (the worst case scenario) people would just turn their faces away when we held hands. Well it's 2025... and I realize... I prefer that turning of heads to the... more recent - staring with hatred thing and not turning the heads at all... but looking at us with aggression.  That is disturbing me. And all of this is being fueled by the far-right party that wants to use us for their political propaganda. And now the masks are falling and people are showing their true ugly colors. If someone had told me that I will be living through this... 4-5 years ago, I would have said - no, it's impossible... there is no way society is going to go back to that... but... here we are. Here we f-cking are. And I don't know if this gets worse what we'll do. Where we'll go. Sorry for the emotional talk. I just... feel so tired. I just want to live in peace and not get looks and anger pointed at me for just holding my husband's hand for 10 seconds. I want the basic freedom to be left at peace.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The anti-Semitic dog whistles around the misinformation being spread on social media about the LA fires is disturbing, if not predictable.

Stewart and Lynda Resnick have spent a fortune donating to the arts and cultural institutions around Los Angeles.  They own Wonderful Pistachios, Pom Pomegranate Juice, and other agricultural endeavors.  As a result, their businesses use a ton of water.  However, none of the water has been misused to prevent the firefighters.  Their farms are hundreds of miles away.  On the news, we've watched helicopters grab water from the Encino reservoir, and planes grab water from the ocean to drop on the fire every 30 seconds since last Wednesday.

However, the concept of Jews hoarding resources during a time of national crisis is the same rhetoric that has been used historically time and again, and I am disgusted.  I don't pretend to know the intentions of those gossiping about the Resnicks, nor do I assume that they are aware of the historical references.  But, it is awful, and it makes me so sad that our culture succumbs to these conspiracies during times of national loss. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

https://spoutible.com/thread/39648211

Please register in order to view this content


 

And that spout goes to this "Accesswire" press release that AP published:
https://apnews.com/press-release/accesswire/spoutible-expands-ai-fact-checking-accuracy-alerts-as-other-platforms-abandon-verification-5e8f66c1685ad713f2be8a7d7f590054

Edited by janea4old
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think of Evan as a smarmy bast*rd. Maybe you'll like that description. You certainly have him pegged correctly since he is just a soldier following "Admiral" Iris's marching orders.  
    • So far the only interest I've seen from Evan to Amanda has been listening to Iris's orders to go and seduce her.  So far he hasn't been successful... but who knows. Amanda is unbearable at times. Entitled, spoiled... idiotic. Iris... so blatantly manipulating her and Amanda takes the bait. But I guess... when she gets in trouble... she'll have a chance to learn. That's what makes these shows so interesting.    Oh, no, don't worry. You haven't ruined a thing. Evan has not been on my radar that much... he was not one of the characters I was caring particularly... so nothing much has been changed for me. I don't think he has the stuff to ruin Rachel's life. He's just a pretty guy that can follow orders. Iris on the other hand... is dangerous. 

      Please register in order to view this content

        P.S Maybe Evan will surprise me. Who knows. 
    • The show has gone back to 10/10 entertainment! I'm glad that I was right in feeling that what were experiencing were growing pains. I'm sure they are not over yet, but I'll know that we always comeback to quality drama. I think it's going to be a hell of ride (in a good way) from this moment on. BTG has that magic that not a lot of shows have. I'll update more... when I'm done catching up.
    • So very glad to hear this. Yesterday I suddenly thought; OMG, what about spoilers, have I just  ruined things for Maxim in getting carried away with interest in Evan, who was so well-written & well-acted. BTW, your fan review of this episode was a sight for eyes that had not seen one of these for a little bit too long, LOL!!!  Mitch is also fascinating to me but in his case it's because he was all in with Janice & her nefarious plan & then he did this turnabout we've mentioned & he basically got off scot-free.
    • It does seem cheap and lazy for this show to have just one family. Passions was heavily criticized but it was nicely structured with a total of four families.      
    • I think it was definitely a surprising reveal in the storyline. I had a hard time appreciating Evan because I couldn't get behind his interest in Amanda. But that's because I never thought Sandra Ferguson made her a compelling character (although to give her credit she occasionally had decent emotional scenes with Mac or Rachel).
    • I'll even go further... I'll make her re-think BeLief and create a new patent. Brooke needs stuff to do. Anything other than beg or be in her panties. We need her to be creative. But sadly Bradley has a very low opinion of these characters. To him Brooke is nothing more than sex and scandal... or a pathetic doormat. Ridge is nothing more than a chauvinist pig that needs to pit women against each other to feel like A MAN and Steffy is nothing more than her father's guard-dog. I don't even want to open my mouth about Hope. She is such a fiasco in my opinion... I will not suffer if they kill her off. Bradley pooped on her character and now it's too late to fix it. Annika is great and I would hate to see her go, but slutty Hope was not her thing. The vibe was missing.     
    • I've seen Jason interact with Mitch and annoy him. That's as far as I recall. I didn't even have a slight idea that Evan had a vendetta against Rachel... That came as a surprise to me. I thought Evan was Iris's dog and that's it. Now he's definitely more interesting.
    • Thanks for these. I can't recall -- did Evan's vendetta have any position on Mitch, or was it all about Rachel? @Maxim have you seen any Frames intreracting with Mitch in any way?
    • Thank you for the tag! It's always a pleasure to see these little pearls of memories. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy