Jump to content

The Politics Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

It's unfortunate, if not surprising, that the Biden comments are what seem to be getting the most attention in these interviews of late. I do think her attempts at courting Republican votes are somewhat clumsy and may not help her in the end, but the far left has made it clear they won't support her, leaving her with fewer options. Part of the reason for all the chatter is because they were looking for another reason to justify not voting for her (instead voting for Stein, or Trump, as many of them are fond of Trump), and this is an easy one. 

There are just a lot of people out there on all sides who will never vote for Harris, some due to racism, some due to sexism, and some because they dearly miss the way the Trump POTUS years made them feel. I saw someone going on about how her answers are just like Hillary 2016, but Hillary tried to run a much more progressive campaign, especially after the Bernie primary scares. It just didn't matter to them what she said or did, and they would, as they still are, come up with any reason to justify their vote. 

I'm not sure any Democrat could win the current election, but the bigotry at the core of this country makes me more and more uneasy as the day gets closer. I hope Harris can somehow pull it off.

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 45.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vee

    6819

  • DRW50

    5993

  • DramatistDreamer

    5521

  • Khan

    3465

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Thompson lost a book deal because Biden was too boring and no one wanted a book about Biden. He's had a hate boner for Biden ever since.

As for the suggestion that Dems are in the doldrums, that's just the Beltway press climbing up their own ass. This was my Board of Elections yesterday for the first day of early voting. I went to vote on my lunch hour but between parking and the lines I knew I wouldn't make it back before a meeting I had scheduled. I've never seen the Board of Ed so busy not even for Obama.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think she has a very good shot. Right now I think she is on track to win. But that's me.

I think when the press gets bored and there's not enough news (and the race isn't close enough) they manufacture this stuff, but I do think very online Dem neuroses is real. Too many people on our side are going to always angst over 2016 (or '04, or '84) if you leave them to their own devices, but the reality is we are ahead. I have never doubted the ground/turnout game myself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Paddy Chayefsky tried his best to warn us that the world was no longer divided by nations but by corporations; but in 1976, and for many years afterward, everyone thought he was being hysterical.  And now we're all paying the price.

The only presidential candidate in my lifetime who, IMO, could communicate to the public the most abstract ideas was Bill Clinton.  He is intelligent, but he's also personable, and able to "make it make sense" for the average, low- or no-information voter.  Tim Walz is another, plain-spoken fellow, though, who can communicate directly to voters without coming across as either simplistic or patronizing.

At the end of the day, however, I don't worry about whether this-or-that candidate can "give good interview."  I don't even worry over what promises they make during their campaigns (although, presenting visions and goals to voters is never a bad idea) because I know promising something and actually being able to fulfill that promise are two different things.  But I DO worry about whether they have the right qualifications and background for the job - and IMO, Kamala Harris is ready to be president.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I am absolutely here for the Paddy Chayefsky references. I have always aspired to be able to write in all three media the way he did.

Back on topic, I have been seeing people warn people who are very much online to be careful of the junk polls and allowing themselves to become submerged in anxiety and fear and doom and gloom. Operating out of fear has never been the way we make progress as a society. It’s the opposite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

My philosophy this election season is simple: ignore the polls.  Even when the polls say we (Democrats) are ahead, ignore them.  Just pretend we still are way behind and then do whatever we need to do to keep the pressure on our opponents.

Oh, and never, ever trust the media, under any circumstances, lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

this is an interesting piece. the title is a bit misleading; sounds as though it’s going to be critical. but, it’s more thoughtful than that — acknowledging that while all politicians avoid the tough questions, kamala’s in a unique position. 

free ny times link. 

In Interviews, Kamala Harris Continues to Bob and Weave

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Part is the press, and part is general unease because it's more common for Democrats to be uneasy, part is some polling trends like Quinnipac (I don't trust a lot of polling, especially Quinnipac, but Elissa Slotkin's comments from a few weeks ago about Harris being underwater in her state seem to back up how bad things may be getting in Michigan), and some of the choices being made and how they may reflect the struggles in the race (Trump is so sure the fix is in that he's going to have big rallies in NY and CA while certain parts of the left or Dem coalition are now so at risk for the party that Harris has to rely more and more on trying to court Republican voters).  Part is just my doubt in this country.

Biden of 2020 was in many ways the ideal candidate to go against Trump (a nondescript older white man with a lot of Rust Belt ties), 2020 was a dumpster fire, yet Trump still barely lost. He is visibly decayed compared to then, but the only people who seem to care are the people who never supported him anyway. Harris is doing her best, better than many could have done, but this is a country where half or more of the country are seemingly either bigoted or are happy to go along with bigotry if it benefits them. We live in a country where "the paper of record" presents Trump's support of eugenics as a fascinating hobby while skewering Harris for some middling TV appearances.

So much that is in the air right now reminds me of 2016. I am hoping Harris will benefit from not having the decades of hostility and baggage that hurt Hillary, but I feel like so much of the conversation and culture have moved to the right even from 2016, it's hard to shake history repeating.

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think that's actually reality, though - I think that's just very online noise. Outliers aside, I just don't see the coalition breaking off, I don't see that bearing out in any actual Dem turnout numbers or polling so far. Just the opposite for both turnout, registration and now apparently early voting. And Trump always pointlessly goes to states he either doesn't need or can't win simply because he feels like it to lift his spirits. He's been doing that since at least 2020.

And I don't think it's half the country behind him - otherwise Trump would be over 50%. He hasn't been in years. He's only been losing voters, never gaining them. Not since 2016. And honestly, Joe's win (while a nailbiter on the first night) was not that close in the end.

I can understand being tense or concerned, because I am tense. It's not over til it's over. And it may be tight on Election Night, though I'm not convinced it will be. I don't see 2016.

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree with most of this but I am not sure he hasn't grown his support in some areas.  No I don't believe the black numbers mostly because we hear this every election cycle for every republican who runs long before Trump.  The only area I have heard potential inroads is with young men.  And that might be possible. Some of them might buy into the so called "machismo" of Trump.(I know don't make me laugh).

I know many folks (not me) have poked fun at Harris for the fact she spent time on the Call Her Daddy podcast, but from what I have read, Trump has spent time on podcasts younger men listen to.  Well not Rogan of course but others like Lex Fridman, although I admit I don't know the traffic on his podcast.  I tend to think the Call Her Daddy appearance reached a lot of people Harris normally would not reach, but then I am also biased towards the idea that abortion rights will still play the dominate issue in this election also.  People tend to forget that abortion is not only a freedom issue, but an economic issue. The largest demographic getting abortions today are married women with children.

And this feels very little like 2016 to me other than the media's behavior. Attacking the democrat and downplaying Trump's actions.  The most idiotic is the fact Harris is dodging interviews, then not doing the right ones, then not taking tough questions, etc.  But we have to remember the media landscape is also much different than 2016.  I still believe people consume and trust more local press and media, sure that's deteriorated, but those venues have less of the "fake news" response from locals IMO. The national media really has so much less relevance and I really believe people are onto polling. Polling has never been super accurate. Can it capture a moment in time, perhaps, but you can look over the decades and see the misses. And it's always the same trend. Some big name will get a poll right and they become the new polling god(Nate Silver in 2012 anyone) and then they falter but still hold a level of validity with some.  Ultimately they fade away like Silver continues to do. That's our national media.  I won't even get into their abhorrent coverage of our involvement in overseas endeavors (trade, wars, insurgencies). It's so loaded and biased, they barely even try to be honest. I'm no advocate for China, but a lot of their analysis is so bad when it comes to China and it's economics, it's either people are blind, are stupid, or are deliberately misleading people here. It pays to follow some non US media.

Edited by JaneAusten
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I decided this primetime soap deserved it's own thread as the Primetime soaps thread is very cluttered and why shouldn't NBC's Lorimar soap mot have a chance to shine? In doing a deeper dive into the second season ratings I was surprised to see that FR actually had an uptick in the ratings when NBC moved it to 9pm Tuesdays beginning March 82. I'd always assumed this move was a desperate one as NBC were running short of programming and had given up on the show,deciding to let the final episodes play out and be hammered by 3's Company  and CBS Movie. But the numbers paint a different story. In it's 10pm slot up against Hart to Hart, which regularly finished in the Top 20, FL premiered in 53rd place and placed in the 40's and 50's as the season continued. But come January 82 the numbers surged a little now moving into the 40's hitting #43 in Feb. Hart to Hart was #11 Then in March Bret Maverick was moved to 8pm with FR @9. First week 16th March FR #47 15.1/24 3's Company #3 Too Close for Comfort #5 CBS Movie #60 Not great but #2 in it's timeslot March 23 FR #44 15.6/25 3's Company #4 Too Close for Comfort #5 CBS Movie #33 So even with a stronger movie on CBS FR's numbers went up. March 30 FR #31 16.6/26 3's Company #9 Too Close for Comfort #5 CBS Movie #56 Best rating/position yet Tues April 6 pre empted Tues April 14 FR #36 16.0/26 3's Company #5 Too Close for Comfort #11 CBS Movie #59 Maintaining previous week's numbers Tues April 21 FR #33 15.6/24 3's Company #3 Too Close for Comfort #5 CBS Movie #60 Numbers down a little (reflecting general spring downturn) but best ranking of the season so far Tues April 28 FR #35 15.1/23 3's Company #9 Too Close for Comfort #6 CBS Movie #42 Tues May 4 FR #27 15.2/24 3's Company #5 Too Close for Comfort #4 CBS Movie #41 Season finale and highest position of the season. Looking at those numbers I wonder why NBC cancelled the show? They had very few hits and here was a show that was holding it's own and moving up in the rankings in a tougher timeslot. And being a serial, the storylines could continue to build the following season. And I'm sure the desirable W18-49 demo was good. Some might argue that CBS were shower weaker movies, but even so, soap viewers are pretty loyal. I guess Grant Tinker arrived at NBC and wanted a classier look but there was room for FR on the schedule. I mean, the following season Knight Rider,Powers of Matthew Star and the A Team arrived so there was still room for more populist fare. Flamingo could have stayed at 9pm-the replacement Gavilan bombed (surely FR would have done better} or moved back to 10pm. The following Jan NBC had a hit with A Team Tues 8pm. Had Flamingo followed it, it might have really taken off. As it was they tried Bare Essence, which flopped. Oh well,it was not to be...    
    • Always, in every way, Cass/Wally/Felicia foundational to my viewing. And, I think if we look at the aftermath of the disastrous 90 minute show that we find too many pockets of some kind of lost time at the show plus way too much of change-ups in exec & writing leadership and of course we also reach the first time it becomes notable that NBC wants to get rid of the show so they can put a new soap they own in the timeslot.
    • If the MAGAts were easy prey enough to get manipulated into voting for the tangerine-tinted terror, they'll fall for anything.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • And this came out as the "feud" and the media pushing the protests in Los Angeles got all the media attention. They know the press and the public will not care or can be manipulated into approving.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Hope you will enjoy the 1976 storyline from the Daytime serial Newsletter. The show had just expanded to an hour so new characters and stories were required. The Soderbergs had been writing since late 73 and the show was still #1. Looking foward to comments and discusssion Pt.1  For over two decades As the World Turns has depicted the events in the lives of two Oakdale families: the wealthy and influential Lowells and the less affluent but equally respected Hughes family. Judge Lowell’s granddaughter Ellen is married now to Dr. David Stewart, whose adopted son, Dan, is actually her own illegitimate child. Dan was once married to Dr. Susan Stewart, by whom he has a daughter, Emily. Dan then married Liz, the ex-wife of his late brother Paul. Liz was the mother of Dan’s daughter Betsy, who believes to this day that Paul was her father. Liz died tragically the day after their wedding. Ellen and David have two daughters, Carolann (Annie) and Dawn (Dee), now of college age. Dan has recently fallen in love with Kim Dixon, who was about to divorce Dr. John Dixon until injuries suffered in a tornado caused amnesia and left her with no memory of her love for Dan. John is using this respite to solicitously convince Kim of his love for her. Nancy and Chris Hughes had three children: Bob, a doctor, Donald, an attorney, and Penny, who, after tragically losing two husbands due to automobile accidents, is now living in Europe, where she is married to a racing-car driver. Bob was married while very young to Lisa Miller, then a scheming and selfish young woman, whose machinations destroyed their marriage. She is the mother of Bob’s son, Tom, who is divorced from Carol, who is now married to Jay Stallings. Tom is currently married to Natalie Bannon. Bob later married model Sandy Wilson, a marriage which ended in divorce, and Sandy is now married to Norman Garrison, who is her partner in a beauty products concern. Norman blames Bob for Sandy’s  recent disillusionment with their marriage, and, ironically, Norman suffered a heart attack during his verbal assault on Bob at a Hughes family party; and while Bob rode with him in the ambulance to the hospital, Bob’s beloved wife, Jennifer, Kim’s sister, died in a car crash while driving home alone. Lisa, more mature and considerate of others now, is married to attorney Grant Colman, but her life has been complicated by the recent arrival in town of Grant’s ex-wife, Joyce, and the incredible news that she and Grant had a child after their separation, a child Joyce gave out for adoption but now wants to reclaim. Now the story continues... The picture has now come clear for attorney Grant Coiman. He has learned that his ex-wife Joyce neglected to tell him she had a child shortly after their divorce and had given the boy to Mary and Brian Ellison for adoption. Grant, after seeing the adoption papers and considering the boy’s interests, tells Mary he feels the child should remain with them; they are providing a fine, stable home for him. Grant’s wife, Lisa, is pleased with his decision, feeling he has thus closed the door to the past and they can now go on with their own lives. But Joyce has learned that attorney Dick Martin is now back in private practice, and she tells him she was confused when she gave Teddy up years ago and wants him to represent her in a custody action to get her son back. Dick tells Joyce she has a very weak case but he’ll do what he can. He goes out to Laramie to see the  Ellisons, upsetting them very much. Grant, meanwhile, has confided in Chris Hughes, his law partner, that while his name was on the consent form for the Ellisons’ adoption, he didn’t sign the papers; he had, in fact, never known that he had a son. But he’s afraid to open a new can of worms by signing a consent form now, as that would reveal that the adoption papers are not legally correct. Grant confides the situation to Lisa, explaining that if he wanted to,  he could probably get custody of Teddy himself, but that’s not what he feels would be best for the child. Mary Ellison finally breaks under the strain of Dick’s visit and tells Brian that Dr. Paulk, the doctor who arranged the adoption, told her he didn’t know where to find the baby’s father and so he signed the consent form himself. She painfully explains she kept this secret knowing that Brian wouldn’t go through with the adoption if he learned the papers weren’t legally sound. Brian quickly calls their family lawyer, Jerry Butler, who immediately phones Grant to be sure he backs the Ellisons’ claim. Dick realizes from Joyce’s story that Grant couldn’t have signed the papers and tells him he knows. The only person who has a right to file for Teddy’s custody now is Grant; he’s the only injured party. And the moment he files, Dick can sue for invalidation of the Ellisons’ adoption. Grant finally files, to settle the custody question once and for all, but technically he's filing for custody himself. Tom Hughes and Natalie Porter are married in a small, lovely ceremony at the home of his grandparents, Nancy and Chris Hughes. They honeymoon in the Southwest and return full of expectations of happiness. Natalie is disquieted, however, when flowers arrive which are not from her new husband. She covers by pretending to check with the florist and tells Tom it was a wrong delivery and they have told her she might as well keep them. But she knows who sent them. Natalie is upset when, shortly after, Luke Porter arrives in town and seeks her out. But Luke insists he is there only to assure her this is a final farewell and he has now decided to concentrate on. making his own marriage work. Sandy Garrison, Bob’s ex-wife, is working at the  bookstore to fill in for Natalie. Her estranged husband, Norman, recovering from a heart attack he suffered during a drunken confrontation with Bob at the Colonnade Room, is still telling anyone who will listen that Bob and Sandy are having an affair, but ironically will let only Bob care for him at the hospital. His recovery is hampered by his easily aroused temper. Norman anxiously tries to persuade Dr. John Dixon to convince Bob to swear he slipped at the restaurant, thus making them liable for a costly lawsuit, but John won’t do this. Chris discovers a large amount of money missing when checking the books on the Garrisons’ business, but doesn’t want to upset Sandy with this. More to come...
    • The cynical (i.e., the dominant) me has the very same thoughts.
    • Oh wow that’s pretty awesome! I wish I had  approached him but there was so many people 
    • In the current environment, while it's small, there is a crumb of good news: Apparently, San Antonio voted for a DEMOCRATIC mayor, Gina Ortiz, beating the "right-hand man" of Gov. Greg Abbott, former Texas Secretary of State Rolando Pablos. https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/5337199-gina-ortiz-jones-wins-san-antonio/
    • Love this! You are both adorable. Wow
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy