4 minutes ago, Roman said:

These better be the Real Mccoys....because if not, she will do herself tremendous damage. 

 

Yeah, no Geraldo's Al Capone vaults mess, please.

 

I don't have MSNBC, so I guess I'll have to keep an ear open to social media for the responses.

16 minutes ago, DramatistDreamer said:

 

Yeah, no Geraldo's Al Capone vaults mess, please.

 

I don't have MSNBC, so I guess I'll have to keep an ear open to social media for the responses.

you know how it takes her 40 minutes to get to the damn point....

she says she has his returns......from 2005.

4 minutes ago, Roman said:

you know how it takes her 40 minutes to get to the damn point....

she says she has his returns......from 2005.

 

Only one year?! 

Sadly, that's already more information than previously known.

10 minutes ago, Roman said:

you know how it takes her 40 minutes to get to the damn point....

she says she has his returns......from 2005.

 

That's better than the previous returns we got from Martha Maples.

Edited March 15, 20178 yr by marceline

I like Rachel, but this is definitely not the night for her increasingly tiresome and mannered long wind-up act where she grins a lot and repeats herself about a dozen times. She'll need to get right to it.

Edited March 15, 20178 yr by Vee

More Goldman Sachs people for Trump, yet Hillary's speaking engagements were a huge deal somehow. Trump must've been jealous that she was getting paid for speeches and he has to run chasing these people.

The people who voted for him to "drain the swamp" should really be embarrassed right now.

 

BREAKING: Trump to nominate Goldman Sachs managing director James Donovan as deputy Treasury secretary - White House

— Reuters Politics (@ReutersPolitics) March 14, 2017

2 minutes ago, Vee said:

I like Rachel, but this is definitely not the night for her increasingly tiresome and mannered long wind-up act where she grins a lot and repeats herself about a dozen times. She'll need to get right to it.

 

Agreed. I hope she'll get right to the important stuff.

If it is the 2005 returns - which the WH is claiming it is while decrying Maddow - then it better have Russian evidence in it or she's poisoned the well.

this is one of the reasons why I stopped watching her show. this spiel she goes on every single night is just boring. 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/stuartanderson/2017/03/11/83-of-americas-top-high-school-science-students-are-the-children-of-immigrants/#d65cc0a2200f

20 minutes going over the same stuff she has reported on for months....

I've just read that the tax return doesn't detail anything about where the money came from. That's really important!  If it doesn't detail where the money came from or how it was made, what's the point?

1 minute ago, DramatistDreamer said:

I've just read that the tax return doesn't detail anything about where the money came from. That's really important!  If it doesn't detail where the money came from or how it was made, what's the point?

starting to really look like she screwed the pooch on this one....

Fair enough.

Too many of y'all are acting like Watergate was one big reveal. It took months of rigorous and boring reporting. Journalism takes time.

— Jonathan Capehart (@CapehartJ) March 15, 2017

I like Rachel Maddow a lot, but this is the kind of smug woolgathering monologuing she does a lot which goes nowhere and it's a big part of why we lose IMO. If she was going to go on national TV and hit #1 on Twitter she needed to come with something real and not her usual giddy nerd act and a lot of smoke.

 

This makes any media inquiry into Trump and his taxes a little weaker, but at least it keeps the conversation at the forefront. I am so angry at her thinking she could come out and do her usual wonk schtick.

Edited March 15, 20178 yr by Vee