Jump to content

The Politics Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 45.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vee

    6816

  • DRW50

    5988

  • DramatistDreamer

    5521

  • Khan

    3458

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

I wasn't suggesting that McGovern or Dole were perceived as likeable (instead, I was suggesting that the perceptions of them being unlikeable are incorrect). Because many thought he was way too far to the left, McGovern was about the only politician viewed as even more unlikeable than Nixon, which is a huge reason why he lost 49 states. As a person, McGovern had likeable qualities, though the general public was way too scared of him to take notice.

Bob Dole was also viewed in a highly unfavorable manner, but not because of any Nixon association (at least in recent times). (With all due respect, I am mystified why you would think that Dole and Nixon come from the same flock; while there political views may be similar, Dole has never been accused of criminal activity.) In 1996, Dole's albatross was that Democrats were always tying him at the hip with Gingrich. (Nixon had long ceased to be relevant to swing voters.) They basically accused him of being a Newt's twin brother (which wasn't hard to do, because they were the two leaders of Congress), though in reality the two were never close (and also Gingrich is way more conservative than Dole).

Dole can be extremely funny and self-depreciating, but these likeable characteristics were seldom on display on the campaign trail. Even if Bob never gave "boring" speeches and Newt never existed, the GOP would still have lost in 1996 because of the booming economy.

Edited by Max
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I hadn't noticed a resemblance to Anthony Herrera but I will look again.

Max, I agree with you that Ryan was probably Romney's best bet at this point - the talk I've heard at sites like TNR is that he probably would have chosen a "safe" VP if he was doing better in the polls.

I loathe Tim Pawlenty and have for almost a decade so I'm thrilled he's not going to be VP, especially since he has been Romney's lackey for most of the campaign. Ha ha.

What do you think of Romney basically disavowing Ryan's entire plan? It kind of makes picking him less important.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't recall Dole ever being perceived as the meanest man in DC (but I'll take your word for it), but I am well aware of the "hatchet man" moniker he got after the nastiness he displayed in the 1976 VP debate. Certainly, the man wasn't perfect, but he is far less partisan compared to today's standards. The consequent damage done to his reputation was repaired, as Dole became skilled at making friends across the aisle following the 1976 campaign. When he left the Senate in 1996, his colleagues on both sides of the aisle had huge praise for him as a human being (regardless of how they felt about his politics).

Carl, I don't think that Romney disavowed Ryan's entire plan; it's just that he is putting forth his own plan, which happens to have many similarities to Ryan's plan. From what I have read, the biggest difference between the two budgets is that Ryan's lowers individual income tax rates more than Romney's does. Some may feel this isn't the smartest political move on Romney's part to make such a statement, but then again he is at the top of the ticket and (I feel) needs to have his own plan (as opposed to completely adopting someone else's).

While I respect and understand the criticism that Romney is getting for somewhat distancing himself from Ryan's budget, I do feel that there is a blatant double standard that exists (because of the perception of Romney being much too wishy washy). For instance, I fail to recall anyone criticizing Obama for not sharing Biden's view on Iraq (after choosing him). (Biden originally supported that war, and a big reason why Obama defeated Hillary was because she voted for that war as well.) Likewise, Reagan never adopted the economic philosophy of GHWB after selecting him, despite the fact that the elder Bush trashed supply-side economics as "voodoo economics."

Edited by Max
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm astounded by the attempts at voter suppression. Is there anything less American than trying to keep people from the polls? I'm just waiting for the court to set the dates for the arguments in OFA v. Husted (the case where "Obama is trying to suppress the military vote!!1!1" rolleyes.gif ) I'm planning on going to the hearing and I won't be alone.

No matter what I suspect that election day in Ohio is going to make the 2004 voting circus look like an episode of The Martha Stewart Show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Interesting election result, although you won't hear about it, since Joe Biden speaking the truth is much more shocking and heinous.

Cliff Stearns, who has spent the last few years trying to make himself a big hero for his investigations against the Obama administration, was defeated in his primary, in a huge upset. Guess how much he had sitting in his campaign account? $2 million.

http://www.tampabay.com/news/politics/national/article1246033.ece

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Dr. Beth Stevenson, an obstetrician-gynecologist, told CBS News, "We are going under the assumption that this isn't going to be harmful for mother or unborn child."

Oof. Don't like the sound of that at all.

But this seems to be getting serious, so I don't know that I can disagree.

Tells you a lot about how shallow our media is that the damn page is plastered with "news" on a man who died 35 years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • My comment has nothing to do with cast resentment, but does relate to the Finland location shoot: It may be a coincidence, but Jim Matthews died in Finland in 1982.  Hugh Marlowe's final episode was in April 1982, but the character probably didn't die untll May or June. (I'm unable to find the character's date of death, only the date of Marlowe's final episode). SInce Jim and Rachel had very little interaction after around 1975, it is unlikely Jim's death in Finland had any connection to Rachel's potential visit, but the choice to have Jim die in that location at that time is a head-scratcher. 
    • I totally understand your sloths concern about it and I agree with you. Let’s hope the show plays it’s cards right.    Further comments about the last few episodes: - I liked that one of the attendees was filming the scene. That’s realistic. I wonder if the writers will follow up with that.  - Martin and Smitty trying to drag Leslie out was very heteronormative, so perfectly in line with them two as characters lol.    As for the future: it’s obvious the Duprees will come to accept Eva one way or another, but the rivalry with Kay should be here for the long term   On the topic of acting: the only bad actors I’m seeing are Ted and Derek. Tomas hasn’t proven to be either good or bad, so far, but he’s certainly mediocre and uncharismatic. He sucks the energy out of the scenes and I don’t see any couple of women ever vying for him. 
    • I’m trying to think which actors VW were working with at the time, and none of them had been there for a while. Even like Mac and Ada didn’t have that big of a part in Rachel’s storyline.  And Jamie was involved with all that movie stuff.
    • Brooke did ads before ATWT too. That probably helped get her the job. After ATWT she seemed to branch more into hosting, along with ads.  I think I saw Kelley in an ad or two, but you're right she wasn't on as much. 
    •   Thanks for sharing these. I wonder if Charles might have been in the running for Adam. I know Preacher was a bit of a bad boy at times on EON, but Neal seemed to be a step down, and Robert Lupone had played a similar part on AMC. Given the huge cast turnover at this point I wonder who thought they had been there long enough to go.  Laura Malone/Chris Rich would get a remote within the next year. 
    • Interesting.  It seems to allude to that statement that Warren Burton made around that time about some AW actors getting special treatment.  I wonder who was resentful about not getting to go. 
    • Good morning, boys!  I figured that it was time that our Gio was introduced into the hotness thread

      Please register in order to view this content

      @ranger1rg I even included a close up of his face for ya!
    • Under all of Madonna's social media today there is this wave of negative, toxic, absurd comments by Lady Gaga fans telling her how Gaga surpassed her in concert in Copacabana. I mean... Who the hell cares? Why are these fan communities so freaking toxic??? I'm sure Madonna doesn't care... But still. Have some respect for M. Leave her social media alone. Go cheer Gaga and be happy. Why come and spew hate on M??? Crazy world.
    • FYI, again, Ruth/Letitia is not in either of these 2 episodes. So that concludes the 4 episodes I had from Nov. 1983. I don't have the October episodes.
    • Eddie has begun uploading the 1990 episodes. I'm so happy about that. I was mindfully taking a break till there's plenty of episodes I can binge watch when I feel like it. Now that 1989 is complete... I can't wait to press play on February 1989 and resume where I left off.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy