Jump to content

DAYS: Deidre Hall and Drake Hogestyn FIRED!


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 239
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

As someone who still watches the show I really don´t see where you people got the idea Marlena was a central or a tentpole, Alice like character on DAYS. Because that´s not true. Bo/Hope are the central characters of the show, always nice and cute, supporting everyone and giving advices left and right. Marlena and John were always either totally involved in their own stories, or not on at all. And it became worse with the years as they had a hard time to even keep a permanent home set just for them and Marlena isn´t exactly the kind of character who hangs at Brady Pub.

I also don´t understand where you took the idea about DAYS being ensemble, multi generation show like Y/R is. Because even twenty years ago the show was mainly about young couples. Older characters had supporting storyline at best, usually used as a meaningless filler between the all important lovestory of the year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

END OF 'DAYS' FOR HALL AND HOGESTYN

By DON KAPLAN

Posted: 2:01 pm

November 18, 2008

The sands in the hourglass have run out for longtime "Days of Our Lives" stars, Deidre Hall and Drake Hogestyn -- both have been fired from the 43-year-old soap.

"`Days of our Lives' has decided to rest the characters of 'John Black' and 'Marlena Evans,'" NBC officials said in a prepared statement." After a year of separation, 'John' and 'Marlena' will finally reunite before exiting the canvas in early 2009."

Hall has appeared on "Days" as Dr. Marlena Evans since 1976 and Hogsestyn has been on the show since 1984.

While there has been buzz that "Days" may also be on its last legs, the network granted the soap a reprieve last week, extending the program for at least another 18 months.

Daytime soap operas in general are dying breed. With far more profitable syndicated judge shows and talks shows dominating the network's daytime schedules, many industry observers believe it will only be a matter of time before soaps are banished entirely to far-flung cable channels, the Internet or oblivion.

http://www.nypost.com/seven/11182008/tv/en...styn_139352.htm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Multi generational show does not mean that the older characters have to have a front burner story or front burner role of their own all the time. Days was a multi-generational show for many many years and Tom & Alice were never really front center in their own story. They were constantly supporting their children's stories and their lives and their grandchildren.

They were there; they were seen.

Multi-generation just means that all the generations are seen.

Chris & Nancy on ATWT have always been there but never front burner. Same with Pa Hughes and Judge Lowell. They were just there.

Days has been that even in the 80's and 90's when Alice was seen alot. Or even Caroline and Shawn were shown.

But especially beginning in 2000 - no the show has not been generation at all. JER tried to turn it back that way but Hogan Sheffer in particular took away any generational feel the show ever had.

Irna Phillips always wrote multi-generational stories but hardly ever wrote front-burner storylines for her older characters. They did get their moments to shine - but she showed how ever story affected each generation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Since SOD reported that DAYS' budget was cut by 40%, that means DAYS' weekly production budget is now around $520,000 give or take a few thousand. That's down from the $1.3 renegotiated budget from 2006.

That is really a horrible budget for a show like DAYS, it should've just been canceled, instead it's now in GL territory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Actually, the budget's been cut by $520,000, that's the 40%...the budget now stands at $780,000 a week, that's the remaining 60%...that's still a pretty awful budget. I'm thinking several permanent sets with room for one take down/build set, no wardrobe or makeup budget (they can shop at Tar-jay!), Hall, Hogestyn, Evans and Nichols all getting the axe among others with everyone taking a pay cut, everyone behind the scenes taking a pay cut and funneling the 1% ownership profits of Y&R into DAYS...that would help...I think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

VERY TRUE! You had the younger crowd, the middle aged, and the older involved in storylines. Also, Reilly made Salem about family! You can always count on Reilly to have some sort of family gathering that reiterated the ties each character had to his/her family as well as each other. His Christmas episodes were always the best!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Bert was like Joanne Tourneur who ended up the matriarch of SFT but she also started out as a central heroine. That is what Bert started out as too. When Irna introduced Bert in 1950 she was unmarried. She became a mother in 1952 for the first time and then by the end of the 1950's had become the mother of a high school graduate.

Bert was never really started out like Nancy Hughes or Mary Matthews or any of the other classic soap opera matriarchs created by Irna Phillips. What was great about them was that they would never have big stories on a consistent basis but they would appear in over 100 or even over half the episodes each year without never having a story.

Frances Reid and Macdonald Carey used to be the same way at Days. Sadly the people in their same age range today on Days or any of the other soaps hardly ever get 100 episodes a year. They are just hardly ever there.

Look at Maeve Ryan on RH. She is one of the most visible matriarchs ever on any soap opera but when you look back she was always reacting to someone else's story - never to one of her own.

You can be a multigenerational soap opera without giving the older characters a front burner story. It's nice when it does happen but it is not necessary. The best stories are those that show how the stories just affect the ones around them.

I.E. the Bill/Laura story that I refer to often. It was a great story that Edward Mallory & Susan Flannery were the main stars of but it affected everyone in the Horton family from Tom and Alice to Bill's sister-in-law, Kitty, and all the way down to young teenager Mike Horton who questioned his sexuality due to the rape and other things that happened. And all were featured often through the story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy