Jump to content

October 20-24, 2008


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 114
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Arguably, this is new to me, but how are AMC and ATWT above GH in the HH numbers? GH does come in at 2.1, but AMC and ATWT are 2.0 not 2.1. GH should still be in 3rd place. Could someone please explain this math to me (and I'm a theological major, not a math major, so explain numbers to me like I'm 5).

The girls numbers are depressing. My 10 year old daughter watches GH with me and that show's the bottom of the heap for girls - and we're Canadian, so my viewing habits don't effect these number in the least. She actually loves Spinelli and enjoys Maxie and Lulu.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What does HH stand for?

And thank you for this there was a post here explaining the trends re: ratings in soaps and I accidently deleted it from my network

and I've been looking all over here trying to find it again....but it sums up pretty much what your referring to here. I don't know if it was in GH or one of the other soaps, but it was a very good post that explained it very well.

I still don't get it because if they are losing audience, it doesn't hit the demo groups? It doesn't reflect on their #s?

Also, which set of #s really tell the tale? Should I look at the Total Viewers where I see they are losing audience.

What should I be looking at? I confuswed... :huh:

I did read somewhere ....( I think it was here I read it a long time ago)...once GH was scheduled for cancellation Leslie Charleson's Monica storyline literally singlehandedly saved the day and got them off the chopping block, went from near 0 the bottom of the barrel... to #1 literally overnight with the Rick/Jeff Alan (not sure which one I forgot) deal which helped to define triangles as we know them today

don't know if this is true just what I read....But I look at how they treated Alan and her now and can only shake my head in disgust...if true, it wouldn't even be a show yet they treat her with such disrespect. Its why I have a hard time watching GH the total lack of respect for their rich history and total disregard of fans with such shabby plot point writing (in their pimping method of storytelling)....hope this is the right term I just learned two new things so I'm trying one of them out to see how it flies :D Next up "exposition" writing ...Yes they have good eppys now and again but for me the writing is not all there...emmy or no emmy.. The only thing that keeps me in it is my favorite actors...I can't take the repetitve dialog how many times do characters have to say the same thing wasting airtime..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Mulder you and I are agreeing entirely too much these days!! Actually I'm not watching OLTL any more and probably will never watch it again because I don't trust it, but I agree on the co-writer, if not an outright demotion. OLTL will probably piggy-back on AMC next week and go up.

Now, on my own post. Way to go AMC. I hope that something post-tornado keeps people interested. I watch that show and it reminds me of my apartment complex. There are African-Americans, there are lesbians, there are older people. It's just so, well diverse. ABCD must not recognize it any longer. :lol: :lol: Y&R continues on the yo-yo.

I've enjoyed seeing Laura back on GH, but I just like Laura. I really do think GH is suffering from a poor lead-in show. It's the Palin effect, OLTL has become a drag on the ticket. :lol: :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The HH numbers are still the most important to Advertisers with the HH Demos for 18-49 being #1 to Advertisers and TPTB with 18-34 last. Most advertisers don't even want to see the Girls 17 and under demos unless it is a product they are gearing totally toward that age group same with the other demos like Men or the age 50 and older demo.

The Viewers is an important number but the advertisers don't put as much stock in it as they do the HH number.

The HH number is a definite number with Nielsen. When they put those boxes in your house every time that TV is turned on or your VCR, your DVR, your game system, etc. - the box records it and sends the data to Nielsen. So advertisers know that that household is definitely tuned in. Those numbers are what measures the HH.

Now how Nielsen gets the Viewers number is more subjective.

This is how my Nielsen guy explained it to me. Say in my house when we were on there were 5 people living here with 4 TVs. They took a record of who might be watching each TV - for instance if the TV was in a bedroom they wrote down that 1 person usually watched that or if it was a master bedroom they registered 2 people.

When they looked at the records from our house and say only the TV in the den was on at that hour they registered it as 5 viewers even though all 5 of us may not have been watching.

If 2 TV's were turned on - one of the bedrooms and the den TV - then they would give 1 viewer to the bedroom and 4 viewers to the living room.

If 3 were on that hour - the den and 2 bedrooms - then they registered 3 watching the TV in teh living room and 1 for each bedroom.

If the TV was on in the Den and the one in the Kitchen at the same time - they gave 2.5 to each TV program.

They have developed a new box that I understand registers better as each viewer has to punch a button while they are watching. If they leave the room they have to punch the button, etc. Not every household has those yet - as I understand it. Plus I have heard from some households that many times they forget to punch the button that they are even in the room watching. Or forget if they leave or come back in, etc.

So the numbers although close on viewers are very subjective and not as accurate as the household numbers are. Even the HH numbers can be off too as I know many times I have finished a program, got up and gone to another room and come back 2 or 3 hours later and the TV is still on teh same station and no one has been watching - but when we were a Nielsen household things like that got counted as an HH recording for that program.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thank you. The alphabetical thing I got, what I can't understand is why AMC and ATWT were given a 2.1 rating when the number for the day add up to a 2.0 for each of them But GH that did so much better day after day is still only 2.1. When I added the ratings per day and divided by 5, GH was 2.1 but the others were 2.0 as I said. Is there some other numbers they use, if not there is a mistake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ah, but that's just it. They are NOT featuring the same ol' same ol'. Amazingly. The All Sextet All the Time has been broken up, the characters better distributed into stories that better suit them. Plus they are not the WHOLE SHOW as they were. The stories are interesting, and character use is balanced. So hopefully... we can keep the numbers up and add some. Fingers crossed!

The trend is also interesting... AMC held steady all week long. Been awhile since I saw that, iirc. They went down just very slightly on Thursday (Babe's death!) and then back up again on Friday. AND they ended with some cliffhangers that made me want to tune in on Monday. So... we'll see how they do next week.

they do lose a big market TODAY in Philly... dang it all, I'm glad the Phillies won but AMC is preempted for a freaking parade! Got to watch on soapnet tonight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Toups, I think we need a pin of this some where since the question keeps coming up all the time.

You cannot go by the daily numbers that are released to get the weekly average. Every day Nielsen does the ratings they fill it out to a 2 decimal figure (i.e. 2.26). When they release them they round up to say in that instance to a 2.3 or if it had been a 2.22 they would just say 2.2.

They do not use the rounded number to get the weekly total. They use the full numbers and then round it up. Nobody but Nielsen sees the full number - only the rounded number is released. So we cannot use those numbers that are released to get the weekly average.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I totally agree.

I have got to watch tonight too. I got too busy to watch today. Same happened to me yesterday and I forgot to set the dang VCR - so I totally missed Babe's funeral. My ex-wife called and said yesterday's show was one of the best in awhile. I am so mad I missed it.

It is weird that she and I watched AMC all our married life and talked about it. I learned to watch from my Dad and Mom and she learned to watch it from her grandmother who was such a big fan of the show that even some of the wreaths at her funeral were AMC related. We both quit watching the show in 2006 and now both have started back. She calls almost every day to talk about it now.

How anyone can say it is the same old same old is beyond me. When I can get into a story that involves Kendall and Zach and actually care about what happens to Kendall then something has changed. A year ago or even a few months ago if Kendall flat lined I would be sitting there yelling let her die or someone pull the plug. But I am not doing that. That tells me alone that something has changed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • But by Dinah and Hart...Hart especially looked as if he could not tie his own shoes!  Ed, Holly, Alan, Alex Henry and Vanessa among others were not able to put Roger down....Dinah???
    • The preaching seems to end before the Barnes settle in late December, 1981. The stuff that felt overly religious (the Davidsons believing a miracle will save Lori rather than a surgeon, Jeff's miraculous recovery from a beam of light) was quickly nixed because it wasn't working. The closest thing that you get to that under the Barnes is when Dennis Fraser, the drunk driver who killed Nora and Scott, turns his life over to god. The born-again redemptions out of nowhere seem to stop fairly early into the Barnes' run. I do think Miriam's transformation was much more delicately done with her turning on her bestie Nancy because Nancy was seducing Charles, Miriam's wealthy father, so Miriam offers to testify for the Davidsons in the trial against Nancy over possession of Nora's house. In turn, Nancy repays the favor by pumping an emotionally distraught Miriam with barbituates while Miriam carries on her affair with low level thug turned political aide Norm Elliott. Miriam is used by everyone into her life and finally lands herself in the hospital becasue she has become so addicted to the pills. At the hospital, it is the friendship and kindness of the Davidsons that brings Miriam to a more peaceful place. The Davidsons ability to forgive is both appealing and, at times, dramatically limiting. In this case, the Davidsons lead Miriam to her new Mama, Ione Redlon. Now, under Vinley, Miriam is determined to reconnect with her son, Frederick, and her ex-husband, Paul.   My bigger issue with the Barnes' writing is that they write the storylines with twist endings that sorta come out of nowhere. I know the resolution to the Kate Carrouthers mystery sorta plays out like that so I am curious to see how I feel about that.  The biggest change throughout the writing teams has been the view of morality. Winsor had many characters who could be viewed purely through the lens of black and white, but others explored the shades of gray (often younger people). The brief head writerless period was much better at embracing an action doesn't make a person and there characters were much more gray or at least evil at a more local level (Nancy, in this period, only flirts with her brother-in-law where as later she is actively providing pills to Miriam to keep her addicted and away from her own father). The Barnes, for the most part, seem to embrace this level of political corruption that seems to permeate throughout the show making it clear that power (as well as money) is the root of evil. Even criminal Vince Cardello is presented as less evil than Charles Carpenter, though Carpenter's murder of a resident of his complex was rewritten to relieve Carpenter of any responsibility in the matter. Vinley's work seems more into exploring the why or delving deeper in general. Babs Farley, the hooker who is looking to reclaim her life, is such an intriguing character. She is given such meaningful monologues regretting her decisions and desperately trying to keep away from the hands of her former pimp, Ron Washington, who hasn't appeared yet. Monk and Fernandez seem to be wrongly accused of Lori's attack and there seems to be hints of racism that the show is looking to address. Marianne confronts Gil about his feelings towards God in relation to their mother's death years earlier.  There does seem to be a layer of misogyny to Vinley's work, but it's early so I'll be curious to see how this plays out. There are a lot of attacks on women (Lori is nearly raped, Babs was beaten, Nancy is on the verge of being blackmailed for sex by Tab, and the Russ / Marianne / Gil scenario has hints of toxic masculinity. It's very early so it'll be neat to see if that is maintained.  Jerry TImm lasts about a year I think (March, 1982 - March, 1983). One of the episodes on TouTube has a comment suggesting that Timm was fired by CBN because he had done something in his past that came to light. It didn't seem to be clear what that was.  I like what I've seen of Timm as Gil. He has such a presence that it covers up some of his weaker acting choices. It's unfortunate that he didn't get to play as much of the Gil - Stacey - Amber triangle as his replacement does.  
    • I believe it was Mark Arnold's family that taped all the shows. It was the same with Ariane Muneker - her mother bought a video recording machine in the 1970s, at a time when that type of technology was really expensive John Wesley Shipp's parents also taped all his shows, and has a complete library of every single episode of every soap JWS has appeared on. Same for Cynthia Watros. When the Soap Actors parents pass away, and there are all these VHS tapes in dozens of boxes, it is shame to waste all that. 
    • Personally, I felt that the deletion of the original music from the girls' slumber party episode, and the axing of REM's Losing My Religion from the ep featuring Brenda and Dylan breaking up, were the most painful. The changes really damaged those episodes. I dropped the DVDs after season two, but I've been told by other viewers who kept going that tunes from all the seasons continued being replaced, and the situation only got worse as the DVD releases progressed. Yes, penny-pinching from those in charge was the principle issue, but I wonder how much better the DVDs would have sold if such poor choices had not been made in the name of cost cutting. On the other hand, when Time-Life put out the Vietnam-war era classic China Beach, they dug deep into their pockets and ended up clearing the rights to a whopping 268 (!!!) of the original tracks. This represented 96% of the total. TPTB said that when they were not given permission to use a few of the remaining pieces, they substituted different singers' versions of the exact same songs, in order to preserve the show's integrity as much as possible. The CB set was expensive as heck, to be sure, but to me it was worth it.
    • Oh I knew it was common (I did not realize Muenker's channel was gone - I'm glad I saved all those videos). I just didn't realize it was the case with the rape episode.  I never really felt like she dominated the show in her second stint either, although I can see where she probably did. I can feel it more in some of her first run, because the show was much different before she came in and suddenly a woman we'd seen for a year was [!@#$%^&*] and marrying an entire family.  In that sense Reva is more like Babe than Erica Kane. One of the more infamous AMC lines was, "Babe is love." You just know HB would have said that line about Reva at some point.
    • I disagree; if this were Chris Clenshaw, then I would be worried. But it's a new producer coming in to clearly create the canvas they want to create, and I'm okay with that. Re-introducing characters to shake things up and possibly take some other ones out of the canvas. It'll be interesting to see the finished product.
    • I am ready for our first full week in what feels like a while! They worked Sweeps month!
    • Beyond the Gates: A The Bold and the Beautiful: F Coronation Street: B Days of Our Lives: B- EastEnders: A+ Emmerdale: A- Hollyoaks: B+ General Hospital: C Neighbours: C+ The Young and the Restless: F For me, Beyond the Gates, EastEnders, and Emmerdale led the pack during Sweeps month, with Coronation Street and Days of Our Lives following. General Hospital and Neighbours sit in the middle with what I'd call a "take it or leave it" kind of Sweeps month, and the Bell soaps bombed (per usual).
    • Actors doing this is pretty common. I used to work for a company that produced a very successful sitcom back in the 70s. Actors who were guest stars on the show would ask to be provided tapes of their episodes. I assume they do it for a variety of reasons, i.e. to create a reel of their best work. I know of some soap actors who have uploaded saved work to YT. One is Ariana Muenker, who played Christine Valere on GL. She was uploading scenes from her many soap roles a few months back. Unfortunately, it looks like either she or YT took the channel down. Sharon Gabet and Mark Arnold help the EON YT channel by providing saved episodes. Along with EON eps, Arnold shared a guest stint he did on GL. Those episodes are really interesting because they involve the introduction of Nola's character, which was tied to the Roger storyline. When he came back after faking his death, he hid out at the boarding house. Nola being a snoop figured out something was fishy with him. She ended up helping the police. Very worth seeking out. I don't think anyone else has those episodes.  Makes you wonder if there's more out there than we know of because actors don't want to be bothered to run a YT channel. Can't blame them because it's a lot of trouble, but if only... I agree. While Lucci definitely used her fame from the show to build her brand and get work outside of AMC, Erica was always part of an ensemble. Yeah, she got a couple of whacky stories (like the "unabortion") but she never took over to the detriment of other actors and stories.
    • It must have been sometime in the early 80's. VI said he first heard about Marj Dusay's talent from CH. Hickland worked with her on Capitol.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy