Jump to content

HOLLYOAKS


ChrisL

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Hello, I have a question regarding the writing team for HOLLYOAKS. I'm trying to figure out who the head writers are for this awesome soap. The credits for the writing appear differently then they do for US soaps. For instance, at the opening of the show, it says Written By. Then during the closing credits, we see - Script Editor, Assistant Script Editor, Story Editor and finally, Storyliners. Does anyone have any idea which one of these titles would be considered head writer? If this is any help, the Written By name during the opening seems to change daily, while the other names generally stay the same for an extended period of time. Thank you in advance for your help!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

UK soaps don't have "Head Writer(s)."

We were discussing this in the Hollyoaks thread in the Foreign Soaps forum a few days ago.

Bryan Kirkwood is the producer (he'll be stepping down in January). Anyway, he and his storyliners come up with the storylines. The script editors and story editors help plot them and check for errors in each episode. The "Written By" part in the beginning lists the scriptwriter, the person responsible for writing that particular episode (both scenes and dialogue).

The head producer on UK soaps typically drive huge amounts of storylines, Bryan Kirkwood in particular, had just come off a 5 year stint at Coronation Street as Script Editor before he was named Producer of Hollyoaks. He is a writer at heart. It seems UK soap Producers have the responsibility for both production and writing (even if they don't do the actual writing).

UK soaps are a huge collaborative effort from what I've heard. About anyone can pitch a story on the staff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thank you for this informative information, Y&RWorldTurner. Very interesting. I wasn't aware of how prominent Bryan Kirkwood's role was in the telling of story. I'm very sad to see him leave as I've been a fan of the show ever since he took over. And I should have checked out the 'foreign soaps' section first. Sorry about that... Mods - by all means - please place this there if necessary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think another good point to the system is that they often have huge story conferences every 6-12 months with all of the writers present. This is where they hammer out their failings, gaps in the cast etc and fight for story ideas.

It works to an extent in stopping the pervading network interference. It's harder for a suit to shoot down a huge group of writers and producers than one headwriter.

What is often noteable (particularly when storyliners of Aussie soaps are interviewed) is how people are hesitant to take credit for an idea and always attribute it to the team. Someone might have the germ of a story which is built upon by various other people during a story session.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

^Agreed.

US soaps should learn from these soap operas around the world.

It's kinda like Big Brother... different countries have their own version of the reality show but they all try to add something unique to their version. The EP of the US version said all the producers of all the BB shows around the world would get together and discuss stuff like once a year.

Maybe US soaps should try and get help from those British soaps. I really like the format that the British soaps are using.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Going back to the Reilly days, so many Salem residents have killed, tried to kill and/or threatened to kill people with virtually no fallout for them. It's bothered me for decades. With the new writers, it seems there might actually be actual consequences to Xander's violence this time. I hope it's not resolved quickly. Paul and Linsey both did a great job today. 
    • I’d like to see Ashley paired with a fatal gunshot. 
    • I like the twist of Drew framing Tracy, but now I'm sad that it deprived us of the sight of Jane Elliot performing "These Boots are Made for Walkin," which is such a perfect Tracy Quartermaine song. 
    • Andre and Ashley just feel like to me some stereotype in the making. The latest news of white women with black men has not been pretty. I know we have Vanessa and Doug but they represent another side of the spectrum.
    • I'm not sure when exactly they started but I remember Chris Schemering claiming they wrote the Rick/Monica/Jeff stuff as he said this type of melodrama later found them success on Dynasty but did not work on GH. He mentioned dialogue between Rick and Monica like, "You're my heaven and my hell," and, "I have a fever in my blood." (presumably the next line was not about needing "more cowbell.")
    • Would not necessarily call myself a shipper, as I think shipping is quite an unhealthy state of mind to exist in, but would I like to see them paired? Yes, I would.
    • I can't stand Andre with Ashley.  Sean Freeman acts the scenes well but I just don't like how Andre is being written in his scenes with Ashley. (edit to clarify: the dialogue is stilted) The last few episodes have been same Fairmont day, everyone in same wardrobe. Fyi, I can't detect it from watching but Andre's white shirt is leather https://www.shopyourtv.com/tag/andre-richardson/ specifically goatskin leather: https://shop.mango.com/us/en/p/men/jackets-and-vests/overshirts/100-leather-overshirt-with-pockets_67085137
    • I have to agree. Yesterday wasn't too bad either. I'm glad there was some movement in the B and C plots, and I'm very intrigued by Bill's story.  Nice scenes.  I have to rewatch them, though.  @Liberty City A Andre and Ashley shipper?
    •     Oh wait, I got that wrong, I think? Correcting what I said: Chelsea and Bill both assumed that Dani was fake-kissing Pamela.  But meanwhile Pamela asked for the reason for the kiss and Dani explained that she was trying to give Pamela something to focus on other than Diego.  So now I think that Dani just wanted to help Pamela, but Bill and Chelsea misconstrued (as did I).  But then Dani reverted to form and taunted Bill about it. Chelsea would be right if Dani was just kissing Pamela as a ruse to make Bill jealous.  But maybe it was really about Pamela and not about Bill.
    • Lulu is not thinking about Gio here What will this revelation do to him?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy