Jump to content

AMC: Monday 10/6


Recommended Posts

  • Members

STFU Annie! Quit whining about how nobody believes you and thinks you're crazy. Maybe if every other word out of your mouth wasn't a lie things would be different. You stole Adam's gun so quit with the innocent routine, grow up and tell the truth and then somebody might believe you about the stalker.

Adam and Erica are just so much fun to watch.

Poor Amanda and Babe, NOT. Amanda, you got exactly what you deserved because you just didn't listen to Kendall. Her and Babe both should be fired.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The show was okay today though I sort of got bored with Taylor and Jake today and have really enjoyed them. I don't want them to be a couple too soon (or not at all...give a chance to develop). I also found myself zoning out in the jailhouse scenes.

I loved seeing Kendall kick ass BossLady! mode. I know folks are tired of her and have plenty of reason to be tired of her (I've found her grating since I've returned to AMC in Sept). But it made sense for Kendall, whose company's name and bottom line was on the line to be pissed and barking orders about fixing an issue that could bring down Bella and Fusion. It felt like a business, imo.

What didn't feel right was Greenlee Smythe...Greenlee's reaction. Too calm and the mitigator for Kedall's actions, whom I think was to be considered too extreme by the viewers? Then she's off to gaze at the moon? Is this supposed to be a post-trapped with Zach change in Greenpea? Greenlee, as I saw her was always the more business-minded between she and Kendall. It felt like a huge, WTF moment for me, anyhoo.

The Adam Erica JR stuff was entertaining per usual.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

As soon as she came in, I thought, "She sure has her muffins in the window today."

Today's ep was so-so for me. Loved how the Fusion Blast stuff came to light with the wedding party. Didn't quite understand how I left Jesse with the young woman in the corridor on Friday and greeted him at the police station like nothing happened today. I don't mind Pratt's Things-Happen-Off-Stage stuff for the most part, but sometimes he plays it a little too loose. HE runs dangerously close to dropping the ball for me. Shock factor.

This is going to come off sounding stupid, but here goes...I thought Emma did a good job with her, "I'm sick" routine today. Emma is cute as a button and for a while now I feel like she's come off a little distracted, but today, she was back to good.

You know a character is good when he has very few lines but still makes you light up when he comes on screen. Thanks Pete.

I know this wasn't today, but can we get Colby out of those green pants? They're atrocious. Punky Brewster comes to mind.

Erica had some great zingers today.

And I love that we saw Stuart. When Bianca left, we lost our heart and soul. It was temporarily filled by Lily, but then she was shoved offstage in favor of Ava. I know Bianca's coming back, but Stuart is a good touch of heart and soul till then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Community Posts

    • Looking at that cover, did Tristian Rogers and Emma Samms ever have a real life relationship? I know it's the National Enquirer and all...
    • There's going to be a certain amount of freewheeling behavior in any creative space no matter what. It certainly exists in the places I work. A fair amount of it is not okay with me. How you engage with it or don't based on what you feel is right or wrong to tolerate or participate with is down to the individual. But the work I do also isn't nearly as claustrophobic or high-pressure a closed-in environment as the writers' room of a network TV show from 20 years ago. Most of the work I do as a writer is remote and has only a few points of direct contact; if I don't want to engage, I simply don't reply. Most don't have that luxury. I do think you can chalk some of what went down onscreen at Lost to the times generally being very different in the culture in general - the network and creative focus on white leads, white love triangles, etc. above all. But the offscreen frathouse mentality, while also exceedingly and drearily common, reaching such wild heights at a show that prided itself on headlining media criticism courses before it went off the air, on being 'the thinking man's hit' just because it named characters after famous philosophers is... well, also unsurprising. I never thought anyone at that show was a creative genius. I have generally made it a point to avoid following most of the creatives' work since, though some are genuinely talented. I also watched a great deal of the latter half of Lost when it aired once it was given a clear end date, in a period in my life where I had very little to do with my time lol and because I wanted to see if they could possibly square the circle with all the mystery boxes and empty hype they'd built themselves around (I'd watched bits and pieces of the first several seasons). It was hatewatching, and the answer to my above question is they couldn't. Watch it again; for the bulk of the run of the show they simply go back and forth from Point B to Point C, learn nothing and continue to have circular 'character building' flashbacks. It was a formula and it was for treading water. But Lost is still venerated today. Everything it is credited as having done for popular entertainment and storytelling was done first and much better by other shows, Twin Peaks among them and most noticeable. Yet Lost gets the lion's share for making this kind of storytelling marketable and broadly commercial, because it is a show led predominantly by bland white leads embarking on a series of Legend of Zelda fetch quests while propped up with savvy mid-late aughts viral-marketing tie-ins and charismatic showrunners. To me Lost is a how-to manual for making a certain kind of successful four-quadrant hit, not any kind of artistic legacy. This is what always enraged me about the show. Even Ryan's (very well written) excerpt suggests it is settled fact that Lost was well-written and elevated drama. I never felt that way and I still don't. It was poorly done but passed off as high art. Which, fine, you can sell art to the general public by packaging it a certain way onscreen, I understand that and I champion it - but other people have done it better and smarter, to say nothing of more inclusively. It was clear they were winging it in so many ways, yet to this day they claim that ending was some true north for them all along. Come on.
    • #3896 – Monday, January 20th 1969 – missing ? #3897 – Tuesday, January 21st 1969 Ken woke up early and rememberd the melody Laurie played on the piano. Jill was surprised he was whistling. Susan phoned and asked Jill for lunch to talk about Amy’s baby as she learned Jill knew. Jill remained evasive towards Ken. At Paul’s office, Bob Hill appeared and Paul introduced Bob – Valerie’s son – to Jill. After Jill left, Bob told Paul he didn’t want to get involved in his marital situation because he liked Amy a lot and was once interested in Belle. He wasn’t giving legal advice but as a friend, he thouth Paul should go back to Amy. Paul was angry at first. Ken phoned Laurie. He was interested in her song but was frustrated there were no lyrics. She suggested he had to do some and he said he would try. At The English pub, Susan told Jill she thought Amy’s attitude was absurd. She hoped Jill would be able to change Amy’s mind. They were interrupted by Paul and Bob who exchanged greetings. Jill was uneasy. Paul wondered why his secretary was at the pub with his wife’s sister and why she didn’t mention it to him. When Jill returned to the office, Paul assured her Susan and she couldn’t bring him and Amy back together. #3898 – Wednesday, January 22th 1969 Sam and Eleanor planned to work in the Stevens’ home and Sam invited her to dinner. Ken told Jill was late and couldn’t fix dinner. When Sam answered a phone call, Eleanor question Ken again on Nola Hollister’s good deed when he was on the verge of being fired but Ken departed. Eleanor offered to cook leftovers for Sam. When Sam complimented her, she felt very proud. From a cabin booth, Ken called the Hollisters and Nola answered. Laurie wasn’t home. Wilfried heard and wondered why Sam’s son – the hippie bartender – was trying to reach for his daughter. When Laurie came home, Wilfred informed her she had a phone call from a married man. Nola assured Wilfred Laurie met Ken at the club when they were having lunch and they talked music. Eleanor told Wilfred about her tenant problem. Her tenant was a divorcee who entertained men and Eleanor didn’t approve. Sam said she might be a little too rigid. When the name of Valerie appeared in the conversation, Sam took offense. He knew she didn’t approve of Val but she should keep her opinion to herself. Sam was growing more and more attached to her. Eleanor was appalled. After Wilfred left, Laurie asked Nola if Ken said more on the phone. It was probably about the lyrics but Nola shouldn’t say Wilfred. Nola assured she wouldn’t, Wilfred would not understand.    
    • Those statements by Abrams and Cuse are total gaslighting. It showed up on screen, so I agree, it’s unsurprising. In fact, it wouldn’t be surprising to say that the majority of writers rooms are like, or very similar to this— an exclusionary space where offensive behavior, under the guise of freewheeling creativity is prized and anyone who doesn’t fit into that archetype is othered and treated with an undercurrent of hostility, that is, if they let you in. In the very beginning, I had hoped for the show and admittedly, the diverse cast is what drew me in, but yeah, I could see that the story was narrowing in on the triangle between Jack, Kate and Sawyer, which was so disappointing because it seems so conventional and basic- a storyline that has been done to death. Then the argument between Locke and, (was it Jack?) about faith vs. science, which was so convoluted and reductive, yet people treated it as if it were some sort of elevated discussion. I liked most of the actors and that’s probably the most I can really say about it. I lost interest in the series but felt compelled to watch the final two episodes, probably because they brought the original cast back together. But yeah, the ending was dumb too. It made me think, this is not going to be the ending, is it? But yeah, it was. 
    • I always felt that Sheila gained layers on B&B when they made her friends with Brooke. I think it added layers to both women honestly. Both women (for the longest) were isolated from their other female counterparts. It was refreshing to see them finally have genuine female friendships. I also liked how Sheila came to Brooke's aid numerous times. Once by trying to expose Connor to Brooke that he was seeing Karen and the next for trying to keep Stephanie from getting custody of Rick and Bridget (despite poisoning her).      
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy