Jump to content

Emmerdale: Discussion Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 5.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

The bloated cast of this show is seeing some departures lately, which it needed. But it's noteworthy that three of the four major cast departures that has happened/is rumoured to happen involves non-white characters (Ethan, Suni and Nate), and three of four also involves gay characters (Ethan, Suni and Nicky).

Now, this might all be just a coincidence, but it does leave the cast a little less diverse than before....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Personally I don't mind any of them leaving, and like I said, it could just be a coincidence, and probably is.

But diversity has been such a hot topic in recent years that it just struck me as interesting. Especially since Emmerdale has been reluctant to get rid of anyone in recent years, or at least that's what it has felt like. They've just added more and more characters to the point where the show is bursting at the seams with people....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I thought this wouldn't happen in our lifetimes but apparently Oliver Farnsworth (ex-Andy) from Coronation Street is joining the show as new character John Sugden. 

I wonder is he going to be a retcon long-lost son of Jack's or perhaps Joe had a son we don't know about? 

Emmerdale signs Coronation Street star as new village hunk - and he's got a shocking connection to original soap family | The Irish Sun (thesun.ie)

You think he's going to be Jack's long-lost kid somehow or as I said above maybe tied to Joe somehow? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm torn... On the one hand I'm ecstatic that they finally give the Sugdens some attention, but on the other hand I have very little faith that they will do this justice. He will probably just end up getting involved with a Dingle somehow....

I do wonder how he will be connected to the Sugden family. As far as I know Jacob (Annie's late husband) was an only child, so unless he's a more distant relative him being an illegitimate son of Jack or Joe seems the most probable answer. Joe did spend some time in France in the mid 1980s so that could be a possible time period.

Edited by I Am A Swede
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thanks. 

I want to be happier about this as Oliver was great on Corrie and Hollyoaks and the show desperately needs Sugdens (Victoria also needs to go away and this could help phase her out) but I don't trust the show. I expect him to start raping and beating women within about three months.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So do you think bringing him in as a son of Joe would be more logical? 

And I pray they don't toss him in the orbit of the Dingles, but that'll be hard as they consume the whole village. 

Please don't put that in the atmosphere, friend. I pray they don't bring him on to have him do heinous stuff. I loved Oliver on Corrie and was devastated when they killed Andy off. While I don't mind him having an edge, at least give the character boundaries. I hate how soaps feel that any character worth keeping long-term has to be morally corrupt. 

And I haven't been tuning in lately, but are they still doing Victoria/Jacob? I felt icky about that pairing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

@I Am A Swede 

Please register in order to view this content

 

I know it kills you that poor Emmerdale has become the Dingle breeding ground. 

And I am glad that squashed Victoria and Jacob. I am all for younger man/older female type stories but that story just felt weird to me given how Victoria was with David along with Jacob being groomed not too long before. I felt it was irresponsible to have Victoria take up with him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • O'Connor was listed as both breakdown and scriptwriter this week in the few episodes I saw and he wrote one script this week.
    • Deadline is reporting that Jake Schreier, who recently directed Thunderbolts* (a return to form quality-wise for the MCU IMO), is the frontrunner to direct the MCU X-Men reboot.  I thought he did an excellent job with Thunderbolts* - in a way, that seemed like an audition for the X-Men revolving around a group of misfit characters that come together under a common goal (the mental health plotline was also unusually deep but well handled for the MCU, a quality that would be important for any X-Men project).  ‘X-Men’ Movie At Marvel Studios Circling ‘Thunderbolts*’ Director Jake Schreier To Assemble New Team – The Dish
    • Laura was at such a cool place by season 7. There were many exciting avenues to take the character, I wish they had explored the different dynamics within the friendship circle. Watching Karen and Laura have more conflict, with Laura becoming the advice giver to Val is something I always wanted.  And why wait until she dead until you bring on her mom? Yep. Yup. I didn't care for it.
    • Thanks.  Yes, I believe this is his first time with the BDWs.  Was O'Connor still listed with the BDWs?
    • The flow of each episode has been so much better
    • And her evolution was so subtly done. There was nothing like the depraved shows later on, like Game of Thrones, where they said a woman needed to be raped in order to find empowerment. The layers of Laura were what got me hooked on Knots, somewhere in the season 3 repeats. And I agree that her becoming a therapist would have made sense - look at how much her trauma over her mother drove her decisions early on.
    • I think that the problem with Laura was that she had grown to love herself and saw her value in both herself, her career, and her marriage.  She had this inner strength and confidence that Lynn/Bernard didn't know how to harness/write for because they were more interested in generating conflict amongst emotionally immature people. Karen/Mac and Gary/Val were all immature/stubborn to a fault even though they all had grown/evolved.  So the Latham's could key into their essence/history to generate the standard soap opera tropes and stories for them. Even the season 8 conflict with Laura's pregnancy and Greg not being cool with it didn't diminish Laura's fire and strength.  You saw how she was able to move on and live her life as a single mother because she'd already done that after Richard took off.   I saw her response to Greg's kissing Paige as 'that's my husband and I can't change him.. but once I find something better, I'll toss himself'.  She wasn't emotionally tied to him nor his money.. and I think that was partly why she was such a unique and interesting character in the nighttime soap world in the 80s.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy