Jump to content

Coronation Street: Discussion Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I don't really believe anything that man writes. 

 

If it is true, then it makes me laugh, as many thought that Daniel would return as gay or bisexual and cause problems for Billy and Todd.

 

Instead, he's 100% straight, and in a boring pairing with one of the most irritating women on the show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Members

So Daniel was the 'shocking' culprit behind Ken's fall? I would've never guessed that...

Please register in order to view this content

 

And I am also guessing that from today's preview of next week that Nick will leave in a blaze of glory (hopefully not killed), and that Daniel killed his mom and buried her in the backyard (a la Knots Landing & Brookside).  

 

I love Kate Oates when she gets it right but when she gets it wrong, boy does she get it wrong. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 



Read more: http://metro.co.uk/2017/05/28/coronation-street-spoilers-chesney-brown-to-be-left-for-dead-after-being-stabbed-6667290/#ixzz4iPpQ42Nz

Edited by victoria foxton
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Wow. I am all for cleaning house on Corrie (as they need to), but if Nick is killed off, that's sheer stupidity. Why kill off Nick when he is still viable in the future? Also, the Platts have already suffered enough this past year. Why make things worse for them by killing off Nick? Gail and David have grieved enough. Give them a freaking break. Plus, poor Sarah already has enough doom and gloom with Bethenny. This is serious overkill. 

 

Why couldn't Nick simply leave the Street and meet up with a very pregnant Carla, who reveals she's knocked up by Nick and they go off into the sunset. 

 

Now with Chesney, I am all for him being killed off as he's been deadweight for the longest. I'd only wish that they'd do in his sister, Fiz too.  

 

Does Kate Oates need for me to send her a list of the right people to kill off b/c I'll do it if necessary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For yrs now Corrie has been doing things for the shock valve. I hope neither Nick or Chesney is killed off, in an over the top manner. Nick's a legacy kid. I hate when writers kill their next gen characters. I liked Chesney as a kid but he grew into rather boring adult. I miss the days when Corrie had light comedic stories. These dark, trashy shock valve stories need to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TINKER DANGER RAPIST CRY

Coronation Street spoilers: Evil rapist policeman Neil to KILL Craig Tinker after he finds out about Bethany Platt’s ordeal?

Neil is part of Nathan Curtis' sick grooming storyline

SPOILER
By Carl Greenwood
30th May 2017, 11:01 am
 
Updated: 30th May 2017, 11:58 am

CRAIG Tinker could be put in serious danger in Coronation Street when Bethany Platt’s rapist Neil drives him to a remote location.

The trainee constable – who is played by actor Colson Smith in the ITV soap – isn’t aware that his mentor Neil is part of the sick grooming gang who have brutalised his friend, but it seems like he will soon discover the vile secret.

Craig looks terrified as his vile mentor Neil tells him something

MARK CAMPBELL/MCPIX
11
Craig looks terrified as his vile mentor Neil tells him something

Craig sits scared on the car’s boot as Neil texts someone

MARK CAMPBELL/MCPIX
11
Craig sits scared on the car’s boot as Neil texts someone

What are Neil’s plans for Craig and can he survive?

MARK CAMPBELL/MCPIX
11
What are Neil’s plans for Craig and can he survive?

Filming pictures show Craig looking terrified as Neil drives him to a remote location.

Corrie fans know that the gang already left Shona Ramsey fighting for her life when she tried to save Bethany, suggesting Craig could be the next target.

It comes as it was revealed Bethany will begin to self-harm as she comes to terms with what Nathan has done to her.

The actors lark about in a break between filming scenes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Right. Literally for decades, soaps mesmerized their audiences with tales of romance, family conflict, class struggles, and recognizable interpersonal-relationship sagas. We didn't need relentless, heavy violence. We didn't need clones, mad scientists, extra-terrestrials and demon possessions. We didn't need gaggles of plastic himbos and bimbos pushing beloved vets off-screen. We only needed to see people whom we cared about, and the intelligent, moving progression of their lives. Flashy sets, gaudy gimmicks, and high-falutin' hairdos be damned. The characters and the words were important.
    • Absolutely! Brad should've simply moved on from Lunacy. There's no point of freeing her, if you're not going to at least make an attempt at redemption or incorporating her into the fold. It happened with Quinn, who committed quite a few felonies before become the Forrester Matriarch.  Heck, keep Lunacy in prison and have Poppy/Finn discover that she gave birth to twins - 'Sunny' could've come on with a clean slate and still had Sheila/Finn and all the other drama. It certainly couldn't have been worse than what we've witnessed with the destruction of $B.    
    • I would enjoy it if Swan popped up on BTG as an old one time friend/mentor of Anita’s for a cameo. This is just

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I had totally forgotten that Courtney story. I see Burton was already phoning it in by that point.
    • omg I completely missed that, but now when I see it typed here in your post, it's obvious icky cringe. So now I just checked and Tomas said that -- on May 27 that he likes the author Carl Ivati.  He said it with sort of an accent, so I didn't catch the stupid joke or think about the spelling.   I remember when that aired, that I actually said to myself at the time, "I wonder if that's a Latin American author, and I will have to google him later." And now I see your post, and I see. Well that's cringe, and I feel stupid to have fallen for it.

      Please register in order to view this content

         
    • There's a lot you don't need if you have the writing.  You don't even need large casts!  You could make do with a cast of 12-18 actors if the writing is there.
    • Thank you. There’s absolutely nothing wrong with sleeping around if your spouse actually knows about it. She’s just a cheating slut.
    • OMG...Robert Mandan! And Donna Mills is a child. I keep hoping for more of early Ross/Vanessa.
    • I get your point, but I also know that if the roles were reversed -- if a man were screwing around on a woman this way -- everyone would be all "All with his head!" When I say Vanessa needs therapy, I'm actually being kind, because I could begin and end with the fact that she's a cheating slut.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy