Jump to content

Should American soaps rethink their format?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I am totally with you here. It is now time to experiment. Again, I think GH-Night Shift is a perfect example. Kudos to Soapnet for trying to do more with that. This time, with an MTV-style writer, I guess they're going to try to see if they can bring over some of those The Hills viewers. [Why does everyone want those blasted Hills viewers? :)]

I don't know, but this is the power of culture. Around the world, these are still primarily a woman's entertainment. And almost every other culture has a higher proportion of stay at home women. The shows have aired in primetime for DECADES. (Germany's Gute Zeiten, Schlechte Zeiten was on at 7 pm even when I lived there in the early 90s). So different cultures and different habits. I really think Americans are folks who eat standing up...they won't sit down for this stuff anymore.

I hope you are wrong. I HATE supercouples :-). I like couples, love stories...but as part of a complex canvas. I just hope supercouples never proliferate again :-).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 100
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I don't think supercouples really exist anymore. I think that's another soap convention that's already dead yet people keep trying to resurrect it. But I don't believe that you can have another Jesse/Angie or Jenny/Greg in this era. The audience has gotten too diverse and too small. plus the internet won't let that happen.

Look at Luke and Laura. They could be considered soap's premiere supercouple. But Luke raped her. The show was able to rewrite that back then. That can't happen in the age of YouTube. Obviously a lot of people consider Zendall a supercouple but there are an equal number of people who consider them "icky" given that they got together over the dead body of Zach's son. Plus a lot of the supercouple pathos comes from the damsel-in-distress dynamic. Again this is a case of where soaps version of womanhood screws them. Supercouples also tend to demand an lot of screentime and writing "for" them. That creates resentment among viewers who aren't invested.

The fact is every couple is a supercouple to their fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Plus, let me be direct :-). Harlequin Romances are in decline too. A quaint old tradition of love stories, they don't sell anymore.

I'm TOLD that it is growing convention among teenage couples for the girl to give the boy oral sex instead of a goodnight kiss. Is that true? If yes...well...they ain't interested in star crossed lovers then. This is a jaded generation, brought up on "Not A Girl, Not Yet A Woman" and "Oops, I Did It Again". The concept of young love, true love...that is as quaint as grandma's needlepoint samplers.

So, for a jaded generation, supercouples would only PROVE how out of touch soaps are with the world.

But I don't know if that oral sex thing is true... Maybe the younger generation isn't as jaded as I think.

Yes, yes, yes. I should care about every couple.

We're agreeing too much, eh? We'll have to find a point of disagreement so we can have a flame war or something :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

A few thoughts (and I don't know whether mine are in accords with yours, but I'll put them out there nonetheless, lol).

IMO, a dollar is a dollar. Doesn't matter where it came from (per se, lol) or how old the person is who's spending it. If advertising revenue is what feeds the TV industry, then I don't feel age should matter to the networks; because, in the end, the dollar bill makes us all equal.

Also, I don't buy the argument that older consumers are "set" in their brand preferences and aren't interested in the latest on the market - or, as you have intimated above, that only younger consumers worry solely about affordability. I think all who make the money and contribute to our economy do everything they must to ensure their money is spent wisely, period. Most Americans, IMO, know that "biggest and baddest" isn't always "best".

However, what I don't understand is this seeming disconnect between what the networks are saying, and what the advertisers are saying. On the one hand, you have the networks justifying their decisions (not just in daytime, but in TV, in general) on the stated belief that they are doing simply whatever they must to attract the target demographic. (Which is fine - no argument there - although, I don't think they're giving 12-year-old girls enough credit for their intelligence or their ability to discern quality from non, lol.) But, OTOH, you have the advertisers saying, in fact, the "target demographic" is actually older (namely, the "baby boomers") and, like you say, they have more disposable income. (I know I read this somewhere before. TV Guide Online, I think?) So, who's telling the truth? The networks, or the advertisers?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What was true ten thousand years ago is just as true today: there is nothing like being in love.

But I hate supercouples, so don't go by me, lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No I think you are right. Everybody loves a love story. But love stories and supercouples aren't the same thing. Let's go back to Lost. If you look on the boards there's plenty of viewers who will battle over Jack/Kate/Sawyer, each thinking their pair is the pair, until the sun supernovas. But that triangle doesn't dominate the show. People like me who think Kate is an idiotic, useless, soul-sucking, vapid whore don't have to deal with "supercouple" style pimpage. We can enjoy the love story of Jin/Sun or Rose/Bernard. There's plenty of love but no supercouple.

And yes, I hate Kate. Jack and Sawyer are MY supercouple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh, I love Kate. Fierce woman who can take down any enemy. But I never thought in terms of any "couple". It is part of the casting and writing miracle of this show that I love all the characters.

That said, the character I probably like least is Jack. He is too fiercely messed up... My "supercouple" money is on Sawyer and the sublime Juliet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I too am a Sawyer/Juliet fan.

Kate can go be Mom, and Jack will die anyway before this is all over, since SOMEBODY needs to suffer the big hero's death at the end and frankly I'd like to see him sacrifice himself to the four-toed Gods just so I don't have to keep track of how long his beard is, to figure out what year it is, and wow, I just realized how completely off the subject we've gotten.

Never mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh, I agree with you, Sylph. But I also wouldn't arbitrarily state that NOBODY floating around these or other boards knows anything about the industry. B) You might be surprised if resumes were attached to poster profiles. Are there are a lot of those individuals participating here? No. Lurking? Maybe. A few posting? Absolutely.

B

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I feel like I've been schooled lol...

On primetime writers Joss and JJ. I'm just wondering where, besides Marceline, the Joss love is? If JJ was everyone's preference-- as I loved Felicity (primarily first season/second half of second season)-- then that's your prerogative. But I hope everyone didn't miss out on Buffy and Angel. Quality folks.

As for the television climate changing, I look at reality versus scripted shows as an example. American Idol (and to a lesser extent, Dancing with the Stars) definitely has become a juggernaut in terms of ratings but I think they're so popular because they each have an inherent value to them. They're not as high caliber as a Lost but I think the American audience has been able to weed out the crap like Who Wants to be a Millionaire.

Even more so, scripted series like CSI and Grey's Anatomy have had strong ratings despite their genre. It's been said the networks put out reality shows more readily than the scripted shows due to the higher development budgets of the latter. I suppose the same logic can be applied to daytime in that one of the reasons why the writing has failed so miserably recently is because of money. No writer is working for cheap and when each show has more than a dozen, the producers are going to want to follow certain proven models to generate quick results without much effort or money. So the producers don't want to cultivate a strong writing team because it'll take too much money and too much of a risk to develop. I guess this might have been said somewhere earlier and much more eloquently. But I just wanted to put my two cents in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • What a wonderful photo! It really is a shame that Peacock will not show those early years. I know I'd love to see them!
    • With the death of Days and GH actress, Denise Alexander, someone posted this in the Days thread, a '60s-era photo of some of the cast, which lists the names. In the upper left, is a young Susan Flannery, who obviously ended up playing Stephanie Forrester on B&B, who was one of a few actresses to play Dr. Laura Horton [mother to Mike and Jennifer Horton] on Days. Here is a link to the photo: https://boards.soapoperanetwork.com/topic/38014-days-behind-the-scenes-articlesphotos/?do=findComment&comment=2022200  
    • https://parade.com/news/days-of-our-lives-star-susan-seaforth-hayes-pays-heartfelt-tribute-to-denise-alexander-a-friend-to-treasure

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Sorry, there must have been a error, while creating the file. I redone it and it has audio
    • Tamara Tunie was on a local CBS affiliate in Baltimore the other day talking about a few things she had going on, BTG amongst them: "Beyond the Gates" star Tamara Tunie is in Baltimore for the Reginald F. Lewis Museum's 20th anniversary
    • Kobe/Long had their own template and pretty much gutted the cast. As soon as contracts were up established characters were dropped. They needed to free the budget for the new characters. Going back to Ann,I wonder why the Dobsons renewed her contract around 78? After her initial story she became supporting and they didn't seem to want to pursue a romance with Mike. Maybe the feedback was that viewers blamed her indirectly for Leslie's death. If Mike hadn't taken on her case etc. Did she decide not to disrupt her son's life? Seems odd after everything she didn't claim him back. 1976 continues... Joe Werner is just not bouncing back after his recovery as he should, and Sarah, concerned about his sometimes morbid-seeming depression, consults Justin Marler. They agree that Joe is becoming a “cardiac cripple,” and know this kind of overcompensation for illness and overprecaution can not only be a permanently depressed condition but can actually cause a setback for him physically.  Marler releases Joe into Sarah’s care, but it’s soon apparent that just being out of the hospital hasn’t done anything to boost Joe’s spirits about his return to a normal existence. Marler finally lays it out to Joe—the choice has to be his. He can choose to lead a normal, productive life as a doctor and as a husband to the best wife he could have, or he can choose to become an invalid and live on the outside looking in for the rest of his days, sentencing Sarah to the same fate. Realizing the selfishness of what he’s doing to —Sarah as well as the narrowness of the confinement he’s set for himself, Joe begins to see his preoccupation with his illness as the self-pity it really is and decides he’s ready to return to the hospital for a one hour shift each day. Sarah is overjoyed by his turnabout, but full happiness is hers on the day she overhears Joe telling a fearful patient that the world is beautiful and worth any. effort to get back into it. Steve and Adam are thrilled to learn that Cedars has been the recipient of the Levy Grant for expansion of hospital property. But they have learned, as they report to Ed, that the land they were hoping to build the new research facility on, the land immediately adjacent to the hospital, has been purchased by Dr. Justin Marler. Both Adam and Steve feel that Justin is expanding a power base at Cedars and the land purchase is just one more block in Justin’s power play. When Ed asks Marler why he purchased this particular parcel of land, Marler explains that he bought it with the express intention of someday building his own offices and facilities convenient to the major facilities of Cedars. When the subject of the hospital’s needing the land arises, Marler meets with Adam, and they agree that he should realize a fair profit from his property and that an unbiased assessor should be engaged to evaluate the market value of the land so they can agree on a selling price. When Sarah comments on the fact that Marler is to realize a profit on the land, he bitterly replies that no matter what he’s done since coming to Cedars to prove that he has changed. since she last knew him, she refuses to see him as anything but what he was all those years ago. Sarah insists this isn’t true. But Marler then calls Adam for a meeting and informs him that the land is not for sale at any price. As Adam begins to grow alarmed, Marler continues that the site for the new building will be his personal donation to the hospital. As Adam expresses profuse thanks and appreciation, Marler wryly notes that the tax deductions he’ll realize on this contribution to a charitable institution will benefit himself almost as much as Cedars. When Steve Jackson learns that Marler is to be elected head of the research wing that will be built on his property, he expresses the conviction that this was the exact intention of the gift. Adam, however, assures Steve that the donation wasn’t a factor in the hospital  board’s decision, they were concerned only with Dr. Marler’s reputation as a doctor. | After lengthy consultations and meetings. with the hospital  staff, Ed assured by the head nurse that her nurses performed commendably despite the added pressure of the train wreck, presents his findings to the hospital review board. Steve arrives at two possible explanations for the facts. Either Grainger, more active than usual due to the previously delayed medication, reached for the writing pad and inadvertently disconnected the breathing tubes, or he was in a state of extreme upset because of the delayed medication and.in the excitement a surge of adrenalin within his system caused his brain aneurism to start hemorrhaging. " Upon learning that the review board has ruled out negligence in Grainger’s death, Ed tells Rita, who takes her first free breath in a long time. But Ed hasn’t thought to tell Rita that he’s been in touch with Grainger’s attorney, Mr. Schafer, who, knowing that a woman was at the base of Grainger’s investigation, is coming to Springfield to try to find out who the woman - was who walked out on Grainger when he collapsed —in the restaurant. Peggy, learning that Rita’s “forgetting” to deliver Holly’s message was instrumental in their divorce ‘being finalized, tells Ed that Holly wanted to reach him to stop the divorce. Immediately after, Peggy is torn by doubts, wondering if she did the right thing.She confides in Barbara, who then discusses the situation with Ed. He tells her he and Holly have discovered a new closeness now that they are building their separate lives. Barbara quickly contradicts him: Holly is not building a new life. Barbara gently cautions Ed, saying, “People change, feelings change, and what seems right now may not be right a year from now. No decision is irrevocable.” Ed agrees with this. Now that Ben has declared his love for her, Hope finds herself apprehensive, fearing that she might be making a mistake, as she did a few years ago, when she was sure she was in love with her college professor. Explaining that she doesn’t want to make another mistake, she asks Ben to be patient, and he agrees. When Mike expresses his disapproval of Ben’s overstated independence, his need to be beholden to no one, Hope quickly jumps to Ben’s defense, and Mike apologizes. But Ben, surprisingly, accepts Mike’s assessment as constructive criticism. Later Hope, examining her feelings and desires, tells Ben she does love him and wants to belong to him. Later that evening, after they’ve made love, Ben asks Hope to marry him.And, delighted, she replies that she will. At Hope’s instigation, Bert has a family dinner to which Ben is invited, and Hope announces their intention to marry over glasses of wine. Mike politely offers best wishes while Bert thrills the couple with her offer to' make a Christmas wedding for them. Bert later tells Mike he must accept this engagement with good spirits for Hope, and later, seeing the joy she’s feeling, he gives his daughter his approval. But Ben finds another problem on his very own doorstep: his brother Jerry, who announces he’s left home after several bad fights with their parents. He refuses to tell Ben what they were fighting about. As Ben is showering, Jerry borrows his car and goes out for an hour. The phone rings, but Ben can’t hear it. Shortly after, two uniformed officers visit Mike at home to tell him that his late wife’s car has been involved in a delicatessen robbery earlier in the evening. Since Ben bought Leslie’s car, Mike accompanies the officers to Ben’s apartment. Ben curtly informs the police that he had nothing to do with the robbery and makes it clear that he feels they wouldn’t be there if he didn’t have a record and that his exoneration doesn’t prevent his being hassled like any ex-con,as they tell him he has to go to the police station for questioning. Hope tells Ben she called him earlier, and when he replies that he must have been in the shower, she accepts his word unhesitatingly.Jerry finally returns to Ben’s place and under questioning from Ben admits that he robbed the store,explaining that he has debts. Ben is now in a quandary,as he feels he must protect his brother but doesn’t want to be unfair to Hope. He tries to ease the situation by withdrawing $185 from the joint checking account he opened with Hope and repaying the delicatessen owner. He then sends Jerry out of town to stay with a friend. His relief at having solved the problem is short-lived, however, when Mike informs him that, despite the reparations, the robbery was a felony and the police will continue to investigate. Hope is badly upset to learn while making a deposit that Ben withdrew’a sum which Mike tells her is equal to the amount stolen. This shakes her belief that he _was really home when she called, and she goes to him, asking for an answer to put her mind at rest. Ben can’t betray Jerry and asks Hope to trust him, promising she will have the whole story eventually. But Hope can’t accept this; she needs complete honesty and openness in her relationship and without it cannot goon. She painfully tells her father that the wedding is off despite her love for Ben, and tells Bert to stop preparations. Mike goes to Ben, reminding him that half the money in the account is Hope’s and she has the right to an answer. But Ben won’t say any more and refuses Mike’s offer to represent him legally, again stating that he doesn’t need a lawyer, because he’s done nothing wrong.     
    • And not since. I recall it was quite small for a house that size. And I don't know why you would walk down a narrow corridor to get to the main living area. I hate when the sets on soaps don't have a logical layout! As for Andre his clothing is fashion forward and suitable for his character.He ain't gonna wear no blazer!
    • The last I remember seeing Ben, he was divorcing Amanda. He came to tell Evie that he still loved her, but was leaving town so that Amanda wouldn't blame Evie for his divorcing her. I'm not exactly sure when, but Evie doesn't leave town until sometime after Nola and Quint's engagement ball. I'm not sure if she leaves before or after Justin leaves in Sept(?) of '83. I grew to like Helena when she became friends with Vanessa, once she's edging her way out of Quint's life.
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy