Jump to content

AMC: A New Interview


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Count me in as one of the people who were close to tuning out during the early 2003 period. Horrible, horrible time for the show. That's why McTavish's return was almost miraculous for a couple of months.

Daddario seems like a nice girl in the interview. They could have done a lot with her character had she been gradually featured on the show, but it seemed like no time before JR and Laurie were running the show. Of that teen set, the only one I really, really liked was the delightful Amanda Seyfried as Joni. It's awesome to see her career grow with each month!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I took a look at some of the other interviews, and I have to say, TC Warner just seems awesome. Of course, I wasn't watching the show at that time, but I'm more intrigued with the character of Kelsey now than I've ever been. I want to see her crashing Noah and Julia's wedding!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Laurie was like the worst character...ever! I know Frons gets a lot of the blame for pushing the younger characters during that time (and he did mandate for 'younger characters' to be featured more), but Gordon Rayfield seriously loved that character...inexplicably. Alexandra talked about how she first came on the show as a dayplayer (JR's prom date). Gordon had written that breakdown and had an affinity for her right off the bat and suggested later that she come back in a recurring capacity. And of course, he took over and made it the freakin' JR and Laurie hour.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Damn right--it's easy to forget now, and I do think AMC was heading in a better direction when Anna Casio (sp?) became co-headwriter, but the very week Megan was officially back was such a great change from the Rayfield stuff. her first episode back was a 4th of July one and suddenly we saw CORE families again--just small basic things that had been forgotten

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Shh....you don't want to get bashed for...you know...actually having a positive opinion dealing with Megan McTavish.

Every now and then, I look for this episode from late 2003 that I have on tape in which Tad comes home and finds then-nuJamie (Bruening) in the midst of a big old party, and so Tad and Joe clean it all up afterwards and talk about how Tad's going to have the same problems raising a teenage Jamie that Ruth and Joe had had raising a teenage Tad. It was a great episode! And if I'm not mistaken, Christmas 2003 was the last time the Martin home has been shown...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The Martin home *cries* Oh I'm already known on here for being more positive towards "McTrash" than most would like :P (and believe me I don't have blinders when it comes to her)

I actually remember that episode. Even when the show started to improve under Casio with Rayfield they still were sorely lacking when it came to families or havign new characters interact and connected--McT was smart to basically just refocus all that--somethign every soap scribe should know to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The reason I feel like VOMITTING just a little bit when I see people keep saying McTravesty turned AMC around in 2003 -- is because it's true. Raping Bianca right off the bat turned this show around alright... turned it around into one of the most dark, the most depressing and the most miserable "soap escape" on ABC. Yeah, Rayfield's version sucked ass, but with the addition of Cascio, I was in no hurry for Megan to come in. After a kick ass May sweeps in 2003, I was optimistic to see what R&C would do... and then I had to spend my summer watching Bianca get raped, impregnated and become a dark and depressing character.

Back on topic, I didn't enjoy the Laurie character. I thought Doug Lewis was... weird. The storyline was written oddly, in my opinion. I know it was supposed to be this teenager forced into becoming an adult and taking care of her drunken father after her mother passed away, but it almost always came across incestuous. It would've worked better if Laurie came off as the parent and Doug was the impossible teenager -- but instead it just came off as Laurie the geisha girl frightened into pleasing her alcoholic father... in curious ways. Plus, she was too green to deliver a storyline like that. It also didn't help, in my opinion, that she spent her time with that horribly miscast (to put it nicely) Andrew Riddings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I agree. Especially after SilkPress got back to her apartment and started to mock Nicole. Her dislike for Nicole and seeing her as a threat to her getting Teddy Bear is growing worse. So I could see her pulling a kidnapping on Nicole at some point. If anything she was going there to poke the bear and got pressed (pun unintended) when the bear gathered her.   Completely understandable. 
    • Beyond The Underwear Oops I mean Gates!

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I swear this entire time I thought Roman knew about the Phillip/Vivian letter lol.  I do like how mature Roman/Kate are as a couple.  It makes me sad the new writers never got a chance to write for John/Marlena. I agree with @AbcNbc247 that the Felicity stuff is a bit after school special-y.  I am pretty sure that (most) of the viewing audience is aware that a grown man should not be shouting at any teenage girl especially one with disabilities.  Just let Xander apologize and move on. Linsey Godfrey was in her Sarah baby voice mode today and it irritates me to no end.   I know it's a cutesy thing her and Xander do but it's annoying. Bringing Kevin back is strange, but I do like the use of history.  I do think Rex probably could have been used instead, but whatever.  I don't care about Rex much either lol.
    • I mean over the past decades. But I do agree that in recent years now, the writing is not working for them as well as it used to then. It's same old, same old...which is what made the Damian storyline refreshing. At least for me.   
    • Did Denise give any interviews where she talked about her first few years on GH... '73-75? I wonder if she had any regrets leaving Days for GH, as from what I've read, the show was in the dumps writing-wise, so am thinking she didn't have great story? Any Leslie story highlights I've seen always start with '76, after Gloria Monty took charge.
    • I know! It's like second verse, here we go again!  Agreed. Certainly there was concern maybe even fear at the highest levels for the very good reason that what they had was so economically successful, so of course this risk was scary but if anyone was brave she was. Yes, he was. I have seen her associated with getting it on the air one other place but no details nor official title. Not the writer or creator so it made me wonder if she functioned as a kind of uncredited ad hoc producer, but then maybe she just supported it. At any rate that is nothing but supposition on my part. No data! Yes, not a surprise anymore but still so frustrating! On one hand I am appreciative that she is included in this book, but scholarship where are you?!
    • that wasnt her point. She wanted to further demonize Ted; that was the main focus of their talk. She wants to ensure that Nicole leaves him so that he's free and single to be with her. At this point, I dont think she really cares what Nicole thinks of her; she just wants her out of the way Eva is Nicole's stepdaughter and is a Dupree by association. If Nicole takes Ted back then its reasonable that she would accept his daughter and i that happens, Eva will have welcomed to their country club, be invited to their parties, have access to their resources, etc....much like Andre whom also isnt a blood Dupree but is accepted by them via Nicole. Eva got what she got from Anita bc of Hayley. I think its important to remember that context bc they just dealt with an interloper that infiltrated their ranks and hurt her daughter in the worse way. Now you have another unfortunate girl positioned to do the same to her other daughter. The feelings are still too fresh and she doesnt want Eva to get the idea that she would ever be allowed the opportunity to play them again
    • Oh I've seem this! That's part of why I'm curious! The show could put EastEnders to shame on the gangster Aspect! Oh I've seem this! That's part of why I'm curious! The show could put EastEnders to shame on the gangster Aspect!
    • Eve was one of those characters that had the "Jessie Brewer"role. They had heavy storyline, they burned through it and now they are there for support and a touchstone in the community (Marland wanted to give Jessie story, but I agree with Monty...she best served in her connecting role, and keeping that damn Amy Vining busy so she keeps her nose out of things) So charcters are important and why they should have kept characters like Bridget around (even as she is more volatiles then Eve) who didnt need a big storyline but could have been behind the bar making connections and expostion, but Rauch wanted JEVA/JEVA/JEVA and DRAMA (which to him meant a lot of yelling and stupidity.)
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy