Jump to content

Loving/The City Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Lemay's gripe was that all the characters were living in the same situation and that there was no real diversity in the living situation. Without a multigenerational element, he argued that an array of conflicts were being overlooked. I wouldn't say he was wrong. I don't get any sense of generational feel in terms of story or type of story. I acquired quite a bit of "The City" recently. Even in stuff where there are clear generations (the dueling paternity reveals of Zoe and Richard / the Roberts family secret) there is just something that is off. In the case of story number one, a lot of the adult story with Nick / Sydney / Lorraine / Jared feels secondary to Zoe and Richard's romance. It doesn't help that Joel Fabiani is so campy in the role that Jared is a non-entity. I also don't get any sense that the adults are experiencing stories differently from the younger characters. In the case of story number two, the parents are paper thin which is ashame because there is definitely mileage in that story if it wasn't being presented as if it was scripted for a mid-1990s talk show. 

The idea of a created family is interesting, but I don't think the show really invested in that concept enough.

I will say, rewatching the reveal of Gwyn as the killer, the confrontation between Angie and Lorraine holds my interest as much as Gwyn's confession and certainly more than the cop shop scenes. 

@DRW50 Thanks for the foreshadowing video. My thoughts on the serial killer plot are pretty well known so I won't rehash that too much. I will say I am curious when the writing team knew they were going to go that route. Some of the material, in my opinion, is a stretch on foreshadowing. The Stacey/Buck/Tess material was so thin after Nixon left because she had made that story so plot heavy that Laurie McCarthy and Addie Walsh fumbled it because they had no clue where to take that group next especially when they dropped Janie. I don't think Tess worked with any writer other than Nixon. Her dealing tarot seems to be about as interesting as anything Tess had in the final half of 1994. Buck and Stacey talking about Deborah of all people shows how little material they have. I also think that Gwyn as a psychologist is odd, but her "I've been taking courses for a while" is even more so. 

Having watched a bit of "The City" recently I've noticed that Brown and Essensten are decent at pulling random threads together to build cohesion when it shouldn't be there. In early May 1996, Buck dates some random art gallery owner who is later revealed to be an FBI agent in the mob story with the Soleitos. I don;t think that was the intention when she was introduced. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Members

For PRIDE in my forum I did a rather good (if I do say so myself) write-up of the Azure C storyline on THE CITY, which was the first transgender storyline in a daytime soap. 

As early as 1976 Linda Gray played a trans woman in ALL THAT GLITTERS but that's a primetime satirical soap so we don't count that. 

Anyway, because of PRIDE both were fresh in my mind. 

Last week Jeffrey Carlson's death was announced. Awful that he was so young, just 48. But the headline touted his playing the first transgender character in a daytime soap, Zoe/Zarf on AMC

Good grief. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No. I have no idea who that is. Now I'm worried. Guess I'd better go see what he had to say about it. WOW. I think I'd better pull that. My story sounds too much like his story. YIKES. I've never read his story before. Thnks for the heads up. I'll just do a total rewrite of Azure C. Suddenly I feel sorry for people who've been accused of plagiarizing who say they are innocent!! 

Edited by Donna L. Bridges
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You copied and pasted the blog. You reworded a few things, but you didn't take out the caption in your second paragraph referencing the picture included in the original blog about Tess wearing the tiara. 

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm curious as to what some of you think of this idea. Since the serial killer storyline was so successful and boosted the ratings, do you think Brown and Essensten may have been better off staying in Corinth and repopulating the show with new characters in addition to the ones they kept versus spinning them off into The City. I'm just wondering if they lost some momentum by starting a "new" show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think you're onto something there. Of course it wasn't as if B&E had that option. Other people had made the decision to end LOVING & begin THE CITY. But there is such a history of network's being more afraid to start a new show than just about anything else. There is reason, though. US Daytime has produced 84 TV soaps. A whole lot of them failed with less than 6 yrs on the air. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy