Jump to content

Y&R: Week of April 28, 2008


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Well yeah, but I was speaking of Y&R's MIA children (Kyle, Scott, Kate...)

Look at OLTL, that's how its done.

I'm not disputing that.

I agree that Jess Walton needs a lead storyline, but something trivial as an ancient feud just ain't it. Walton is a formidable actress and deserves something better. I want to see Jill in an original storyline, that doesn't involve alcoholism, or plain old bitchery. That is played out now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

And look at OLTL's ratings. Bottom of the barrel.

Regardless of how well that sort of propping is done...it's still propping and it appears that daytime viewers aren't interested in the 'new generation'...audiences appear to hunger for the characters they love, not new characters like Kyle Jenkins, Scott Granger or Kate Valentine, they're children or teens...I will never believe that displaying 'young' characters is the answer to daytime's woes. Y&R and B&B have remained as stable as they have because they've maintained their veteran casts. To tamper with this formula would be disastrous. Take a look at ABC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You need to establish history between the young and older generation because that's the only way things are going to work out down the road. That's kind of why I like Amber and Kay on Y&R, cross-generation relationships.

As for OLTL ratings, it means nothing. Y&R was the number one rated soap in 2007, but the same could not be said for its "quality."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree that they need to fit the younger generation in with the old. But the younger generation to me is weak. Why are the older generation are playing supporting roles to the weaker young generation. They should give the talent older generation storyline & weave in the younger generation into it. I think that's why people liked Amber because she became part of Katherine storyline. That's why people paid attention to Vikki & nick because they weave into the older people storyline.

Why Jill & Katherine are playing supporting roles to a weak CKLily.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The problem is not that young characters in and of themselves are weak and unable to draw viewers...the problem is that WEAKLY WRITTEN young characters whom neither younger or older viewers can identify with coupled with casting poor actors to play the roles turns viewers off. Historically, the most successful daytime drama in terms of both quality and popularity are those that make good use of multigenerational storytelling....because that is something that the audience can identify with. Teens and for the most part twenty somethings don't identify with teenagers who have already been married multiple times, are longing to have children and/or hae already suffered multiple miscarriages, are already running million-dollar companies, and/or are battling the mob, etc.

AMC and Y&R in the early days were such smash hits BECAUSE of the facts that the young and the more mature got equal screen time, and in stories that intersected and intertwined. This is what daytime needs to get back to...and eventually if you have characters that have been on the canvas for ten or twenty years or more, often times there comes a time where they will not be the absolute most prominent position storywise, but they should not be seen as material to prop others, yet anchoring young and/or new characters is essential to the basic daytime soap formula.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

To me they weakly writing these young characters because that's all these actors can handle. they cast these poor actors because They don't want to put brain power behind a good storyline for them. I really believe these writers are out of touch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

ITA and have said so myself in the past.

Again, the really good Y&R was when Colleen (Lyndsy Fonseca) dated JT, Mac/Billy hated then loved each other (although the recasts were weak and Ashley Bashioum was marginally better than Christel), and Lily/Daniel (up until the marriage). Although the Cassie storyline was riveting and played out incredibly, if she remained on the canvas, there would be an opportunity to write these quality teen storylines, especially with Camryn in the center.

But Y&R's so broken down that building a strong teen base again is the least of their worries. They need to strengthen what they got at this point. I guess the main problem with these writers is that they're writing apathetically. Otherwise, they'd use each character with vigor and a sense of direction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

AshBash had that tough homeless street girl thing down - but the char changed and i dont thinka shbash ever did. and idk if thats good or not. it can go both ways.

KK had mac in love and the im a pretty pretty princess thing down.

ashbash's return was rather lackluster, IMHO.

rachel kimsey has the ebst of them all. they never gave her anything to act out that was anything like when mac first came on - but i could picture her playing tough if it was ever needed. i bought her falling in love. and she had the rich bitch thing down when it needed to be pulled.

i would love ashback, rachel, or someone new as mac. mac is needed... esp with colleen being lame and victoria gone. this show has no oung heroine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I could do without Mac, personally. I didn't mind AshBash so much, mainly because she didn't matter as much. She was featured alongside stories like Phyllis vs. Diane and the return of Matt and Tricia's descent into madness. There was so much stuff going on! Right now, though, Lily's story feels like a main event alongside three others featuring the same gang, and that's why its weaknesses stand out. Personally, I cannot WAIT for Chloe to come back.

Does anybody remember, back in the dark days of LML, Cane making a phone call right around the time he first joined CI? "I'm in. They bought it hook, line and sinker." I just do not understand why Y&R haven't followed through on this. A potentially great SL for JC, JW and DG.

P.S.: JP, what is R.O.W.N.?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This is also right up CKLily ally too. She always getting hurt by the guys she loves. & Cane shouldn't be no different. The problem with how they write CKLily is she always in the mode woe is me. She never stands up for herself. & this miscarriage is just going to be another woe is me that I'm going to self destruct to have another woe is me. Why I am the victim?

Personally I'm know I'm tired of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Kelli Giddish (Di Henry, AMC) has been reinstated as a regular in her popular role on Law & Order: SVU after a few seasons off.
    • I really like Paul Telfer a lot.   But I loathe Xander!
    • OK. No harm done. Agree to disagree... (Even thought I'm not sure about what...

      Please register in order to view this content

      ) Anyways... I did really feel disgusted by Eurovision this year and I doubt I'll watch this horrific musical torture in the future. My ears and my psyche will not survive.  
    • Regarding the mobster storyline: The scripts, the cardroom set, and the writing for Joey -- are all terrible. They seem to be writing a realistic depiction of compulsive gambling as an addiction, showing that it pops into his head all the time -- it has become hardwired into his brain.  The APA (American Psychological Association) describes compulsive gambling as having a similar effect on the physical brain as drug and alcohol addiction. https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/07/how-gambling-affects-the-brain I think Jason Graham (Doug) is doing an adequate job playing Doug as a compulsive gambler, with the thoughts/urges coming into his head all the time, and being unable to stop. However, the cardroom set is awful and the mobster storyline is a bad cliché, so it's all so uninteresting to watch. I think Mr. Graham is doing the best he can with the crap they gave him to work with. If anyone reading or watching has a gambling issue, check out Gamblers Anonymous.  They have many types of meetings -- in-person, online, video, audio, etc.  They also have resources for friends/family of compulsive gamblers.
    • Today was painful (especially for Philip).  I still feel for Xander. He was clear he was happy sharing and working with Philip. It's just one more betrayal from someone he loved. Going back to last year when he found out about Victor and Fiona, then Alex and Philip. He forgave and tried. Then Philip went behind his back again. He's been walking on the edge for weeks. This is a man who was abused, neglected and has never had any therapy for his horrific past. He has zero coping skills because he's never learned them. I hate this but I refuse to hate Xander
    • Lucy Coe wasn't even this big of a whore. 
    • Kate being the one that Alex called was a nice surprise. The cut to her looking all sheek made me instantly get excited for her to get back into business mode. And the Jack reference from when she first came to town (on-screen) was inserted naturally which is always welcome. When they were talking about how much sex sells, I almost got the impression they were sizing each other up in a May/December type of way.  All the Philip stuff was gruesome. I'm happy the show isn't shying away from Xander's ugliness. I love them both, and it just makes me intrigued for the aftermath for it all to be taken seriously. I cheered when Philip spat out at that Sarah knew the truth. I'm on tenterhooks for their eventual confrontation. I was surprised that Kate wasn't a little vicious towards Sarah for Xander's obvious behavior, but maybe that's still to come. How wonderfully entangled is it that both Philip and Shawn/Steve stopped each other from getting the drug. Both equally at fault. Who/what will ultimately save Bo? And with everything going on, is a Salem where it's looking likely that EJ is about to own the hospital imminent?  
    • Oddly.. Chase and Steve seem to have both vanished from the canvas in December so the Estelle return loses impact when two of her kids stop appearing shortly after her return (and I assume TR leaves in early 1986 as well). The Steve recast doesn't work... but it's odd that he has a long scene with Teri with Cagney looking jealous.. when the majority of his time on the show previously was a relationship and engagement to Stephanie (who he barely has a scene with in the episodes I see). Your idea for Wendy/Bela/Stephanie sounds just like what Ryan's Hope did with Michael/Kim/Rae... and considering Louise Shaffer was playing Rae and Stephanie.. it would have been a lousy redux of a superior story on another soap (that had months of build-up) I think Quinn becoming assistant to Stephanie was Mayer/Braxton... but not 100 % sure. I don't know if Mayer/Braxton was setting up Sarah as a bad girl disguised as a good girl.. but the actress (Joyner) was playing the scenes in that manner.. and Tomlin wisely tapped into that when he took over.  
    • She’s such a caricature - which is a shame because I think the actress is capable of so much more.   I don’t know why Cady often feels like she has overcompensated in her performances. She already proved she can play much more than just Dixie Cooley during her first stint at ATWT (her best acting era). Her performances in various roles since then have been quite strange at times.
    • It feels like the show suddenly woke up today and remembered it was Sweeps month. Lots of action and forward momentum, including a delicious Nina/Carly fight. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy