Jump to content

March 31 - April 4, 2008


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

This is a very interesting discussion. That's why I like SON.

But unlike a lot of the posters on this site, I'm not an industry insider or someone who knows everything about what goes on behind the scenes, etc. I'm not a soap historian. I'm just a plain ole' soap opera fan. And my love for soaps hasn't diminished. I love everything about the genre. I hope they don't disappear. Soaps are a mixed bag though, I've yet to see one that is perfectly written. And I've been watching them steadily since 1978. There's always clunky stories or storylines that make no sense, poor dialogue at times, characters that get on my nerves, unrealistic timelines, etc.

I'm also a realist too. Things in life come and go. Soaps may be on the way out. Am I upset? Not anymore than when other things I've love have disappeared. It happens. That's life. One night when I was really, really bored and couldn't go to sleep, I went through the ratings archive here. It looks to me that soaps have been on a downward trend for years. The ratings way back in the 70's and 80's were amazing. But I think with the introduction of cable TV, people having to work two jobs to make ends meet, the internet, home video, etc. that viewing habits have changed.

I'll share something here -- a few years ago, I had to take care of my father during his last months on this earth. It was tough, excruciating, sad -- everything you can imagine as awful when watching someone you love die in from you your eyes and being powerless to do anything about it. Wanna know what helped me keep my sanity during that time? My soap. I won't name it because I don't want to argue about how bad some people think it is. I love it though and I think that's what matters to me. And although the storyline was stupid at the time during my dad's illness, I swear, I looked so forward to turning on the TV at 1pm in the afternoon to escape from the hell that filled my home. It gave me a welcome respite. And I'll always be grateful for that.

I'm not so sure that soaps have become more horrific than they've ever been. I still love my soap. And perhaps I'm considered a moronic boob for loving it, for being passionate about my favorite characters, but so be it! Maybe I'm the one who is killing soaps since I belong to a fanbase. I travel to fan events, read up what's happening on the show storywise, surf sites like this one and watch my show religiously through the bad and good because quite frankly I'm enjoying myself. I thought that is what soaps were all about -- enjoying yourself, getting an hour of escape and getting a little rest and relaxation from the real world.

I do agree with the opinion that if people don't like what they are seeing on screen, they have zero obligation to watch the show. It's up to the show's producers to figure out how to get and keep an audience. It's not up to the audience to save a show if they think it stinks. I know if I don't like a show, if it's getting on my last nerve, I won't watch it anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 171
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Wow. SON is on fire with this thread! Wiccachick's post reads like a strategy proposal to TPTB at the networks. They need to *take notes* on that post ASAP! I would add that if TIIC rely on live ratings so much, they should consider scheduling soaps between 4-8pm when more people have a chance to watch (but that's just my personal beef).

Secondly, KSlater really summed up the magic and durability of the soap genre and why they hook us, even now. I'm glad your show was "there" for you when your father was so dreadfully ill, KSlater.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's good to be back Scotty. I don't visit boards as much as I used too. I am busy writing two online soap operas and working on my history board SoapsWEB - those take a lot of time now.

Plus I am in sort of a relationship. WE don't love each other or anything but we are living together and partners now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

In talking about soaps dying - soaps are not dying. The soap opera genre is still alive and well on television. Nearly 75% of the primetime shows now have a soap operaish feel to them or some type of serial storyline in them that carried through.

Foreign soaps are alive and well.

Two of the big reasons for this is that the nighttime shows still embrace some of the old basic ideas of soaps. They also keep the key components of the story and the show front and center all the time. Foreign soaps don't treat their audience like idiots either. Shows like Coronation Street embrace all ages and show a balance in the storytelling. They also don't feel that every actor on the show has to be a model. They have characters who look like people you see and meet in your everyday life.

They don't have SORASing - children grow up in real time. They are true soap operas and true slice of life dramas for the most part.

Daytime soaps are dying though and we are watching them everyday die a slow agonizing death unfortunately. In the end there are going to be a lot of reasons that they died. TPTB will have to take a huge part of the blame but we as fans will have to take part of the blame too.

When you take and look at the changes made in soap operas over the years one of the biggest things that changed was fans.

Fans used to be fans of the characters and not the actors. Now many actors are households names due to their soap fans.

Fans used to love the show and not just a small segment of the show. Fans now latch on to certain characters or couples and push the agenda of their fave often times at the detriment of the show as a whole.

Fans are not more vocal than they used to be but they are more vocal about more specific issues esp. in regards to their faves. Fans have always written the shows but now it is more in regards to their fave than the show as a whole.

Fans also have attached certain actors to roles and label anyway else a fake or a faux. Recasts have always been a common part of daytime soap operas and the replacements were never labeld faux or fake. The character remained the same just with a new face. That doesn't happen today. In 38 years I have seen some very big shoes filled (i.e. Robin Strasser on AW; Jacqueline Courtney on AW; Gillian Spencer on OLTL; Nancy Pinkerton on OLTL; Jada Rowland on SS; Lynne Adams on GL; William Gray Espy on Y&R; Terry Lester on Y&R; and many others). Those replacements were never labeled fauxRachel - fauxVicki - fauxAlice - etc. They were just Rachel, or Vicki or Alice or Jack, etc.

Sadly many of these things fans demand and sadly TPTB listen to them. Proof being the ABC campaigns that the real Greenlee was back (makes me puke when I think about it). They listen to those groups that push their faves and they do whatever they can to keep those faves front and center thinking that is what all the fans want.

All these things have helped to lead to the impending death of the daytime soap opera. In the end we all share blame, but one thing that fans will not share the blame in is causing the death by not watching.

That ultimately is TPTB's fault. If a fan quits because the show has just gotten so bad - fans don't have an obligation to watch. It is the shows obligation to make the "right" changes in order to win that fan back. He owes that show nothing.

Notice I said "right" in quotes. Sometimes we as fans quit over stupid issues such as our fave not being on 7 days a week or them not getting the sheet set we sent in or not getting the love scene we requested, etc. Although those are important reasons to some fans - they are not ultimately the be all and end all to the best of the show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thank you for the wonderful compliment. I'm just a boring accountant and I don't profess to be the grand poobah of marketing but you would assume that thinking outside of the same tired old box would be on the table IF and I mean IF they are committed to daytime drama programming to continue.

KSlater- I am so happy that you had your soap to help you through such a tough time. That gives me a warm fuzzy about the genre that I love so much. That's what people need from their soap. Earlier in this thread someone asked me what my fascination with ABC soaps are and I think you hit it on the head. I have "known" Alan Quartermaine, Erica Kane, and Vicki Buchanan all my life. I find it comforting to have them around and that's the only reason I can't seem to throw in the towel completely. It's why I still care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Interesting. The only soap I watch at all anymore is AMC (semi-regularly) and that's only for Jesse/Angie. I watched AMC and OLTL for more than 20 years and as I read through this thread it's become clear to me how much I really have given up on soaps overall. I see these impassioned pleas on how to save soaps and it makes me realize that somewhere along the way I stopped caring about them the way I used to. I guess it's the trust issue that somebody brought up upthread. After years of watching my favorite shows turn into jokes, I've kind of lost the will to fight for them. Call it Battered Viewer's Syndrome. Of course it doesn't help that my shows are on ABC, by far the most abusive network of the bunch. Honestly if AMC or OLTL got cancelled tomorrow I wouldn't lift a finger. (I'm not trying to start anything. This is more a realization on my part.)

Now that is vastly different from the way I reacted when I heard Friday Night Lights was going to be cancelled. I called, wrote, donated money to the fan campaign, signed online petitions, the whole shebang. (And we got a season three!) But how did I grow to care more about a show that's been on for two seasons than ones I've watched for 20 years? Or I guess a better question is: how did those shows manage to beat the loyalty out of me? Because looking at the numbers, it obviously isn't just me.

Of course I still care enough to post on soap boards so I guess that's something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I calculated the percentages of viewers that watch these shows. It's interesting to see how many men actually watch Y&R -- it's significantly more than the number of women 18-49...

The Young and the Restless -- Men 18+: 27%; Women 18-49: 21%

The Bold and the Beautiful -- Men 18+: 25%; Women 18-49: 23%

General Hospital -- Men 18+: 18%; Women 18-49: 35%

Days of our Lives -- Men 18+: 20%; Women 18-49: 34%

As the World Turns -- Men 18+: 24%; Women 18-49: 27%

One Life to Live -- Men 18+: 18%; Women 18-49: 34%

All My Children -- Men 18+: 20%; Women 18-49: 32%

Guiding Light -- Men 18+: 23%; Women 18-49: 30%

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

MONDAY, MARCH 31

1.(1) Y&R: Monday: 4.0/5,496,000 (+99,000)

2.(2) B&B: Monday: 2.8/3,794,000 (-332,000)

3.(5) GH: Monday: 2.3/3,217,000 (+407,000)

4.(4) DAYS: Monday: 2.2/3,035,000 (+195,000)

5.(3) ATWT: Monday: 2.2/3,012,000 (-139,000)

6.(8) OLTL: Monday: 2.0/2,763,000 (+481,000)

7.(7) AMC: Monday: 2.0/2,674,000 (+347,000)

8.(6) GL: Monday: 1.8/2,498,000 (+216,0000

TUESDAY, APRIL 1

1.(1) Y&R: Tuesday: 3.8/5,289,000 (-207,000)

2.(2) B&B: Tuesday: 2.7/3,735,000 (-59,000)

3.(3) GH: Tuesday: 2.2/2,961,000 (-256,000)

4.(5) ATWT: Tuesday: 2.1/2,721,000 (-291,000)

5.(4) DAYS: Tuesday: 2.0/2,654,000 (-381,000)

6.(6) OLTL: Tuesday: 2.0/2,523,000 (-240,000)

7.(7) AMC: Tuesday: 1.9/2,519,000 (-155,000)

8.(8) GL: Tuesday: 1.7/2,209,000 (-289,000)

WEDNESDAY, APRIL 2

1.(1) Y&R: Wednesday: 3.7/5,105,000 (-184,000)

2.(2) B&B: Wednesday: 2.6/3,722,000 (-13,000)

3.(4) ATWT: Wednesday: 2.1/2,845,000 (+124,000)

4.(5) DAYS: Wednesday: 2.1/2,842,000 (+188,000)

5.(3) GH: Wednesday: 2.0/2,566,000 (-395,000)

6.(7) AMC: Wednesday: 1.9/2,426,000 (-93,000)

7.(8) GL: Wednesday: 1.7/2,421,000 (+212,000)

8.(6) OLTL: Wednesday: 1.8/2,263,000 (-260,000)

THURSDAY, APRIL 3

1.(1) Y&R: Thursday: 3.6/4,951,000 (-154,000)

2.(2) B&B: Thursday: 2.6/3,655,000 (-67,000)

3.(4) DAYS: Thursday: 2.2/3,026,000 (+184,000)

4.(5) GH: Thursday: 2.0/2,725,000 (+159,000)

5.(3) ATWT: Thursday: 2.0/2,714,000 (-131,000)

6.(8) OLTL: Thursday: 1.7/2,298,000 (+35,000)

7.(7) GL: Thursday: 1.6/2,237,000 (-184,000)

8.(6) AMC: Thursday: 1.7/2,228,000 (-198,000)

FRIDAY, APRIL 4

1.(1) Y&R: Friday: 3.7/5,187,000 (+236,000)

2.(2) B&B: Friday: 2.5/3,425,000 (-230,000)

3.(4) GH: Friday: 2.1/2,740,000 (+15,000)

4.(5) ATWT: Friday: 2.0/2,684,000 (-30,000)

5.(3) DAYS: Friday: 1.9/2,557,000 (-469,000)

6.(6) OLTL: Friday: 1.9/2,223,000 (-75,000)

7.(8) AMC: Friday: 1.8/2,218,000 (-10,000)

8.(7) GL: Friday: 1.6/2,166,000 (-71,000)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This is another terrific post.

Let me also say that embedded in your post is sadness...of a lost love, so to speak...and so my sympathies go to you. I used to watch ABC shows, but I detached long ago (just because life took over)...so I've noted from a distance what a ruin they have become, but I haven't felt the emotional pain of it.

I think I'm still capable of loving the genre, and caring about it, because my one remaining show is Y&R. Even during the HELL of 2007, when LML had total control, my show was still in many ways my show. Sets were the same. Production values were high. Front burner characters were still mostly the vets I'd seen for 10-35 years. So I could still go "home".

I must confess, though, as LML made the show less and less close to what it was, I did begin to feel a kind of quiet desperation, and then anger, that even my show was in jeopardy.

I think, when Y&R finally fully jumps the shark--to the point that it can't come back, like so many of the other shows--I'll probably get to where you are. My trust violated, the object of my affection on "life support" (as Steve Frame conjured up), I'd leave the genre behind too.

Therein lies my deeper sadness, though. These soaps have been such an important throughline of continuity in a life that has taken me many places. When people were dying, or jobs or homes where changing, Genoa City was always there. I distinctly remember using Y&R to "clear my mind" on some of the worst days of my life.

Sure, other entertainment or distractions will come. But none of the other forms are "life long friends". And when life long friends pass on, they cannot be replaced.

Sad for all of us, that the caretakers of our "friends" have been so careless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I hadn't thought about it that way but you're right, it does make me sad. I remember how much these shows meant to me. I think all of us can come up with stories of how or love of soaps expressed itself in some amazing way. (I'm thinking back to an impromptu "return of Max Holden" party my college roommates and I held. We just ran through the apartment building knocking on doors saying "Max is back!!" By 2:00 we had 10 coeds in our apartment getting loaded on wine coolers. And no, nobody went to class. I'm still in touch with my former roommate (now a mother of two) and all we have to say is "Ooooh Maaaaxxx" with a breathy sigh and we share a smile.

I'm a born fangirl. Give me a show that affects me and I am THERE. I'm a Trekker, a Browncoat, a TenthWonder, a Buffyfan and a Panthers Rally Girl. I takes a lot for me to walk away, but I feel like I've been forced to walk away from soaps.

But, part of me really does feel like even if THESE PARTICULAR SOAPS fall by the wayside something will replace them. For example, I am really looking forward to Eden Riegel's web series Imaginary Bitches. It's not a soap - actually its a comedy - but it looks interesting to me. And that's more than I can say for OLTL or AMC outside of J&A.

Maybe "soaps" aren't dying. Maybe they're just finding their smaller, niche audiences.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No wonder viewership for soaps is down or for that matter viewership for TV is down as a whole.

A few months back in a TV interview Mary Beth Evans admitted she never watches Days (even when she is off) and said she didn't keep up with it when she was off the show.

Then over at Buddy TV, James Scott says this in an interview:

I never hear Interviewers ask this question of other stars. If the Days stars don't even watch TV or the soaps, I wonder how many of the others watch or don't watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Respectfully, I'm not sure that's fair. Who can blame any actor for wanting to put a big wall between their work life and their "real" life? Most of us can easily put our "day jobs" out of sight and out of mind. But when your day job (which may include 12 hour taping days often spent getting naked with your coworkers) also includes weekend promotional appearances and being interrupted by fans when you're playing with your kid in the park, is it really that surprising that soaps stars don't watch?

I worked in radio for ten years and I can tell you I NEVER listened to the station I was working for, when I was working there. It's just not the same when its your job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Nothing about Joss ever works. I can't blame them for trying a completely fresh approach for her, but she needs to be written out. 
    • Thanks @Paul Raven  Some of this sounds strong but it's all so heavy and some elements, like with Felicia and Charles, almost veer on parody. L&L seemed to always be a heavy show - did they ever even have comic relief moments? - but I do wonder if it all became too much for viewers.
    • It's a joke. If there's a way to put Joss into a WSB spy story that works, I haven't seen it. What they're doing is just ridiculous. Imagine trusting a huge operation to someone who "finished training" a month ago. I think they're trying to make this work by having a college-age agent be a part of the professor's class, etc. It might look acceptable on paper, but it doesn't work when you see it.
    • Monday, after the party, Leslie showed up at the Duprees. Martin was with everyone as they listened to her for a bit. Then Martin said he was needed at home.  Anita and Vernon knew he was upset and they were concerned. Vernon asked "Do you need Titus, or are you okay to drive?"  Martin said he was okay and left to drive himself home. Either Titus is a chauffeur or just some helpful all-around employee.
    • if only Dante had admitted to hating string instruments earlier....

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I know the other soaps talk about staff help who we never see (especially Y&R with all those ridiculous "Mrs. Martinez" mentions), but I wanted BTG to do better.
    • @Franko As requested 1976 story summary. I'll be posting it in parts as it is very lengthy  and probably too much to take in at once.  Since 1951 the story of the residents of the town ofRosehill, Love of Life, has revolved around the livesof Vanessa (Van) and Margaret (Meg) Dale and their families. ' Van, now married to Bruce Sterling, finds her husband has become mayor due to the death of the former mayor, Jeff Hart, who was her sister Meg’s husband. Meg offered her son Ben half a million dollars as a wedding gift to marry refined and responsible Betsy Crawford and thus abandon his playboy existence. The offer was so good that Ben married Betsy with alacrity despite the fact that he was already married to Arlene Lovett, a fact very few people knew. Arlene reluctantly agreed to the bigamous marriage on Ben’s assurance that as soon:as he had his hands on the money they would skip town. However, Meg decided Ben needed more time to become responsible for such a large sum of money and has held up the gift. Attorney Jamie Rollins has discovered discrepancies in Ben’s stories concerning his close friendship with Arlene but has been thwarted in his attempts to expose Ben by Ben and Arlene’s successful blackmail retaliation.They drugged him and took suggestive pictures of him in bed with Arlene, which they now threaten to show to Diana Lamont, Jamie’s lover, who is carrying his child. Knowing that Diana’s health and age make carrying this child dangerous to her, Jamie can do nothing. Ben is horrified to discover Betsy is now pregnant, too. Felicia Lamont, married to Diana’s ex-husband, Charles, has been unable to consummate her marriage due to extreme emotional frigidity. Charles has been exceedingly patient, but Felicia’s emotional torment has been increased by the constant harassment of hoodlum/rapist Arnie Logan, whose subtle terror campaign is apparent only to Felicia, thus making her appear to be emotionally unstable. Only Eddie Aleata, Meg’s ex-husband, seems aware of the tortures Felicia is undergoing. Caroline (Cal) Aleata, Meg’s daughter, is becoming romantically involved with Rick Lattimer, formerly married to Bruce’s daughter Barbara, to the dismay of his business partner in the Beaver Ridge Club, who has him earmarked as her latest lover—Cal’s mother, Meg! Realizing that she is an accomplice, albeit unwillingly,in her- husband Ben’s bigamy, Arlene Lovett (Harper) tells attorney Jamie Rollins that she and Ben were once married but divorced before his return to Rosehill. To: prove good faith, Arlene gives Jamie the negatives of compromising pictures of him with Arlene that Ben set up, hoping they could keep Jamie in line by threatening to send them to his wife-to-be, Diana Lamont, who at forty is pregnant for the first time, and thus vulnerable. Jamie finds Diana collapsed on the floor and rushes her to the hospital, where their son is born prematurely. Learning that Diana found a partially burned picture of him and Arlene in bed, Jamie blames himself. The baby, Adam Jonathan. Rollins, has respiratory problems and cannot be saved. Diana feels she has lost everything, recalling the picture as well as the baby. Di and Jamie start to make plans for the future. Then Dr. Albertson informs them that | more tests are necessary, as a shadow appeared on her final X-rays. Exploratory surgery is scheduled, and Diana is shattered to learn later that a hysterectomy was necessary. Ben again asks his mother when she’s going  to give the wedding present (Ben married Betsy Crawford because Meg promised a half million dollars, but she postponed the gift until Christmas, and still hasn’t delivered.) Betsy tells Meg she’s destroying Ben’s manhood by dangling the money in front of him. Learning that Ben is into Ray Slater, a gambler, for six thousand dollars, Meg withdraws her promise of the money. When Ray informs Ben that his loan, with interest, is now up to nine thousand dollars, Ben threatens to go to the police. Ray replies that it’s the money or Ben’s skin, and when Ben tries to slip out of town, he’s badly beaten by collection men and dumped in the snow. Found by two backpackers, Ben is taken to a small hospital with a skull fracture and pneumonia. Meg is stunned to discover that her partner in Beaver Ridge Club, Rick Latimer, whom she considers her private property, is in love with her daughter,Cal. Learning that Cal and Rick are planning a weekend together, Meg arranges an immediate audit of the Beaver Ridge books, keeping Rick in town. Meg’s plot backfires, however, when the audit reveals that Meg wrote the down payment for her next project, the Priestly Estate venture, on the Beaver Ridge construction account. Meg replaces the money, but Rick warns her to stop trying to run his life or he’ll press misappropriation charges. Felicia Lamonte has been harassed by a young hoodlum, Arnie Logan, who has served time for assault and rape. At her painting studio she is again accosted by Logan, and she pulls out her gun, scaring him off. Unable to reach her husband, Charles, she calls Edouard Aleata, who has reinterested her in painting, and he arrives with the police. Charles, finding Eddie there with Felicia, fuels his growing suspicion that there’s something other than friendship between them. Because he’s already jealous, Arnie’s new harassment—notes to Charles that Felicia is unfaithful seem believable. Felicia convinces Charles that a week apart will help their marriage, and in looking over her paintings, she realizes she has grown as a person and feels ready to be a woman. She calls Charles, telling him she no longer wants to be his child virgin bride, but a real wife to him. Later, hearing someone at the door, Felicia assumes it is Charles, and is grabbed by Arnie when she opens it. He drags her downstairs, but she manages to escape and get back to her studio and her gun. Hearing footsteps outside, she fires blindly. Cautiously,she then goes to the door to find Charles lying there. He is rushed to the hospital, where it is discovered that the bullet is lodged in his spine. He’ll recover, but will be paralyzed. Logan is picked up, and charges are confirmed when other victims come forward with similar stories STAY TUNED.MORE TO COME...
    • They've talked about having staff at the Dupree house, like Rowena the chef. I just don't think we've seen them.  
    • Really an excellent point. I'm worried about Derek but he's not working. The Duprees being too good somehow ... well, if they say it instead of be it, okay yes, I would worry but as long as they keep on being good, geeze, that's something to celebrate, not worry!!!  Party on?!
    • I blame Mitch.

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy