Jump to content

GL: Barbara Bloom's response


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 14
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I agree with Ms. Bloom's response to the complainers wholeheartedly. The bemoaning and complaining is quite nonproductive and endless. IMHO, GL has improved 1000% since day one when their new production format made its debut and I truly enjoy the changeover.

GL has improved in viewership (much higher than AMC & OLTL), 12-17 ratings, and 18-49 demo ratings despite of the time slot differences across the country.

A little note for GL, I enjoy Wes Ramsey's Sam today (bring him back), still hoping GL would cast Martha Madison as Marah, and give Reva/Billy more screentime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's good that people are complaining so they know what to fix. I see changes each week, positive changes. Now if they just hire a good writer and give that cast a much needed revamp all will be okay. Sam sticking around would be a good start for the younger characters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

GL viewers have reason to complain, not only does the new model have countless problems but the show is trash. I don't even think that the model will evolve - EW is probably thrilled with it and doesn't want to change a thing.

GL is still awful and the production won't change it at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Lol love what she had to say. I think she's right.

I doubt she needed fans to tell her the camera work is too shakey. Actually I'm just impressed she admitted there are aspects that need to go or change. Rarely do network execs admit anything is even remotely wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, by today's eppy, GL figured out how to shoot in the rain without drowning out the actors. But I still don't see how BB can defend some of the "new model". Most of the actresses look bad, and the camera men are suddenly obsessed with shooting "through" things (today...it was those cheap ass steps at Company), just because they can.

I refuse to "lighten up", when GL tested out this format for months before the 2/29 launch, and went bat-[!@#$%^&*] crazy and regressed because they loved playing with the "new toy".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah, right. We're stuck with it and we all know it. They didn't bother spending every Wednesday's episode for the last year preparing and practicing with the new equipment/technique and putting out all that ridiculous hype just to go back to the way things were just because of a little viewer discontent. When has that ever meant anything to this regime anyway? Josh & Cassie ring a bell? How about Harley & Cyrus? Or Alan & Beth? Or Wheeler's decision to rip Ed Bauer, Ross Marler, Phillip Spaulding, and Holly Reade completely off the show while keeping Ava around all this time? These people don't care what we want. It's like Wheeler is on a quest to make the most horrific TV program imaginable and go down in history as the less-talented soap version of Ed Wood.

The fact that it's a "work in progress" is part of the whole problem. This isn't a 10th grade media class or a film school project, this is a major network TV series that's been on the air for 70 years. Where is the professionalism, pride in their craft, and desire to only put out the best work possible? Or do they have such little respect for the fact that they're in daytime that they don't think it matters if their product is horrible? They're airing material that is shot in such a way that at times you honestly can't tell if the director and camera operator are incompetent or pretentious jerks who think they're conceptual brilliant artists. It doesn't really matter, either way, it reeks.

And I think that everyone in charge of this debacle needs to stop saying "lighten up" as if their viewers' complaints have no validity, listen to their customers, realize that they are in big trouble and that today is the day that things must start changing or it'll be too late, and do their jobs properly or have the decency to re-sign. That's what I think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Are we sure Kat isn't really Dani's daughter?  She acts a lot more like Dani then either Chelsea or Naomi do.... imho.   She certainly loves breaking and entering people's places and has a one track vendetta like her auntie Dani. I'm glad to see some movement on the Joey/Vanessa/Doug story, but thinking about it... the pacing for this tale has been just right.  We needed to see Doug sink further and further into gambling addiction to the point where he can't pay it back... and we needed to see Joey/Vanessa in conversations getting to know one another before the two ended up hooking up.   So now I'm curious to see what happens next... and if Nicole and/or Dani will weigh in on this.. and if the dropped Jacob angle will be revived. Nice to see Ashley/Derek being support for the Bill/Hayley/Naomi/Chelsea situation with Ashley finally having a scene with Hayley while Derek lets Naomi know about Bill.   So Chelsea's new crush is the doctor handling Bill's case.  I wonder why she's acting so mysterious. Thoughts on the 'Coming next week' scenes: Andre... Dani is acting like a teenager about to be discovered hooking up with her boyfriend by her dad.  You're more mature than her..imho. Now Sharon/Tracy/Anita have buried the hatchet?   Or maybe it's a fake out.
    • The 90’s apartment Phyllis had will always be her best set, IMO.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I agree with you about rules & regs but, frankly, choosing between retirement & working uncredited, come on, we know what she'd choose & she'd be right to do so. 
    • Hold up, hold up, hold up!!!   MADISON MONTGOMERY???   If a Zoe, Misty Day, and/or Queenie shows up...lol.
    • The Producers Guild of America (PGA), while not a union, does have rules and regulations regarding membership, conduct, and yes, credits. Assuming she’s a member of course. Being uncredited for what work exactly? Given her years of experience and multiple Emmy wins - why now decide you want to go uncredited for work you’ve done? 
    • That's very sad. What party he represented for and which area he represented? 
    • -- Daisy is a terrible name. If you're not going with a family legacy name, you gotta do better than that. -- When Frank is done with a character, he makes sure that character is painted in the worst possible way and the shade is thrown in the script. Natalia is being treated like a punchline to a bad joke....not that I mind. -- So Cody talked about Britt today. Gee, I wonder what's going on.
    • I remember another Phyllis residence -- I don't think that was a set shown abovethread, but I'm not sure.  Trying to remember some things off the top of my head but I might be wrong about part of it: I'm referring to the condo where Phick first had sex after the Michael/Lauren wedding.  I think they specifically referred to it as a condo?  After Stafford's Phyllis went into a coma, Jack sold it and I think he gave money to HunterKing's Summer when she married Austin? Or he gave Summer the condo?    There was a convoluted side plot about someone needing money and something from this was drawn in a shady way.  Something about it being sold?  And then when GinaT's Phyllis awoke from her coma, she had no condo to come back to.
    • Which union rules? SMH. Jill’s back, uncredited. 
    • Yeah I don’t get why she wouldn’t be credited if she’s back. That seems odd. I hope it’s true though, because the show needs a change. Badddddd.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy