Jump to content

Santa Barbara Discussion Thread


dm.

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I will say that there was this one day when I did not like the SB broadcast:


On February 21, 1989 #Mason (Lane Davies) meets #God (Brian Frons) in Heaven. God was played by NBC's vice president for daytime, Brian Frons. Mounted on the wall was an all-white peacock with the initials GBC (God's Broadcasting Company). At the beginning of the clip you can see God's secretary - Joan Crawford played by the amazing Joe Marinelli - watching her favorite show, "Santa Barbara", what else? It's really telling that Frons had the ego to cast himself as God in a soap over which he has power for the time being. No other PTB ever set themselves up over Good & Evil.

Just ran right into this tonight.

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 4.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

I know John Conboy gets a lot of flack for his tenure on the show, but it's the last time I enjoyed the show (admittedly, he had his problems). Once Rauch took over, the show just lost so much of its appeal. He made bad decision after decision. The departures of Marcy Walker, Carrington Garland, Roberta Bizeau and Louise Sorel really spelled the end for the show for me. I've never bothered to watch the Pamela Long tenure. I've seen the odd episode or clip but I have no desire to watch. The beginning of SB was very rough and I wonder how much time the Dobsons had to get the show on air. When did NBC choose to switch from Match Game/Hollywood Squares to SB?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If you can believe it, Santa Barbara was supposed to debut a few weeks earlier than it did, but wasn't ready yet. This gave Match Game/Hollywood Squares Hour a few more weeks of shows, through June and July 1984. 

I thought SB's July 30, 1984 premiere wasn't bad. A lot of money was poured into it, with the remotes, the sets, and the extras. But things went south from there. You could argue that Santa Barbara still wasn't ready, after 13 weeks being on the air! 

Here's a link to an article from Nov 5, 1984 by Tom Shales of the Washington Post talking about how SB resorted to an earthquake, ordered by NBC, to shake things up! 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/1984/11/05/santa-barbara-shakes/c98d4919-3537-4a36-91f5-971417239fca/

 

Quote from the article: 

...the quake was originally envisioned as a means of doing away with characters in the soap that, according to audience research, aren't particularly popular with viewers. Those who tested poorly would have pink stucco houses fall on their heads. NBC ordered the testing and the guinea-pig audiences made their choices. That's when the network got the really bad news. None of the characters tested very well. None of the characters was particularly popular with viewers. 

So NBC considered, at least briefly, making this such a killer of a quake that it wiped out virtually the entire cast. 

Edited by Jdee43
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Not by the earthquake but I think the main victims of the bad ratings were Dane Witherspoon, Ava Lazar and Melissa Reeves.

The three of them had character individual promos, the same as Mason and Kelly, and Dane and Ava were fired.

In Melissa’s case she has many counts episodes in the first 3 months or so and then she practically disappears from the show with little episode counts (maybe one episode every month with nothing to do).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

While I can understand that point of view, the Dobsons were the ones responsible for Carrington Garland's exit, per her own admission, who stated they wanted to take Kelly in a "new direction." Roberta Bizeau Weiss' deal was a one-year now, so I suspect the deal to pick up was not met. And, considering her replacement, Marguerite Hickey, was only on for a few weeks, I suspect Flame's storyline was already wrapping up. The only exit I would firmly place on Paul Rauch is Louise Sorel's exit, again, by her own admission. Marcy Walker's exit, for me, is more-so on her taking a job on Palace Guard than the executive production team. If anything, the writers' story of Eden's multiple personalities was more of a selling point for her to move to primetime, but it seems like Walker might've wanted that in the end over daytime.

I found an an article by Janet Di Lauro from the July 30, 1991, issue of Soap Opera Weekly, which stated:

❝ As fate would have it, the emergence of Suzanne was most untimely. No sooner had the plot twist been scripted, than Walker landed a starring role on the upcoming CBS series Palace Guard. Her inevitable departure from SB left the show's writers in a quandary - how to neatly wrap up the actress' last weeks. Walker readily admits that portraying Suzanne "was not my favorite way to leave the show, but I realize that it had to be this way because of storyline. I think when fans learned that I was leaving the show, they wanted to see as much Cruz and Eden as they could. I would have liked to play out their romance and their relationship - I think it would have been a nice gift to the audience. But unfortunately, that just couldn't be."

The character of Suzanne then turns into a fourth personality, that of Eden's late brother, Channing. It is as Channing that Eden leaves SB. (His/her departure does leave the door wide open for a Walker return.) There had been some talk about recasting, a sensitive subject.

"They've got to keep the show on an even keel," Walker says. "They thought that Eden's leaving would have a detrimental effect on the other characters. But I think [the writers] got a taste of the audience's dissatisfaction and decided not to recast and leave the door open. If the show (Palace Guard) doesn't work, I can always come back; I'm not averse to that. [Ed. note: The real Suzanne comes to SB in a few weeks when Terri Garber arrives on the show.] ❞

For me, personally, had Paul Rauch come in at a different time, he could have worked quite well as executive producer, as we've seen from his tenures at other soaps. Same with John Conboy (especially if he wasn't attached to Jill Farren Phelps).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But Palace Guard didn't work out and MW never came back. 

I've never looked at how long it was on the air but SB would've still been airing. Maybe it was already dead in the water.

That Suzanne dreck was beyond awful.

I hung in only to see if it would resolve and when MW left so did I. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Here is the opening cast, in case anyone is interested.

This was the cast from the first week of episodes (July 30 – August 3, 1984):

Series regulars:

  • Dame Judith Anderson (Minx Lockridge)
  • Valorie Armstrong (Marisa Perkins)
  • Robert Alan Browne (John Perkins)
  • Ismael "East" Carlo (Ruben Andrade)
  • Margarita Cordova (Rosa Andrade)
  • Lane Davies (Mason Capwell)
  • Rosemary Forsyth (Sophia Armonti/Dominic)
  • Andrea Howard (Veronica Gayley)
  • Ava Lazar (Santana Andrade)
  • Todd McKee (Ted Capwell)
  • Stephen Meadows (Peter Flint)
  • John Allen Nelson (Warren Lockridge)
  • Rupert Ravens (Danny Andrade)
  • Melissa Reeves née Brennan (Jade Perkins)
  • Peter Mark Richman (C.C. Capwell)
  • Julie Ronnie (Laken Lockridge)
  • Louise Sorel (Augusta Wainwright Lockridge)
  • Dane Witherspoon (Joe Perkins)
  • Robin Wright (Kelly Capwell)

Recurring/episodic guests: on-going recurring characters in italics

  • Philip Abbott (warden)
  • Ian Abercrombie (Phillip)
  • Frank Avila (policeman)
  • Carlo Allen (Burt)
  • Jim Boeke (bus driver)
  •  Doug Boethin (Jeremy Thomas)
  • Arthur Burghardt (television reporter)
  • Ed Dogan (warden's assistant)
  • Rick Fitts (Jake)
  • James Hornbeck (Mr. Forbes)
  • Margie Impert (news reporter)
  • John Jackson (helicopter pilot)
  • Geof Prysirr (henchman)
  • Bill Saito (Ambrose)
  • Robert Brian Wilson (Channing Capwell, Jr.)
  • uncredited actor (Bill Larwin)
  • uncredited actor (Nick Salvi)
  • uncredited actor (Miss Thomas)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They were crazy to get rid of Ava Lazar.

I know this is an unpopular opinion, but I prefer Linda Gibboney's Gina to Robin's. 

Back in those days I didn't care for Carrington Garland's Kelly, but now I realize that she is what the role needed to survive. The 80s were coming to an end and the princess in danger type could not stay any longer.

Carrington and Kimberly Simms *Mindy 2 GL* were what their characters needed in order  to keep up with the times. They were more like Nicolette Sheridan's Paige on KL. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Following this thread right now has put me in the mood of thinking about a passage in an interview & maybe you'd enjoy reading it, or re-reading it as the case may be. I believe it is some part of a 6 part interview, which is named

My Exclusive Interview with BRIDGET DOBSON

and can be found at

 
(as far as I know the link is good)
 

One of the offers that came within a few days of our new “retirement” was stunning: NBC-TV called to ask if we were to own a show, if we were to be in complete charge of every creative aspect of a show, from sets and costumes and hairstyles and music to every minute detail of the production, acting and writing, would we be willing to work again? Nobody in history had ever been asked this question. Not before and not since. We were being offered total creative control of an hour a day television drama five days a week. We were floored. And enticed. And terrified. It had never been attempted and never achieved, not starting from zero - nothing - a blank page - to an hour a day, every day, five days per week, no seasons, no holidays, no respite...with total control in the hands of two individuals, not in the hands of a corporation or a network.

So it was that Jerry and I came out of retirement and climbed what seemed to be an extremely steep creative mountain, clinging to sheer granite, our pen was our pick, no path, no trail, no rope or safety net. We'd done our writing push-ups in the years leading up to this moment, but there was no way to properly prepare. What if we died? Nobody even thought of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I remember reading that Rauch fired Bizeau because of her relationship with Born. Born had apparently written a song insulting Rauch and others. Bizeau/Weiss was collateral damage so to speak. The Dobsons were setting up storylines with Bizeau so they clearly wanted to write for her. I think that's why Hickey briefly came in to wrap up everything. It probably explains why Runyeon would exit since Flame and Michael were set up to be a couple on the show. 

 

Edited by chrisml
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I thought today was still good. Leo is always awful, but the characters treating him like he's a plague feeds my soul. Rafe in particular had been very passive about him, but today was wonderful seeing him put Leo on notice. I really think it's being written that Javi is going to have to eventually take the blinders off and see Leo for who he really is. Them having sex on Gabi's desk made me want to explode. Roman taking in stray Doug was nice to see. And the mention of Frankie and Max was unexpected, but good to know they're at least being thought of. Tate being petty and a bit vindictive by going back to Sophia's as soon as he saw Doug with Holly was entertaining for me. I think I actually like Tate the most out of all of them because he's so damn messy.  Is Holly about to be kidnapped? Her first time?
    • That would have saved the Anita singing segment -- having her by herself, singing quietly and reflectively. Belting it out like she was in church did not work. The black screens fade at the end was a mistake. BTG insists on being different with these fades for the sake of being different, and it's not working.   I thought all of that was just fine. Worked for me.   I'm going to disagree with this. Martin hasn't had many scenes with his parents, but he's been around family A LOT -- and that's what matters. We also know Martin is someone with a hair trigger response. He can be very emotional when discussing an issue before getting to the logic and reason of it all.  
    • My view of Evan is that he's smart but not as smart as he thinks he is, not a good guy but not an entirely bad guy - he's a lot of things, the show never quite knowing what to do with them. I never saw him as Iris' follower because Iris always seemed a bit in over her head from the start. 
    • She was the Town Historian, who knew a bit too much about Brandon and the infamous cottage.  SF was still a pretty normal place at that time, with Nola and Reva being the most outrageous citizens....seems that Carrie Pipper would have stood out a bit more for people.
    • Credits for Tuesday, May 6, 2025: Created by: Frank & Doris Hursley Executive producer: Frank Valentini Head writers: Elizabeth Korte, Chris Van Etten Writers: Micah Steinberg, Kate Hall, Cathy Lepard Director: Tina Keller
    • Yes, I need to dot hat. Also on my list talking to the person I got these files from since they clearly have a mess, in terms of dates being wrong. And, unfortunately finding one date wrong, automatically means more are wrong, too. 
    • I'm hoping that it doesn't happen. If the show keeps putting out good performance and story it will be hard to shut it out. Daphnee, Trisha, Ambyr and Colby are earning nominations without question.
    • Speaking of correcting dates, since you mentioned it above, why don't you go back to your Saturday post and edit it and replace your wording of "DAYS Ruth Buzzi 11-2-83"  with "DAYS Ruth Buzzi 11-1-83" and add a note that the video has the wrong date of 11/2/83 on it, and that the video is actually 11/1/83. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy