Jump to content

March 3-7, 2008


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

BWAH-HAH-HAH-HAH-HAH-HAH-HAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I'll be laughing about that all day.

The thing is, I think RC is talented (I'm not wearing the HTofC robes or nuthin'). He's certainly not the WORST head-writer in the world. He definitely understands these characters, I just feel like (as you said, Marceline) he's focused on a very narrow field in Llanview and is trying to recapture something that existed a long time ago on this show. I want to see OLTL break new ground, and if anyone can do that, it's RC. I just haven't seen it yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 183
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I can totally see your point. With hyperbole and belittling like this, who needs a concise point of view other than "I WANT EVANGELIIIIINEEEE!!!"

Nelson Branco is an idiot prone to ridiculous hyperbole of his own, but attacking Carlivati on the basis of what Branco says independent of him is stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm not wearing the HTofC robes either...though I do donate to his campaign ;)

It's hard to break ground new ground when so many things have gone wrong with the show. I think he's doing well right now. The stories are interesting, characters are interacting and the vets are front and center w/o backburnering the younger set.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

True enough, Ryan. Which is why I still have faith in the guy. I'm hoping once the post-strike episodes start airing, and we get to the heart of this Allison story, we'll all have better things to say. My biggest complaint is almost every front-burner story on that show is about parentage (Rex/Shane, Charlie/Jared, Asa/David, Jess/Allison [pre-strike]). It's getting a little repetitive. But since a lot of that is strike material, I'm holding out hope that May Sweeps will knock our socks off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

*sigh* just a couple of questions...

1.) What does Evangeline have to do with ANY of this? If you want to disagree with me fine. But could you at least disagree with the the things I actually say?

2.) Did you read my original comment? If so then you'll see that my criticism of Ron is based on his own failings and not an "attack" based on Branco's meth fueled ravings.

Enjoy the potluck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I honestly don't see why people have it out for RC (I mean come on, we share the same initials, that alone makes him freakin awesome....j/k). I understand the complaints for OLTL during the strike. Gary Tomlin did a good job of trying to keep RC's plans going, but it still wasn't RC's work. He's back, fixing storylines and trying to get the show back into pre-strike shape.

I hear fans of other soaps (including myself) complaining about the lack of vet use, lack of interesting storylines, lack of character interaction, etc, etc. We get the things people complain about on OLTL. Can someone explain to me exactly what the problem with RC's work is? Because I really can't see a big problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

We need a Marty Saybrooke/Billy Douglas. Or a BJ/Maxie. Or hell - I'd even take a turkey baster! SOMETHING to stir the pot in daytime again. When was the last time we all were foaming at the mouth over something on ANY network? Was it really DOOL's serial killer? God, that's sad. That was almost five years ago.

Nuke came close, but just fell to the wayside like every other homosexual story on a soap (and we ALL saw that coming a mile away).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I would pay more attention to the specifics of your weekly complaints if not for the fact that everything you say essentially goes back to the idea that the show was so much better when Malone (actually Higley, judging by your preferences, but we'll get to that) wrote it, and that the Williamson family and that verbose, diamond in the rough Vincent were/are the only minorities on the show. If I've read you properly, the gist is that only Michael Malone understood how to do contemporary soap (starring Evangeline, of course) and Ron Carlivati is just a white upper-class WASP who wants to take the show back to the 80s (when Evangeline wasn't there). After all, only Michael Malone understood that Viki, Dorian, Nora and the core families don't draw ratings and that endless amounts of John McBain and the Williamsons (and Evangeline), as the only minorities, were the way to go (with extra Evangeline)!

Except Malone didn't understand almost any of those things. Yes, he frontburnered the disgusting John way too much. But in his original run (the good one) he wrote heavily for all these dreaded vets you talk about. And yes, minority leads, which are extremely important (but not if they're not Evangeline, apparently). But the only minorities that got major screen time in his last tenure on OLTL were Antonio, Tico, Antonio, and, once she grabbed her ticket on the John Express, Evangeline. And when HE was writing the show, she was only a sidebar in a story with two white people - not very progressive, no? In Malone's second run (the mostly bad one) he also wanted to write for all these older characters who are now, as you might put it, "eating up the airtime" today, but he was blocked. What he did put onscreen last time was, at best, a very mixed bag. And only Dena Higley was the writer who really turned it into The Evangeline Show that you have lovingly detailed for us. If you really think it was all Malone's master plan for Evangeline to become as integral to the canvas as you envisioned her being, with John, Cristian, Todd or anyone else, in some huge supercouple, I don't think you knew his work as well as you think you do. And I think you would have been bitterly disappointed in what he did if he'd really been allowed to get anything but his worst, most youth-centric writing onscreen.

Basically, all I take away from you is that if it doesn't adhere to Dena Higley's ethos, it's bad. Because what you've described as a good OLTL, and what you've dismissed as bad, was never Michael Malone's sort of thing, even at his worst low. Even he wouldn't have come up with Vincent.

I will, I will. We're serving punch and pie and roasting cheerleaders on the barbecue while people break out into gospel song for no apparent reason. We would invite you, but...but...we can't stop thinking about John!

God, I am so mature.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think his work is boring and it is focused on too few characters and too many newbies. I also think it is based on a model that is about a decade old. I will admit, I don't watch anymore so I can't really say what he is doing now. I will also grant that the newbies are a Frank obsession. Maybe you are right and when RC comes back he will be the gift to daytime that many posters over here say that he already is. I watched his work when folks were saying ain't he great the first time. I didn't think he was. I thought he was boring.

I also agree with Marcellina on most of her points, particularly that disliking RC's writing and OLTL right now has nothing to do with Evangeline or John McBain or anything else except for the very reasons that people say they don't enjoy the show. You and I exchanged words over this mass generalization that it had something to do with McBain. I have never been a McBain fan. Maybe some of us who don't like RC's writing just think it's a boring show. If it become interesting, I will watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • There has been some confusion about Michael & facial burns. Please see this post: https://bsky.app/profile/shallotpeel.bsky.social/post/3lqkrryu54226 I've chosen to put this here instead of the Classic Thread because it is now with the appearance of recast Michael that this has come up. Different places online, including at least one podcast, remarks have been made about how remarkable it is that he is without facial scarring. Other fans say it was clear from the first that he did not have facial burns. What is included in this post is 2 screengrabs where you can see his face at the hospital & a very quick edit of that day in the hospital. 
    • Put me in the LOVE KMH camp. As a poster alluded to above, her detractors seem to come from people who first experienced the 80s Emily actress. And that's often the case with soaps, myself included. I enjoy the original actor so much that I just never take to the recast. However, KMH played Emily far longer than the original - for almost 20 years - and when she had great material, she was great. I get the sense she didn't like playing the whiny oh-woe-is-me Emily which was all the material she got from about 1996 until she took over the Intruder in late '99/early '00 and got to play a stronger kiss-ass woman who didn't care what anyone thought of her. (Some would call that a bitch but, if a man was in that role, he'd just be called a smart and savvy businessman.) Her relationship with Hal was great. The transformation was done realistically and I thoroughly enjoyed those years the best out of all. Once the writers decided to break up those two, they went back to writing Emily half the time as whiny and pathetic. I preferred when the writers made her stronger.
    • Hahaha - I do. I've always been the type, though, that can't miss anything. I get FOMO, so I'll not skip episodes or fast forward anything. There are only a few TV shows I've dropped because they got so bad vs. sticking it out to the end.  The promise that GL 1997 is better is what keeps me going. I especially want to see the fallout of Blake's lie about her twins and then Annie's descent which I believe won Watros's Emmy.
    • Rita's rape is an episode i constantly search on YouTube hoping one day that it will show up. I always feel like I may have seen it, but I was only 6 at the time and can never figure any of the things I have vague recollection of 
    • FROM THE VAULT: NON-SOAP DAYTIME RATINGS: HIGHLIGHTS FROM FEBRUARY 1973 & MAY 1973:

      Please register in order to view this content

        FROM THE VAULT: NON-SOAP DAYTIME RATINGS: HIGHLIGHTS FROM AUGUST 1973 & NOVEMBER 1973:
    • The rape was in 1979 after they were married. Blake was the result of Holly cheating with him while she was married to Ed. I believe she was born in 1975. 
    • No. Ed and Holly were married and having problems. She had an affair with Roger and that's when Christina--Blake--was conceived. The rape happened much later, after Holly and Roger were married.
    • Was Blake the product of Roger raping Holly, or did that come after when they were a couple?
    • I really wish we could see that episode...absolutely, my memory could be faulty, it was a very long time ago. I'm not going to contradict what the actors said--there has to be a reason it made them so uncomfortable that they talked about it in the press and complained to TPTB. I think that was the first one where they made the point that they wanted to educate the audience about the subject.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy