Jump to content

B&B: Week of February 18th


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I hate Nick blaming Taylor for the end of their marriage. He admited to loving Brooke! Why shoudl Taylor have accepted that? Im glad that she was strong and said she wants to focus on herself and being the woman she used to be. Nick was talking crazy. An hour after she left, he was all over Brooke, kissing her trying to make a future with her. Taylor certainly wasnt on his mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Speaking of Steph....I'd love for the Bakers to tell her her word is now worth zilch, credibility-wise. And I hated her blaming Brooke and Donna for Storm's fate. C'mon...she's just delighting in sticking it to them. Storm did the crime. Whether or not Brooke and Donna kept their end of the bargain, Storm is responsible for Storm's actions. No one else.

Doesn't it occur to Steph that threatening his sisters is a bad move? He coldly and callously shot her to get even with his father. Therapy, schmerapy...he's got a screw loose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I’m extremely happy about last week.

We skipped the partner swapping and it seems Kay Alden got the steering wheel with full hands and now has the characters where she wants them to be.

I loved how they use the Who shot Stephanie-storyline and do not just forget it. All this Logan/Forrester drama is so intense. No surprise that Ridge is Momma’s Boy and sticking to Queen Stephanie.

It was nice seeing Taylor calm, reorganized and with a new perspective on life. “I will start looking for a man who has no ties to Brooke and just loves me.” You go, girl!

But now to the real event: Eric exposed definitely ranks as one of the top 10 most hilarious B&B episodes ever – and probably the only one not including Darlene Conley. This was a riot.

Speaking of which: Instead of focussing on technical mishaps with a non-digital camera; was I blind or everybody else? Eric was standing on the ledge – in the FIRST FLOOR. Yet, Donna always enters her apartment which looks like the GROUNDFLOOR with the green backyard et al. What kind of house is this???

Logic and continuity department can you hear me?

In light of the Oscars, I think it’s time to announce the winner of the puke-me-a-river-award: Ridge waffleman Forrester: "We need to rediscover each other."

Seriously Ridge, you must have slept with Brooke to the moon and back in the last 20 years. Your relationship is nothing but sex. So what’s there to rediscover!? Keep Ridge & Brooke together for heaven’s sake but do not show them actually together, please.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Going away for a few days to calm down does not mean you have to loose your child. Yes, she left them, but she probably would have been a danger to the child for as long as she was in bad shape. Nick has no right to forbid Taylor to take Jack anyway, even if you want to look at it legally. The mother has the right to her child. If daddy wants it, go to court (oooh, is that what's going to happen?).

Loved the scene between Katie and Stephanie, Katie trying to convince Stephanie to change her mind. There is a very lovely dynamic between those two. On one hand, Stephanie does have a resentment for Katie for the mere fact that her last name is Logan. On the other hand, though, Katie is sooooo much different than her sisters, and Stephanie is amazed and recognizes Katie's character. Of course, if Katie gets together with Nick, that's it. Whoredom International. Will she tell Lt. Baker and Charlie (mmmmmm) the truth?

Btw, WHY OH WHY? isn't Bridget associated with Charlie? Isn't he supposed to be contracted? Those two would be so hot together, it would be a nice pairing, a NON-FORRESTER/LOGAN pairing. Ah, dreams. It'll never happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But why is Taylor in bad shape? Because she can't handle Brooke's presence hovering over her life. She felt Nick still wasn't over Brooke blah blah blah...fine, great, whatever....she decided to end the marriage. We all know she's had a problem accepting that Jack is Brooke's biological child. I don't see that changing anytime soon.

To backtrack and say Taylor's anxieties were only about Nick's feelings for Brooke is a cop out. From the moment she found out about the switch, she's had trouble bonding with Jack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I see what you mean. The story should, and originally was, about Taylor's shock of finding out the biological mother of her child was her life-long romantic rival. Of course, this being B&B, it all boils down to Nick and Brooke's destiny ( :rolleyes: ). I'll be honest with you: The fact that Taylor couldn't bond with her child made for great drama, but it all focused on Nick and Brooke again. Still, Nick does not have the right to keep Jack from her. Although I'm not sure if Taylor loves Jack at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I hate Nick (I think he's a bigger [!@#$%^&*] than "The Dressmaker"), but I think he's got every right to keep Jack from Taylor. The woman is two twinkies short of a carton. She still blames Brooke for the end of their marriage. (and apparently everything just short of global warming..) I so hope James reappears and tells everyone that Taylor was having delusional conversations with Brooke. I'm tired of hearing how put upon Taylor is/was. She should have known what kind of man Nick was after he dumped Bridget for Brooke, then slept with Bridget while married to Brooke. And if Taylor heads where I think she's heading...she's a hypocrite. Which I will personally love.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The character has become so overwrought. Somebody on another board pointed it out, and I agree with her. All the ranting and raving have become nauseating. I know I'll get beat up for this one, but I think Jennifer Gareis gave Flannery a run for her money last year in most of their scenes together. She was a breath of fresh air and force to be reckoned with, and her performances were intriguing and controlled. Whereas with Flannery I can see where she's coming from a mile away. Same juvenile lines, chest thumping, and repeat. Now while I do get a kick out of some of her lines, the character has seemed to taken a downward spiral ever since the awful "I was abused as a child" storyline. Now that we have Eileen Davidson, Heather Tom, and Lesli Kay let's start writing some compelling stuff. These actresses can more than carry lead storylines, and are all Emmy nominated actors (hell two are Emmy winners).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Tay should just lose custody of baby Jack and then die already! Tay was drinking while alone with baby Jack, and she has the unmitigated gall to say who is a fit mother? Tay is the most unfit mother on B&B ever. Drinking alone with a baby, hallucinating because of her jealousy and insecurity towards Brooke, and then walking out on her less than a year old "baby". Tay is evil and needs to lose permanent custody of baby Jack! Let's not forget how Tay set herself on fire because she was unconscious due to all of her drinking years ago. Taywhore is such a trainwreck!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't know why anyone cares who Brooke or Taylor end up with.

a ) We've seen them on the romance merry-go-round for years.

b ) No relationship lasts on this show because Brad has tremendous difficulty telling stories don't revolve around a triangle.

As far as Stephanie is concerned, I've never been overly fond of the transformation in character. There's a difference between icy, classy matriarch and vulgar, crotchety grandma which is basically how she's been written for a long time. I have a horrible, horrible feeling that she is going to be put back with Eric again because of this "rich, beautiful history" they supposedly share and I don't want to see it. The characters are far more interesting apart than they ever have been together.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Agree. But I said that from go. Regardless of the setting and discussion over Joey of all the B/C plots, it was the one that got a build to it throughout and development. 
    • Are we sure Kat isn't really Dani's daughter?  She acts a lot more like Dani then either Chelsea or Naomi do.... imho.   She certainly loves breaking and entering people's places and has a one track vendetta like her auntie Dani. I'm glad to see some movement on the Joey/Vanessa/Doug story, but thinking about it... the pacing for this tale has been just right.  We needed to see Doug sink further and further into gambling addiction to the point where he can't pay it back... and we needed to see Joey/Vanessa in conversations getting to know one another before the two ended up hooking up.   So now I'm curious to see what happens next... and if Nicole and/or Dani will weigh in on this.. and if the dropped Jacob angle will be revived. Nice to see Ashley/Derek being support for the Bill/Hayley/Naomi/Chelsea situation with Ashley finally having a scene with Hayley while Derek lets Naomi know about Bill.   So Chelsea's new crush is the doctor handling Bill's case.  I wonder why she's acting so mysterious. Thoughts on the 'Coming next week' scenes: Andre... Dani is acting like a teenager about to be discovered hooking up with her boyfriend by her dad.  You're more mature than her..imho. Now Sharon/Tracy/Anita have buried the hatchet?   Or maybe it's a fake out.
    • The 90’s apartment Phyllis had will always be her best set, IMO.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I agree with you about rules & regs but, frankly, choosing between retirement & working uncredited, come on, we know what she'd choose & she'd be right to do so. 
    • Hold up, hold up, hold up!!!   MADISON MONTGOMERY???   If a Zoe, Misty Day, and/or Queenie shows up...lol.
    • The Producers Guild of America (PGA), while not a union, does have rules and regulations regarding membership, conduct, and yes, credits. Assuming she’s a member of course. Being uncredited for what work exactly? Given her years of experience and multiple Emmy wins - why now decide you want to go uncredited for work you’ve done? 
    • That's very sad. What party he represented for and which area he represented? 
    • -- Daisy is a terrible name. If you're not going with a family legacy name, you gotta do better than that. -- When Frank is done with a character, he makes sure that character is painted in the worst possible way and the shade is thrown in the script. Natalia is being treated like a punchline to a bad joke....not that I mind. -- So Cody talked about Britt today. Gee, I wonder what's going on.
    • I remember another Phyllis residence -- I don't think that was a set shown abovethread, but I'm not sure.  Trying to remember some things off the top of my head but I might be wrong about part of it: I'm referring to the condo where Phick first had sex after the Michael/Lauren wedding.  I think they specifically referred to it as a condo?  After Stafford's Phyllis went into a coma, Jack sold it and I think he gave money to HunterKing's Summer when she married Austin? Or he gave Summer the condo?    There was a convoluted side plot about someone needing money and something from this was drawn in a shady way.  Something about it being sold?  And then when GinaT's Phyllis awoke from her coma, she had no condo to come back to.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy