Jump to content

Barack Obama Elected President!


Max

Recommended Posts

  • Members

A TRUE Conservative!

I love this man!

Hagel takes aim at Limbaugh, Senate colleagues

Posted: 03:13 PM ET

Hagel had sharp words for Rush Limbaugh Tuesday.

Hagel had sharp words for Rush Limbaugh Tuesday.

(CNN) — As his Senate career nears its end, Republican Chuck Hagel isn't holding back when it comes to criticizing members of his own party — including conservative talk radio hosts.

"We are educated by the great entertainers like Rush Limbaugh," Hagel said Tuesday during a speech in Washington, according to the Huffington Post.

"You know, I wish Rush Limbaugh and others like that would run for office," a sarcastic Hagel continued. "They have so much to contribute and so much leadership and they have an answer for everything. And they would be elected overwhelmingly. [The truth is] they try to rip everyone down and make fools of everybody but they don't have any answers."

Hagel has increasingly become critical of his party in the aftermath of the Iraq War and notably held back endorsing his longtime friend John McCain during the presidential campaign. He's reportedly under consideration for a cabinet post in the Obama administration.

Speaking at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies, Hagel also faulted Washington lawmakers for "raw, partisan, political paralysis."

"The American people don't like what is going on… they want us to start doing what leaders are expected to do, address the problems, find some consensus to governing. Get along. There will be disagreements, sure… but in the end we can't hold ourselves captives to this raw, partisan, political paralysis."

And for the record, if I wanted another Clinton White House, I would have voted for HRC. This is getting ridiculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 8.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Hagel makes a lot of sense. I think people are tired of the name-calling, and I think they want to believe in a leader. Americans followed Ronald Reagan too because he represented hope. I did not agree with much that Reagan did, but he was a leader.

I personally think HRC will make a good SOS. I would sure like to see Hagel in the cabinet though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So, if I'm to understand your qualifications to your outrageously stupid responses, non-racists make racist statements and possess a bigoted slant? Dude, that's ridiculous.

This forum is permeated with an intolerant bigoted slant, Roman. The responses today make that obvious and clear. Your comments... Ryan's comments in particular... are thrown about to silence opposition. The game is to hurl vile insults so that people like me will shut their mouths, fearing the "racist" label. Roman, you and clowns like Ryan (who apparently can violate rules of the forum all he wants without consequence -- unlike me with my 20% warning) can tag me with the racist label all you want. You have no clue what I'm like, the company I keep, or the friends I have. You judge me based on political ideology.

You're the bigot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No wonder he is going to go down as the worst VP in history, but then againg GWB is going down as the worst President.

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,2...5005961,00.html

Dick Cheney indicted over prison abuse

From correspondents in Washington

November 19, 2008 01:27pm

A TEXAS grand jury has indicted US Vice President Dick Cheney for conspiring to block an investigation into abuse at privately run prisons.

The three-page indictment alleges that Mr Cheney profited from the abuse because he invested $US85 million ($131 million) in a mutual fund company which holds shares of for-profit prisons.

It said this was a "direct conflict of interest'' because Mr Cheney had influence over the federal contracts awarded to the prison companies.

The indictment also accused Mr Cheney of committing "at least misdemeanour assaults'' of inmates by allowing other inmates to assault them.

The indictment further alleges that former attorney-general Alberto Gonzalez "participated by further having used his position ... to stop the investigations as to the wrongdoings which includes the assaults committed in the prison for profit in Willacy County, Texas".

Mr Cheney and Mr Gonzalez were charged with engaging in organised criminal activity.

Mr Cheney's spokeswoman declined to comment because his office had not yet received a copy of the indictment.

"I'm not going to speculate or forecast the Vice President's legal options,'' Megan Mitchell said.

"Let's wait and see if we even receive one.''

Several other related indictments were brought against a host of public officials in what one lawyer called a circus act by a local prosecutor seeking revenge in his final weeks in office.

"We look forward to having the opportunity to have an independent, competent prosecutor review the facts, and are confident that once that happens these baseless charges will be dismissed,'' said Michael Cowen, who represents Texas State Senator Eddie Lucio.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No.

My friend, you get warned for the comments you make and the fact that you can't take responsibility for offending anyone. I ahve said offensive things about bouth John McCain and Sarah Palin, and when I was called out, I appologized.

You, on the other hand, post a extremely offensive, and some would say racist, joke about Obama, and instead of saying you're sorry for maybe offending people in this thread, you do what Republicans and ultra right-wing conservatives do........you blame me and others for your poor taste in jokes.

What you call me truly means nothing. In fact, you calling me a bigot may mean I'll sleep 10 hours tonight instead of the usual 8 hours. That is how much your words..........

Relaxed me.

But, my friend, if you still can't see that the words you use can offend, you are the one who is in a sad state of denial, not me.

Take it light, Brian. And God Bless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have nothing to apologize for, Roman. That joke wasn't racist. Your hypersensitivity puts to mind your motives and perhaps even your own level of bigotry.

Never had a doubt in my mind that you would sleep well. I'll sleep very well, myself. Always do, pal. In the meantime, enjoy this one...

2008-04-16-malkinsnob1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And now, back to the political news:

(CNN) -- Alaska Sen. Ted Stevens, the Republican lawmaker convicted on felony corruption charges in October, appears to have lost his bid for re-election to Democrat Mark Begich, according to a release from Begich's campaign and unofficial results from state officials.

Democrat Mark Begich campaigns in Anchorage, Alaska, on Tuesday, November 4.

The statement and results Tuesday come two weeks after the election, after absentee ballots were counted.

The results of this race have national implications as Democrats seek a filibuster-proof 60-member majority in the Senate. Races in Minnesota and Georgia are still unresolved.

With 100 percent of Alaska's precincts reporting, Begich, the mayor of Anchorage, had roughly 47.7 percent of the vote, compared with about 46.6 percent for Stevens, according to unofficial results posted on the Alaska Secretary of State's Web site.

He appears to have bested Stevens by 3,724 votes, according to the posted results.

Alaska elections Director Gail Fenumiai said 2,500 overseas ballots remain to be counted.

She said officials hope to make an official announcement during the week of December 1 -- and that Stevens would then have five days to request a recount.

Stevens, who turned 85 on Tuesday, was convicted in October of filing false statements on his Senate financial disclosure forms. Prosecutors said Stevens hid hundreds of thousands of dollars in "freebies" from an oil-field services company in his home state.

On Tuesday, his fellow Senate Republicans postponed a vote they had planned on whether to kick Stevens out of their caucus pending the final vote results.

Stevens maintained his innocence even after the conviction. At a debate days before the election, he said he had "not been convicted of anything."

In his statement claiming victory, Begich said he was "humbled and honored" by the apparent results.

"It's been an incredible journey getting to this point, and I appreciate the support and commitment of the thousands of Alaskans who have brought us to this day," he said in the written statement. "I can't wait to get to work fighting for Alaskan families."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • John Black actually was the ultimate good guy soap hero. So I don’t mind the town gushing over him. It’s deserved.
    • Be glad it wasn't a Perry production. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I love my girl, but nope he's pathetic. 250K and now he's put her business at risk.   L O S E R    

      Please register in order to view this content

    • The whole town gushing over John Black as if he was a saint is eye rolling.  I guess death really colors people's memories over his many flaws, but I guess that is normal and human nature. I'm still confused as to why Leo hasn't been written out.  The actor stank up two soaps with his sub par acting, what does he have on TPTB's to remain on these soaps.   What's the point of Cat?  I hope the new head-writers figure out her purpose and develop her character. And I much prefer scenes not focusing on John's death because life does go on for the world when someone passes.  
    • Wasn't there a break in Zaslow's first run? I thought Roger was off-screen for a while, and when Zas came back, Roger was hiding at the boarding house and Nola figured out there was something hinkey about him. I'm pretty sure Simon chose to leave the first time and was replaced by RVV. I don't want to assume Jordan's issues played a role in his first departure, but Maeve said in an interview that at some point, it became very hard for her to work with him and she asked to work with him less. That seems to fit 1986, where suddenly Vanessa is essentially Ross' law clerk and not at every Lewis family moment.
    • He needs to divorce her arse with her constant cheating.   She's no better than Doug... she's F*cking pathetic.
    • I didn't know of any interruptions for Maeve Kinkead after her 1997 return. Her runs would then be 1981-1987, 1989-1996, 1997-2000, short arcs until the end. I knew Maureen Garrett second run was interrupted from a 2009 interview but I couldn't recall the exact year. Her runs would then be 1976-1980, 1988-2000, short arcs until the end.
    • As I said in May, I have no problem with Martin and Bradley being married. You can still do all the fun introloper storylines with them as you do everyone else. Both men of a certain age, and it is very believable for them to have either a first love or have been previously married. And, you can do it without either of them cheating!  

      Please register in order to view this content

       I said something similar during the premiere week. Bill was the perfect age to play Martin as Vernon and Anita's child. I would've much preferred this version, but oh well.
    • I don't know how you want to count Maeve. She "retired" in '00, but would come back for appearances. I don't know however if she made an appearance in '01 or '03. In '02 I believe she came back for Josh and Reva's wedding. I assume she came back when Gina Tognoni took over the role of Dinah. And I know she was back for Ross' memorial service. Maureen Garrett was around until at least '00. I don't think Holly was in town when Ben returned though. I just got pissed off about Jerry all over again.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy