Jump to content

Barack Obama Elected President!


Max

Recommended Posts

  • Members

The only issue here that I have been able to research here is the earmarks. From what I understand Palin did make inroads in the Alaskan practice of using earmarks. According to online sources, prior to Palin, Alaska used to request over 100 earmarks each year to be secured by Alaska's congressional delegation. Palin's administration cut the earmark request to 51 in her first year. In her second year that number was reduced again to 31. Sources say that 27 of those 31 are continuous or previously appropriated. When changing a methodology for funding, it takes time to implement legislation and other revenue sources for projects that would normally be funded for the state on the federal level by these earmarks. Prior to Palin earmarks requested for Alaska totalled upwards of $550 million but during her time that amount was reduced to $200 million.

http://www.juneauempire.com/stories/031808...258953362.shtml

I do not however have all the specific details of what those requested earmarks did fund. I know that some of them were transportation earmarks. Does anyone else have that information?

And by the way, I'm posting alternative information here. I am still neutral in my support. Don't kill the messenger! hehe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 8.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

That's true..To be honest with you..I couldnt have recited the Bush Doctrine either (until yesterday). I am very much into politics, but I have never taken the time to read the doctrine. I think Palin has been pretty involved with Alaska, so I could understand her not knowing the specifics of the doctrine.

I bet McCain would be able to define the Bush Doctrine. He is the foreign policy expert for the republican ticket.

Thanks for that..Every state has earmarks. At least she did cut back the amount coming into Alaska.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Obama has sponsored 136 bills since 2005. Out of those, most of them are still in committee and 2 have been enacted. Some of the more significant bills incorporating change include voting for Equal Pay for Equal Work (a woman's issue), funding for Vet care including a homeless provision act, a climate change education act.

I could go on. But that should give you some ideas of the change Obama has worked on in the Senate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Wow, I didn't realize he had sponsored that many bills. Good for him...I heard the other night that he has only attended around 100 sessions since becoming a US Senator. I never would have imagined that the number of bills he has sponsored would out number the amount of sessions he has attended.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Palin DID INDEED request earmarks. She hired a damned lobbyist to lobby D.C. for them! Alaska's the most taxed and spend state in the union per citizen! Palin DID INDEED leave Wasilla with a $20 million DEBT! Obama is MOST definitely a reformer. McCain was, but now he isn't. He's changed a lot in the last couple years, when he decided to run with W and then support W/Dick even though he used to oppose W/Dick.

Not for the bridge, Palin didn't, but she accepted the funds anyhow and spent it on other things. She was for the bridge until she started getting flack then she turned on her cronies.

:lol: Great post Roman! Short and to the point!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • @TaoboiI ran into Dani’s favorite party planner again tonight

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy