Jump to content

All Soapsoperas:- If an actor, Actress has Plastic Surgery...


Recommended Posts

  • Members

What do you all say, i must admit i think almost all of the actors who have had their face worked on many times, are getting worse as actors, they have no emotions or cant act at all, Jackie Zeman who where a great actress, has had to much done, to act soon, the same with Lauren Koslow, Renee Jones, Deidre Hall, Susan Lucci, they cant show an inch in their face like naturally talents like Susan Flannery, what do you all here think, does plastic surgery affect abbility to act on soapoperas?...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 22
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Well aside from her nose, chest and eyes Jackie Zeman's look is courtesy of Botox and Restylane. I'm one of the minority who actually think that she still looks pretty good. I think when people are surprised by her look it is because she's just had something injected.

Lauren Koslow and Renee Jones, in my opinion, have not had much, if any plastic surgery. Just some Botox and Restylane and quite conservative use at that. They don't look 'done' they just look like they always have: gorgeous.

Deidre Hall's plastic surgeon should get the Nobel Prize, she looks wonderful.

Susan Lucci also looks great, but should give it a rest, she'll look a bit severe if she keeps at it.

Leslie Charleson, who I love, I think had a bad facelift. She looks a bit pulled.

Jeanne Cooper is the definitive example of soap opera plastic surgery, it was wonderful for her and her acting never suffered.

I only think plastic surgery or cosmetic dermatology hurts an actress if it is overdone and drastic. That being said, if the actress is game for it, she can make the transformation work in her favour by working it into the storyline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I remember when Susan Lucci came back from her... "vacation..." during the whole Desiree Dubois storyline, and Erica was crying over her father's coffin, it was sooooo distracting because her face looked "renewed" and tight and shiney and soooo totally incapable of emoting beyond a mere wince, if even THAT.

I enjoy seeing clips of Susan pre-"facial renewal" as Erica. I heard that she even wondered if she were going to get the Erica part back when she auditioned because she feared she looked too "ethnic" for the role, but that's what I enjoy immensely about her look back in the 70's and 80's. The dark hair and the bold strong features is what made her beautiful. That look, to me, was Erica Kane. But, over the last seven years or so, she's slowly chisled away at that look.

It's funny. I think Alicia Minshew and Eden Riegel are perfectly cast as Erica's daughters, because Eden looks like a pre-"renewed" Lucci, and Lish looks like a young post-"renewed" Lucci.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Plastic surgery is a major risk for an actress, but one which many seem game to take.

Jackie Zeman, has, I think, had the very worst procedures. Her breasts look botched, and her lips look duck-like. However, I actually think she has more facial mobility than most of the others on the list. I don't think the "work" has particularly affected her acting.

Conversely, Deidre Hall looks absolutely incredible. The woman looks at least fifteen years younger than she is. I've never seen a woman of sixty who looks that good. HOWEVER, I do think it's affected her acting. She doesn't seem to be able to open her eyes all the way.

Leslie Charleson's facelift/botox looks painful, and I think it's affected her facial mobility very much. It looks laborious for her to open and close her eyes.

I don't mind Susan Lucci's work in the least. It seems very in character, actually. And acting has never really been what she's known for. I don't think she shouldn't go any farther, though.

I also think Robin Strasser has had something. The woman has no wrinkles, and at her age, that isn't really possible. I don't think it has affected her acting, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think there is an actress or actor over 50 in a lead role who hasn't had some sort of work done.

It is more obvious on some than others-maybe some people have better skin to start off with,or just better doctors.

When Drake,Deidre and Thaao were asked on the Australian interview how they kept so youthful.by an audience member.there was a slight pause before Drake jumped in with the old healthy living,gym,positive attitude line!!

Kim Zimmer admitted to a face lift in the 90's. as did Jennifer Bassey I think.

Josh Taylor and Robert Woods have obviously had work done.

Erica Slezak,Suzanne Rogers,Tina Sloan,Lesley Ann Down,Jess Walton,Colleen Zenk and many others are all well over 50 and practically wrinkle free.

I think younger performers in their 30's and 40's are also having 'preventative' work down.

I think ,in many ways,it mirrors what is happening in society.There seem to be these clinics on every corner,yet no-one admits to using them.

Whether you agree or not is another issue!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I can't believe Hunter Tylo hasn't been mentioned yet in this thread! The WORST case of plastic surgery on Daytime!!!

I think her acting is just fine, but in some cases her new look certainly detracts from the show if you remember what a beauty she was before she had any work done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

:lol: I totally agree with this. I can't believe how unnatural she looks. She seriously looks like a burnt victim that's had major reconstructive surgery to look half-way normal again.

It's all about getting work done gradually over time. Deidre Hall looks amazing. Even up close in person, she looks fabulous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I remember a scene when Bobbie Eakes was doing a really emotional scene with David Canary after the Jenny kidnapping hullabaloo. She was trying to show emotion on her face, but the botox was clearly holding her back. I was moved by their scenes, but her cosmetic surgery was distracting (had she not had anything done, I would've been totally vested in the scene).

My mom also commented on Susan Lucci the other day. She was soo distracted by her neck (it was all wrinkled, while her face was all tight). The contast was too striking (same for Leslie Charleson, really). Jackie Zeman's lips are distracting. Personally, I think if they put on 5-10 pounds, it might help fill out their face, and they wouldn't need botox or a facelift (but weight is another topic).

When I think about it, any time an actor has had work done, you can totally tell anytime they have to emote beyond a smirk--because they can't even use the muscles in their forehead. It's like straining to show us what should come naturally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • It is an insult. To the viewer's intelligence. Everything in this show in the past 4 years has been horribly conceived, produced like a cheap tik-tok video, without any build up or psychological reasoning, and then re-written to level 0 in couple of weeks (where everything is ABSOLUTELY the same as it was before it happened). People get gravely sick and then recover in 5 episodes, because of miracle cures. People get killed and un-killed in the most cartoonish Scooby-Doo scenarios, people get pardoned after killing 2 innocent victims, people become and unbecome CEOs with the snap of a finger. But when you look around in a month or two or three... it's like absolutely nothing has happened. Nobody has grown... or evolved... or changed. We still have Steffy talking to Ridge how Hope and her mother are not worthy. We still have Brooke crying about something that Ridge said. We still have Hope at the same emotional limbo she's been put in ever since Brad decided she needs a re-vamp and made her a ho. EVERYTHING IS THE SAME. Only the Taylors change every few seasons and become increasingly younger. The problem I have with Liam's storyline is the problem I have with every storyline - why should I care if he is dying or sick with cancer when I haven't seen him in 2 years?!! Why go from 0 to a 100 like that. The same way with Sheila... who was backburned for months... before getting fake-killed for ratings. Why would we care about that... when Sheila was a non-entity before that.  Or why should I care for Brooke... when she's been ABSOLUTELY NOTHING of a character for years... to now all of a sudden re-birthed into a lingerie queen and CEO?   Back in the day, we... the viewers of this horrible show... cared and loved to see characters struggle from point A to point B. We wanted to see the build up, the makings of something. Not get a finished result that is undone after a week or two. When Brooke became CEO in 1993... we cheered because it mattered and because she gave HER ALL to get to that point. It was a revenge after years and years of abuse, being slapped around like a homeless dog by Stephanie. She plotted and calculated her every move. But she was also raw and hurt. She was both opportunist and a heroine. She had dept and dimensions. THAT WAS A CHARACTER. That was a human being.   My diagnosis is that at this point Bradley Bell doesn't care. Bold is living off of past history, fans being loyal, the show being 18 minutes of crap that people watch to laugh at. He sees the ratings are still okay and even improving and he DOES NOT GIVE A S-IT. He is even more motivated to continue with the current style of trash. It will only get worse from this day on.  He is way pass the period where he wanted to tell stories or impress the viewers with anything. (Not that he was particularly good about that anyways) I would not even be surprised if he is writing this drivel on complete auto-pilot at this point. Maybe he asks Chat GPT what to write each week. That's how it feels. IF IT'S THE OPPOSITE... and he is trying and that's the BEST HE CAN DO?!!! Then we are really f-cked.  Even Bradley Bell was NOT THAT HORRIBLE guys. But times change and people age... and that's all I'm going to say.   
    • -- Really good episode today, with a lot more happening than I expected. -- SilkPress is great, but I don't see the need to criticize Dani/KM when supporting Leslie. -- That being said, I don't like Dani with Andre. I think they should end that as soon as possible. -- Very lame that Vanessa and Doug weren't there. If they want to impress on us that Vanessa is Nicole's best friend, they need to do better. -- Brandon Claybon continues to improve as Martin, and his relationship with Smitty finally feels real. -- Dr. Carlton is, as others have posted, fine as fck. We need more.
    • As much as I have hyped the looks on this show, those dresses did not impress today. Since the premeire, there's only been one look that I can truly say IMO didn't work (and it honestly wasn't even that bad). It was an outfit Dani wore. These flowly wide leg trousers and it was paired with a loose top with a cowl neck. However, I didn't LOVE a single dress on any of the ladies today. Kat's was great only because it suits the character and her personality - so an A for that. It's a good dress. Dana's was also really nice. Everyone else either just was meh, had something unflattering about the fit, or didn't really fit the vibe.  Also, this isn't BTG's fault. It's just the state of soap operas today, but that event felt empty. Tables of 3

      Please register in order to view this content

      I mean it was nice that they had some extras on there, but it definitely didn't feel like an event when the family was pretty much ever table there.  That was a nice end to the episode and I wonder how this is going to unfold.   
    • I was looking at the AWHP synopses from the period where Quinn had a stalker in 1984 and it refers to pranks and phone calls. Does anybody remember what the pranks were? Or were they just disturbing phone calls?
    • Same. Things were really coming together the last moment of the show. I wish we had more time with it.
    • Exactly when did Ada's kitchen become the "centerpiece of the action"? And which set was the centerpiece of the action before that???    Another World premiered in 1963, and Ada didn't even arrive until 1967.  And then, Ada and Rachel lived in a small apartment.  A couple of years later, Ada married Ernie Downs and moved into his house. So the kitchen so identified with Ada, was actually in the house Ada inherited from her husband Ernie after he died.   I'd suggest Ada's kitchen did not become the centerpiece of the action (if it ever was) until around the time Mary Matthews died, and Rachel began her romance with her second millionaire husband, MacKenzie Cory.  Others might disagree, but that doesn't offend me in the least.   
    • The last scene of the final episode did show that life on Wisteria Lane would continue on once the toxic housewives moved away. It won't be as good as the original, but I'm intrigued to see what these new people do with the concept.  
    • This underscores the biggest issue that the show needs to work on.   The majority of the characters on the show are all related to one another, which is why we have that B&B esque Dani/Andre hook up situation
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • It was a good episode. I didn't expect things to unravel so soon.   One thing I still don't like about these big events: Where was everyone else?   This is a big event. Everyone should've been there.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy