Jump to content

Will any soap ever go to dvd?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 34
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

With so many episodes produced over the years (and I'm not including the ones that were supposedly erased and lost forever), it would be cost-prohibitive, at best. I mean, unless you were a total fanatic with a highly disposable income, I doubt you'd want to pay, say, two thousand bucks for "The Complete GL: 1977-1985," or something like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Not necessarily. Most stand alone DVD players are already able to play videos in MPEG4 format (divX, Xvid, etc.), which is much more space efficient than MPEG2. And with the new HD media like BlueRay and HD-DVD coming, you could easily put an entire year on one or two discs. So, it´s nothing impossible but I think rather than burn them onto DVD/HDDVD they will make them available on web, probably for free with some unstoppable adverts attached to it.

But I do think storyline related and couple related editions will be eventually published.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The ABC soaps have Disney/Buena Vista for DVD distribution, Y&R and Days have Sony for DVD distribution, and Passions has Universal for DVD distribution. If the parent company allows, all of those or some part of them could in fact be available on DVD. However, the P&G soaps (GL and ATWT) DO NOT have a DVD distribution company, which means they probably have no option of ever being released on DVD. Unless of course, Paramount (parent company of CBS) strikes a deal with PGP to release something of those soaps on DVD, or some independent DVD company chooses to do so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Probably just a compilation of things like they've done on VHS in the past or like Soap Net has done. Luke and Laura through the years, and then have like a two four disc set of their greatest 16 episodes. Or like my mother has a VHS tape she bought about fifteen years ago of AMC's greatest weddings. I bought A&E's behind the scenes Biography of AMC on DVD this summer and that had to be specially made.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There are many reasons this will be very unlikely to happen:

If you are thinking complete series it would be impossible they have 250 episodes on average a year. A show like Sex and the City I think had less then that over its entire run and when the entire series came out is was around $200.

With the ever declining ratings due you really think any distrubtion company will be like "lets put a whole bunch of money into producing and advertising Soaps on DVD" Highly unlikely.

Didn't ABC have some Best of or complitations or something a while back? Like 5 plus years. I don't even know if they were whole episodes or just bits and pieces pasted together.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Of course complete series are out of the question for most soaps, but Dark Shadows has been a HUGE success and it's been cancelled for DECADES! If fans will spend hundreds on autographed scripts, luncheon's, etc. then they'll buy a $30 dvd. In the UK for Coronation Street they released 8 episodes, per year, in boxsets for each decade. You mean Y&R can't throw together 25 episodes and say "Best of 90s: Vol 1?"

These soaps have the platform to promote them as well. Look at how well all of those crappy books have sold. Fans want DVD. Short-lived shows have them, game shows have them, everyone has them except soaps. This is a big market that is wasted. BTW, ABC only released one hour wedding specials which were already on VHS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The couples is a great idea. I still can't believe they didn't do a Luke and Laura DVD. With all the promo, that would've definitely sold. Other big couples like Carjack on ATWT, Todd/Blair on OLTL, Tad/Dixie on AMC, etc. Or what about a Susan Lucci DVD to promote when she's on The View countless times?

If soaps do get cancelled, I doubt we'll get them though. The PGP soaps are lucky due to the channel with AOL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I don't think that would be the reason tbh. Thinking about it, it's probably storyline related - I could see bio mom / dad eventually turning up (or maybe it's June as speculated) and wanting the children back. I could also see it being a part of the fall-out of Martin's secret being revealed now that he's backed down from a presidential campaign - his and Smitty's ability to be parents comes into question, which the bio parents use. They might've wanted the kids to be at a age where they could reliably speak for themselves what they prefer, but also have enough memories of their bio parent(s) not doing a good job. I'd also think that they might want to avoid having the image of this gay couple keeping a mother away from her small children, as it might skew the viewer to sympathise too much in one direction. 
    • Something self-defense is my guess, and I have a feeling maybe he was protecting someone close to him and the optics looked bad so Vernon/Anita covered it up (my guess maybe he was protecting Vernon/Anita).
    • If Reginald had had more dimensions he probably wouldn't have been killed off and Carl might not have been brought back to fill the international supervillain role. I think though that the Loves were also severely damaged by the way Nicole and Peter were made iredeemable and written out. I definitely feel that loss more than the loss of Reginald, primarily since they were good characters to begin with and were only ruined during this period.   
    • What if they were originally cast as Vanessa and Doug's twins and then were moved to Samantha/Tyrell when the show decided to delay introducing the twins? It's a shame they didn't stick with the original plan. BTW, does anybody have any new speculation on what Martin's secret will be? Brandon is hinting nobody is guessing it. Initially I thought it would be something where he was drunk and killed somebody or something like that but now I'm feeling like maybe it wasn't completely his fault. I don't get the vibe they're going to take him in a dark direction anymore.
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • I don't think some of Samantha's hairstyles have worked with the ponytails and bows making her look like an older adult wearing a 10-year-old hairstyle.    Bows work on Kat much better for Kat's age and personal style. We've known since the start that Eva was a hairstylist before she began working for Nicole.  I like that they brought that back, with Ted arranging for her to work at a high-end salon.  Yesterday's scene with Martin bringing Eva over for pizza with his family, and then Eva doing hairstyles for Samantha worked (for me). I did think that the new hairstyle that Eva created for Samantha was less "little girl" and somehow even though more mature, it made the actress Najah look less aged. Can't quite explain it, but she looks better now.
    • That backdoor pilot may have failed, yet one year later "Empty Nest" became a reality anyway, so it wasn't a complete waste of time. 

      Please register in order to view this content

      The show was completely revamped of course, but still....
    • Honestly, either 6-7 and 10-11 would've worked better. But maybe they wanted actors who wouldn't be held to child labour laws and needed them to be able to act, especially if they're (eventually?) going to go with their bio mama showing up (June??). 
    • I thought it interesting that in the Claybon/Manning youtube with Michael Fairman, Brandon Claybon said Samantha and Tyrell were initially supposed to be 6 and 7, but aged up for technical reasons, first aged up to 10 or 11, and then finally to 16 and 17.  (Not sure what "technical reasons" means but that's what he said.) Claybon didn't mention when this decision was made to change the ages of the children. No mention of when this happened during the process of casting/writing/preparation. Just speculating: I wonder if Najah Jackson and Jaden Lucas Miller were cast later than other recurring actors due to this change? - so maybe that's how they selected Ms. Jackson? 
    • Damn, there was a tiny pre-emption where I'm from and I missed the Kat/Nicole scene, according to recaps.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy