Jump to content

What the hell is with these HW's who know nothing


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Where's the article/proof that LML is watching the crap she dishes poor viewers herself?

She DID watch the show before taking over as part of her consulting job - that's what I remember. Then, she also watched B&B on her own and got acquainted with her favorite character ever then known as Amber now known as Pornbrosia. *rolls eyes*

To say the least, she learned nothing from either show...

In all honesty: Why should a writer watch his own show every day? Maybe I'm just baffled because I always picture the Bell shows where the writers like Bill Bell, Kay Alden, Brad Bell have always been in LA, had an office at the studio and there therefore too close to production so that they had to watch it on TV.

However, if that's not the case - the headwriter should be checking the stuff that reaches on-screen every once in a while. Bu I guess the influence is sometimes small anyway: Bill Bell always demanded full power and no meddling from the exec producer/network when it came to writing. I really doubt

that is the case nowadays except on B&B .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 22
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Isn't Latham both headwriter and producer? I'd think she's going to be at Y and R for awhile. It took years and a very high level of viewer dissatisfaction to get Higley fired. With LML being the double threat, she is that much more secure. Worse, Latham has been slowly turning over the writing/direction/production staff - they are now loyal to her.

It does take arrogance to admit you never watch the show you write. You may not watch it every day, but it is NOT something you should ever say in an interview. To admit you didn't even watch any after you took the writing position is very arrogant and Higley showed her arrogance in spades so many times, she should have been an ABC public relations nightmare. LML does have that level of arrogance, and it will turn off some longtime fans - but Y and R has a long way to go before losing the number one spot (almost 1.5 points).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

For several reasons actually...to see if the actor/actress is playing the material right...to see what sounds good coming out of the actors/character's mouth and what doesn't, to see how things were edited and if anything you did write(whether it be a script, breakdown, or otherwise) was removed due to time constraints or last-minute interference by the production company or the network.

There are just LOTS of reasons why writers need to, not only watch their own work, but observe what is going on other soaps too. Maybe we wouldn't have the amount of repetition that we do in daytime if the writers would step up and be competitive.

These days, it's all about "take what you can get."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Seeing how something plays out on screen is invaluable, it can give you ideas about characters you never thought of. The way actors interact is a source of inspiration too. How could someone who doesn't watch their show write to the strengths of a Tony Geary or Elizabeth Hubbard - people who ad lib to high heaven anyway? And what a better way to know what's NOT WORKING. You can't just rely on what's written down and expect it to be the way you imagined it. It's all different when it's acted out on a set in costumes. LML is not only the head writer. If she doesn't even watch Y&R as it's executive producer, security should drag her off the lot pronto.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think if you compare the headwriter role with equivalents in other industries, you can see why they should be watching and it comes down to ultimate responsibility. No ad exec would put together the key components of a major campaign and not bother looking at the finished product. These people should be protecting their reputations.

And let's be honest, when the episodes are parred down minus commercials and titles/credits, they run to little more than 35 minutes (18 for B&B). It's really not much to ask.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Pretty accurate but I feel like most fans complain about the opposite of #2: they want more fresh blood. I myself do prefer the vets, but they're not sidelined... they don't have story but that's because no one has story. They get plenty of airtime though. That one feels more like a generic soap viewer complaint. The rest of this is very on point.
    • If this was a Ron episode, Sarah’s choking would’ve lasted almost the entire episode. Javi being revealed as a firefighter EMT and Sarah chastising Xander for wanting to go after Chanel/Sweet Bits the cliffhanger. I’m glad there’s actual movement and progression in these episodes. I vaguely remember Cwikly and Brash tenure being the same with their daily episodes 
    • https://www.tvinsider.com/1180503/denise-alexander-dead-general-hospital-lesley-webber Denise Alexander died March 5th & I'm so sad.  The first soap storyline I remember was Susan Hunter Martin (Denise Alexander) & David Martin & Julie Olson & poor little baby Dickie on DAYS.  I followed her to GH, Lesley.  I followed her to AW, Mary/Marisa.  I followed her back to GH.  About her, Christopher Schemering said  In soap magazine polls she was voted Best Actress over & over.  Schemering, C. (1987). The Soap Opera Encyclopedia. Ballantine Books.
    • Good point. In addition to being a great character in her own right, she had chemistry with almost everyone on the show. A Jake/Paulina/Iris triangle would have been a lot of fun. If 1994 AW aired in 2025, I doubt Iris would have even considered to be on the chomping block. All the shows now are noticeably less youth obsessed compared to the 90s.
    • I wrote my previous post about Dante being on a 3-day rant while I was at the 30-minute mark of the show. By the end, Dante was back to being reasonable and kind and understanding of everyone and everything. OK, I get it. We all knew that sooner or later we'd get the wise Dante. The mistake was showing him berate Jason IN THE SAME EPISODE and imply he's a lousy father.
    • I think Dante has a larger GH fanbase than both Ava and Nina character wise.  Both CW and MW have a built in fanbase outside GH which isn't really indictive of the characters, IMO.
    • Just this fan's opinion but I have said these writers are the most plot opportunistic maybe ever! They will have any character say just about anything if it advances whatever plot point they have in their minds atm. I think if Dante's POV right now was defensible people would be running it up the flag pole. The fanbase thing you're describing to me it just means they're going to continue to like their fave no matter what. 
    • I think the difference between the head writer change at Days vs GH is that the day to day episode quality at GH was still lacking while the day to day episode quality has improved. And now that there appears to be some depth to the episode content... the limitations of some of the performers on Days is more apparent (i.e. Leo, Alex, Sophia, Cat). However, Rome wasn't built/rebuilt in a day so I'm waiting to see how things are in three to four months once some of the threads/stories from Ron's era are tied up/resolved.. and Ford/Cwikly's long term content kicks off
    • That would be me. hehe. Keeping track of who I liked better and how it informed what would happen from episode to episode. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy