Jump to content

OLTL Discussion: Week of July 16th


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I'm not one to notice things like lightening, but I sure noticed OLTL's today. I hate the lighting at Roady's. The way it's dark and then it seems like there is a blue spotlight coming down on the person. Nat looked awful today and so did John due to that horrid lighting.

How much longer can they drag this situation with Todd out? It's really starting to piss me off. So glad they gave TSJ the big bucks so he could play unconscious for a month. :angry: I love Todd, but let's move the drama forward please!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I'll ask the question. How is having a bunch of guests that most love back for two episodes and then gone a great intro for the new writer? Killing Asa might have potential as a good story. Time will tell on that one although I agree that a final exit for the character is better than his languishing in nonexistence. Still the funeral sounds like one of FV's stunts and nothing more. Certainly it will be great to see Kevin, Joey, Max and Cord but then what? They all vanish and we go back to the same old same. If the funeral was being used as a way to restore some of the favorites to the show I might more impressed with it as an intro for RC's work. Instead it appears to be more bait and switch. RC's going to have to do better than offering up an illusion.

To the David story, so far it's previewed as a story involving three characters not on contract and with no announced plans to have them on the show. Again what is the story I'm supposed to want to tune in to watch because so far a story that revolves around characters not in Llanview isn't much of an incentive to tune in to see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This is from the Paul Satterfield message board at his website in response to a fan's question. I know he made the post on June 12, but notice how long he says we will be seeing dead Spencer.....looks like we haven't seen the last of the late doctor......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I like them better than Rex and Adrianna. Rex has become so holier than thou lately. It's just annoying seeing him screaming and lecturing her all the tme. I'd sure like to see him be Sexy Rexy again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree Jay. Every story has potential IMO. In Higley's case it's the execution that inevitably failed. People who look to couples or characters and just think shifting them back and forth in terms of the focus makes any difference are short sighted (IMHO). It's how the stories or woven together and how the interaction is played and defined. I am loving John and Blair in scenes. Just because it's different and shows a different dynamic for him. I liked seeing Rex and Michael again. I always enjoy their scenes. Natalie and Blair yesterday were good. I would love to see more of that. The same people in scenes everyday gets flat. Frons may say "I want a TnB reunion" but it's up the headwriter to create a reunion that makes sense and show how that impacts everybody on the canvas. Viki being totally absorbed with Jessica right now and seemingly having no awareness that Todd's even missing is DH all the way. I strongly anticipate that RC will not fall into those same kinds of mistakes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I enjoyed Wednesday's episode. I too hope we don't see a return to Jolie. I like Natalie and want to see her in a story of her own. I'm still not comfortable with Clint and Dorian, but at least I'm getting to see them.

I think Jessica and Nash have a great chemistry. I also enjoyed seeing a little bit of the ol sarcastic Jess that I haven't seen since Tess was around. I so hope we get to see much more of the fun Jess in the future.

I don't care who killed Spencer. My unpopular opinion: I liked this version of Paige. It was the first time the character had a career and we saw the career. Having a career woman on this show was nice and I thought the actress was very good and believable. I also liked her with Bo. Of course, I don't see the point in re-creating the Bo, Nora, Lindsey triangle. I know others feel strongly about Bo and Nora so I hope that is what happens and happens quickly. I do think the actress who played Paige this time did a nice job and it's unfortunate she got caught up in the newbie backlash. It's my opinion the backlash wasn't aimed at the actress but at the heavy focus for such a long time on a newbie character.

Finally, I believe I'm seeing the RC influence a bit in some stories. I think Jess and Nash are light and funny again. I think Bo is the principled son of an ends justifies the means dad again. I think most of the Buchs are becoming themselves again. The one exception remains Dorian and Clint, but that is my opinion.

Now Jay, LOL, I agree that Dena was a bad writer, and that Frons was blamed for more than he should have been. However, I do think Frank and Frons share in a lot of the problems with OLTL. I do think you are right that Frons doesn't deserve as much blame as he gets. He deserves some though and Frank deserves more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I know how you feel about Frank. I think EP's should report to Head Writers, and yes I know it sounds funny. Ultimately, it is the Head Writer who is writing the story, so they should decide who they are bringing back. I know now, that the HW's pitch possible stories to the EP, and they approve, or not, but I think the HW should have final say. And Jess, I can see a little bit of Valentini's hackness. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's interesting. I think the HW is making all the decisions anyway so perhaps they should have that authority. It seems that Valentini has either recognized or been told he needs to take responsibility. This is his writer and he has said so. I think that is for the good. You know, right now, the only story that I believe RC is writing that I don't agree with is Dorian and Clint. Many other viewers love it. I don't have to like everything. Overall I'm feeling pretty good about this show! :) I think Ron might be exactly what OLTL needed right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • It seemed to be your intent. coming into a thread I started and making multiple posts saying my data was wrong. In the next paragraph you say "Of course, I was suspicious from the very first instance where what I saw & heard did not agree with what it should have.  I'm very glad to know why." That certainly didn't stop you from immediately saying the data was wrong, until I provided additional receipts. Why did you not check the daily episode guide (for instance, this one for the 1980's) I posted for the world to see for exactly this reason...to help confirm airdates: http://daytimeroyaltyonline.com/days-daily-summaries-1980-1989-t15361.html? That is what you should be checking BEFORE you make any posts in the future like this, trying to suggest something from my data is incorrect. You could have also messaged me and asked me why your dates weren't adding up with what the correct data is. I would have fast forwarded through that video you posted, spotted Roman and Hope and immediately have told you that was the 11/1/83 episode.
    • Jason, just let me say that it was not my intent to any way impugn any of your data  or research. I'm very sorry if it came out that way. Obviously the person I got these 4 November episodes from has mislabeled files, multiples, which I was certainly unaware of.  When I am editing it is all about what I see & hear. Later, I find time for greater reflection.  Of course, I was suspicious from the very first instance where what I saw & heard did not agree with what it should have.  I'm very glad to know why.  If you find you are no longer interested in the edit, that is fine. I have no ego in this. I did it only to share it.
    • I feel like Vernon and Anita need to not be hypocrites and try and take the heat off Bill in this case. It's clear that the family used him as a fixer and especially knowing he helped with Martin's situation, they need to either be quiet or support him. BTW...with Vanessa being in the hospital for food poisoning, am I the only one who thought Shanice was gonna say she's pregnant or had an STD? The only reason I say STD is because she hasn't had any memorable sex partners, but I definitely don't believe she just had food poisoning.
    • Yeah, I mean I know that the name still pertains. I just laugh at it not now being called Arizona Dust, but, I admit it simply does not have the same ring to it. Above, that is interesting that Arizona had already come up before the crisis. 
    • Leslie and her family are from Chicago? Anita's background also includes being a former Chi-Town native? Might they connect this and go somewhere with it?
    • Honestly who's to say Leslie even birthed Eva, I mean she's a liar, I wouldn't believe a word she says about Eva being Ted's(or hers)
    •   1. 11/1/83 cast/set list:  

      Please register in order to view this content

          The "11/2/83" video you posted of Ruth Buzzi's scenes includes Roman and Hope in them, meaning the video you posted is actually 11/1/83, since Roman and Hope aren't in 11/2/83.   2. The video you posted of "11/2/83" has scenes with Roman and Hope. As you can see from my cast/set list, Roman and Hope are not in the 11/2/83 episode (see above note):   4573...11/2/83: Cast: Mickey, Julie, Doug, Maggie, Neil, Don, Marie, Alex, Liz, Andre as Tony, Gwen, Chris, Eugene, Sandy, Letitia, Charlene, Mrs. Whiting, Wanda/Guard, Dave, Delia, Saleslady # 1, Saleslady # 2, Figure in Dark, Raven/animal, Cats/animals, Birds/animals.   2.  11/3/83 :My video collection starts with 11/4/83. so I don't have the 11/1/83 or 11/3/83 video, but in addition to the cast/set list for 11/3/83, here is also the parking clearance call sheet for that day, showing Ruth was not only in the cast/set list but did work that day:     They even had hired the animal trainer and all the animals for the day, so It's sort of a certainty that her scenes were not cut that day, or it would have been a big waste of the budget. 3. As for 11/7/83, I just fast-forwarded through that whole episode myself. Letitia is in it from start to finish. It's her big final episode where she is killed. She starts the episode saying "Eugene, are you there?" In the next act, Marlena shows up and meets Letitia's lion. Later in the episode, Letitia is killed by "Eugene" (the Salem Slasher in a Eugene mask).   So, as we can see from your own post, the 11/2/83 date you have listed on that video is incorrect, since Hope and Roman are in that video but not in the 11/2/83 episode.It seems the dates you have on all your early November 1983 episodes are incorrect.   When you post videos and suggest that my data is incorrect, do you not first compare who is in the scenes and see if that matches who is in the episode? You didn't do that with the "11/2/83" episode, which based on Roman and Hope being in it means that is actually 11/1/83. Best to do something like that first before suggesting my data and research is incorrect.
    • Within the Dupree family, I predict Vernon/Anita will be conflicted about what to do about Bill and his role in the whole Ted/Silk Press Sheila situation... especially since Bill knows where the particular bone about Martin is buried. Dani, Chelsea, and Naomi's reactions to what Bill possibly did isn't hard to guess.. but Hayley's reactions will be interesting to hear.  Especially given her recent pregnancy scare.. she might not be so much on Bill's side, or she'll totally surprise us and be totally on Bill's side.   Either way, I think Martin's secret will be the main focus in May sweeps.. with the fall out of the Eva secret playing out in the background... while the Joey/Vanessa/Doug thing continues to boil/develop.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy