Jump to content

AMC: Do you think the new head writers will turn AMC around?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 154
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Am I the only one who is thinking that people are giving Brian Frons WAY too much credit for having WAY too much power? :unsure: I doubt the American Broadcasting Company and the Walt Disney corporation would just give him sooo much power. The man answers to at least one person -- if not a whole buncha persons. Isn't former ABCD president, Angela Shapiro one of his superiors?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What i also like in the article is that they want to bring driversity back! McT wrote off Reggie, Danielle. That could have been a great couple with potential! I hope they can write Character driven stories!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes it is an overstated idea that everything begins and ends with Brian Frons. Yes he has executives to answer to at ABC and with Disney. His predecessor at his post and his eventual successor have had and shall have the same situation poised at them. At many daytime soap message boards , that talk about the ABC soaps, nearly everyone say that all the problems the soaps have start with Brian Frons. Just too easy an explaination and answer for a complex situation that can't be taken care of overnight. When you consider the network executives that both ABC and Disney have running the soaps along with their meddling focus groups and how they inject their input on how to run the ABC soaps on a daily basis without having any kind of experience in writting ,directing, or producing soap operas, then you understand the problems facing these soaps in the long run. These execs care about the bottom line in terms of advertising dollars and nothing more. If it was just Brian Frons that was the only reason these soaps are the way they are ABC daytime would be in much better shape than it is now. Network involvement on a daily basis makes that highly unlikely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Good luck to you AMC fans, but all I know from these two at Days is that from the time that they were hired to the time they were announced as the new head writers at AMC was the most boring, worst period of "Days of our Lives" that I can ever remember. Maybe it was just a coincidence that they were the script editors or whatever it was during that slow, dull time and not their fault, but I can't say I am sad at all that they are gone. While "Days" still has a lot of flaws the writing is so much fresher and the pacing is infinitely better, just as it was last fall before these two were brought in last January.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

yes and NO!

Yes, PC was behind PASSIONS in the ratings around the time Jim Brown and Barbara Estenten took over. However, once they started in with their supernatural arcs bull(no matter whose idea it was), the ratings took even more of a nosedive from a position of 2.0-2.4 to a 1.5-1.9.

Please note that even though PC's ratings were in the toilet around the time Karen Harris left, it was Brown and Esenten who flushed them down with their inane crap.

I don't even watch AMC anymore, but I am just careful about saying anything optimistic about any HW. Because they usually start off really good and then they crash and burn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

PC's ratings were low, but for it being aired in alot less markets, it sure wasn't that far behind Passions in ratings despite that. IMO that's pretty damn good.

They're not responsible for any shows being cancelled, alot of those shows were on their last legs anyways. PC was a network thing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I could see Agnes maybe be OK with the story (though I admit it's a stretch). Ok, the fetus was saved. FINE. The main problem with the story, was that Erica's reason for the abortion was rewritten. They SHOULD have kept it so that she DIDN'T feel the need to continually appologize for the abortion, did it because she was a model and DID NOT want to be a mother. That's that. I couldn't stand watching Erica talk about her Kendall trauma because that's NOT THE REASON. Again, writing was the problem.

'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah, but they never got a nomination for writing PC, and a few months later, the poor show was canceled. LOL!

Honestly, a fairer comparison would be their work on GL. B&E spent a good part of their soap writing career as breakdown writers for GL, so they knew some history about the show. Where their first year on GL was good, everything after was beyond terrible and overly sensationalistic, talk about plot-driven crap. They totally neglected the rich history of the show, which was a shame, since they already had a history of being apart of the writing staff for the show.

Let's keep in mind that B&E have no prior history with AMC, which in IMO is a receipt for disaster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Good point. But in the interview they did say that they watched AMC when they were grwoing up. Even though they had a bad track record, all the shows cancelling was not all their falt. I have some faith in them because they are coming up with a "big" storyline that involves Erica, Jack ect.. I really do hope that they can write were Greenlee is more tolarable!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The only way to make Greenlee more tolerable is to get rid of her!! Her return has been a complete disaster. And the possibility of a Rylee redux, makes me gag.

I have yet to be impressed with anything these new writers have said. I have to laugh at the comment they made about joining a show that isn't struggling and is in good shape. Have they seen the latest ratings for AMC??? They are dropping like Days has and look how hard Days is trying to regain their audience. I just don't get the sense that these writers think AMC is in trouble and drastic changes have to be made to improve the show. When they start getting a sense of urgency and bring back vets and focus on core characters, I will feel better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's like saying a crap show deserved their nomination.

"Oh, the show was a POS all year, but because they put on one good show New Years Eve, they deserve to be nominated."

And YES, PC's ratings were low, there's no doubt about that. But when Brown/Esenten took over, the quality of the show plummeted as did the ratings into mid 1's territory.

God, I'm having flashbacks of Santoses and San Cristobel. It makes me sick everytime my GL watching friend mentions that as the best period of GL.

I'll take what we have now anyday over San frickin Cristobel and the Santoses.

IIRC, PASSIONS was PC's biggest competition when Karen Harris took over. She was able to score at least one week where the show surpassed PASSIONS in the ratings. They were usually neck-to-neck with PC at like a 2.0 or 2.1 and PASSIONS as a 2.2 or 2.3.

Once Brown/Esenten took over, the ratings eroded. PASSIONS stayed strong with their 2.0-2.4 range, but PC dove further into the depths of hell, getting household numbers of 1.5-1.8, on a GOOD week.

PC wasn't on its last legs when Brown/Esenten took over. ABC just didn't want to give Karen Harris time to build an audience that wanted entertaining, yet competent storytelling and took the "shock and awe" route, which failed miserably on their part. You don't give a new Head Writer on a fairly new soap eight months to turn things around. Again, IIRC, The ratings were stable when Karen Harris took over. They fell when Brown/Esenten took over.

PC was certainly not on its last legs creatively during that period, unlike when Brown/Esenten took over and they began to repeat the same damn vampire bull OVER and OVER again.

I can't talk about LOVING, because I wasn't there for that. THE CITY(their own creation) was awesome, but I think it was moreso for the acting and the technological marvel and less because of the story. From the things I read, after the first two/three months, THE CITY 's stories didn't move anywhere until the Masquerader Mystery and the Azure is a tranny story. Even Michael Logan referred to it in a review/writeup as "THE CITY that always sleeps."

And I don't need to bring up the Santos clan or San Cristobel again. Once was enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • After Season 1 they jumped to Season 25. I queried why but they didn’t reply. They’ve also added the episodes to their on-demand section too (as well as live streaming them)  Oddly, some S25 episodes are the longer 21-22 minute edit used for international distribution, but the majority appear to be the shorter US edit. They also blur out the B&B web-address at the end of the credits which I can’t fathom why. They’re also very diligent in ensuring the ‘BBL Distribution’ slide is cut from the very end too - there’s an abrupt fade out of the music which typically would overlay into the distribution credit. 

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Dante jumps to conclusions Remember when Dillion went with the Spencer's to help Lucky in 2015 Dante assumed an affair andslept with Valerie then called lulu a wĥore  Only after explaining did Dante apologize
    • Did anyone see this? It was really good and far more important to the future of the MCU than people expected. The fact is its not a Thunderbolts film but stealth

      Please register in order to view this content

        This was definitely Yelena's movie. I love how she was utilized
    • A lot of very interesting commentary, thanks! Thoughtful, considered, etc.  I found myself chuckling since as a current fan of GH one thing we lack is romance. Here, you're complaining about too much. I sure get it when it manifests as Fight about G, make up, Fight About G again. That's a stuck couple, right? Who needs it?!!!  Wrong Donna, yeah, sorry, it has to be survived. The Right Donna DOES return.  Criticisms of Felicia Gallant .... No comment. 
    • Brooke was a commercial mainstay back in the day.. she probably made more money and treated better doing that then how she was sort of treated by the show during her time on the show. Ironically.. Kelly was born and raised in the Chicago suburbs

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I am probably veering more toward the classic thread, but I felt like her original run had her more as a moral voice for the Quartermaines than was needed (I thought her connections with Sonny and Brenda made more sense).  Sonny, Carly and Jason are all suffering the consequences of being too prominent for too long. They are above any relationships due being unable to form human connections. I do still wonder just what their original plans were for Jason this time, if they even had any.
    • Perhaps Lujack/Beth should have been the other couple involved in that location story with Tony/Annabelle instead of Claire/Fletcher or Jim.   Since Lujack was a Spaulding, the whole fallout could have caused him to further distance himself from having anything to do with Spaulding and Alexandra and as a result, pushes Beth away and potentially back in Phillip's direction. Out of the three Pam Long major mystery/action stories in her first stint.. the fishing mystery story was probably the best... although I did kind of enjoy parts of Infinity and the cabin mystery stories as well.    
    • I’m now realizing all of Nick and Sharon’s screen time last month all revolved around Phyllis and then they took a “trip” to visit Noah and still haven’t been back? That’s super lame. They should be involved in a lot more and COULD be, especially where any of the Newmans are concerned (Sharon in particular, since I don’t care much for Nick unless he is in the presence of Sharon). 
    • Now, you are just not being grateful for the right things!!! There was not even ONE Elvis on velvet!!!! I want to say how magnificent I think it was that we are so unified in our condemnation of the show giving little Ally to Sam & Amanda, so quickly & relatively young & so newly married. Paul, here, I love your description of a different couple that they could have been.  Xanthe, I similarly love your suggestion here, a GREAT one, of how if they simply MUST do the bambino thing how they could have made it better by giving Amanda a very realistic struggle with becoming a mom, etc.    So, I'm sorry that most of us would put Sandra Feguson/Robinson smack in the middle of any pack, as average, but it's nice that some of us saw more, substance, when we got to Brunette Amanda!!  FAST FUN FACT, gleaned from a Locher room: Tucci is not only lucky enough to be Stanley Tucci's baby sister but she & Lorna #1, Alicia Coppola are besties & godparents to each others kiddos & talk on the phone every day.     
    • Sharina?  @alwaysAMC I am glad you've kept writing about the Brent story all the way through. I think that Beaty may have had to briefly leave again, rather than scenes being aired out of sequence, but I'm not sure.  You are right that the reveals of Brent's various reasons for being what he was bog down the end of the story a bit, although based on what is to come in 1996 I still kind of wish Beaty had stayed another year.  I'd forgotten J and Michelle were tied to the end of the story. This J is generally just gross. I don't really remember much of anyone caring about Nadine dying outside of her family. The worst part was Frank just giving a rose and saying it was from Harley, which made me very mad at the time. I am not sure if Beth Ehlers was asked to return and declined. Luckily this is addressed when she does return.   I felt like it was one of those stories that was done via mandate - trying to keep the ratings gains they had, via more location shoots, more adventures, more secrets, etc. Tony, Annabelle and Jim were thrown in as they were meant to be important to the show at the time.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy